2 Albuquerque teens accused of killing homeless man face murder charges
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – Yet two more teens in Albuquerque face murder charges after police said they shot and killed a homeless man last month. This wasn't the teens' first run-in with the law, one was already on probation for taking a gun to school. The district attorney said this is more evidence that the juvenile justice system isn't working.
Story continues below
Community:ABQ bus driver speaks out on her experience of safety issues on Central route
News:Homeland Security: 11 people arrested at New Mexico dairy were 'undocumented'
Trending:Mexican gray wolf Asha gives birth to litter of pups
Food: Two Albuquerque restaurants make Yelp's 'Top 50 Cheap Eats' list
'We have two teenagers accused of killing a homeless person. The frustration level, quite frankly, is at a boiling point. This will be, I believe, the 47th juvenile that we've charged with murder in this office since I've been district attorney,' said Bernalillo County District Attorney Sam Bregman.
On May 1, Albuquerque police were called to an apartment complex at Carlisle near Montgomery for a homicide. When they arrived that morning, they found 23-year-old Christopher Sturluson dead inside the tent he was living in behind the building.
According to a police report, the Albuquerque Police Department arrived the night before due to reports of shots being fired nearby, which were picked up by ShotSpotter. Police interviewed Sturluson at that time. He said there were three males shooting in his direction, and he told them to stop.
The next day, Albuquerque Community Safety found Sturluson dead inside the tent with a gunshot wound. Investigators believe 17-year-old Adrian Brown and 18-year-old Joshua Curtis shot and killed Sturluson. Police said the two teens can be seen in surveillance footage from that night walking near the tent moments before shots were fired. Investigators linked casings from the scene to a gun they believe was used in the crime.
The DA said Brown has a criminal history involving firearms and was already on juvenile probation at the time of the murder for taking a gun to Sandia High School in 2022. Bregman reiterated his calls in recent months to overhaul the juvenile justice system and said minors need more consequences. 'If we don't start doing something, we will continue to see this kind of result. We're not teaching our kids anything when we're not giving them consequences,' said Bregman.
The District Attorney's office said they plan on charging Adrian Brown as an adult for murder. Joshua Curtis is also facing murder and other charges. His criminal history includes a pending battery upon a peace officer case.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
2 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Chicago man charged in deadly Hammond crash
A Chicago man is charged in a drunken deadly Hammond crash in March. Joellic Herron, 30, is charged with Causing Death When Operating a Motor Vehicle with a blood alcohol content of .08% or More, Causing Catastrophic Injury When Operating a Motor Vehicle with a blood alcohol content of .08% or More and Causing Serious Bodily Injury when Operating a Motor Vehicle with a blood alcohol content of .08% or More. He has not been apprehended. When arrested, he is ordered held without bail. When Hammond police arrived just before 1 p.m. March 15 on the 3000 block of Michigan Street, they concluded Herron went into the east lanes and hit another car head-on. Rosa M Lopez, 72, a passenger in the other vehicle, was later pronounced dead. She died from abdominal injuries from the crash. Lopez's husband had four fractured ribs and a fractured leg. A female in Herron's vehicle was also injured. Lopez's husband said they went to the Ameristar casino in East Chicago for a few hours that morning and were headed to Cline Avenue to go home to Illinois. 'It all happened too quickly,' he said. 'All I remember saying is Mamma Mia. I grabbed the steering wheel and then my mind went blank.' His wife said she couldn't feel her legs. She was crying from the pain. A native of Mexico, she lived in south Chicago, then the south suburbs and was a beloved mother and grandmother, according to her obituary. She was the 'cherished backbone' of the family — who made delicious Mexican food, loved the casinos and had an 'unparalleled talent for spreading happiness.' A new court date is not yet set.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Why are ICE agents running amok? Because they can.
As the Trump administration pushes for more mass deportations, law enforcement officers from the Department of Homeland Security are suddenly everywhere. In San Diego, Homeland Security officers conducted a SWAT-style raid on a restaurant, handcuffing 19 employees over an hour and slamming the manager against a wall in the process. Eventually, they arrested four people. The raid was so heavy-handed that the officers had to deploy flashbang grenades to escape from the angry crowd that gathered in response. Even members of Congress aren't safe. Last week, Homeland Security officers forced their way into Rep. Jerry Nadler's (D) New York office without a warrant. When one of the staffers protested, she was handcuffed and detained. The cases you hear about are only the tip of the iceberg. Federal officers are fanning out across the country, conducting raids, traffic stops, even scooping people up at courthouses when they appear for immigration hearings and carting them away in leg irons and shackles — harsh treatment that you seldom see even when felons are arrested. This heavy-handedness and cruelty isn't a glitch — it's intentional, as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security Kristi Noem and Tom Homan, President Trump's border czar, attempt to frighten immigrants into leaving the country. Even legal residents and American citizens are getting caught up in the crackdown. And the worst part is, while things like barging into a congressman's office and detaining his staffers aren't legal, there is nothing anyone can do about it. If Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents force their way into your house without a warrant, slap you around and detain your family at gunpoint while conducting an illegal search, you have no way of getting your constitutional claims into federal court. As a practical matter, these agents are above the law and cannot be held accountable for violating your constitutional rights. Why this is true is yet another example of our system of checks and balances failing to appreciate the risk of a president deciding to simply the the law. After the Civil War, to ensure that states abided by the Constitution, Congress passed 42 U.S. Code 1983, giving individuals the right to sue in federal court when their constitutional rights had been violated under color of state law. At the time, it was inconceivable that there should be a similar need to sue for constitutional violations by the federal government. For one thing, law enforcement was almost exclusively under state control — the FBI was not founded until 1908. Moreover, the federal government was seen, generally, as the perennial good guy and the guarantor of constitutional rights, a position it held right through the civil rights era. As the federal government and federal law enforcement grew, this became more and more untenable. So in 1971, in a case called Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, the Supreme Court created what is known as a 'Bivens action' as an analogue of section 1983, giving individuals the right to sue in court when their Fourth Amendment rights were violated under color of federal law. Since then, the Supreme Court has been reluctant to extend the reach of Bivens, ultimately holding in 2022 that no one could ever bring a legal claim for excessive force — or any constitutional claim — against a federal officer enforcing immigration laws. This is dangerous, especially now. The rule of law is not supposed to run on the honor system. Section 1983 and Bivens actions are not just about monetary damages. They are a way for citizens to hold their government accountable. Officers' understanding that they may someday have to explain their actions is a powerful deterrent to bad behavior. Nobody likes accountability, but it makes all of us, including police officers, better people. The current system of 'what happens in ICE, stays in ICE' is the opposite of that. Unchecked by the courts, ICE's behavior will only get worse over the next three and a half years. Even the most well-meaning bureaucracies are subject to mission creep, so you can expect Noem's troops to expand their activities well beyond detaining immigrants. The Homeland Security officers who invaded Nadler's office were hunting for protesters, and Homan has already threatened state officials and even members of Congress with arrest for 'interfering' with ICE. When it comes to constitutional rights, no man is an island. The threats, performative cruelty and denials of basic due process are not attacks on immigrants. They are attacks on the rule of law itself. You should be just as upset and concerned by the Guatemalan snatched off the street and hustled onto a plane with no notice and no due process as you are by the sobbing staffer handcuffed in Nadler's office. In the eyes of our Constitution, they are all of us. Chris Truax is a charter member of the Society for the Rule of Law and an appellate attorney. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The end of humanitarian parole and TPS is shaping Michigan communities
Anti-deportation protesters gather in Detroit, waving Mexican flags and signs in both Spanish and English, to show their opposition to border patrol activities in the area on January 26, 2025 | Photo by Erick Diaz Veliz. On Wednesday morning, community members reported Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents were making surprise arrests at an immigration check-in office in Grand Rapids where individuals were present for previously scheduled appointments, part of a larger nationwide effort by the Trump administration to restrict those with legal immigration status and deport them. Activist groups, including GR Rapid Response to ICE and Movimiento Cosecha GR, say they quickly mobilized through social media, with members showing up outside the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program office to let new arrivals who were showing up for appointments know about the ICE presence, while others entered the office to warn people waiting inside. 'People who show up for check-ins were being taken anyway. This is what we've come to. We need to do much more to help the affected community. Still, I'm hopeful that over time, the number of people helping will increase,' Ivan Diaz, a former Kent County commissioner and candidate for Michigan senate, said in a text statement. The arrests are just the latest by federal agents in Michigan that continue to spark concern among community members and activist groups of the increasing intensity and sweep of federal actions against the immigrant community. Restricting legal status Since the start of the current administration, the Temporary Protected Status, or TPS, protections for immigrants and humanitarian paroles are in danger of being removed from hundreds of thousands of foreign individuals. Christine Sauve, from the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center, told Michigan Advance that it is uncertain how many members of the community across Michigan currently live under either TPS or humanitarian parole. 'There are currently 31,500 cases pending in Detroit's immigration court, and the majority of those cases involve individuals with parole. These individuals deserve to have their case heard and their day in court, especially if they fear persecution in their country of origin,' Sauve said. On Monday, May 19, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way, at least for now, for the Trump administration to end Temporary Protected Status for 350,000 Venezuelans who arrived in the United States in 2023. That followed a February decision by the federal government to cut similar extensions for just over half a million Haitians, leaving them vulnerable to losing their jobs and facing deportation after August. Additionally, by the end of May, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a court order that had protected almost 500,000 Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelans immigrants with temporary legal status through what is referred to as the CHNV program, from losing their humanitarian parole protections, exposing them to possible deportation. In an X post, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson wrote that the decisions by the federal government are within their legal authority to revoke the temporary status granted to hundreds of thousands during the Biden Administration. 'Biden's program violated black letter immigration law, incentivized additional illegal immigration,' Jackson wrote. Sauve did not appear hopeful about the issue being resolved in a timely manner for those facing deportation. 'During this time, current CHNV parolees will not have a legal immigration status. Individuals utilized these legal immigration pathways in good faith, and overnight they have been rendered undocumented, unable to work, and subject to deportation.' Sauve said. Temporary Protected Status and humanitarian parole are two distinct immigration protection mechanisms. TPS allows qualified nationals already present in the U.S to live and work legally for a specific period, while humanitarian parole, granted on a case-by-case basis, allows certain individuals to enter or remain in the country temporarily. They are given to individuals from countries affected by armed conflict, natural disasters, or who might face persecution. 'Many individuals with parole status have fled dangerous situations in their country of origin and have pending applications for asylum or other immigration benefits that they may be eligible for,' Sauve highlighted. 'They have built lives and become part of our Michigan communities. They are our neighbors and co-workers.' Economic consequences Another aspect of the mass deportations promised by the federal government is the impact to Michigan's agricultural economy in which a considerable portion of the working population is undocumented. In March, days after half a million Haitians found their TPS extension cut, a Michigan food corporation declared their operation would be significantly affected by losing such a large number of employees. Clemens Food Group in Coldwater employs around 400 Haitian TPS holders as its workforce. According to a report by the American Immigration Council, based on 2022 data and published in 2024, TPS holders have contributed positively to Michigan industries and paid a significant amount of taxes in the U.S. 'Forcing them to leave the country not only risks putting these individuals in danger, but also threatens to significantly disrupt local economies,' the report stated. The council says TPS holders across the state make significant contributions to both public coffers and the private economy, including earning $57.9 million in household income, which translates into $5.2 million in state and local taxes paid, $6.7 million in federal taxes paid. 'The end of TPS and parole designations is devastating for our clients and their families, but also for their families, workplaces, and communities across Michigan,' Sauve said. 'These programs are lifelines for vulnerable individuals and should not be cruelly ended prematurely, while immigration cases are still pending or conditions are still not safe for individuals to return.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
