logo
Lawsuit accuses Atlanta police of illegally targeting 'Stop Cop City' protesters

Lawsuit accuses Atlanta police of illegally targeting 'Stop Cop City' protesters

Independent03-03-2025

Atlanta police have for years illegally targeted critics of a police and firefighter training center, according to a federal lawsuit filed on behalf of a protester who is one of dozens of 'Stop Cop City' activists facing domestic terrorism and racketeering charges.
The lawsuit, filed on behalf of Jamie Marsicano, alleges that authorities view any critic of the training center as a would-be criminal and have repeatedly made arrests without cause, depriving protesters of their First Amendment rights and their civil rights protections against false arrest and malicious prosecution.
The long-brewing controversy over the training center erupted in January 2023 after state troopers who were part of a sweep of the South River Forest killed an activist who authorities said had fired at them. Numerous protests ensued, with masked vandals sometimes attacking police vehicles and construction equipment to stall the project and intimidate contractors into backing out.
Though the training center is nearly complete, dozens of defendants, including Marsicano, are facing a state racketeering charge that critics have decried as heavy-handed attempts to silence the movement, which emerged in the wake of the 2020 racial justice protests. Environmental activists and anti-police demonstrators argued that uprooting acres of trees for the facility would exacerbate environmental damage in a flood-prone, majority-Black area while serving as an expensive staging ground for militarized officers to be trained in quelling social movements.
Marsicano, 31, was among 23 people arrested near a music festival in DeKalb County in March 2023, hours after a group of more than 150 masked festivalgoers trekked about three-quarters of a mile (1.2 kilometers) through the South River Forest and stormed the training center's construction site, with some lighting equipment on fire as others threw objects at retreating officers. The group then returned to the festival to blend in with the crowd.
According to an arrest warrant, authorities said Marsicano, who uses they/them pronouns, was taken into custody because they had on 'muddy clothing' from crossing through the woods and possessed a shield, assertions that Marsicano's attorneys say are false.
Marsicano's attorneys say their client was not among the group that attacked the construction site and never left the festival grounds until they were arrested while walking back to their vehicle after police ordered everyone to disperse.
Marsicano was caught up in an 'indiscriminate mass arrest of legitimate festival attendees' that was part of a pattern spearheaded by Atlanta Police Chief Darin Schierbaum of authorities targeting the 'Stop Cop City' movement, according to the lawsuit, which was filed Feb. 24.
Marsicano was subsequently charged with domestic terrorism and, months later, was one of 61 charged with violating Georgia's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, known as RICO.
Marsicano was banned from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill campus after their arrest and completed their law degree remotely but has had difficulty finding a job and securing housing because of the charges, according to the lawsuit.
Marsicano was 'publicly broadcast to the world as a 'domestic terrorist' and 'RICO co-conspirator,' forever tarnishing Plaintiff's personal and professional life,' the lawsuit said.
The lawsuit lists more than a dozen instances in which authorities 'pretextually charged individuals deemed to be at or around Stop Cop City,' including after a May 2022 protest where three people 'walking home were selectively stopped for carrying Stop Cop City signs,' and taken into custody. Those arrests, as well as others, have led to civil lawsuits that are pending.
Marsicano's lawsuit names various law enforcement officials as well as the city of Atlanta, which it accuses of having made a 'custom and practice' of targeting critics of the training center.
Neither the Atlanta Police Department nor a spokesperson for the city immediately responded to a request for comment.
City officials say the $115 million, 85-acre (34-hectare) campus will replace outdated, far-flung facilities and boost police morale amid hiring and retention struggles. Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens has also said that the facility will teach the 'most progressive training and curriculum in the country' and that officials have repeatedly revised their plans to address environmental concerns.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A juror in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex-trafficking trial is expected to be dismissed
A juror in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex-trafficking trial is expected to be dismissed

NBC News

time5 hours ago

  • NBC News

A juror in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex-trafficking trial is expected to be dismissed

A juror in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex trafficking trial is expected to be dismissed from the case on Monday over inconsistencies about where he lives. The issue came up this week, five weeks into the trial, during a conversation Juror No. 6 had with the jury department, indicating he had moved to New Jersey a few weeks ago to live with his girlfriend. That conversation sparked another discussion among legal counsels, who pressed for more information. Jurors in the case must live in New York state and district courts have broad discretion to replace a juror for any violation. The juror, a 41-year-old Black male who works in communications at a correctional facility, told court officials he was living in a New York apartment during the work week. His story later changed to him living with his daughter and fiancée in the Bronx. At some point, he told court officials he lived with his aunt in the Bronx. Earlier Friday, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian said he was leaning against dismissing the juror, saying there was likely an innocent explanation for the conflicting answers. But as more details emerged, Subramanian said there were serious concerns about his candor and it appeared the juror either could not follow simple instructions or there was an effort to be deceptive. Subramanian warned that removal of the juror may be required. Defense attorney Xavier Donaldson said the juror answered the question about where he resides as truthfully as possible and suggested bringing him back to court because he wanted to remain on the jury. Prosecutors argued that the juror's removal is necessary to protect the integrity of the court proceedings. The juror said during jury selection that he enjoyed listening to reggaeton and '90s hip-hop, and his hobbies included sports and fantasy football. Combs faces five criminal counts: one count of racketeering conspiracy; two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion; and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. Combs has vociferously denied the allegations against him.

Is India quietly tightening its grip on Kashmir?
Is India quietly tightening its grip on Kashmir?

Channel 4

time2 days ago

  • Channel 4

Is India quietly tightening its grip on Kashmir?

India's prime minister has just inaugurated the Chenab rail bridge, connecting Kashmir to India's vast rail network. But critics are warning it's the latest project designed to control the disputed territory. India has been approving an enormous amount of building projects in the disputed territory of Kashmir in recent years. Since revoking laws that granted Kashmir autonomy, Narendra Modi's government has had new powers to build on and populate the land. Channel 4 News explores the impact of these projects and the extent of a growing military presence using data gathered by Forensic Architecture and Forensis, to investigate claims by some Kashmiris that Modi's government is trying to tighten its grip on the region by bringing more Hindus into India's only Muslim-majority region. India says this is all part of a plan to improve the lives of Kashmiri people. Produced by Matthew Lucas, Milena Dambelli, Mahnoor Akhlaq and Girish Juneja Graphics by Ian Watkins Reported by Harry Fawcett

Families file suit challenging Arkansas law that requires Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms
Families file suit challenging Arkansas law that requires Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms

NBC News

time2 days ago

  • NBC News

Families file suit challenging Arkansas law that requires Ten Commandments be posted in classrooms

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — Seven Arkansas families filed a lawsuit Wednesday challenging an upcoming state requirement that public school classrooms have posted copies of the Ten Commandments, saying the new law will violate their constitutional rights. The federal lawsuit challenges a measure Republican Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders signed into law earlier this year, similar to a requirement enacted by Louisiana and one that Texas' governor has said he'll sign. The Arkansas law takes effect in August and requires the Ten Commandments to be prominently displayed in public school classrooms and libraries. "Permanently posting the Ten Commandments in every classroom and library — rendering them unavoidable — unconstitutionally pressures students into religious observance, veneration, and adoption of the state's favored religious scripture," the lawsuit said. The suit was filed on behalf of the families by the American Civil Liberties Union, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State and the Freedom from Religion Foundation. The lawsuit names four school districts in northwest Arkansas — Fayetteville, Bentonville, Siloam Springs and Springdale — as defendants. A spokesperson for Fayetteville schools said the district would not comment on pending litigation, while the other three districts did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A spokesperson for Attorney General Tim Griffin said his office was reviewing the lawsuit and considering options. Attorneys for the families, who are Jewish, Unitarian Universalist or nonreligious, said they planned to ask the federal judge in Fayetteville for a preliminary injunction blocking the law's enforcement. The attorneys say the law violates longstanding Supreme Court precedent and the families' First Amendment rights. "By imposing a Christian-centric translation of the Ten Commandments on our children for nearly every hour of every day of their public-school education, this law will infringe on our rights as parents and create an unwelcoming and religiously coercive school environment for our children," Samantha Stinson, one of the plaintiffs, said in a news release. Louisiana was the first state to enact such a requirement, and a federal judge blocked the measure before it was to take effect Jan 1. Proponents of Louisiana's law say that ruling only applies to the five school boards listed in the suit, but The Associated Press is unaware of any posters being displayed in schools as the litigation continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store