logo
SNP faces two big problems as it kicks off election campaign

SNP faces two big problems as it kicks off election campaign

At next year's Scottish election, his party will face two main foes: Labour, and voter disaffection. His latest Programme for Government, a ministerial to-do list for the next year, is a battle plan to address both. This, the last pre-election legislative plan to go before Holyrood, is about trying firstly to rebuild trust with voters by showing he can keep promises while, secondly, persuading them that the SNP will do better than Labour.
Read more Rebecca McQuillan
Mr Swinney is having a good go at point two. He is attempting to embarrass Labour on traditional Labour ground, by abolishing peak time rail fares and restoring the winter fuel payment after it was slashed by Rachel Reeves. It adds to a list of benefits and free stuff available in Scotland that can't be accessed down south. The UK Government's determination to be 'fiscally responsible' has forced it to cut benefits and slash the overseas aid budget, making it a sitting duck for wounding comparisons with the Scottish Government. How sustainable all this spending is for the Scottish Government is another question, but the politics is effective.
So will Mr Swinney's 'year of delivery' make people trust the SNP? Well, it's certainly cute politics to focus on this, as a relatively new leader trying to distance himself from his predecessors. The hint is clear: the SNP's failures are not my failures, I've moved back to the centre. Judge me by what I deliver as First Minister, not by what happened before.
And he will deliver on this short to-do list, probably.
But will it restore trust? That's much more doubtful.
Top of the list of Mr Swinney's promises is that pledge to deliver 100,000 more GP appointments a year across Scotland. It might sound like a lot, but as the British Medical Association has unsportingly pointed out, GPs in Scotland already provide 650,000 appointments a week, so the First Minister's promise will provide one extra day's worth of GP appointments across the year.
Put another way, it promises a whole two to three extra appointments per GP surgery per week. Deliverable? Yes. A good rejoinder to criticism by Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar? Yes. But the end of the 8am phone lottery? No.
John Swinney (Image: free) And that's the obvious problem. While these new policy pledges are fine as far as they go, they won't end the steady stream of reportage about public services in various stages of crisis. They won't help the SNP hide from its rather long list of ongoing failures, some of which date back years. It brings into focus the problem with targets and promises. Too ambitious and you miss them by miles, leading to disaffection. Too timid and they don't change how people feel on the ground.
The party has been haunted by its own shortcomings over the last five years, from failing to boost education standards and close the attainment gap to fuel poverty levels, homelessness and waiting lists. Those failures won't stop intruding upon the moment and no one's likely to forget that John Swinney as deputy first minister, finance secretary and education secretary was implicated in most of them.
And how much does delivering on any single promise really count anyway, when the underlying democratic malaise is about wider, more systemic discontent? SNP, Labour, Conservative: in the minds of too many voters, they're all the same – which is to say, none of the parties are seen as making a significant difference to people's lives.
Reform UK is not about policies or delivery. Reform is about sentiment. Nigel Farage's party took more than 677 seats in the English local elections last week in a show of anti-incumbency sentiment. Mr Farage's status as chief cheerleader for Brexit, which has damaged economic growth and delivered none of its promised benefits, has been no impediment to his success. So much for policy. Reform's policy platform is barely known to voters, the only policy he's ever helped deliver was a disaster but he's considered by a quarter of UK voters, and around a fifth in Scotland, as preferable to the mainstream parties. Why? Because those voters are desperate for change.
Read more
Oh to be the change candidate. Mr Swinney might be positioning himself as Mr Delivery, but knows the limitations of that strategy, so he can't resist hedging his bets by telling people he's also the change guy. Just 24 hours after presenting his Programme for Government, the First Minister opined that there must be a referendum if a majority of pro-independence MSPs are returned in the next Scottish Parliament.
'Westminster has scarcely looked more distant from the people of Scotland and their everyday concerns,' was his somewhat contestable claim.
So we're back here again. It was inevitable, given the current atmosphere of voter discontent, that the SNP would dust off its old demands for an independence referendum, but Mr Swinney will need to take care. He doesn't want voters to start noticing unfavourable parallels between himself and Mr Farage. Brexit never did deliver on the promise of milk and honey. There's no sign voters have any appetite for another rammy about independence. And it doesn't wash to try and portray the UK Government of Sir Keir Starmer, with its 37 Scottish MPs, as out of touch with Scotland. This is just the sort of divisive nonsense that puts people off the SNP.
But put your tin hats on: we'd better get used to it.
Rebecca McQuillan is a journalist specialising in politics and Scottish affairs. She can be found on X at @BecMcQ and on Bluesky at @becmcq.bsky.social

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer says 'AI makes us more human' as he unveils new tech tool
Keir Starmer says 'AI makes us more human' as he unveils new tech tool

Daily Mirror

time32 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Keir Starmer says 'AI makes us more human' as he unveils new tech tool

Keir Starmer has insisted artificial intelligence 'makes us more human' in a keynote speech setting out his plans to use tech to create a 'better future' for generations to come Keir Starmer has insisted artificial intelligence "makes us more human" in a keynote speech. The PM suggested the tech could help workers spend more time on face-to-face help - instead of spending many hours filling out forms. It came as Mr Starmer said a new AI tool - 'Extract' - will also help speed up planning permission for new homes by scanning hundreds of files in a second. ‌ The government said it will slash 250,000 hours spent by planning officers manually checking documents - freeing up valuable time. Mr Starmer said the tool was already being trialled in councils including Exeter and Nuneaton. ‌ Addressing London tech week, he said: "What it does is take old hand-written planning documents and puts them into digital form within seconds. So jobs that otherwise would have taken hours and hours done in seconds. We want to roll that out across the country." Keir Starmer unveils plan to help one million schoolkids in major tech drive During the event Mr Starmer also said a social worker told him at a No10 reception that AI had helped her concentrate on the "human element" of the job". He added: "I've always said AI and tech makes us more human, which sounds an odd thing to say, but it's true. We need to say it because... some people out there are sceptical. They do worry about AI taking their job." But he added: "I believe the way that we work through this together is critical." Mr Starmer also said youngsters will be able to access more job opportunities in tech under a major drive to skill up Britain. The PM announced plans to help around one million school-age children gain skills in technology under a new TechFirst scheme. ‌ It will help to prepare kids should they want to become AI engineers, computer scientists or data analysts in the future. Mr Starmer has said that within the coming years the Government should be able to "look every parent in the eye" and pledge that tech can create a "better future" for their children. Speaking on Monday, he said: "By the end of this Parliament we should be able to look every parent in the eye in every region in Britain and say 'look what technology can deliver for you'. "We can put money in your pocket, we can create wealth in your community, we can create good jobs, vastly improve our public services, and build a better future for your children. That, to me, is the opportunity we must seize. That's what my plan for change will deliver and, today, I think we're taking another big step towards it."

Rachel Reeves wants to teach her critics a lesson
Rachel Reeves wants to teach her critics a lesson

New Statesman​

time42 minutes ago

  • New Statesman​

Rachel Reeves wants to teach her critics a lesson

Photo by Hannah McKay -. The toughest job in politics is usually said to be the leader of the opposition – an impression that Kemi Badenoch's tenure has done nothing to dispel. But it is arguably rivalled by that of chancellor. Every incumbent since the 2008 financial crisis has faced a version of the same dilemma: the UK is a poorer country than it once expected to be. At last year's Budget, Rachel Reeves escaped her fiscal straitjacket through two manoeuvres: she raised taxes by £41.5bn and loosened her debt rules to increase investment. The Spending Review is the moment at which the Chancellor gets to distribute the bounty that resulted. Reeves has already launched a pre-emptive strike against critics who liken her to the flinty George Osborne. A graph shows how Labour's spending far exceeds that planned by the Conservatives before the election (one aide calls it 'the honesty chart'). This isn't just spin: Reeves intends to increase day-to-day spending by £190bn – the biggest real-terms rise since Gordon Brown occupied the Treasury in 2000 – and capital investment by £113bn. Austerity this is not. But two things can be true. Yes, overall spending is rising by £303bn but some must lose in order that others may win. The latter includes the NHS – which has secured a 2.8 per cent real-terms rise – and defence (even if plenty regard 2.5 per cent of GDP as inadequate). Ed Miliband's energy security department will enjoy a large increase in capital investment including on nuclear power (allies point to the Energy Secretary's long-standing support for the sector as part of 'the sprint for clean energy abundance'). Other departments, however, face average real-terms cuts of 0.3 per cent to day-to-day spending. Hence the fraught negotiations of the last week. Angela Rayner – that former trade union negotiator – reached a settlement with Reeves last night having warned that cuts to affordable housing would render Labour's target of building 1.5 million new homes impossible. Yvette Cooper – who knows her way around the Treasury as a former chief secretary – is still holding out. After public dissent, the police will receive a real-terms increase but this will entail cuts to other Home Office areas. Last week I detailed Andy Burnham's rhetorical fusillades against the government. This week it's Sadiq Khan who is unhappy, with concern inside City Hall that Reeves will announce no new projects or funding for London at the Spending Review (key demands include Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line extensions, a tourist/visitors levy and a significant rise in funding for the Met Police). 'We must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government, which would not only harm London's vital public services, but jobs and growth across the country,' one person close to the Mayor tells me. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Here is further evidence of why some inside government believe that Reeves needs an 'economic reset' – abandoning her tax lock or further loosening her fiscal rules. But the Chancellor will have a message for such critics in her speech, which aides describe as a chance to 're-educate' these errant foes. Rewriting the UK's fiscal rules, Reeves will warn, would not be a cost-free choice, but one that would entail higher borrowing and higher mortgage rates. An ally speaks of a 'terrifying' gap between a commentariat that pleads for more taxes and more borrowing, and a much more sceptical electorate. 'They think we tax too much, they think we borrow too much, and a lot of people probably think we spend too much.' The Chancellor is seeking to pull off a tricky double act – assailing those who accuse her of austerity while reassuring those who fear Labour profligacy. This week will test whether she can keep her balance. This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here [See also: Rachel Reeves wants to level up your commute. Does she have the money?] Related

Rutte to meet PM as Nato chief says ‘quantum leap' in defence needed
Rutte to meet PM as Nato chief says ‘quantum leap' in defence needed

North Wales Chronicle

time43 minutes ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Rutte to meet PM as Nato chief says ‘quantum leap' in defence needed

The secretary general of the military bloc is expected to use a speech at London's Chatham House to say a '400% increase in air and missile' capability is required just to maintain deterrence and defence. He will say 'wishful thinking will not keep us safe' as he warns Nato must become a 'stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance' to protect itself, in the remarks on Monday, when he will also separately meet the Prime Minister and Defence Secretary John Healey. Mr Rutte is expected to say: 'The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence. The fact is, we must have more forces and capabilities to implement our defence plans in full. 'The fact is, danger will not disappear even when the war in Ukraine ends'. He will add: 'We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies. 'Our militaries also need thousands more armoured vehicles and tanks, millions more artillery shells, and we must double our enabling capabilities, such as logistics, supply, transportation and medical support'. On threats against the alliance, Mr Rutte will say: 'Wishful thinking will not keep us safe. We cannot dream away the danger. 'Hope is not a strategy. So Nato has to become a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance.' The Prime Minister has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament, a timetable which could stretch to 2034. But Mr Rutte's visit to the UK comes after he proposed members of the bloc spend 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) on defence as part of a strengthened investment plan for the alliance. The target would require nations to raise core defence spending to 3.5% of GDP, while the remaining 1.5% is to be made up of 'defence-related expenditure'. Nato leaders will meet in The Hague later this month, when the total 5% spending target by 2035 will be discussed. The UK's Strategic Defence Review, which was published on Monday, recommended sweeping changes, including a greater focus on new technology, including drones and artificial intelligence based on rising budgets. The boost to the defence budget will be confirmed by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her spending review on Wednesday, when she will set out the Government's priorities for the next three years.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store