Free speech essential to university life, Cambridge chancellor candidate says
Universities must stay committed to free speech, a leading contender for the chancellorship of Cambridge University has said.
In comments likely to be seen as Lord Browne setting out his stall for leadership of one of Britain's leading universities, the former head of BP described freedom of speech as the single value which must 'not change' in higher education institutions.
The 77-year-old made the comments as the race to replace Lord Sainsbury as the next ceremonial head of Cambridge University gains momentum ahead of the election in July.
The official list of candidates is yet to be released but potential contenders include Mohamed El-Erian, the economist, Gina Miller, the anti-Brexit campaigner, and Michael Portillo, the former Conservative minister.
Alumni and senior members of the university and its colleges are eligible to vote in the election.
Lord Browne, who led BP between 1995 and 2007 before founding an environmentalist investment group, made the comments in an interview at Hay literary festival in Powys, south Wales.
Asked how universities should respond to threats to free speech, such as the pressure exerted on American institutions by Donald Trump 's administration, Lord Browne said: 'There's been a lot of change in universities. But the values must not change.
'Universities embody this great thing that says: I may disagree with your view, but I will fight to make sure you can say it.
'People need to be able to say what they think, so long as they do it in the spirit of debate and they [do so] in a way which recognises they may disagree with each other but they can have that debate.'
Universities, he added, 'are not there to form government policy and not there to have walls, that's the role of nation states, but they are there to really engage with the future.'
The US administration has withheld $4 billion (£2.95 billion) funding for Harvard in a move intended to punish the country's wealthiest university for refusing to comply with demands to clamp down on its diversity initiatives.
The cut to funding will hamper critical research into infectious diseases at the university, Harvard's president warned last month.
Addressing the situation in the US, Lord Browne said: 'Some things have now been forbidden, or chilled down to zero, in the US. 'Research on climate, for instance, these things have been, dare I say banned, since Trump.'
Cambridge University was at the centre of a free speech row in 2020 when academics roundly rejected a policy which asked that scholars be 'respectful' of differing views.
A new policy which emphasised 'tolerance' was passed in its place.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
38 minutes ago
- The Sun
Putin could attack Nato by 2030, alliance boss warns as ‘Europe needs to build its own Golden Dome defence system'
VLADIMIR Putin could launch an assault on NATO by 2030, an alliance chief has warned. Mark Rutte, NATO's secretary general, has urged Europe to build "its own Golden Dome defence system" to protect countries from Russia's looming threat. 6 6 6 The NATO head said that the alliance would need to take a "quantum leap" in building up its defence systems as Putin's war machine is "speeding up, not slowing down." Speaking at the world-leading policy institute, Chatham House, he urged European leaders to increase their air and missile defence capabilities by a staggering 400 per cent. Europe should also be prepared to protect its skies, as Russia 's war on Ukraine has shown the despot leader "delivers terror from above". He said: "The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence. "The fact is, we must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full. "The fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends." In an urgent plea to leaders, he called for militaries to be armed with thousands more vehicles and tanks, and millions more artillery shells. He also insisted allies double their resources supporting military power including logistics, transport and medical aid. Terrifyingly, Rutte also hinted at a potential triple threat - with Mad Vlad teaming up with despot leaders in China, North Korea and Iran. Russia currently produces in three months what the whole of NATO produces in a year, he said. Russia's ambassador to the UK 'blames Britain' for Ukraine's daring drone attack & warns of 'WWIII risk' China is also modernising and expanding its military, with its battle force expected to increase to 435 ships by 2030. He warned: "Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger. "Hope is not a strategy. So NATO has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance." The alliance chief's comments came as he pushed for NATO members to commit to ramping up defence spending at a key summit of the western military alliance later this month. Rutte is urging NATO members to commit to 3.5 percent of GDP on direct military spending by 2032, and an additional 1.5 percent on broader security-related expenditure. The proposal is a compromise deal designed to satisfy US President Donald Trump, who has demanded that allies each spend 5 percent of economic output on defence, up from a current commitment of two percent. Rutte said he "expects" leaders to agree to the proposal at the summit of the 32-country alliance on June 24-25 in The Hague. 6 6 "It will be a NATO-wide commitment and a defining moment for the alliance," he said in his speech. Russia condemned Rutte's comments before he took to the stage, denouncing NATO as "an instrument of aggression". NATO "is demonstrating itself as an instrument of aggression and confrontation", Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters in Moscow. This follows Rutte's meeting with the UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer - their second Downing Street talk since the Labour leader came into power last year. Starmer's government this year pledged to increase defence spending to 2.5 percent of GDP by 2027, but has not yet set a firm timeline for further hikes. Meanwhile, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Canada would hit two percent this year. US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said last week the allies were close to an agreement on the split five-percent target. "That combination constitutes a real commitment, and we think every country can step up," he said on Thursday. Space rockets & hypersonic interceptors…Trump unveils half-a-trillion dollar Golden Dome air defence to be ready by 2029 DONALD Trump has unveiled plans for a high-tech "Golden Dome" missile defence system, which the president claims should be operational by the end of his term in office. The futuristic concept announced by Trump would see American weapons put in space for the first time ever. Trump had already signalled his intent to set up a Golden Dome following his return to the White House, calling missile attacks the "most catastrophic threat facing the United States". The idea is modelled on Israel's Iron Dome defence system, which uses radar to detect incoming missiles and calculates which ones pose a threat to populated areas. But the Golden Dome would be an infinitely bigger project, not least because the United States is more than 400 times larger than Israel. During his announcement in the Oval Office yesterday, Trump said his new Golden Dome would be "capable of intercepting missiles even if they are launched from the other side of the world". NATO members have been scrambling to bolster their defence capabilities since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Trump's return to the White House in January, and question marks over his commitment to European security, has added urgency. Rutte warned: "Danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends. "We must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full." He added that if countries cannot commit to 5 percent for defence spending "you could still have the National Health Service, or in other countries, their health systems, the pension system, etc, but you better learn to speak Russian. I mean, that's the consequence". Britain announced plans last week to build up to 12 nuclear-powered attack submarines and six munitions factories to rearm the country in response to what it said were threats from Russia. 6
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Dawn French's moronic outburst on Israel spells the death of celebrity virtue-signalling
There's no denying that Dawn French's video about Israel was mind-bogglingly crass. In particular the bit when she put on a silly, babyish voice and referred to the October 7 massacre as 'a bad fing'. Even so, let's not be too hard on her. In time, I believe, we may end up owing her our deepest gratitude. Because, thanks to the sheer, blistering ferocity of the backlash she's received, other mush-brained luvvies may finally take the hint – and stop inflicting their witless political views on the rest of us. To be clear: I'm not suggesting that these people deserve to be cancelled for their opinions. Cancel culture is a blight on our age, and famous actors have got just as much right to free speech as anyone else. The problem is that, all too often, what they say is so cluelessly conformist. It's obvious that they're only passing comment because they think trotting out the fashionable line on a given topic – Israel, gender identity, net zero or whatever – will make them look good. With any luck, therefore, Ms French's experience will deter them from expressing a view on such issues until they've bothered to give them some actual thought. And if that sounds too much like hard work, and they'd prefer not to say anything, that's absolutely fine. Why on earth should we expect actors to have intelligent opinions on current affairs, anyway? Their day job is to recite words that have been written for them by other, much smarter people. It doesn't require them to think. So you might as well seek geopolitical analysis from a performing seal, or a parrot. Ms French, however, seems to have believed she had some kind of duty to air her criticisms of Israel's military strategy. In a subsequent statement apologising for her 'tone', she wrote: 'I have felt my silence is complicit or even somehow sanctioning.' Allow me to put her mind at ease. Dear Ms French, I promise you: your previous 'silence' was not responsible for a single death in the Middle East. Even if you'd published your video months ago, Benjamin Netanyahu would not have said, 'Stand down, everyone – I'm ordering an immediate ceasefire. Look, I know we want to defeat Hamas and save the hostages. But, as a nation, we simply can't afford to incur the wrath of that woman from The Vicar of Dibley.' So please, dear Dawn, try not to feel guilty. In fact, be proud. Because if your calamitous own goal does indeed prompt other celebrities to abandon their narcissistic virtue-signalling, it will be the greatest contribution to human happiness you'll ever make.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Rachel Reeves to reinstate winter fuel payments for nine million pensioners
Rachel Reeves has announced plans to restore winter fuel payments for all pensioners with an income of less than £35,000 in her biggest U-turn since taking office. In one of her first acts as chancellor, Reeves stripped ten million people of the benefit, worth between £200 and £300 per year, in an effort to balance the books. The decision was met with widespread criticism from cabinet ministers and backbenchers, and was blamed in part for Labour's poor performance in the local elections last month. The chancellor announced that the payments will be reinstated for nine million pensioners, with money clawed back from higher income households at the end of the next financial year. The Treasury said that only about two million pensioners would miss out. It is not clear how the government will pay for the move. Ministers admitted the new threshold would cost the government £1.25 billion — wiping out all but £250 million of the planned £1.5 billion worth of savings from restricting the benefit this year. However, the government insisted that even after the U-turn the policy would save £450 million. The Treasury said Reeves would set out how the shortfall will be covered in the autumn budget amid warnings that it would require tax rises in other areas in order for the chancellor to hit her fiscal rules. Ministers said that the cost of the change would not be paid for through additional borrowing. The delay to explaining how the policy change will be paid for is likely to lead to accusations that the chancellor is making an unfunded pledge, something she has repeatedly insisted she will not do. The government argues that it is right to defer the announcement until the autumn budget, when decisions on tax and spending are made. Reeves insisted that her original decision had been the right one. Economists pointed out that the fiscal picture is significantly worse now than it was then. She said: 'Targeting winter fuel payments was a tough decision, but the right decision because of the inheritance we had been left by the previous government. It is also right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair, rather than restoring eligibility to everyone including the wealthiest. 'But we have now acted to expand the eligibility of the winter fuel payment so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out. This will mean over three quarters of pensioners receiving the payment in England and Wales later this winter.' Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, said Starmer was attempting to 'clear up a mess of his own making'. 'This humiliating U-turn will come as scant comfort to the pensioners forced to choose between heating and eating last winter,' she said. Under the plans, the payments will be restored to all pensioners this winter. The government will then recoup the money from those earning more than £35,000 automatically through their tax bills. The announcement will be seen as an attempt by Reeves to clear the decks before the spending review on Wednesday. The review will allocate £113 billion on infrastructure such as public transport schemes and nuclear energy. It will also increase the NHS budget by about £30 billion a year and boost investment in the Ministry of Defence. However, there are likely to be some significant losers, as unprotected departments face real-terms cuts. Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, is still in negotiations with Reeves over her budget amid a row over police funding. The chancellor has offered the home office a real-terms increase in police funding. However, Cooper argues that this is not enough to cover the cost of meeting the government's flagship pledge to recruit 13,000 more neighbourhood police officers.
