logo
Trump Hits Back At Springsteen With 'Golf Ball' In Edited Online Video

Trump Hits Back At Springsteen With 'Golf Ball' In Edited Online Video

Forbes21-05-2025

Bruce Springsteen performs during the first night of his 'The Land of Hopes and Dreams' tour at ... More Co-op Live on May 14, 2025 in Manchester, England. (Photo by)
President Donald Trump took a swing at rock legend Bruce Springsteen in an edited video first shared on Trump's Truth Social platform. In the eight-second video, Trump is seen teeing off on a golf course, wearing his signature white shirt and black pants. In the second half, an animated ball strikes Springsteen in the back, and he is then seen falling on a stage.
The edited clip used footage from one of Springsteen's shows, where he had tripped on stage. It was the latest in a series of exchanges between the president and the rocker, and it likely won't be the last.
Though Springsteen has long been critical of Trump, the two have become increasingly vocal about their respective dislike for one another.
"The America I love, the America I've written about, that has been a beacon of hope and liberty for 250 years, is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent and treasonous administration," Springsteen said last week during the opening show of his European tour.
The Trump administration initially responded to Springsteen's comments in a statement saying, "The 77 million Americans that elected President Trump disagree with elitist and out-of-touch celebrities like Bruce Springsteen." Still, later Trump wrote on Truth Social, "Never liked him, never liked his music, or his Radical Left Politics and, importantly, he's not a talented guy — Just a pushy, obnoxious JERK, who fervently supported Crooked Joe Biden, a mentally incompetent FOOL, and our WORST EVER President, who came close to destroying our Country."
The latest salvos between the two men are certainly being amplified by social media, where their respective supporters were quick to rally and add fuel to the fire. This feud follows the same playbook as other celebrity beefs.
On some level, it is almost comedic.
As The Associated Press noted, there are similarities between the two. They're both "guys in their 70s with homes in New Jersey and big constituencies among white American men middle-aged and older. And both, in very different respects, are the boss." Yet, it is still somewhat embarrassing to see a 75-year-old singer offering such blunt commentary about the nearly 79-year-old president, while it may be even more uncomfortable to see the leader of the free world offering a meme directed at someone he dislikes!
Though it is true that Springsteen has always been political, he's spent his life only singing about the working man, never really being one, while Trump has shown himself to be unable to take any level of criticism.
"When Bruce Springsteen first came on the scene in the 1970s, he was referred to as 'the new Dylan' in the press. Bruce was uncomfortable with the comparison at the time, but it seems prescient in hindsight: both men have displayed an unwavering commitment to their personal truths, regardless of the consequences," explained Bruce Barber, professional in residence and general manager of 88.7 WNHU at the University of New Haven.
The carefully edited meme also serves as a reminder that there will never be any love lost between the two.
"This moment between a politician and a rock star says everything about how cultural capital is wielded — not just to entertain, but to influence," added Angeli Gianchandani, global brand strategist and adjunct instructor of marketing and public relations at New York University.
Trump rarely turns the other cheek, but the White House may have a point that celebrities shouldn't criticize the country while touring across Europe. At the same time, should the president be sharing memes at all?
To paraphrase Bob Dylan, the times are indeed changing, at least in how politicians like Trump respond to those who offer such opposing views.
"President Trump is following a common social media messaging pattern for dealing with an attack — which is to attack back," said Dr. Cliff Lampe, professor of information and associate dean for academic affairs in the School of Information at the University of Michigan. "When a person is criticized on social media, there are a few common responses you can follow. One is to ignore it, another is to respond and try to de-escalate. President Trump has commonly followed a third tactic, which is to respond and escalate the attack."
He suggested that particular strategy offers an advantage in that it floods the attention spans of any audience.
"It becomes a noisy 'he said/he said' argument," Lampe continued. "President Trump is banking on the idea that his base does not see this as non-normative behavior for a sitting president, and in fact, I believe he has learned that they respond positively to the more acerbic he is in his attacks on his critics."
The other takeaway is that the rocker, in blue jeans and holding a guitar, may have spoken from the heart, while the politician, who is seen daily in a suit and tie, took a more counter-culture approach of using a meme to hit back at his opponent.
"This isn't just Trump vs. Springsteen," said Gianchandani. "It's a master class in cultural warfare. One leads with soul and protest; the other with memes and mockery. In today's attention economy, belief is the new currency — and both men are cashing in. What we're really seeing is two aging icons fighting for the narrative of America: one built on dignity, the other on dominance."
It is also a reminder that Springsteen remains relevant when he is more critical of the occupant in the Oval Office, even if that brings him into direct confrontation with the sitting president.
"Today's political climate has made us all painfully aware of the risks of speaking our truths, and the stakes are obviously much higher when doing so as a public figure in a digitally connected world. To me, this is the difference between a good musician and a great one," said Barber.
Moreover, neither is just performing. Even as grumpy old men, each still very much has his soapbox. Springsteen may be on stage, while Trump is on social media.
"They're shaping how millions see power, patriotism, and identity," added Gianchandani. "Culture isn't a sideshow — it's the whole game now."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says number of 'non-working holidays' in America 'must change' in Juneteenth social media post
Trump says number of 'non-working holidays' in America 'must change' in Juneteenth social media post

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says number of 'non-working holidays' in America 'must change' in Juneteenth social media post

Trump criticized the number of American holidays and claimed they cost billions in productivity. The post was made on Juneteenth, a federal holiday that Trump previously supported. The president said the number of non-working holidays "must change." In a social media post on Juneteenth, President Donald Trump said America has "too many" holidays where people don't work. "Too many non-working holidays in America," Trump wrote on Truth Social late Thursday. "It is costing our Country $BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to keep all of these businesses closed." The president said that the frequency of holidays "must change" and that workers didn't want them, either. "The workers don't want it either!" he continued. "Soon we'll end up having a holiday for every once working day of the year. It must change if we are going to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Juneteenth, held on June 19 every year, commemorates the end of slavery in the United States and has long been celebrated by Black Americans. It became the 11th federal holiday in 2021 with a law signed by then-President Joe Biden. The bill passed with broad bipartisan support, receiving unanimous approval in the Senate and all but 14 votes in the House of Representatives. Most federal offices, such as the US Postal Service, are closed during Juneteenth. Markets like the Nasdaq and New York Stock Exchange don't trade during the holiday, either. But whether private companies and state governments remain open varies. Most major banks are closed for the holiday, but not all companies provide paid time off. The White House press office didn't immediately respond to Business Insider's request for comment regarding Trump's Truth Social post. Earlier on Thursday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at a press briefing that the White House was open. When asked by a journalist about commemorating Juneteenth, she said she was "not tracking" Trump's signature on any proclamations for the holiday. "I know this is a federal holiday," she said. "I want to thank all of you for showing up to work. We are certainly here. We're working 24/7 right now." Trump himself supported making Juneteenth a federal holiday in the wake of widespread protests following the killing of George Floyd. "Make Juneteenth a National Holiday" was included among his "Promise to Black America over 4 years" policy proposals in his 2020 presidential campaign. During that campaign, Trump took credit for publicizing Juneteenth after moving one of his rallies from June 19 to June 20 in Tulsa, Oklahoma. "I did something good: I made Juneteenth very famous," Trump told The Wall Street Journal at the time. "It's actually an important event, an important time. But nobody had ever heard of it." In the same interview, Trump expressed surprise that his administration had commemorated Juneteenth every year. "Oh really? We put out a statement? The Trump White House put out a statement?" he said, according to the Journal. "OK, OK. Good." The White House did not publish a statement on its website commemorating Juneteenth this year. Read the original article on Business Insider

Appeals court blocks Newsom's bid to reclaim control of National Guard from Trump
Appeals court blocks Newsom's bid to reclaim control of National Guard from Trump

Politico

time24 minutes ago

  • Politico

Appeals court blocks Newsom's bid to reclaim control of National Guard from Trump

A federal appeals court has indefinitely blocked an effort by California Gov. Gavin Newsom to reclaim control of the National Guard troops President Donald Trump deployed to Los Angeles following unrest related to immigration enforcement. The three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that Trump appeared to have acted within his authority when he took control of 4,000 California National Guard troops under a law that has never been invoked without the consent of a state governor. Despite a debate over the level of violence accompanying the protests, the judges — two appointed by Trump and one by President Joe Biden — concluded that the law gives Trump enormous latitude to determine that the protests and related violence were interfering with execution of federal law. The judges said there are limits to the president's ability to call up the Guard, but there was enough evidence of civil unrest and danger to federal officials to justify Trump's actions. The ruling indefinitely sets aside a decision by U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer, who last week issued a temporary restraining order against Trump's deployment of the Guard. Breyer is scheduled to hold another hearing in the case on Friday to consider Newsom's request for a longer-term block of both the Guard deployment and Trump's subsequent deployment of 700 Marines. The three judges on the panel were Trump appointees Mark Bennett and Eric Miller and Biden appointee Jennifer Sung. All three appeared skeptical of Newsom's position during oral arguments on Tuesday. Their Thursday night order was issued on a 'per curiam' basis, which means no judge was identified as the author of the opinion. Newsom, a Democrat, could ask a larger, 11-judge panel of the appeals court to take up the issue or seek emergency relief from the Supreme Court. Despite ultimately ruling for Trump, all three judges flatly rejected his administration's claim that the courts had no role in reviewing his call-up of the military to Los Angeles. Had Trump's call-up been 'obviously absurd or made in bad faith,' they said, courts would clearly have a role in assessing it. However, the appeals court said a line of legal precedents dating to the early 19th century indicated that the court's review of Trump's decision should be 'especially deferential' and that the president's orders should be upheld if they reflect 'a colorable assessment of the facts and law within a 'range of honest judgment.'' Newsom and his attorneys argued that Trump's involvement of the National Guard was likely to fuel more anger from protesters and inflame an already tense situation on the streets of L.A. But the appeals judges said those concerns were too remote to entitle the state to an order reversing Trump's action. 'California's concerns about escalation and interference with local law enforcement, at present, are too speculative. We do not know whether future protests will grow due to the deployment of the National Guard,' the court wrote. 'And we do not know what emergencies may occur in California while the National Guard is deployed.' There are signs that the protests and altercations with authorities have actually diminished in the days since the deployment. After imposing a curfew in downtown L.A last week, Mayor Karen Bass eased the curfew Monday and lifted it on Tuesday. The 9th Circuit judges also concluded that a technical aspect of the law — a requirement that Trump issue his order to call up the Guard 'through' Newsom — was not violated, even though the order was delivered to Newsom's subordinate. Even if it were a violation, they added, it wouldn't justify Breyer's ruling to rescind the order altogether. The appeals court panel had put a temporary hold on Breyer's ruling shortly after he issued it — an administrative measure to give the panel time to hear arguments. The decision Thursday grants the Trump administration's request to keep the hold in place as litigation proceeds. While it's not a final ruling on the legality of Trump's deployment order, by the time those issues are resolved by another panel of the appeals court, the Guard deployment could be over and the dispute could be moot.

Sanders wades into battleground district with Wisconsin endorsement
Sanders wades into battleground district with Wisconsin endorsement

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sanders wades into battleground district with Wisconsin endorsement

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has endorsed Democrat Rebecca Cooke in her attempt for a rematch against Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-Wis.) in a battleground Wisconsin district. Sanders said in a statement, first reported by NBC News, that he's supporting Cooke to represent Wisconsin's 3rd Congressional District because she will 'stand up for working families and take on the greed of powerful special interests.' 'Rebecca is a working-class fighter who developed her populist roots in rural Western Wisconsin,' the senator continued. 'A daughter of farmers, a waitress and a small business owner — she's lived through failed policies from Washington elites and is ready to deliver tangible outcomes that working people will actually feel.' Cooke previously ran for the House seat twice, losing the Democratic nomination in 2022 before winning the primary last year. Democrats eyed Van Orden's seat as a possible pickup opportunity, and she narrowly lost to him by less than 3 points. She's now seeking to face him again in what the party hopes will be a stronger year for its prospects in 2026. Sanders said Cooke would be an ally to him in the House to enforce antitrust laws against monopolies, raise the minimum wage and expand Medicare. Cooke said she's 'honored' to receive Sanders's endorsement, calling him a 'champion for the working class.' 'He's spent his career fighting for the same values that drive our campaign here in Wisconsin's Third District: putting people over politics, taking on corporate greed, and building a future that works for everyone—not just the wealthy and well-connected,' she said. Cooke faces a couple primary opponents but has notched a wide range of Democratic endorsements from progressives and moderates. That includes support from the Blue Dog PAC, which backs moderate Democrats, and EMILY's List. Updated at 11:48 a.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store