US admiral at NATO fired in expanding national security purge
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. Navy Vice Admiral Shoshana Chatfield, who holds a senior position in NATO, has been fired as part of what appears to be an expanding national security purge of top officials by the Trump administration, three sources told Reuters on Monday.
The information was not immediately confirmed by the Pentagon. However, the sources told Reuters that allies had been notified that Chatfield had been removed from her job.
Chatfield, the U.S. military representative to the NATO Military Committee, is one of only a handful of female Navy three-star officers and was the first woman to lead the Naval War College, a job she held until 2023.
Air Force Academy leader seeks civilian faculty cuts: Report
The firing is the latest to rock the Pentagon after Thursday's removal of General Timothy Haugh, the head of the National Security Agency and U.S. Cyber Command. For the Navy, it follows the firing of its top officer, Admiral Lisa Franchetti, the first woman to become Chief of Naval Operations.
President Donald Trump's administration has taken a cool view of NATO, as well as European allies, since taking office in January. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth used his first trip to NATO headquarters in February to warn Europe against treating the United States like a 'sucker' by making it responsible for its defense.
It was unclear if any official reason was given for Chatfield's dismissal, or if it was related to any U.S. policy direction on the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
One source said the motive may have been related to the Pentagon's crackdown on diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.
The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In a recent Harvard Magazine interview, Chatfield sounded eager for a time when the qualifications of women in the military would not be held in suspicion.
The article cited one example when Chatfield, herself a helicopter pilot, led an MH-60S Sea Hawk expeditionary helicopter squadron in 2005-2006.
'A mid-grade sailor … asked, 'Ma'am, can you fly one of those helicopters?' And I chuckled and said, 'Yes, actually it's a prerequisite for this job!'' she was quoted as saying, adding that at the time she had been wearing her wings that showed she was a naval aviator.
Hegseth has made the elimination of DEI initiatives a priority, arguing they are divisive.
Naval Academy removes hundreds of library books in DEI purge
He has also ended observances of events such as Black History Month and Women's History Month, issuing guidance to the U.S. military that 'efforts to divide the force – to put one group ahead of another – erode camaraderie and threaten mission execution.'
In recent weeks, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General C.Q. Brown, as well as other admirals, generals and security staff have also been dismissed.
Pentagon watchdog to review Hegseth's use of Signal app to convey plans for Houthi strike
Many current and former government officials have said they worry that any national security official could be suspected of disloyalty by Trump's inner circle because of perceived links to those who have fallen out of favor or for having served key roles in the Biden administration.
Uniformed military officials are supposed to be loyal to the U.S. Constitution and independent of any party or political movement.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
President Trump should end Iran's endless war on the world
For more than 40 years, Iran has waged a relentless shadow war against the U.S., its allies, and the free world. From the 1979 hostage crisis to its proxy terrorism, from nuclear brinkmanship to the chants of 'Death to America,' from cyberattacks to assassination plots, Tehran's aggression has been unyielding. Amid the clamor of diplomatic platitudes and partisan squabbles, a clear truth stands out: It is both a moral imperative and a cornerstone of American survival to end this endless war — not through appeasement, but through resolute strength. Iran is not a regional irritant but a global predator. Its threats are not theoretical. It is the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism and it has American blood on its hands. Since the Islamic Revolution, Iran has fueled attacks through such proxies as Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthis, killing hundreds of U.S. servicemembers — 603 in Iraq alone, according to a 2019 Pentagon report. Its militias target our bases, its assassins target our leaders, its cyber-assaults probe our infrastructure, and its leaders openly promise our destruction. President Trump has full constitutional and statutory authority to respond to attacks against the U.S. without waiting for congressional permission. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 makes that clear. The 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force reinforces it. There is bipartisan agreement — even if it is selectively remembered. Why trust Trump to end this threat? Because unlike the armchair critics obsessed with avoiding so-called 'endless wars,' Trump actually has a record of strategic restraint paired with decisive action, prioritizing targeted operations over prolonged engagements. For example, he hit the Houthis for six weeks, not six years. He took on ISIS, dismantled its caliphate in two years, and walked away. He took out Qassem Soleimani — arguably the most dangerous terrorist on the planet at the time — and avoided the regional war that everyone said would follow. He did the same with Qasim al-Raymi, the leader of al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula. He pushed back on al-Shabaab in Somalia, and then exited on his own terms. So Trump is not known to start wars. He responds to and ends threats — with precision, resolve and zero appetite for forever conflicts. That's not warmongering — that's peace through strength. The stakes are escalating. Iran's imminent pursuit of nuclear weapons threatens to upend the Middle East. A nuclear-armed Tehran would spark a regional arms race, with Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey racing to match it. Our troops in Qatar, Bahrain and Iraq would face immediate danger. Iran's terror networks, shielded by a nuclear deterrent, would strike with impunity. Ending Iran's war on the world does not mean diving into another quagmire. It demands a strategy of strength: airtight sanctions, unwavering support for allies like Israel, and targeted measures to disrupt Iran's nuclear and terror networks. Israel stands as our forward shield, delivering intelligence and military innovations like Iron Dome that bolster our own defenses. U.S. aid to Israel, spent on American defense jobs, is an investment in our security. To abandon this partnership is not restraint — it is folly. Some argue for disengagement, claiming Iran's threats are someone else's burden. But when a regime targets our shores, isolationism is a delusion. An emboldened Iran would choke oil routes through the Strait of Hormuz, spiking prices and hitting American wallets. It would deepen ties with Russia, China and North Korea, forming an anti-Western axis. Cyberattacks, terror plots and economic shocks would follow. Ignoring Iran doesn't neutralize it — it brings it closer to home. Others push for endless diplomacy, as if words alone can sway a regime built on defiance. Negotiation has its place, but only when backed by unrelenting pressure. Weakness invites aggression; strength compels restraint. Iran, Russia and China are watching. If we falter, our global deterrence unravels, inviting conflicts far costlier than the resolve we muster today. Ending Iran's endless war is the very essence of 'America First.' It means protecting our people, our prosperity and our principles by confronting a regime that has terrorized the world for too long. It means standing with allies who share our fight, not leaving them to face our mutual enemies alone. With Trump's proven resolve, we can act with the moral clarity to secure peace — not as a hope, but as a victory, won through courage and conviction. But the clock is ticking. Iran's war on the world has raged for four decades. It is time to end it — not with wishful thinking, but with the strength that safeguards our future. Mark Goldfeder is an international lawyer and a law professor at Touro University
2 hours ago
Iran's foreign minister arrives for talks in Geneva with top European diplomats
Iran's foreign minister arrives for talks in Geneva with top European diplomats By 1:16 GENEVA -- Iran's foreign minister arrives for talks in Geneva with top European diplomats.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Putin says Russia plans to deepen military-technical ties with 'friendly countries'
ST PETERSBURG, Russia (Reuters) -President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that Russia intends to develop military and technical cooperation with "friendly countries" with whom Moscow wants to jointly produce arms and train military personnel. In a speech at Russia's showcase economic forum in St Petersburg, Putin said Moscow also planned to modernise its own armed forces and their bases by equipping them with the latest weapons and technology. "We will harness new technology to improve the combat capabilities of the Russian armed forces, modernise military infrastructure facilities, (and) equip them with the latest technology and weapons and equipment," he said. "At the same time, we intend to develop military-technical co-operation with friendly countries. And we are talking not only about supplies or the modernisation of equipment and weapons, but also about joint development, personnel training, and the creation of turn-key enterprises and production facilities," he said. Talking about global trade, Putin said Russia planned to develop trade ties with its partners by removing barriers, opening up market niches and deepening investment cooperation.
