
US lost business travelers in April as economic anxiety and border detentions cooled demand
Business travel to the U.S. fell 9% in April as companies and workers grappled with economic uncertainty and anger over the Trump administration's tariffs and border policies.
The National Travel and Tourism Office released preliminary figures Thursday showing the number of airline and ship passengers who entered the country last month using business visas.
The Middle East was the only region that saw higher business travel to the U.S., with arrivals up 9.4% compared to April 2024. But that didn't make up for big losses from other regions; the number of business travelers from Western Europe fell 17.7%, for example.
The new government data didn't include people coming from Canada for business or who traveled by land from Mexico. Mexican arrivals by air for those holding business visas were down 11.8%, the government said.
And overall travel from Canada also fell in April. According to Statistics Canada, Canadian residents' return trips by air from the U.S. fell 20% in April, while return trips by car were down 35%.
Business travel to the U.S. held up better than leisure travel in the first quarter of the year. According to U.S. government data, more than 1.2 million travelers entered the U.S. using business visas in the January-March period, up 7% from the year before. The number of travelers using tourist visas fell 6%.
But that flipped in April, as the late Easter holiday likely encouraged more leisure travel. Travel to the U.S. by international travelers holding tourist visas was up 13.8% in April.
It's unclear if that trend will hold. Cirium, an aviation analytics company, said an analysis of online travel agency data indicated that advance bookings from Europe to 14 U.S. cities in June, July and August were down 12% from those same months last year.
Multiple U.S. airlines have pulled their financial forecasts for the year, citing uncertainty and weaker demand from lower-fare leisure travelers. Many industry experts think business travel to the U.S. will continue to decline in the coming months.
Leslie Andrews, the global travel leader for real estate company JLL and a board member at the Global Business Travel Association Foundation, said she thinks corporate travel to the U.S. will slow in the second and third quarters of the year as the full impact of economic and geopolitical volatility sets in.
'What I am hearing is, 'Things were good in the first quarter,' but in the second quarter it's a matter of, 'Must you take that trip?'' Andrews said. 'They're pulling in the reins a bit to make sure only purposeful travel is happening as things grow and evolve.'
BT4Europe, a business travel association, said companies are increasingly wary about unpredictable procedures to enter the U.S. and the risk of detention, especially for LGBTQ+ individuals or those who have voiced political opinions on social media.
Kevin Haggarty usually travels to the United States from Canada several times a year to attend trade shows in Atlanta or Las Vegas or to visit suppliers in Los Angeles. But his concerns about crossing the border will keep him from making those trips this year.
Haggarty, who owns a company that sells gifts and souvenirs, said Canadian retailers no longer want U.S.-made merchandise. His U.S. suppliers are struggling to stay afloat due to U.S. tariffs on products made in China. Above all, he's concerned about reports of international travelers being detained at the U.S. border.
'Honestly, my nervousness and reluctance to cross into the U.S. stems from that more than any hostility to the American market,' said Haggarty, who lives in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Global Business Travel Association CEO Suzanne Neufang said a poll of more than 900 of the association's members last month showed nearly one-third expected a decline in global travel volumes this year.
Canadian members were the most pessimistic, with 71% saying they expect a decrease in travel this year, Neufang said.
'The uncertainty is unnerving for a business travel sector that likes to be safe and likes to be efficient,' she said.
A drop-off in business trips would represent a setback for the U.S. travel industry and cities that host international conventions and trade shows. The $1.6 trillion global business travel sector was finally returning to normal after the COVID-19 pandemic. U.S. business travel spending reached pre-COVID levels in 2023, Neufang said, while the rest of the world achieved that last year.
Winnipeg Jets Game Days
On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop.
Brett Sterenson, the president of Hotel Lobbyists, a Washington firm that helps groups book hotels for meetings and conferences, said he was losing international business as some countries warn travelers not to visit the U.S.
U.S. government cuts are also hurting business, Sterenson said. He works with several groups that offer international exchange programs through the State Department. The programs welcome travelers from Africa, Latin America, Southeast Asia and elsewhere and share best practices on things like energy policy and environmental stewardship, he said. But with funding cuts, that part of his business is down 75%.
'These exchanges were monumentally useful in spreading goodwill, but also in educating developing nations on good governance,' Sterenson said.
Haggarty, in Canada, said he canceled a trip to a trade show in Gatlinburg, Tennessee, and said several retailers he works with also pulled out. He's now looking to England, France, Spain and other markets for goods to sell.
'It's unfortunate. It's much easier to bring products to Canada from the U.S., but we're in a corner,' he said. 'I want people to know just how much damage this administration is doing to their relationships globally.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Calgary Herald
6 minutes ago
- Calgary Herald
'Buy Canadian': Here are 6 of the best homegrown condiment brands
Article content Article content In 2020, as people across Canada found themselves managing three meals a day within four walls, Jannine Rane and Anush Sachdeva were also in the throes of the 'what's for dinner' dilemma. Article content 'We really were just trying to figure out a way where we could have that variety, which is the reality of how most people eat today. (It's) based on wanting a mix of cultures, wanting that convenience, but then also the reality of what's in the fridge at 6:23 on a Tuesday,' says Rane, co-founder and CEO of Zing Pantry Shortcuts in Toronto. Article content The average Canadian knows seven recipes, she adds, which is in stark contrast to our growing appetite for global flavours. According to Canadian Grocer, Korean, Japanese, Filipino and Thai cuisines are driving 24 per cent growth in the multicultural food category. Article content 'How we want to eat and how we eat — there was no real overlap there. So that was the pain point. How do we eat what we want without having to spend hours in the kitchen? And the inspiration was really restaurants,' says Rane. 'How does a restaurant get a plate of dinner from the kitchen to your table in 20 minutes? The secret sauce is the secret sauce, quite literally.' Article content Article content Rane and Sachdeva co-founded Zing with their friend Kiran Singh, a chef, to bottle sauces that brought flavour 'without compromising on quality or health. And doing it in a way that is also an homage to Canada and reflects the communities we live in.' Article content Over the past five years, they've partnered with Canadian chefs and food creators to develop a range of condiments, including Vincent Ng's Mala Savoury Chili Salt, Pay Chen's Sacha-ish Chili Miso Condiment and Christine Flynn's Buzz Hot Honey. Article content They make their products in a Mississauga facility and manage all aspects of the business in-house. Rane says that Zing built its business with independent grocers, small boutiques and coffee shops willing to take a chance on something new. It's now available at more than 700 retailers nationwide, including Metro, Whole Foods Market and Fortinos. Article content Article content Zing's top seller is one of its original products, Hakka-ish Chili Crisp. It's been so popular that there's now a Garlic Chili Crunch version. In 2020, Zing was one of a handful of companies in Canada making chili crisp. People often asked Rane what it was — but no longer, which she sees as evidence of how much more frequently people seek out these flavours. Article content According to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, chili sauces, such as chili crisp, are seeing the greatest growth in the 'cooking and table sauce' segment, the largest sauce category. Article content Many people have advised Zing to move its operations to the United States, but Rane has resisted each time. She says running a Canadian small business in a consolidated industry and an uncertain economy isn't easy, but her absolute belief in their work keeps her going. Article content 'We took a leap of faith,' says Rane. 'There was no one doing what we were doing at the time. We're that example for folks that are starting now. So, I hope it's the beginning of a wave of more Canadians being excited and proud of what we have to offer and just doing it — because I think we can and should.'


Global News
16 minutes ago
- Global News
Speaker of U.S. House of Representatives downplays Musk's influence on Trump's tax and budget bill
With an uncharacteristically feistiness, Speaker of the United States House of Representatives Mike Johnson took clear sides Sunday in President Donald Trump's breakup with mega-billionaire Elon Musk. The Republican House leader and staunch Trump ally said Musk's criticism of the GOP's massive tax and budget policy bill will not derail the measure, and he downplayed Musk's influence over the GOP-controlled Congress. 'I didn't go out to craft a piece of legislation to please the richest man in the world,' Johnson said on ABC's This Week. 'What we're trying to do is help hardworking Americans who are trying to provide for their families and make ends meet.' Johnson said he has exchanged text messages with Musk since the former chief of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency came out against the GOP bill. Musk called it an 'abomination' that would add to U.S. debts and threaten economic stability. He urged voters to flood Capitol Hill with calls to vote against the measure, which is pending in the Senate after clearing the House. His criticism sparked an angry social media back-and-forth with Trump, who told reporters over the weekend that he has no desire to repair his relationship with Musk. Story continues below advertisement The speaker was dismissive of Musk's threats to finance opponents — even Democrats — of Republican members who back Trump's bill. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'We've got almost no calls to the offices, any Republican member of Congress,' Johnson said. 'And I think that indicates that people are taking a wait and see attitude. Some who may be convinced by some of his arguments, but the rest understand: this is a very exciting piece of legislation.' Johnson argued that Musk still believes 'that our policies are better for human flourishing. They're better for the U.S. economy. They're better for everything that he's involved in with his innovation and job creation and entrepreneurship.' The speaker and other Republicans, including Trump's White House budget chief, continued their push back Sunday against forecasts that their tax and budget plans will add to annual deficits and thus balloon a national debt already climbing toward $40 trillion. Story continues below advertisement Johnson insisted that Musk has bad information, and the speaker disputed the forecasts of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office that scores budget legislation. The bill would extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts, cut spending and reduce some other levies but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over the decade, according to the CBO's analysis. The speaker countered with arguments Republicans have made for decades: That lower taxes and spending cuts would spur economic growth that ensure deficits fall. Annual deficits and the overall debt actually climbed during the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, and during Trump's first presidency, even after sweeping tax cuts. Russell Vought, who leads the White House Office of Budget and Management, said on Fox News Sunday that CBO analysts base their models of 'artificial baselines.' Because the 2017 tax law set the lower rates to expire, CBO's cost estimates, Vought argued, presuming a return to the higher rates before that law went into effect. Vought acknowledged CBO's charge from Congress is to analyze legislation and current law as it is written. But he said the office could issue additional analyses, implying it would be friendlier to GOP goals. Asked whether the White House would ask for alternative estimates, Vought again put the burden on CBO, repeating that congressional rules allow the office to publish more analysis. Other Republicans, meanwhile, approached the Trump-Musk battle cautiously. Story continues below advertisement 'As a former professional fighter, I learned a long time ago, don't get between two fighters,' said Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin on CNN's State of the Union. He even compared the two billionaire businessmen to a married couple. 'President Trump is a friend of mine but I don't need to get, I can have friends that have disagreements,' Mullin said. 'My wife and I dearly love each other and every now and then, well actually quite often, sometimes she disagrees with me, but that doesn't mean that we can't stay focused on what's best for our family. 'Right now, there may be a disagreement but we're laser-focused on what is best for the American people.' –with files from The Associated Press' Gary Fields


Globe and Mail
41 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Should You Invest in Quantum Computing Stocks During the TACO Trade?
It's been a hard year for investors so far. As of market close on June 5, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite indexes each have breakeven returns on the year. While this makes it incredibly difficult to make money in the stock market, there have been some pockets during which investors made out well if they chose to engage with higher-than-usual volatility. By now, you may have come across a new acronym floating around financial circles called the "TACO" trade. Below, I'll detail what this means and why it's important. From there, I'll dig into one of the new, hot areas fueling the artificial intelligence (AI) narrative: quantum computing. Could quantum computing stocks be a good way to play the TACO trade? Read on to find out. What is the TACO trade? Even though the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are both flat on the year, the image below illustrates that there have been some pronounced dips and sharp rises across both indexes throughout 2025. The catch is that these volatile movements have been incredibly fleeting. ^SPX data by YCharts The term "TACO trade" is a cheeky acronym that stands for "Trump always chickens out." Basically, whenever the President voiced some tough rhetoric on his new tariff policies, the markets plummeted. However, when he subsequently eases some of the pressure on the tariff talking points, the markets roar again. In summary, the TACO trade is simply a new version of buying the dip when stock prices become abnormally depressed. Are quantum computing stocks a good buy right now? Two of the most popular quantum computing stocks in the market right now are IonQ (NYSE: IONQ) and Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ: RGTI). During 2024, shares of IonQ soared by 237% while Rigetti stock climbed by a jaw-dropping 1,450% -- both of which completely dominated the broader market. This year has been a different story, though. As of closing bell on June 5, shares of IonQ and Rigetti Computing have plummeted by 12% and 28%, respectively. Given these declines, is now a good opportunity to buy quantum computing stocks? To answer that question, smart investors understand that valuation needs to be a consideration. Per the chart below, Rigetti Computing and IonQ boast price-to-sales (P/S) ratios that seem incongruent with the company's underlying fundamentals. RGTI PS Ratio data by YCharts Looked at another way, IonQ and Rigetti Computing have generated a combined revenue of roughly $50 million over the last 12 months -- all while posting a net loss of $460 million between the two businesses. Given the nominal sales figures and hemorrhaging losses, it's hard to justify the valuation multiples pictured above. While Rigetti and IonQ have each been on a monster run from a share price perspective, both of these companies appear to be riding high on a bullish quantum computing narrative. In other words, their trading levels are not rooted in the actual performance of the business but rather in a broader macro viewpoint that quantum computing could be a good opportunity in the long run. Keep the big picture in focus The big takeaway here is that even though shares of IonQ and Rigetti are down on the year, their respective valuations make it clear that neither of these companies is a good "buy the dip" candidate. Rather, even with their underperformance throughout the year, each stock remains overvalued. For these reasons, I would not chase any sell-offs in these quantum computing stocks as the TACO trade continues to evolve. My suspicion is that both IonQ and Rigetti will experience some continued valuation compression, and their share prices could very well keep spiraling downward. Should you invest $1,000 in IonQ right now? Before you buy stock in IonQ, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and IonQ wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to173%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025