Trump urges Iranto talk
US President Donald Trump on Monday warned Iran, which Israel is pounding, to re-enter negotiations "before it's too late" as Group of Seven leaders considered a joint call for de-escalation.
Host Canada had designed the summit in the Rockies resort of Kananaskis to paper over differences within the bloc of major industrial democracies, as Trump returns to the global stage in his norm-shattering second term.
But two days before the summit, Israel launched a surprise, massive military attack on Iran, which had been in negotiations with the Trump administration over the cleric-run state's contested nuclear program.
Trump, who has praised Israel's strikes despite his stated preference for diplomacy, said he believed a negotiated settlement remained "achievable."
"It's painful for both parties, but I'd say Iran is not winning this war, and they should talk, and they should talk immediately, before it's too late," Trump told reporters as he met Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.
Israel has struck major nuclear and military sites and killed leading commanders and nuclear scientists in Iran, which has responded with its own volley of drones and missiles on Israel.
Canada and European leaders have looked to draft a statement on the crisis, although it looks set to stop short of demanding a ceasefire.
Leaders will discuss the statement Monday evening, a diplomat said.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that G7 leaders share concern about Iran's nuclear program but there is "absolutely a focus on how we de-escalate this and that will be a central focus as we go into the talks."
"I do think there's a consensus for de-escalation," Starmer told reporters.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that a text being put forward by the Europeans would put the onus on Iran.
"We'll highlight again that Iran must never possess material that would allow it to produce nuclear weapons," Merz said.
"We'll highlight the legitimate right of the state of Israel to defend itself and we will also discuss potential additional measures to reach a diplomatic solution," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
Meta policy fuels hate speech, survey finds
Harmful content including hate speech has surged across Meta's platforms since the company ended third-party fact-checking in the United States and eased moderation policies, a survey showed Monday. As per AFP, the survey of around 7,000 active users on Instagram, Facebook and Threads comes after the Palo Alto company ditched US fact-checkers in January and turned over the task of debunking falsehoods to ordinary users under a model known as "Community Notes," popularised by X. The decision was widely seen as an attempt to appease President Donald Trump's new administration, whose conservative support base has long complained that fact-checking on tech platforms was a way to curtail free speech and censor right-wing content. Meta also rolled back restrictions around topics such as gender and sexual identity. The tech giant's updated community guidelines said its platforms would permit users to accuse people of "mental illness" or "abnormality" based on their gender or sexual orientation. "These policy shifts signified a dramatic reversal of content moderation standards the company had built over nearly a decade," said the survey published by digital and human rights groups including UltraViolet, GLAAD, and All Out. "Among our survey population of approximately 7,000 active users, we found stark evidence of increased harmful content, decreased freedom of expression, and increased self-censorship." One in six respondents in the survey reported being the victim of some form of gender-based or sexual violence on Meta platforms, while 66 per cent said they had witnessed harmful content such as hateful or violent material. Ninety-two per cent of surveyed users said they were concerned about increasing harmful content and felt "less protected from being exposed to or targeted by" such material on Meta's platforms. Seventy-seven per cent of respondents described feeling "less safe" expressing themselves freely. The company declined to comment on the survey. In its most recent quarterly report, published in May, Meta insisted that the changes in January had left a minimal impact. "Following the changes announced in January we've cut enforcement mistakes in the US in half, while during that same time period the low prevalence of violating content on the platform remained largely unchanged for most problem areas," the report said. But the groups behind the survey insisted that the report did not reflect users' experiences of targeted hate and harassment. "Social media is not just a place we 'go' anymore. It's a place we live, work, and play. That's why it's more crucial than ever to ensure that all people can safely access these spaces and freely express themselves without fear of retribution," Jenna Sherman, campaign director at UltraViolet, told AFP. "But after helping to set a standard for content moderation online for nearly a decade, (chief executive) Mark Zuckerberg decided to move his company backwards, abandoning vulnerable users in the process. "Facebook and Instagram already had an equity problem. Now, it's out of control," Sherman added. The groups implored Meta to hire an independent third party to "formally analyse changes in harmful content facilitated by the policy changes" made in January, and for the tech giant to swiftly reinstate the content moderation standards that were in place earlier.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
North Korea slams Israeli attacks on Iran as ‘crime against humanity'
SEOUL: North Korea on Thursday slammed Israel's launching of strikes to spark its conflict with Iran, and warned the United States and European powers against 'fanning up the flames of war', according to a foreign ministry spokesperson. The North expressed 'serious concern' over 'Israel's military attack and resolutely denounces it,' the spokesperson said, adding that Israel's killing of civilians was 'an unpardonable crime against humanity.' 'The illegal act of state-sponsored terrorism by Israel (is) raising the danger of a new all-out war in the Middle East region,' said the statement, which was published by state-run news agency KCNA. Israel on Friday launched strikes that it said targeted Iran's nuclear programme, sparking six days of continuing exchanges that have seen both sides firing salvoes of missiles at each other. Iran said Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. It has not issued an updated toll since then. Since Friday, at least 24 people have been killed in Israel and hundreds wounded, according to the Israeli government. Those casualties also reportedly include civilians. Israeli firing kills 41 people in Gaza North Korea has in recent years grown closer to Russia, supporting its military operations against Ukraine in Moscow's grinding war with that country. Russia and Iran in January inked a far-ranging strategic partnership agreement to broaden military ties, and Kyiv and its allies have long accused Iran of supplying Russia with drones and short-range missiles. US President Donald Trump has fuelled speculation about the US joining its key ally Israel in military action against Iran, saying Wednesday that his patience had 'run out' with Tehran, but that it was still not too late for talks. He later said he had not yet made a decision on whether to join Israel in bombing Iran and warned that the country's current leadership could fall as a result of the war. Pyongyang warned Trump and others against joining Israel's war. 'The present grave situation witnessed by the world clearly proves that Israel, supported and patronized by the US and the West, is a cancer-like entity for the peace in the Middle East and a chief culprit of destroying global peace and security,' said the foreign ministry spokesperson. 'The international community is strictly watching the US and Western forces fanning up the flames of war, taking issue with the legitimate sovereign right and exercise of the right to self-defence of Iran, the victim,' they added. The spokesperson said actions by the United States and European powers were 'pushing the situation in the Middle East to an uncontrollable catastrophic phase'.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Trump on Iran strikes: ‘I may do it, I may not do it'
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said Wednesday he was still deciding whether to join Israel's strikes on Iran, claiming Tehran now wants talks at the White House but may have waited too long. Trump held his second Situation Room meeting in two days with his national security team as he left the world guessing about his potential order of military action. 'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do,' Trump told reporters at the unveiling of one of two giant new flagpoles at the White House. 'I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate.' He added that 'the next week is going to be very big' when it comes to determining Iran's fate. Iran launches hypersonic missiles against Israel in new attack: state TV Trump's comments came after the Islamic republic's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei rejected his demands for an unconditional surrender and warned the United States of 'irreparable damage' if it intervenes. A day after saying Khamenei was an 'easy target', Trump told AFP in the Oval Office that a change of leadership in Tehran 'could happen.' But Republican Trump, who faces opposition from the isolationist wing of his support base to joining any more foreign wars, insisted that he had not yet made up his mind on whether to take US action. 'I have ideas as to what to do, but I haven't made a final (decision),' Trump said. 'I like to make the final decision one second before it's due, because things change. Especially with war.' The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had told aides on Tuesday he had approved attack plans for Iran but was holding off to see if Iran would give up its nuclear program. 'All options are on the table,' a White House official told AFP when asked about the report. 'Very late' Trump appeared to be in no hurry to reach what would be one of the most consequential decisions of his presidency – spending more than an hour dealing with the installation of his new flagpoles. He said Iran was reaching out to try to strike a deal on its nuclear program to end the conflict with US ally Israel. 'They want to come to the White House, I may do that,' Trump said. He added however that it was 'very late to be talking… There's a big difference between now and a week ago.' Iran denied it had offered to send officials to Washington. 'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House,' Iran's mission to the United Nations posted on X. Iran's Khamenei rejects Trump's call for unconditional surrender Trump had favored a diplomatic route to end Iran's nuclear program, seeking a deal to replace the agreement he tore up in his first term in 2018. But since Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched strikes on Iran six days ago Trump has moved in behind the key US ally and is now weighing whether to use American military power against Tehran too. Trump said Wednesday that Iran was 'weeks' away from being able to make a nuclear bomb. He noted that the United States is the only country with 'bunker buster' bombs capable of taking out Iran's Fordow nuclear plant 'but that doesn't mean I'm going to do it.' The US president said he had told Netanyahu to 'keep going' with Israel's offensive against Iran, adding that they were speaking every day. Trump however rebuffed Russian President Vladimir Putin's offer to mediate in the Israel-Iran conflict, saying Russia should end its own war in Ukraine first. 'He actually offered to help mediate, I said 'do me a favor, mediate your own. Let's mediate Russia first, okay? You can worry about this later,'' Trump said.
