Free speech essential to university life, Cambridge chancellor candidate says
Universities must stay committed to free speech, a leading contender for the chancellorship of Cambridge University has said.
In comments likely to be seen as Lord Browne setting out his stall for leadership of one of Britain's leading universities, the former head of BP described freedom of speech as the single value which must 'not change' in higher education institutions.
The 77-year-old made the comments as the race to replace Lord Sainsbury as the next ceremonial head of Cambridge University gains momentum ahead of the election in July.
The official list of candidates is yet to be released but potential contenders include Mohamed El-Erian, the economist, Gina Miller, the anti-Brexit campaigner, and Michael Portillo, the former Conservative minister.
Alumni and senior members of the university and its colleges are eligible to vote in the election.
Lord Browne, who led BP between 1995 and 2007 before founding an environmentalist investment group, made the comments in an interview at Hay literary festival in Powys, south Wales.
Asked how universities should respond to threats to free speech, such as the pressure exerted on American institutions by Donald Trump 's administration, Lord Browne said: 'There's been a lot of change in universities. But the values must not change.
'Universities embody this great thing that says: I may disagree with your view, but I will fight to make sure you can say it.
'People need to be able to say what they think, so long as they do it in the spirit of debate and they [do so] in a way which recognises they may disagree with each other but they can have that debate.'
Universities, he added, 'are not there to form government policy and not there to have walls, that's the role of nation states, but they are there to really engage with the future.'
The US administration has withheld $4 billion (£2.95 billion) funding for Harvard in a move intended to punish the country's wealthiest university for refusing to comply with demands to clamp down on its diversity initiatives.
The cut to funding will hamper critical research into infectious diseases at the university, Harvard's president warned last month.
Addressing the situation in the US, Lord Browne said: 'Some things have now been forbidden, or chilled down to zero, in the US. 'Research on climate, for instance, these things have been, dare I say banned, since Trump.'
Cambridge University was at the centre of a free speech row in 2020 when academics roundly rejected a policy which asked that scholars be 'respectful' of differing views.
A new policy which emphasised 'tolerance' was passed in its place.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
3 minutes ago
- Leader Live
UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says
Rhun ap Iorwerth, leader of Plaid, criticised the UK Labour Government for reclassifying the £6.6 billion Oxford to Cambridge line to an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth called on Eluned Morgan, the Welsh Labour First Minister, to condemn the reclassification. Baroness Morgan agreed Wales was not getting its fair share but said she was expecting to see positive changes in the UK Government's spending review on Wednesday. Mr ap Iorwerth's comments come following reports that revealed the project had originally been listed as England-only from 2020 to 2024. The Treasury told the BBC the classification was a 'publishing error' and insisted it was always considered an England and Wales development. Speaking First Minister's Questions in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mr ap Iorwerth said: 'We were getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts. 'Labour went out of its way to make sure Wales wouldn't get the money when the big spending really began.' He added: 'She should be joining me in condemning the UK Labour Government for betraying Wales. Will she?' Mr ap Iorwerth argued the reclassification was a 'new HS2 scandal' – a rail project that has been controversial in Wales. Despite none of the track being laid in the country, it was also designated an England and Wales project by the last UK Conservative government. Plaid has said this designation cost Wales £3.9 billion in funding. Responding to Mr Iorwerth, Baroness Morgan said: 'I've learned to expect nothing but constant negativity from the Plaid Cymru leader. 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice. 'I don't know what's going to be in the spending review, but the one thing I do know is that if Labour gave Wales a total land of milk and honey, Plaid Cymru would still find fault.' Baroness Morgan added they were 'expecting something positive from the spending review', but the Welsh government would have to keep on making the case for a fair share of funding. In January, the UK government admitted Welsh railways had been underfunded, with spending at 'low levels' in recent years. However, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander did not announce any additional funding at the time.
Glasgow Times
3 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says
Rhun ap Iorwerth, leader of Plaid, criticised the UK Labour Government for reclassifying the £6.6 billion Oxford to Cambridge line to an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth called on Eluned Morgan, the Welsh Labour First Minister, to condemn the reclassification. Baroness Morgan agreed Wales was not getting its fair share but said she was expecting to see positive changes in the UK Government's spending review on Wednesday. Mr ap Iorwerth's comments come following reports that revealed the project had originally been listed as England-only from 2020 to 2024. The Treasury told the BBC the classification was a 'publishing error' and insisted it was always considered an England and Wales development. Speaking First Minister's Questions in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mr ap Iorwerth said: 'We were getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts. 'Labour went out of its way to make sure Wales wouldn't get the money when the big spending really began.' He added: 'She should be joining me in condemning the UK Labour Government for betraying Wales. Will she?' Mr ap Iorwerth argued the reclassification was a 'new HS2 scandal' – a rail project that has been controversial in Wales. Despite none of the track being laid in the country, it was also designated an England and Wales project by the last UK Conservative government. Plaid has said this designation cost Wales £3.9 billion in funding. Responding to Mr Iorwerth, Baroness Morgan said: 'I've learned to expect nothing but constant negativity from the Plaid Cymru leader. 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice. 'I don't know what's going to be in the spending review, but the one thing I do know is that if Labour gave Wales a total land of milk and honey, Plaid Cymru would still find fault.' Baroness Morgan added they were 'expecting something positive from the spending review', but the Welsh government would have to keep on making the case for a fair share of funding. In January, the UK government admitted Welsh railways had been underfunded, with spending at 'low levels' in recent years. However, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander did not announce any additional funding at the time.
The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Relief after 10 dance centres for children across England saved from cuts
Campaigners from the world of dance including Arlene Phillips and Matthew Bourne have been celebrating after a training scheme for children was saved that they say stops the art form becoming the preserve of the elite. The National Centres for Advanced Training in Dance, or National Dance CATs, work with 10- to 18-years-olds to provide them with multiple sessions of training each week, which is combined with their mainstream education. The centres use outreach programmes to attract dancers from outside of traditional backgrounds in a bid to make dance, which has had issues with elitism for decades, more diverse and equitable. High-profile dance figures feared the 10 National Dance CATs could have been scrapped after a £300,000 grant for outreach work was cut in December 2024. But on Tuesday, the Department of Education confirmed to the campaigners, including alumni, students and parents who wrote to more than 100 MPs, that funding for the centres had been secured for another 12 months. Clare Connor, chief executive of The Place and London Contemporary Dance School, said: 'We are pleased to see government have listened … we will build on this good news and work to secure the long-term future of the programme. 'This is an encouraging step in the government's commitment to safeguarding the pathways to careers in dance, and a positive signal of the recognition of dance's contribution to our thriving and growing creative sector.' Brendan Keaney, the artistic director and chief executive of DanceEast in Ipswich, said the decision to scrap the outreach funding was a 'retrograde step' that could have reversed the progress made in the last 20 years to make access to dance easier for people from ethnic minority and working-class backgrounds. 'The outreach funding was our search vehicle. It was the route into the programme – a first step into the pathway towards a career in dance,' he said. 'The National Dance CATs are sort of like little beacons across the country, where you can get high-quality specialist dance training without having to go off to a residential school. You can go to a regular school, but also get the kind of intensive training that is absolutely essential if you're going to compete as professional dancer.' Dame Arlene Phillips, said: 'Every child should have the right to pursue the arts and dance and the opportunity to reach their potential, regardless of their background or where they live.' Sir Matthew Bourne called the National Dance CATs the 'envy of international dance companies' and said without them we could enter 'a world with no more Billy – or Betty – Elliots.' The centres were introduced by the last Labour government in 2004 in an attempt to make dance more equitable. Manchester, Salford, Leeds, Newcastle upon Tyne, Swindon, Ipswich, London, Bournemouth and Exeter all host the centres that have produced dancers who have gone on to work with Wayne McGregor, Akram Khan Dance Company, BalletBoyz, Northern Ballet and Matthew Bourne's New Adventures. Earlier this year the Guardian reported that artists, directors and actors had raised the alarm about what they described as a rigged system preventing working-class talent thriving in their industries. There had been speculation before the spending review that more funding could be cut at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) and even some suggestions DCMS itself could have been abolished – although this was dismissed as 'madness' by culture minister Chris Bryant. The Department for Education has been contacted for comment.
