Global retailers' tariff strategy risks spreading pain beyond US consumer
LONDON/FRANKFURT —Global retailers including sandal maker Birkenstock BIRK.N and jeweller Pandora PNDORA.CO are looking at spreading the cost of U.S. tariffs by raising prices across markets to avoid big hikes in the United States that could hurt sales.
A global presence gives large retailers an advantage to minimize higher tariff costs in the U.S. But it is putting central banks on watch as the strategy could fuel inflation in other markets like the European Union and Britain, where consumer prices have finally started to stabilise.
Birkenstock's chief financial officer said last week that a "low-single-digit" price increase globally would be enough to offset the U.S. tariff impact.
Pandora CEO Alexander Lacik said the Danish company is debating whether to raise prices globally or more in the U.S., its biggest market.
"Companies are really thinking about distributing the tariff," said Markus Goller, partner at consultancy Simon Kucher in Bonn, Germany. "A manufacturer from outside of the U.S. might say, OK, I cannot increase my prices to the U.S. market that much, so I will do a little increase in the U.S., and a little increase in Europe, and in other markets."
U.S. President Donald Trump has imposed a blanket tariff of 10% on all global imports and is threatening higher so-called "reciprocal" tariffs on its trading partners.
When U.S. behemoth Walmart WMT.N said it would have to raise prices in response to tariffs, Trump ordered the world's biggest retailer via social media to 'eat the tariffs'.
Announcing price increases in non-U.S. markets could be a way for retailers to avoid a similar backlash from Trump.
"Obviously if your products coming into the U.S. are now subject to tariffs, then math says that you have to raise your prices in the U.S.," said Jean-Pierre Dubé, professor of marketing at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
"But you don't want to be accused by the White House of raising prices purely because of U.S. tariffs, so if you can demonstrate that your prices are going up everywhere then... it's kind of a shield."
Retailers could raise prices on certain products or in certain markets where consumers are less price-sensitive, and use that to subsidise other products or countries where price hikes would hurt sales more, said Jason Miller, professor of supply chain management at Michigan State University.
"Maybe a U.S.-only firm has to raise (U.S.) prices by 12%. But you, as a global firm, raise prices by 8% because you can play with pricing in other markets," he said.
If many multinational retailers do spread the tariff pain, higher inflation could spread even to countries which, like Britain, have already struck trade agreements with the U.S. in a bid to minimise the economic fallout of tariffs.
Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey earlier this month raised the issue of "global companies that don't make that distinction [on tariff rates] and just say, we're going to impose a pricing solution which goes right across the world irrespective of those differences."
"I think we do have to watch that carefully," he said.
Inflation uncertainty
In the euro zone, inflation was finally gliding towards the European Central Bank's 2% target. European companies surveyed by the European Central Bank (ECB) in late March said price growth in the retail sector was subdued.
But that was before Trump unveiled his tariff policy on April 2, and later hiked tariffs on Chinese goods to 145%.
However, the U.S. tariffs on China - lowered last week to 30% - have allowed some European retailers to source goods more cheaply than before.
Martino Pessina, CEO of Takko Fashion, which sells clothes in 17 European countries, said suppliers in China had offered lower prices as U.S. retailers cancelled orders from factories there, and shipping costs also fell.
"What we don't know is if there's going to be inflation in the U.S. and if that inflation comes to Europe or not," Pessina said.
Some big retailers have in any case ruled out raising prices outside the U.S..
"There is no reason to raise prices outside the U.S. because of the tariffs," Adidas ADSGn.DE CEO Bjorn Gulden told investors after reporting results late last month. "The discussion we're having on tariffs is only for the U.S.."
ECB executive board member Isabel Schnabel has said the euro zone's inflation rate may initially dip below the central bank's 2% target, but that tariffs might prove inflationary further down the road.
"In order to compensate for the hit to input costs, firms also tend to raise the prices of goods not directly affected by tariffs," Schnabel said in a speech earlier this month.
While every company has its own pricing strategy, economists warn some could take advantage of tariffs to raise prices by more than rising costs, boosting their profits similarly to the inflation surge of 2021-2022 during the pandemic.
"It will be very difficult for a firm's customers to know what portion of the product's total costs are subject to the tariff, or even the tariff rate that applies. This information asymmetry creates a ripe environment for exploitation. Just as it did during COVID," said Hal Singer, professor of economics at the University of Utah.
U.S. consumers' 12-month inflation expectations jumped in April to 6.7%, the highest reading since 1981. And in the euro zone, too, consumers are expecting inflation to rise.
"If people are expecting inflation, well then it gives firms a little bit more room to raise prices," said Miller.—Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


GMA Network
12 minutes ago
- GMA Network
Canada's unemployment rate in May at almost nine-year high outside of COVID years
OTTAWA, Canada - Canada's unemployment rate in May jumped to its highest level in almost nine years outside of the pandemic era with 1.6 million jobless people in the country amid a constrained labor market, data showed on Friday. The unemployment rate ticked up to 7% in May from 6.9% in April, a third consecutive monthly increase, Statistics Canada said, adding that the total jobless people in May were almost 14% higher than what was seen a year ago. This was primarily driven by an almost flat employment growth amid a rising population, even though there were no major mass layoffs. This level of unemployment was last seen in September 2016 after the COVID-era unemployment numbers of 2020 and 2021 are excluded, Statscan said. "People are facing greater difficulties finding work in the current labor market," it said. The total number of people employed saw meager addition of 8,800 people. The employment number has a standard error margin of 32,000. Analysts polled by Reuters had forecast the unemployment rate to be at this level due to the impact of U.S. tariffs on Canada. They had estimated total employment number to drop by 12,500. Trump imposed tariffs in March on a variety of Canadian products, followed by on steel and aluminum, and later in April on automobiles. These have already led to fewer job additions and some layoffs. The Bank of Canada has said that the tariffs and the confusion over the scope and extent of them have created uncertainty that is hurting investments, hiring intentions and risking job losses, and this trend is likely to continue. This was evident in the duration of unemployment which has been consistently rising with jobless people spending an average of 21.8 weeks searching for work last month, up from 18.4 weeks from a year ago. The average hourly wage growth of permanent employees, a metric closely watched by the Canadian central bank to gauge inflationary trends, was unchanged at 3.5% in May. The employment number was driven by increase in wholesale and retail trade and was offset by drop in manufacturing and government jobs by 2.5% reflecting the expiration of election-related temporary hiring. — Reuters


GMA Network
6 hours ago
- GMA Network
Rise in gold value drove up PH reserves to $105.5B in May 2025
'The month-on-month increase in the GIR level reflected mainly the upward valuation adjustments in the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas' gold holdings due to the increase in the price of gold in the international market, net income from the BSP's investments abroad, and national government's net foreign currency deposits with the BSP,' the central bank said. The country's foreign reserves snapped two straight months of decline in May as the increase in global gold prices drove up the value of the central bank's gold assets, offsetting the effect of tempered foreign investments amid uncertainty brought by US President Donald Trump's reciprocal tariff policy. Preliminary data released by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) showed the gross international reserves (GIR) —a measure of the country's ability to settle import payments and service foreign debt— amounted to $105.5 billion as of end-May from $105.3 billion as of end-April. 'The month-on-month increase in the GIR level reflected mainly the upward valuation adjustments in the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas' gold holdings due to the increase in the price of gold in the international market, net income from the BSP's investments abroad, and national government's net foreign currency deposits with the BSP,' the central bank said. The Philippine central bank's reserve assets include foreign investments, gold, foreign exchange, IMF reserve positions, and special drawing rights. Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. chief economist Michael Ricafort said the GIR increase during the period was 'due to the continued gains in gold holdings to all-time highs after world gold prices hovered near record highs recently ($3,500.10 per ounce on April 22, 2025),' which offset the decline in foreign investments 'amid the continued Trump risk factor/premium that led to some market volatility worldwide.' Net inflows of foreign direct investments (FDI) to the Philippines dropped to a 10-month low in February 2025 to $529 million, down 61.9% from $1.062 billion net inflows seen in February 2024, amid high base effects and global uncertainties weighing on foreign investors' sentiments. Ricafort said that value of the BSP's gold assets rose by 2.9% to $13.7 billion month-on-month 'largely reflecting and consistent with the elevated world gold prices, which again posted new record highs recently partly due to some flight to safe havens such as gold amid the recent global market volatility largely brought about uncertainties on Trump's higher US import tariffs.' Trump, in April, announced a sweeping reciprocal tariff policy on its trading partners, including the Philippines, which would be facing a 17% tariff on its imports to the US. Although it is lowest among its Southeast Asian peers, still the Philippine government was prompted to send a delegation to Washington to seek dialogue with US officials while a 90-day pause in implementing the trade policy was ongoing. 'The GIR is still above the $100-billion mark for the 20th straight month or since October 2023 —still a good signal, on the country's strong external position that could help stabilize the peso exchange rate and support the country's favorable credit ratings of 1-3 notches above the minimum investment grade in recent years despite the COVID-19 pandemic,' Ricafort said. The BSP said the latest GIR level provides a 'robust' external liquidity buffer, equivalent to 7.3 months' worth of imports of goods and payments of services and primary income or earnings of overseas Filipino workers and profits from Philippine investments abroad. By convention, GIR is viewed to be adequate if it can finance at least three months' worth of the country's imports of goods and payments of services and primary income. The end-May reserves would also cover about 3.7 times the country's short-term external debt based on residual maturity. Short-term debt based on residual maturity refers to outstanding external debt with original maturity of one year or less, plus principal payments on medium- and long-term loans of the public and private sectors falling due within the next 12 months. The level of GIR, as of a particular period, is considered adequate if it provides at least 100% cover for the payment of the country's foreign liabilities, public and private, falling due within the immediate 12-month period. Similarly, the net international reserves —the difference between GIR and the BSP's reserve liabilities (short-term foreign debt and credit and loans from the IMF)— grew by about $8 million from $105.26 billion as of end-April to $105.34 billion as of end-May. –NB, GMA Integrated News

GMA Network
14 hours ago
- GMA Network
Trump, Musk feud explodes with threats of cutting contracts, backing impeachment
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump threatened on Thursday to cut off government contracts with billionaire Elon Musk's companies, while Musk suggested Trump should be impeached, turning their bromance into an all-out brawl on social media. The hostilities began when Trump criticized Tesla CEO Musk in the Oval Office. Within hours, the once-close relationship had disintegrated in full public view, as the world's most powerful man and its richest launched personal barbs at one another on Trump's Truth Social and Musk's X. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump posted on Truth Social. Wall Street traders dumped shares of Musk's electric vehicle maker and Tesla closed down 14.3%, losing about $150 billion in market value. It was Tesla's largest single-day decline in value in its history. Minutes after the closing bell, Musk replied, "Yes," to a post on X saying Trump should be impeached. Trump's Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of Congress and are highly unlikely to impeach him. The trouble between the two started brewing days ago, when Musk denounced Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill. The president initially held his tongue while Musk campaigned to torpedo the bill, saying it would add too much to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. Trump broke his silence on Thursday, telling reporters in the Oval Office he was "very disappointed" in Musk. "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore," Trump said. While Trump spoke, Musk responded with increasingly acerbic posts on X. "Without me, Trump would have lost the election," wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election. "Such ingratitude." In another post, Musk asserted that Trump's signature tariffs would push the US into a recession later this year. Besides Tesla, Musk's businesses include rocket company and government contractor SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink. Musk, whose space business plays a critical role in the US government's space program, said that as a result of Trump's threats he would begin decommissioning SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. Dragon is the only US spacecraft currently capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. Hours later, Musk appeared to reverse that move. Responding to a follower on X urging Musk and Trump to "cool off and take a step back for a couple of days," Musk wrote: "Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon." In another possible sign of de-escalation on Thursday evening, Musk separately posted, "You're not wrong," in response to hedge fund manager Bill Ackman saying Trump and Musk should make peace. Pugilistic pair The feud was not entirely unexpected. Trump and Musk are both political pugilists with a penchant for using social media to punch back against their perceived enemies, and many observers had predicted an eventual falling out. Even before Musk's departure from the administration last week, his influence had waned following a series of clashes with Cabinet members over his cuts to their agencies. For Trump, the fight was the first major rift he has had with a top adviser since taking office for a second time, after his first term was marked by numerous blow-ups. Trump parted ways with multiple chiefs of staff, national security advisers and political strategists during his 2017-2021 White House tenure. A few, like Steve Bannon, remained in his good graces, while many others, like UN Ambassador John Bolton, became loud and vocal critics. After serving as the biggest Republican donor in the 2024 campaign season, Musk became one of Trump's most visible advisers as head of the Department of Government Efficiency, which mounted a sweeping and controversial effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. Musk was frequently present at the White House and made multiple appearances on Capitol Hill, sometimes carrying his young son. Only six days before Thursday's blowup, Trump and Musk held an appearance in the Oval Office where Trump praised Musk's government service and both men promised to continue working together. A prolonged feud between Trump and Musk could make it more difficult for Republicans to keep control of Congress in next year's midterm elections. In addition to his campaign spending, Musk has a huge online following and helped connect Trump to parts of Silicon Valley and wealthy donors. Musk had already said he planned to curtail his political spending in the future. Soon after Trump's Oval Office comments on Thursday, Musk polled his 220 million followers on X: "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" 'Kill the Bill' Musk targeted what Trump has named his "big, beautiful bill" this week, calling it a "disgusting abomination" that would deepen the federal deficit. His attacks amplified a rift within the Republican Party that could threaten the bill's prospects in the Senate. Nonpartisan analysts say Trump's bill could add $2.4 trillion to $5 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. Trump asserted that Musk's true objection was the bill's elimination of consumer tax credits for electric vehicles. The president also suggested that Musk was upset because he missed working for the White House. "He's not the first," Trump said on Thursday. "People leave my administration... then at some point they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile." Musk wrote on X, "KILL the BILL," adding he was fine with Trump's planned cuts to EV credits as long as Republicans rid the bill of "mountain of disgusting pork" or wasteful spending. He also pulled up past quotes from Trump decrying the level of federal spending, adding, "Where is this guy today?" Musk came into government with brash plans to cut $2 trillion from the federal budget. He left last week having cut only about half of 1% of total spending while causing disruption across multiple agencies. Musk's increasing focus on politics provoked widespread protests at Tesla sites in the US and Europe, driving down sales while investors fretted that Musk's attention was too divided. — Reuters