logo
ScoMo offers Albanese his tips for dealing with Donald Trump

ScoMo offers Albanese his tips for dealing with Donald Trump

Former Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison has hosed down Opposition concerns about the United States' snap review of the AUKUS nuclear submarines deal, saying "there shouldn't be any issue" for Australia.
After the US informed Australia of the review overnight, the Coalition seized on the news to suggest the move was influenced by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's refusal to comply with US President Donald Trump's request to commit to higher defence spending.
"This government has sent mixed messages to our allies and now we're seeing the consequences," Opposition Defence spokesperson Angus Taylor said.
But Mr Morrison, who signed Australia up to the AUKUS security pact in 2021, said it was "important to keep this in perspective and not to over-interpret" the review, which was initiated by the US Department of Defense and not the White House.
"Like with any arrangement ... you've got to keep making the case," he told Sky.
"The first time round, it took us over a year - and that was predominantly during the first Trump administration - to convince pretty much the same people who will be involved in this review about the technical and policy and strategic merits of this."
Former US ambassador Joe Hockey, who has been described as "Australia's Trump-whisperer", expressed a similar view.
"I don't think we should be overly worried, but we should be involved in contributing to that review," Mr Hockey told Sky.
"I know Donald Trump supports AUKUS, and there's no doubt about Congress and the Senate. I was there just a few weeks ago, met with a number of key senators, Democrats and Republicans, including Senator [Roger] Wicker, and they're emphatically supporting AUKUS. But you have to pay your way, and Australia is paying its way."
Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles played down the significance of the review, saying it was only natural for the US to review the deal and arguing this was no different to Australia's Defence Strategic Review.
Asked if he could guarantee Australia would get submarines out of the AUKUS deal, he told ABC radio: "The agreement is for the submarines to come in the early 2030s and that is what we are all working to and I'm very confident that that is what is going to happen."
READ MORE:
When asked what Mr Albanese should say to Mr Trump at a possible face-to-face meeting on the sidelines of the G7 Leaders' Summit in Canada next week, Mr Morrison said Australia needed to be "very clear about our commitments on continuing to increase our capabilities".
"The other thing about AUKUS is it's not a lowest common denominator partnership," he said. "It's a highest common denominator partnership. It requires big investments. "
Mr Morrison signed Australia up to the three-nation AUKUS security alliance between Australia, the UK and the US in 2021 after controversially tearing up a previous $90 billion deal to buy diesel-powered submarines from France.
The alliance was formed to counter China's strategic moves in the Pacific arena and was underpinned by an agreement between the US and the UK to provide Australia with access to nuclear-powered submarine technology, to eventually replace its aging Collins-class boats.
Australia is contracted to buy three off-the-shelf nuclear submarines from the US, costing about $US4 billion each, before making eight of its own - with the total cost expected to hit $368 billion. The first submarine is not expected to join the Australian fleet for years.
The deal includes a clause that enables the US to withhold ready-made nuclear submarines from Australia if it does not have enough for the US Navy's use - and American shipyards are not on track to meet domestic targets.
Mr Albanese has refused to commit to a specific target for Defence spending after the US administration has called for Australia to increase it to about 3.5 per cent.
He told the National Press Club on Wednesday that "Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defence", saying "we will always provide for capability that's needed".
Mr Morrison agreed with the Opposition that "we need to get to" putting 3 per cent of GDP into the Defence budget.
"I don't make that as a partisan comment. I just think it's absolutely necessary, and there's no shortage of areas where that can be filled," Mr Morrison said.
He said the Pentagon was "very focused on the US submarine production rate", amid reports that US shipyards were not manufacturing nuclear submarines quickly enough to meet the US Navy's own needs.
"Every time I go to the US, there's very strong support [for AUKUS]," Mr Morrison said.
"There's very strong congressional support as well ... AUKUS has been making very good progress there."
Mr Morrison said the AUKUS security pact was "the strongest one and the most important one we've struck in 70 years - and it's the one that I've noticed that the Chinese in particular, have really reacted to ... So that tells you something, I think, about its strategic merit."
Former Liberal prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has joined the Greens in calling on the Australian government to conduct its own review of the AUKUS deal.
"The UK is conducting a review of AUKUS. The US [Department of Defense] is conducting a review of AUKUS," he posted on X/Twitter.
"But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed. Time to wake up?"
Mr Turnbull is a longtime critic of Mr Morrison's handling of AUKUS and has previously argued the government needs a backup plan in case the deal falls over.
Mr Taylor rejected the call for a review, telling reporters in Canberra on Thursday: "I'm not into bureaucratic processes. I'm into outcomes, and I want to see the outcome."
- with Eleanor Campbell
Former Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison has hosed down Opposition concerns about the United States' snap review of the AUKUS nuclear submarines deal, saying "there shouldn't be any issue" for Australia.
After the US informed Australia of the review overnight, the Coalition seized on the news to suggest the move was influenced by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's refusal to comply with US President Donald Trump's request to commit to higher defence spending.
"This government has sent mixed messages to our allies and now we're seeing the consequences," Opposition Defence spokesperson Angus Taylor said.
But Mr Morrison, who signed Australia up to the AUKUS security pact in 2021, said it was "important to keep this in perspective and not to over-interpret" the review, which was initiated by the US Department of Defense and not the White House.
"Like with any arrangement ... you've got to keep making the case," he told Sky.
"The first time round, it took us over a year - and that was predominantly during the first Trump administration - to convince pretty much the same people who will be involved in this review about the technical and policy and strategic merits of this."
Former US ambassador Joe Hockey, who has been described as "Australia's Trump-whisperer", expressed a similar view.
"I don't think we should be overly worried, but we should be involved in contributing to that review," Mr Hockey told Sky.
"I know Donald Trump supports AUKUS, and there's no doubt about Congress and the Senate. I was there just a few weeks ago, met with a number of key senators, Democrats and Republicans, including Senator [Roger] Wicker, and they're emphatically supporting AUKUS. But you have to pay your way, and Australia is paying its way."
Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles played down the significance of the review, saying it was only natural for the US to review the deal and arguing this was no different to Australia's Defence Strategic Review.
Asked if he could guarantee Australia would get submarines out of the AUKUS deal, he told ABC radio: "The agreement is for the submarines to come in the early 2030s and that is what we are all working to and I'm very confident that that is what is going to happen."
READ MORE:
When asked what Mr Albanese should say to Mr Trump at a possible face-to-face meeting on the sidelines of the G7 Leaders' Summit in Canada next week, Mr Morrison said Australia needed to be "very clear about our commitments on continuing to increase our capabilities".
"The other thing about AUKUS is it's not a lowest common denominator partnership," he said. "It's a highest common denominator partnership. It requires big investments. "
Mr Morrison signed Australia up to the three-nation AUKUS security alliance between Australia, the UK and the US in 2021 after controversially tearing up a previous $90 billion deal to buy diesel-powered submarines from France.
The alliance was formed to counter China's strategic moves in the Pacific arena and was underpinned by an agreement between the US and the UK to provide Australia with access to nuclear-powered submarine technology, to eventually replace its aging Collins-class boats.
Australia is contracted to buy three off-the-shelf nuclear submarines from the US, costing about $US4 billion each, before making eight of its own - with the total cost expected to hit $368 billion. The first submarine is not expected to join the Australian fleet for years.
The deal includes a clause that enables the US to withhold ready-made nuclear submarines from Australia if it does not have enough for the US Navy's use - and American shipyards are not on track to meet domestic targets.
Mr Albanese has refused to commit to a specific target for Defence spending after the US administration has called for Australia to increase it to about 3.5 per cent.
He told the National Press Club on Wednesday that "Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defence", saying "we will always provide for capability that's needed".
Mr Morrison agreed with the Opposition that "we need to get to" putting 3 per cent of GDP into the Defence budget.
"I don't make that as a partisan comment. I just think it's absolutely necessary, and there's no shortage of areas where that can be filled," Mr Morrison said.
He said the Pentagon was "very focused on the US submarine production rate", amid reports that US shipyards were not manufacturing nuclear submarines quickly enough to meet the US Navy's own needs.
"Every time I go to the US, there's very strong support [for AUKUS]," Mr Morrison said.
"There's very strong congressional support as well ... AUKUS has been making very good progress there."
Mr Morrison said the AUKUS security pact was "the strongest one and the most important one we've struck in 70 years - and it's the one that I've noticed that the Chinese in particular, have really reacted to ... So that tells you something, I think, about its strategic merit."
Former Liberal prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has joined the Greens in calling on the Australian government to conduct its own review of the AUKUS deal.
"The UK is conducting a review of AUKUS. The US [Department of Defense] is conducting a review of AUKUS," he posted on X/Twitter.
"But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed. Time to wake up?"
Mr Turnbull is a longtime critic of Mr Morrison's handling of AUKUS and has previously argued the government needs a backup plan in case the deal falls over.
Mr Taylor rejected the call for a review, telling reporters in Canberra on Thursday: "I'm not into bureaucratic processes. I'm into outcomes, and I want to see the outcome."
- with Eleanor Campbell
Former Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison has hosed down Opposition concerns about the United States' snap review of the AUKUS nuclear submarines deal, saying "there shouldn't be any issue" for Australia.
After the US informed Australia of the review overnight, the Coalition seized on the news to suggest the move was influenced by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's refusal to comply with US President Donald Trump's request to commit to higher defence spending.
"This government has sent mixed messages to our allies and now we're seeing the consequences," Opposition Defence spokesperson Angus Taylor said.
But Mr Morrison, who signed Australia up to the AUKUS security pact in 2021, said it was "important to keep this in perspective and not to over-interpret" the review, which was initiated by the US Department of Defense and not the White House.
"Like with any arrangement ... you've got to keep making the case," he told Sky.
"The first time round, it took us over a year - and that was predominantly during the first Trump administration - to convince pretty much the same people who will be involved in this review about the technical and policy and strategic merits of this."
Former US ambassador Joe Hockey, who has been described as "Australia's Trump-whisperer", expressed a similar view.
"I don't think we should be overly worried, but we should be involved in contributing to that review," Mr Hockey told Sky.
"I know Donald Trump supports AUKUS, and there's no doubt about Congress and the Senate. I was there just a few weeks ago, met with a number of key senators, Democrats and Republicans, including Senator [Roger] Wicker, and they're emphatically supporting AUKUS. But you have to pay your way, and Australia is paying its way."
Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles played down the significance of the review, saying it was only natural for the US to review the deal and arguing this was no different to Australia's Defence Strategic Review.
Asked if he could guarantee Australia would get submarines out of the AUKUS deal, he told ABC radio: "The agreement is for the submarines to come in the early 2030s and that is what we are all working to and I'm very confident that that is what is going to happen."
READ MORE:
When asked what Mr Albanese should say to Mr Trump at a possible face-to-face meeting on the sidelines of the G7 Leaders' Summit in Canada next week, Mr Morrison said Australia needed to be "very clear about our commitments on continuing to increase our capabilities".
"The other thing about AUKUS is it's not a lowest common denominator partnership," he said. "It's a highest common denominator partnership. It requires big investments. "
Mr Morrison signed Australia up to the three-nation AUKUS security alliance between Australia, the UK and the US in 2021 after controversially tearing up a previous $90 billion deal to buy diesel-powered submarines from France.
The alliance was formed to counter China's strategic moves in the Pacific arena and was underpinned by an agreement between the US and the UK to provide Australia with access to nuclear-powered submarine technology, to eventually replace its aging Collins-class boats.
Australia is contracted to buy three off-the-shelf nuclear submarines from the US, costing about $US4 billion each, before making eight of its own - with the total cost expected to hit $368 billion. The first submarine is not expected to join the Australian fleet for years.
The deal includes a clause that enables the US to withhold ready-made nuclear submarines from Australia if it does not have enough for the US Navy's use - and American shipyards are not on track to meet domestic targets.
Mr Albanese has refused to commit to a specific target for Defence spending after the US administration has called for Australia to increase it to about 3.5 per cent.
He told the National Press Club on Wednesday that "Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defence", saying "we will always provide for capability that's needed".
Mr Morrison agreed with the Opposition that "we need to get to" putting 3 per cent of GDP into the Defence budget.
"I don't make that as a partisan comment. I just think it's absolutely necessary, and there's no shortage of areas where that can be filled," Mr Morrison said.
He said the Pentagon was "very focused on the US submarine production rate", amid reports that US shipyards were not manufacturing nuclear submarines quickly enough to meet the US Navy's own needs.
"Every time I go to the US, there's very strong support [for AUKUS]," Mr Morrison said.
"There's very strong congressional support as well ... AUKUS has been making very good progress there."
Mr Morrison said the AUKUS security pact was "the strongest one and the most important one we've struck in 70 years - and it's the one that I've noticed that the Chinese in particular, have really reacted to ... So that tells you something, I think, about its strategic merit."
Former Liberal prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has joined the Greens in calling on the Australian government to conduct its own review of the AUKUS deal.
"The UK is conducting a review of AUKUS. The US [Department of Defense] is conducting a review of AUKUS," he posted on X/Twitter.
"But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed. Time to wake up?"
Mr Turnbull is a longtime critic of Mr Morrison's handling of AUKUS and has previously argued the government needs a backup plan in case the deal falls over.
Mr Taylor rejected the call for a review, telling reporters in Canberra on Thursday: "I'm not into bureaucratic processes. I'm into outcomes, and I want to see the outcome."
- with Eleanor Campbell
Former Liberal prime minister Scott Morrison has hosed down Opposition concerns about the United States' snap review of the AUKUS nuclear submarines deal, saying "there shouldn't be any issue" for Australia.
After the US informed Australia of the review overnight, the Coalition seized on the news to suggest the move was influenced by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's refusal to comply with US President Donald Trump's request to commit to higher defence spending.
"This government has sent mixed messages to our allies and now we're seeing the consequences," Opposition Defence spokesperson Angus Taylor said.
But Mr Morrison, who signed Australia up to the AUKUS security pact in 2021, said it was "important to keep this in perspective and not to over-interpret" the review, which was initiated by the US Department of Defense and not the White House.
"Like with any arrangement ... you've got to keep making the case," he told Sky.
"The first time round, it took us over a year - and that was predominantly during the first Trump administration - to convince pretty much the same people who will be involved in this review about the technical and policy and strategic merits of this."
Former US ambassador Joe Hockey, who has been described as "Australia's Trump-whisperer", expressed a similar view.
"I don't think we should be overly worried, but we should be involved in contributing to that review," Mr Hockey told Sky.
"I know Donald Trump supports AUKUS, and there's no doubt about Congress and the Senate. I was there just a few weeks ago, met with a number of key senators, Democrats and Republicans, including Senator [Roger] Wicker, and they're emphatically supporting AUKUS. But you have to pay your way, and Australia is paying its way."
Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles played down the significance of the review, saying it was only natural for the US to review the deal and arguing this was no different to Australia's Defence Strategic Review.
Asked if he could guarantee Australia would get submarines out of the AUKUS deal, he told ABC radio: "The agreement is for the submarines to come in the early 2030s and that is what we are all working to and I'm very confident that that is what is going to happen."
READ MORE:
When asked what Mr Albanese should say to Mr Trump at a possible face-to-face meeting on the sidelines of the G7 Leaders' Summit in Canada next week, Mr Morrison said Australia needed to be "very clear about our commitments on continuing to increase our capabilities".
"The other thing about AUKUS is it's not a lowest common denominator partnership," he said. "It's a highest common denominator partnership. It requires big investments. "
Mr Morrison signed Australia up to the three-nation AUKUS security alliance between Australia, the UK and the US in 2021 after controversially tearing up a previous $90 billion deal to buy diesel-powered submarines from France.
The alliance was formed to counter China's strategic moves in the Pacific arena and was underpinned by an agreement between the US and the UK to provide Australia with access to nuclear-powered submarine technology, to eventually replace its aging Collins-class boats.
Australia is contracted to buy three off-the-shelf nuclear submarines from the US, costing about $US4 billion each, before making eight of its own - with the total cost expected to hit $368 billion. The first submarine is not expected to join the Australian fleet for years.
The deal includes a clause that enables the US to withhold ready-made nuclear submarines from Australia if it does not have enough for the US Navy's use - and American shipyards are not on track to meet domestic targets.
Mr Albanese has refused to commit to a specific target for Defence spending after the US administration has called for Australia to increase it to about 3.5 per cent.
He told the National Press Club on Wednesday that "Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defence", saying "we will always provide for capability that's needed".
Mr Morrison agreed with the Opposition that "we need to get to" putting 3 per cent of GDP into the Defence budget.
"I don't make that as a partisan comment. I just think it's absolutely necessary, and there's no shortage of areas where that can be filled," Mr Morrison said.
He said the Pentagon was "very focused on the US submarine production rate", amid reports that US shipyards were not manufacturing nuclear submarines quickly enough to meet the US Navy's own needs.
"Every time I go to the US, there's very strong support [for AUKUS]," Mr Morrison said.
"There's very strong congressional support as well ... AUKUS has been making very good progress there."
Mr Morrison said the AUKUS security pact was "the strongest one and the most important one we've struck in 70 years - and it's the one that I've noticed that the Chinese in particular, have really reacted to ... So that tells you something, I think, about its strategic merit."
Former Liberal prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has joined the Greens in calling on the Australian government to conduct its own review of the AUKUS deal.
"The UK is conducting a review of AUKUS. The US [Department of Defense] is conducting a review of AUKUS," he posted on X/Twitter.
"But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed. Time to wake up?"
Mr Turnbull is a longtime critic of Mr Morrison's handling of AUKUS and has previously argued the government needs a backup plan in case the deal falls over.
Mr Taylor rejected the call for a review, telling reporters in Canberra on Thursday: "I'm not into bureaucratic processes. I'm into outcomes, and I want to see the outcome."
- with Eleanor Campbell

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Breakfast Wrap: What next for AUKUS?
Breakfast Wrap: What next for AUKUS?

ABC News

time29 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Breakfast Wrap: What next for AUKUS?

The questions about Australia's deal to buy nuclear powered submarines aren't going away. We learnt this week the US Defence Department is reviewing the agreement. And while the Australian government is playing it cool and insisting there's nothing usual about that, not everyone is so sure. We'll bring you the latest reaction here from shadow Defence Minister Angus Taylor and get the view out of the other AUKUS partner, the UK. Also today bring you a panel of journalists to wrap the huge political week that was. And a flight travelling from India to the UK has crashed on take-off. We'll get an early view from one aerospace expert about what happened. Recap the morning's news, politics and global affairs with the Breakfast Wrap

Trump can keep National Guard deployed to LA for now, appeals court rules
Trump can keep National Guard deployed to LA for now, appeals court rules

ABC News

time34 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Trump can keep National Guard deployed to LA for now, appeals court rules

A US appeals court has temporarily blocked a federal judge's order that directed President Donald Trump to return control of National Guard troops to California after he deployed them there following protests in Los Angeles over immigration raids. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals said it would hold a hearing on the matter on June 17. The ruling came just hours after a federal judge's order was to take effect at noon on Friday, local time. Earlier on Thursday, US District Judge Charles Breyer ruled the Guard deployment was illegal, violating the Tenth Amendment and exceeding Trump's statutory authority. The order applied only to the National Guard troops and not Marines who were also deployed to the LA protests. The judge said he would not rule on the Marines because they were not out on the streets yet. California Governor Gavin Newsom, who had asked the judge for an emergency stop to troops helping carry out immigration raids, had praised the earlier ruling. "Today was really about a test of democracy, and today we passed the test," he said in a news conference before the appeals court decision. The White House had called Breyer's order "unprecedented" and said it "puts our brave federal officials in danger". "The district court has no authority to usurp the President's authority as Commander in Chief," White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement. "The President exercised his lawful authority to [mobilise] the National Guard to protect federal buildings and personnel in Gavin Newsom's lawless Los Angeles. "The Trump Administration will immediately appeal this abuse of power and looks forward to ultimate victory on the issue." Mr Newsom's case was solely focused on the National Guard, and the judge said when the state attorney asked about whether this could apply to the Marines that he would not rule on that because they were not on the streets yet. About 700 Marines have been undergoing civil disturbance training at Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach in Orange County, California. "I have been told by the office of the governor that within the next 24 hours, 140 Marines will replace and relieve National Guard members in Los Angeles," attorney for the state Nicholas Green told the court. Typically the authority to call up the National Guard lies with governors, but there are limited circumstances under which the president can deploy those troops. Mr Trump federalised members of the California National Guard under an authority known as Title 10. Title 10 allows the president to call the National Guard into federal service under certain limited circumstances, such as when the country "is invaded," when "there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government," or when the president is unable "to execute the laws of the United States". Judge Breyer said in his ruling that what is happening in Los Angeles does not meet the definition of a rebellion. "The protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion,'" he wrote. It was not immediately clear how that would change the situation on the ground. Mr Newsom sued to block the Guard's deployment against his wishes. California later filed an emergency motion asking the judge to block the Guard from assisting with immigration raids. The governor argued the troops were originally deployed to guard federal buildings and called for the court to block the troops from helping protect immigration agents during the raids, saying involving the Guard would only escalate tensions and promote civil unrest. Major General Scott Sherman, commander of Task Force 51 which is overseeing the Guard troops and Marines sent to Los Angeles, said as of Wednesday about 500 Guard troops had been trained to accompany agents on immigration operations. Photos of Guard soldiers providing security for the agents have already been circulated by immigration officials. None of the Marines have been trained to go on immigration raids, and it is not yet clear if they eventually will, Major General Sherman said. In his broad ruling, the judge determined Mr Trump had not properly called the Guard up in the first place. The lawsuit argued that Title 10 also requires the president to go through governors when issuing orders to the National Guard. Brett Shumate, a lawyer for the federal government, said Mr Trump complied with the statute by informing the general in charge of the troops of his decision and would have the authority to call in the Guard even if he had not. In a brief filed ahead of the Thursday hearing, the Department of Justice said Mr Trump's orders were not subject to judicial review. "Courts did not interfere when President Eisenhower deployed the military to protect school desegregation," the department said. "Courts did not interfere when President Nixon deployed the military to deliver the mail in the midst of a postal strike. "And courts should not interfere here either." Judge Breyer, who at one point waved a copy of the constitution, said he disagreed. "We're talking about the president exercising his authority, and the president is of course limited in that authority," he said. "That's the difference between a constitutional government and King George." AP

Trump's ‘deal' with China is just a waypoint to the next fight
Trump's ‘deal' with China is just a waypoint to the next fight

AU Financial Review

time34 minutes ago

  • AU Financial Review

Trump's ‘deal' with China is just a waypoint to the next fight

It might sound odd to say, given that Donald Trump at one stage hit Chinese imports with tariffs of 145 per cent, but the truth is that the US president has barely turned his attention to China policy. The negotiations, which concluded in London this week and involved three US cabinet secretaries and a politburo-led Chinese team, were an effort to untie the knot tangled by Trump's initial sky-high tariffs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store