logo
California consumer group sues to block insurers from adding surcharge following LA fires

California consumer group sues to block insurers from adding surcharge following LA fires

Independent15-04-2025

A consumer advocacy group filed a lawsuit this week to block insurers from charging California customers for $500 million in costs associated with the deadly Los Angeles fires.
California's insurance commission in February ordered insurers doing business in California to provide $1 billion to the FAIR Plan, the state's insurer of last resort, to help it pay out claims related to the LA wildfires. The order allows insurers to recoup half the cost from its policyholders in the form of a one-time fee. The commissioner must approve the costs.
The lawsuit, filed by Consumer Watchdog in Los Angeles, alleges Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara overstepped his authority and violated state laws for allowing for such cost shifting without going through the proper process. Such regulations have never been authorized in California and should have been vetted and approved by the Legislature or other oversight agencies before enforcement, Consumer Watchdog argued. The suit is asking the court to block Lara from approving the requests. There were at least three pending applications to implement a surcharge as of Tuesday, according to Consumer Watchdog.
'We look forward to defending the rights and pocketbooks of Californians and stopping this socialization of FAIR Plan losses at the public's expense, while the FAIR Plan's profits will wholly remain with the insurance companies,' Consumer Watchdog staff attorney Ryan Mellino said in a statement.
The Department of Insurance said the lawsuit could make California's insurance crisis worse.
'This hurts homeowners, small business and nonprofits who need access to insurance options, while doing nothing to address the insurance crisis,' Gabriel Sanchez, a department spokesperson, said in a statement. "It also serves to undermine our efforts to restore competition to all areas of our state, so people can get off the FAIR Plan and back to the regular market.'
The FAIR Plan is the state's last resort option for people who can't get private insurance because their properties are deemed too risky to insure. The plan, with high premiums and basic coverage, is designed as a temporary option until homeowners can find permanent coverage, but more Californians are relying on it than ever. There were more than 555,000 home policies on the FAIR Plan as of March, more than double the number in 2020.
The plan estimated a loss of roughly $4 billion from the Eaton and Palisades Fires, which sparked Jan. 7, destroyed nearly 17,000 structures and killed at least 30 people. The plan had already paid out more than $914 million as of February.
The lawsuit will not affect the FAIR Plan's ability to pay out claims, Consumer Watchdog said.
The American Property Casualty Insurance Association, the largest national trade association representing home, auto and business insurers called the lawsuit 'a reckless and self-serving stunt.' Insurers have paid ten of billions in claims and contributed more than $500 million to sustain the FAIR Plan after the LA fires, the group said.
'Blocking recovery of the additional costs insurers have paid to prop up the Fair Plan would jeopardize the last-resort coverage option for homeowners — and push our fragile insurance market closer to total collapse," Denni Ritter, the group's representative, said in a statement. 'It is critical that the costs be spread equitably across a broader pool of insured customers to help restore California's insurance market and protect access to coverage for all consumers.'
The regulation to allow insurers to shift some of the costs used to sustain the FAIR Plan is among the strategies unveiled by Lara last year. California is undergoing a yearlong effort to stabilize its insurance market after several major insurance companies either paused or restricted new business in the state in 2023, which pushed hundreds of thousands of homeowners onto the FAIR Plan. Wildfires are becoming more common and destructive in California due to climate change, and insurers say that's making it difficult to truly price the risk on properties.
Of the top 20 most destructive wildfires in state history, 15 have occurred since 2015, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
The state now gives insurers more latitude to raise premiums in exchange for issuing more policies in high-risk areas. That includes regulations allowing insurers to consider climate change when setting their prices and allowing them pass on the costs of reinsurance to California consumers.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas considers banning products infused with THC derived from hemp, and retailers are worried
Texas considers banning products infused with THC derived from hemp, and retailers are worried

The Independent

time3 days ago

  • The Independent

Texas considers banning products infused with THC derived from hemp, and retailers are worried

Walk into enough gas stations and they're likely easy to find: gummies, drinks and vapes infused with THC, the compound that gives marijuana its psychoactive properties. That's given lawmakers across the U.S. headaches over how to regulate the booming market, and it's a conflict now taking hold in Texas, where a proposed ban passed by the Legislature poses another major battle for the industry. Texas has some of the nation's most restrictive marijuana laws, but thousands of retailers in the state sell THC consumables, underscoring states' struggle to set rules around the products that generate millions in tax revenue. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott has not indicated whether he will sign the ban. Other states, including California, have imposed restrictions in recent years that include banning underage use and limits on the potency of the products, which are often marketed as legal even in states where marijuana is not. 'Governor Abbott will thoughtfully review any legislation sent to his desk,' spokesperson Andrew Mahaleris said when asked for comment on the bill. Texas tries to crack down The Texas bill would make it a misdemeanor to sell, possess or manufacture consumable products with tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC. The proposal shadows several other state efforts to crack down on a market that has exploded since a 2018 federal law allowed states to regulate hemp, which can be synthetically processed to create THC. Hemp is a plant that is grown to make textiles, plastics, food and several other products. It is related to marijuana and must contain less than 0.3% THC to still be classified as hemp under federal law. The proliferating market has given residents in states with strict marijuana laws such as Texas a legal way to access products that can give them a similar high. Nationwide, the substances are often sold through legal loopholes, despite concerns about potential health risks and a lack of oversight of how they're produced. Republican Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick laid out bags of THC snacks on a table in front of a group of reporters last week to reiterate his determination for Texas to ban the products. He said he wasn't worried about Abbott when asked about the possibility of a veto. 'This is serious business,' Patrick said. If enacted into law, Texas would have one of the most restrictive bans in the country, according to Katharine Neil Harris, a researcher in drug policy at the Baker Institute for Public Policy at Rice University. 'I'm not aware of any other states without recreational marijuana markets that also prohibit consumable hemp products from having any THC,' Harris said. A jumbled legal landscape States that prohibit recreational marijuana have also made efforts to regulate the THC market, including Alabama, Kentucky and Tennessee. In Florida, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis vetoed a bill last year that would have put in place age restrictions and banned marketing directed toward children, stating that it would hurt small businesses. 'There's such a variety in how states have responded to this," Harris said. Texas has one of the most restrictive medical marijuana programs in the country, only allowing three licensed dispensaries to operate in the state to sell low-potency marijuana to residents with PTSD, cancer or other conditions. Proposals to expand the state's medical program are a sticking point for some Republican lawmakers. A total of 38 states and the District of Columbia have laws that allow the medical use of marijuana. About 6 in 10 voters across the country said they favor legalizing recreational use nationwide, according to AP VoteCast, in a 2024 survey of more than 120,000 U.S. voters. Retailers push back on ban Kyle Bingham, a farmer in the Texas Panhandle, said he doesn't plan on growing hemp anymore if there's a ban. He has grown the plant on a family farm with his dad for four years and said it is one of many crops they grow, including cotton. 'We've never planted more than 5% of our acres in hemp, and that's part of the business plan," said Bingham, who is also vice president of the National Hemp Growers Association. 'So for us, it's definitely hard to walk away from as an investment.' Because of a lack of federal oversight into manufacturing processes and a lack of uniform labeling requirements, it's hard to know what exactly is in THC products sold in stores. Many dispensaries, worried about their future, have urged the governor to veto the legislation. They have defended their industry as providing medical relief to people who cannot access medical marijuana through the state's restrictive program. 'It's absurd they think they can sign away 50,000 jobs,' Savannah Gavlik, an employee at Austin-based dispensary Dope Daughters, said. The store will likely have to close if the ban takes place, but the anxiety has not yet set in, she said. 'One of the biggest things we provide is self care,' Gavlik said. 'It's people genuinely wanting medical relief.' ___

Electric car fires up 77pc in two years
Electric car fires up 77pc in two years

Telegraph

time24-05-2025

  • Telegraph

Electric car fires up 77pc in two years

Electric car fires have increased by 77 per cent over the past two years, new figures have revealed. There were 232 blazes attended by fire brigades last year, up from 131 three years ago, according to the data. Electric car fires are more dangerous than petrol or diesel car fires because they are extremely hard to extinguish. Whereas petrol and diesel fires can be smothered by water, foam or fireproof blankets, lithium-ion battery fires are self-sustaining – meaning they continue to burn until the entire battery is consumed. Such fires are normally the result of 'thermal runaway', where batteries start to irreversibly overheat, usually owing to impact damage, over-charging or over-heating. Despite the risks, the Government has pressed on with its zero emission vehicle mandate, which will see a total ban on sales of new petrol and diesel cars by the year 2030. Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, refused pleas by the motor industry earlier this year to push back the deadline. Earlier this month CCTV footage caught the moment an electric vehicle fire spread to a family's home in Hampshire after bursting into flames at around 5am. While the family managed to escape unhurt, domestic fires involving electric vehicles, electric bike or e-scooter batteries are highly risky. It comes as the number of electric vehicles on British roads jumped from 664,000 to more than 1.3 million in 2024. Adrian Simmonds, the practice leader for property risk solutions at QBE Insurance, which compiled the figures, said: 'Lithium-ion battery fires continue increasing at a worrying pace. 'These fires burn differently, they take longer to tackle, typically need ten times more water to put out and are often more harmful to the surrounding environment. People need to understand the risks and how to deal with them. 'Raising awareness around safe charging, use and disposal of lithium-ion batteries is critical to keeping people and property safe.' Bedfordshire Fire and Rescue Service said damaged lithium-ion batteries were responsible for the majority of fires. A spokesman added: 'Fundamentally, electric vehicles are extremely safe, but the main danger occurs when the lithium-ion battery is damaged, which might happen if it is exposed to extreme heat or something penetrates the battery cell wall.' It is not just cars affected by the rise of electricity-powered devices. Fires involving e-bikes and their lithium-ion batteries, which are similar to those fitted to electric vehicles, doubled over the same period, rising from 181 to 362. Lesley Rudd, the chief executive of the Electrical Safety First charity, warned: 'Substandard e-bike batteries can cause ferocious fires if they fail, releasing toxic vapour into the home and decimating a room in minutes. 'Whilst reputable manufacturers produce high quality and safe devices, the market is being flooded with substandard versions of e-bike batteries that are destroying homes and putting people at risk.' Richard Field, the London Fire Brigade's deputy assistant commissioner for prevention and protection, added that e-bike fires 'have become one of London's fastest-growing fire risks.' Mr Field said: 'They have destroyed homes and families have sadly lost loved ones in these fires. From our investigations, we know many of the fires we've attended have involved the battery or charger of second-hand e-bikes or e-scooters or the bike has been modified using parts bought online.' A government spokesman said: 'There is absolutely no evidence to suggest that fires in EVs are more likely to occur than in petrol or diesel vehicles. EV fires make up a tiny minority of all vehicle fires, with all models going through rigorous fire and electrical safety testing before they are sold in the UK. 'Meanwhile we take the risk of fires caused by lithium-ion batteries very seriously, including those linked to e-bikes and e-scooters. That's why we are updating product safety law to keep the public safe, and cracking down on those trying to import unsafe products via our borders or ports.'

Americans are fleeing woke coastal areas and flocking to unexpected Southern gems
Americans are fleeing woke coastal areas and flocking to unexpected Southern gems

Daily Mail​

time22-05-2025

  • Daily Mail​

Americans are fleeing woke coastal areas and flocking to unexpected Southern gems

Americans are packing up and heading to warmer, cheaper cities, with new data revealing where people are flocking to — and the places they can't escape from fast enough. The South continues to dominate as the nation's top relocation hotspot, according to a new report from PODS Moving and Storage. The region led for move-ins last year, and it's on track to do the same in 2025. Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, and Wilmington, North Carolina, top this year's list of most popular move-in destinations. The area's warm weather, relaxed lifestyle, and relatively low cost of living make it a magnet for retirees and families alike. Other East Coast standouts in the top 10 include Raleigh and Charlotte in North Carolina, as well as Greenville-Spartanburg in South Carolina. Ocala, Florida — a small city of 63,000 known for its thoroughbred farms and scenic forests — ranked second nationwide. Dallas–Fort Worth, Texas, made a surprise leap to fifth place, after failing to crack the top 10 last year. Experts say the city's strong job market, mild winters, and affordability are behind the surge. The data shows a 'desire for warmer climates, lower costs of living, and a greater focus on balance and quality of life,' Rich Schwartz of PODS said of this year's report. 'While the Southeast continues to dominate the top of the list, we are seeing areas across the south, like Dallas-Fort Worth, making big moves.' Californian saw three of its cities in the top 10 places with the most move-outs this year. Los Angeles topped the list, followed by the San Francisco area in second and San Diego in fifth. Los Angeles has been battered by the devastating wildfires earlier this year, and residents now also face rising home insurance costs. The East Coast also took a battering with Long Island in New York seeing the fourth biggest loss of residents this year. Also in New York the Hudson Valley north of Manhattan also made the top 10. Central Jersey in New Jersey and Boston, Massachusetts ranked 6th and eight respectively. Meanwhile, there are increasing fears that the US property market could crash. In fact, realtors warned last week that South Florida 's pandemic property boom has officially reversed. After years of surging demand due to the pandemic real estate boom, the region's real estate market is flooded with listings as desperate homeowners rush to sell amid soaring costs and vanishing buyers. According to a new report from Cotality, the number of homes for sale across Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties has quadrupled since 2022 — hitting the highest level in nearly a decade.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store