
GE2025: WP defends turf but gains no inroads, to be only opposition party in parliament
SINGAPORE: The Workers' Party ended the 2025 polls as the only opposition party to be elected to parliament, having won 10 seats in total, though this likely comes as cold comfort to the party, which was eyeing 26 seats across eastern Singapore.
Once results were tallied, the party failed to make gains in any new constituencies, but entrenched its incumbent positions in Aljunied GRC, Sengkang GRC and Hougang SMC.
Its winning margins increased in both Sengkang GRC – 56.31 per cent this year versus 52.13 per cent in 2020 – and Hougang SMC – 62.17 per cent this year versus 61.19 per cent in 2020 – while in Aljunied GRC its vote share of 59.68 per cent was just marginally lower than the 59.93 per cent it received in 2020.
The party will also be offered two non-constituency MP seats, having lost by the slimmest of margins in two constituencies – it garnered 48.53 per cent of votes in Jalan Kayu SMC and 47.37 per cent in Tampines GRC, which was a four-way race.
If there are fewer than 12 opposition candidates voted in after an election, the "best losers" from among the opposition candidates are offered seats as NCMPs, to guarantee a minimum number of opposition members in parliament.
Party chief Pritam Singh declined to speak to the media after the election results were announced, but each team of candidates took the stage at Serangoon Stadium to thank supporters and volunteers.
While thanking Aljunied GRC residents following the party's win, Mr Singh said: "It was always going to be a difficult election. The slate is wiped clean, we start work again tomorrow, and we go again.
"Your support has been so important in the mission of achieving and working towards a more balanced parliament – that work also continues."
He added that the WP's Aljunied GRC team will serve everyone equally, including those who had voted for the PAP.
THIN MARGINS
Jalan Kayu SMC, which was a showdown between WP's newcomer Andre Low and the People's Action Party's Ng Chee Meng, turned out to be the tightest contest of GE2025.
The 56-year-old Mr Ng, who was running in his third General Election, clinched 14,113 votes while Mr Low, a former lawyer, took 13,307 votes in the newly formed constituency.
In an address to WP supporters at Serangoon Stadium after the results were announced, Mr Low said that while the outcome was "not what we hoped for", he respected it as part of the "democratic process that is at the heart of our nation".
The race for Jalan Kayu had gained a lot of attention as it reignited a debate around Mr Ng's handling of the aborted deal between Income Insurance and German insurer Allianz. Mr Ng is secretary-general of the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), which owns Income.
The contest grabbed headlines for a very different reason late into the hustings, when some of Mr Low's vulgarity-laden Telegram messages were leaked, which led to him issuing an apology.
The second-thinnest margin of the night was in Tampines GRC, despite it being a four-way race and the WP's first time contesting the constituency.
At the end of the night, the PAP team led by Minister for Social and Family Development Masagos Zulkifli came out victorious with 52.02 per cent of the vote, while WP achieved 47.37 per cent.
The National Solidarity Party (NSP) and People's Power Party (PPP), which also ran, earned only 0.43 per cent and 0.18 per cent respectively.
Mr Faisal Manap, who led the WP's Tampines team, told supporters at Serangoon Stadium in Malay that their belief had helped his team to "compete with all their heart".
He thanked voters for all their support and their prayers throughout the campaign. He also conveyed his congratulations to the PAP team and said he hoped that its leader, Mr Masagos, who is also Minister-in-Charge of Muslim Affairs, would become an even better MP going forward.
Mr Faisal's outing in Tampines GRC was a surprise – the former Aljunied GRC MP made it known only on Nomination Day that he was leading a five-member team to contest the constituency.
Some netizens quickly framed the contest as a showdown between two Malay-Muslim leaders, which Mr Faisal addressed by saying that he did not see himself as going up against Mr Masagos, but rather as being the minority candidate of the team.
Mr Singh also said that while Mr Faisal is a representative of the Malay-Muslim community, neither he nor any of the other WP candidates would represent only their communities.
The race for Tampines also drew much attention as the authorities warned about foreign interference in the election, following several Facebook posts that mixed religion and politics and called on Muslim voters to support Mr Faisal.
The WP spoke out against the interference after the authorities raised the issue, with Mr Singh saying the party cannot be a successful political party if it "plays the race and religion card".
PUNGGOL, TAMPINES CHANGKAT A "STEP FORWARD"
The newly formed Punggol GRC was another key battleground, with WP fielding a team led by its star candidate Harpreet Singh Nehal.
Through the course of the campaign, the opposition party had focused its attacks on its opponents, specifically Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong.
At an Apr 28 rally, Mr Pritam Singh told voters in Punggol GRC to send "a strong message" to the PAP.
And again during WP's final rally on May 1, Mr Pritam Singh said that Mr Gan would not have been fielded in the new GRC if he was indispensable.
But the PAP team helmed by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong eventually won with 55.17 per cent of the vote.
Speaking to supporters at Serangoon Stadium after the results were announced, WP candidate Jackson Au said the results were not what they had hoped for, but his team would respect the voters' decision.
He added that while his team did not prevail at the ballot box, their commitment to the people of Singapore will not change.
"If anything, this result tells us that we will continue to speak up, to serve and to stand by all Singaporeans," said Mr Au, a first-time candidate. "This is not the end. This is just another step forward."
Over at Tampines Changkat SMC, WP candidate Kenneth Foo lost to PAP's Desmond Choo. Mr Foo garnered 43.83 per cent of the vote against Mr Choo's 56.17 per cent.
Addressing supporters at Serangoon Stadium, Mr Foo congratulated Mr Choo but promised to return for another fight.
"We'll continue to do the good work in Tampines Changkat SMC to make sure that one day the Workers' Party will win Tampines Changkat SMC," he said, to cheers from thousands of supporters.
SUPPORTERS DISAPPOINTED BUT HOPEFUL
WP supporters who gathered at Serangoon Stadium and at a coffee shop along 322 Hougang Avenue 5 – a gathering spot for the party's supporters at every election – had mixed reactions when they spoke to CNA.
First-time voter Kishan R, who stayed at Serangoon Stadium until the very end of the announcement of results, said he was disappointed that the WP had not gained more seats than it had at the 2020 election.
"But at the end of the day, I feel like … you can't really do much about it," said the 23-year-old full-time national serviceman. He felt that the WP had stood a good chance in Jalan Kayu SMC.
"He had so much going for him," said Mr Kishan, referring to Mr Low. But the Aljunied resident was thankful that the party retained Aljunied GRC, where he lives.
Like him, many other supporters were surprised by the results for Jalan Kayu SMC.
Jalan Kayu resident Jason Koh, 44, was disappointed as he thought Mr Low had a good chance of securing a seat in parliament, even though he is a rookie and his opponent Mr Ng was previously a Cabinet minister.
Ms Siti, 30, an educator, said that the close margins in the wards WP contested meant that the PAP could not be "complacent in the next few years".
"We've given them a good fight, and hopefully next election the WP will contest Jalan Kayu SMC and the other wards," said the Hougang SMC resident.
Accountant Muhammad, 36, who only goes by one name and is a long-time supporter of the WP, said that Jalan Kayu SMC was an upset but also expected.
"It's like David and Goliath – you have a big shot from PAP who is NTUC chief versus a pretty new guy from the WP," said Mr Muhammad as he watched the results at the coffee shop in Hougang.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
16 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Myanmar junta says UN labour resolution ‘politically motivated'
Myanmar has hit back at a UN resolution aimed at curbing labour violations in the war-torn nation. PHOTO: AFP BANGKOK - Myanmar's ruling military on June 7 hit back at a UN resolution aimed at curbing labour violations in the war-torn nation, calling it 'politically motivated'. The International Labour Organisation (ILO) on June 5 invoked Article 33 of its Constitution, which could see sanctions imposed against the military authorities which seized power in a 2021 coup. The United Nations' labour agency said countries should ensure their relations with Myanmar 'in no way enable, facilitate or prolong the violations of workers' rights in respect of freedom of association and forced labour.' It called on international bodies to 'report any activities... directly or indirectly enabling or abetting' labour violations under Myanmar's junta government. On June 7, Myanmar's labour ministry released a statement saying the resolution had been adopted 'without due partiality and fairness' and was based on 'politically motivated approaches'. A UN investigation into Myanmar in October 2023 urged the country's military rulers to end forced labour in the army and to halt all violence against trade unionists. It found far-reaching violations of international forced labour and freedom of association conventions in the South-east Asian nation. The resolution adopted on June 5 at the ILO's 113th International Labour Conference in Geneva said Myanmar's military authorities had not indicated 'any sign of meaningful acknowledgement' of the 2023 report's recommendations. Myanmar said it had been 'actively implementing' the recommendations and had made 'continuous progress' and accused the ILO of 'turning a blind eye' to its efforts. The International Trade Union Confederation – Asia Pacific said it was the third time in the ILO's century-long history that Article 33 has been invoked. Myanmar has been in turmoil since the military ousted the democratically-elected civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi in a February 2021 coup. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Japan trade negotiator Akazawa says he made progress in US tariff talks
The latest round of talks may be the last in-person meeting between Japanese and US officials before the upcoming Group of Seven leaders summit. PHOTO: REUTERS Japan trade negotiator Akazawa says he made progress in US tariff talks TOKYO - Japan had made some progress in a fifth round of trade talks with US officials aimed at ending tariffs that are hurting Japan's economy, Tokyo's chief tariff negotiator said. 'Tariffs have already been imposed on autos, auto parts, steel and aluminium, and some of them have doubled to 50 per cent along with 10 per cent general tariff. These are causing daily losses to Japan's economy,' Mr Ryosei Akazawa, said in Washington on June 6 after talks with officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Mr Akazawa declined to say what progress they had made. The latest round of talks may be the last in-person meeting between senior Japanese and US officials before the Group of Seven (G-7) leaders summit that starts on June 15, where US President Donald Trump is expected to meet Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba. Japan also faces a 24 per cent tariff rate starting in July unless it can negotiate a deal with Washington. 'We want an agreement as soon as possible. The G-7 summit is on our radar, and if our leaders meet, we want to show what progress has been made,' Mr Akazawa said. 'Still we must balance urgency with a need to guard our national interests,' he added. In May, Japan's trade negotiator said US defence equipment purchases, shipbuilding technology collaboration, a revision of automobile import standards and an increase in agricultural imports could be bargaining chips in tariff talks. In a bid to reach an agreement with the US, Japan is also proposing a mechanism to reduce the auto tariff rate based on how much countries contribute to the US auto industry, the Asahi newspaper reported on June 6. Mr Akazawa said Japan's position has not changed and that the tariffs are not acceptable. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.


AsiaOne
5 hours ago
- AsiaOne
From bros to foes: How the unlikely Trump-Musk relationship imploded, World News
WASHINGTON - When Donald Trump met privately with White House officials on Wednesday (June 4), there was little to suggest that the US president was close to a public break with Elon Musk, the billionaire businessman who helped him win a second term in office. Two White House officials familiar with the matter said Trump expressed confusion and frustration in the meeting about Musk's attacks on his sweeping tax and spending bill. But he held back, the officials said, because he wanted to preserve Musk's political and financial support ahead of the 2026 midterm election. By Thursday afternoon, Trump's mood had shifted. He had not spoken to Musk since the attacks began and was fuming over what one White House aide described as a "completely batshit" tirade by the Tesla CEO on X, his social media platform. On Friday, a White House official said Trump was not interested in talking to Musk and no phone call between the two men was planned for the day. Musk had blasted Trump's tax bill as fiscally reckless and a "disgusting abomination." He vowed to oppose any Republican lawmaker who supported it. The bill would fulfil many of Trump's priorities while adding, according to the Congressional Budget Office, US$2.4 trillion (S$3 trillion) to the US$36.2-trillion US public debt. Privately, Trump had called Musk volatile. On Thursday, he told his team, it was time to take the gloves off. Sitting next to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters he was "very disappointed" in his former adviser. Musk quickly hit back on social media, and the back-and-forth devolved from there. "The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's government subsidies and contracts," Trump posted on Truth Social, his social media site. Within minutes, Musk said it might be time to create a new political party and endorsed a post on X from Ian Miles Cheong, a prominent Musk supporter and right-wing activist, calling for Trump's impeachment. The depth of the Trump-Musk relationship at its height was unprecedented in Washington - a sitting president granting a billionaire tech CEO access and influence inside the White House and throughout his government. Musk spent nearly US$300 million backing Trump's campaign and other Republicans last year. For months, Musk played both insider and disruptor - shaping policy conversations behind the scenes, amplifying Trump's agenda to millions online, and attacking the bureaucracy and federal spending through his self-styled Department of Government Efficiency. Just last week, Trump hosted a farewell for Musk and declared that "Elon is really not leaving." Now he had not only left but had turned into a top critic. Hours after Trump's Oval Office remarks, a third White House official expressed surprise at Musk's turnaround. It "caught the president and the entire West Wing off guard," she said. Musk did not respond to emails seeking comment about the downturn in relations. His super PAC spending group, America PAC, and spokeswoman Katie Miller did not respond to calls and texts requesting comment. In a statement, the White House called the breakup an "unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted." From allies to adversaries The Musk-Trump breakup sent Tesla's stock price plunging 14 per cent on Thursday and drove uncertainty among Trump's allies in Congress, who are working to pass the monumental spending package that Democrats and a small number of vocal Republicans oppose. Tesla shares clawed back from steep losses on Friday. The breakup could reshape both men's futures. For Trump, losing Musk's backing threatens his growing influence among tech donors, social media audiences, and younger male voters - key groups that may now be harder to reach. It could also complicate fundraising ahead of next year's midterm elections. For Musk, the stakes are potentially even higher. The break risks intensified scrutiny of his business practices that could jeopardise government contracts and invite regulatory probes, which might threaten his companies' profits. Some of Musk's friends and associates were stunned by the fallout, with a number of them only recently expressing confidence that the partnership would endure, according to two other sources familiar with the dynamics. The split had been simmering for weeks, said the first two White House officials, but the breaking point was over personnel: Trump's decision to pull his nomination of Jared Isaacman, Musk's hand-picked candidate to be Nasa administrator. "He was not happy" about Isaacman, one of the White House officials said of Musk. Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur and close Musk ally, was seen as key to advancing Musk's vision for space exploration and commercial space ventures. After his nomination was scuttled, Isaacman posted on X: "I am incredibly grateful to President Trump, the Senate and all those who supported me." The move was viewed within the administration as a direct snub to Musk, the two officials said, signaling a loss of political clout and deepening the rift between him and Trump's team. Before the Isaacman episode, top White House aides behind the scenes had already begun limiting Musk's influence - quietly walking back his authority over staffing and budget decisions. Trump himself reinforced that message in early March, telling his cabinet that department secretaries, not Musk, had the final say over agency operations. At the same time, Musk began to hint that his time in government would come to a close, while expressing frustration at times that he could not more aggressively cut spending. His threats and complaints about Trump's bill grew louder, but inside the White House, few believed they would seriously alter the course of the legislation - even as some worried about the fallout on the midterms from Musk's warnings to cut political spending, the first two White House officials said. Still, a fourth White House official dismissed the impact of Musk's words on the president's signature bill. "We're very confident," he said. "No one has changed their minds." But there was bafflement at the White House at how a relationship that only last week had been celebrated in the Oval Office had taken such a turn. Time will tell whether the rift can be repaired. [[nid:718783]]