
Project to restore derelict land takes step forward with cash boost
A project that will restore almost three hectares of derelict land in Paisley's Ferguslie Park will help tackle anti-social behaviour in the area, it is hoped.
Renfrewshire Council has been awarded £650,000 of Scottish Government cash to deliver the regeneration of the Belltrees site into a multi-functional green space.
Two new shared pedestrian and cycle routes have been planned, as well as a natural play trail, event space and landscape features, enhanced biodiversity and drainage improvements.
Councillor Kenny MacLaren, an SNP representative for Paisley Northwest, believes the initiative could deter issues such as fly-tipping and dirt bike use.
He said: 'It's good news that Renfrewshire Council has been awarded the funding from the SNP Scottish Government to work on the Belltrees project in Ferguslie Park, which will restore 2.69 hectares of derelict land and create a new multi-functional green space.
'At the moment, this area has been used for fly-tipping or by people using dirt bikes, creating a nuisance and mess for local residents.
'The transformation of this site will hopefully cut down on such antisocial behaviour while creating a new community space for the residents of Ferguslie.'
Funded from the vacant and derelict land investment programme, designs are set to be completed this summer, with construction expected to begin in early 2026.
The regeneration project is part of 'The Making of Ferguslie' which is a long-term, community-led framework developed in partnership with residents to reimagine the area and deliver lasting change.
Approved by the council in December 2021, the plan sets out a shared vision for Ferguslie Park, with a focus on transforming underused land, enhancing greenspaces and supporting local initiatives.
At the centre of the regeneration is the Ferguslie Green Line – a green corridor and public realm spine that will connect key parts of the neighbourhood and provide a vibrant space for residents.
Councillor Andy Steel, SNP convener of the economy and regeneration policy board, said last week: 'The Making of Ferguslie is a fantastic example of what can be achieved when we work hand-in-hand with our communities.
'I'm delighted that we have been awarded such a significant amount of funding to support the Belltrees project as this will make a visible difference to the area and will help create a greener, more connected and vibrant Ferguslie Park for generations to come.'
The first project to emerge from the Green Line is the Neighbourhood Centre at Bankfoot Road and this activity space is transforming vacant land into a games and recreation area, framed by a tree-lined boulevard that links to schools and the Tannahill Centre – with construction expected to finish this summer.
STV News is now on WhatsApp
Get all the latest news from around the country
Follow STV News
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


STV News
5 hours ago
- STV News
SNP ‘all over the place' on funding for defence companies, claims Labour
The SNP has been accused of being 'all over the place' on state funding for defence companies, after the Government enterprise agency declined to back a Rolls-Royce welding skills centre. Rolls-Royce has been told the project in the Glasgow area cannot be supported with £2.5m of funding from Scottish Enterprise. A Scottish Government minister said the project could not be funded as it concerns 'munitions' and is part of a programme for building attack submarines. UK Defence Secretary John Healy has described the refusal to back the welding centre as 'student union politics'. SNP business minister Richard Lochhead responded to MSPs' questions on Tuesday. He said the Scottish Government and its agencies have a longstanding policy that public money should not support 'the manufacture of munitions'. PA Media Richard Lochhead said the project would be ineligible for Scottish Enterprise support PA Media Mr Lochhead said as the project concerns an 'attack submarine' it would be ineligible for Scottish Enterprise support, but a formal application had not been received. Scottish Labour deputy leader Dame Jackie Baillie said: 'The Scottish Government's position is frankly incoherent and their policy on state funded aid for defence is all over the place and applied selectively.' She pointed out that the Government-owned shipyard Ferguson Marine is carrying out subcontractor work for the Royal Navy's Type 26 frigate programme – arguing 'there are munitions on the frigate'. Mr Lochhead responded, saying: 'The Scottish Government very much values the role of the defence sector in Scotland and the many jobs it sustains, and indeed the value it adds to the Scottish economy. 'For that reason £45m of support through our enterprise agencies has been allocated to defence companies or companies partially involved in defence activities.' PA Media Labour's Dame Jackie Baillie said the SNP is 'all over the place' PA Media Dame Jackie asked: 'What does the Government believe the Army, the Navy and the air force should defend the country with? 'Pea shooters, bows and arrows, a telling off?' Conservative MSP Stephen Kerr aid the SNP's position is 'not just incoherent, it's totally hypocritical'. Mr Lochhead said funding had focused on the diversification of industry, noting defence is reserved to the UK Government. He also said governments must take into account 'ethical considerations' when it comes to funding companies in the defence sector. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
SNP's 'outdated dogma' over armed forces spending is threat to national security
The SNP has been accused of putting 'outdated dogma' above the interests of national security in a dramatic escalation of a war of words over defence spending. Holyrood ministers have refused to back down from the party's policy against funding companies involved in munitions manufacturing. In a letter to the First Minister, Labour MP Graeme Downie, accused him of 'willing to place outdated SNP dogma regarding the UK armed forces and defence sectors above the security of our country' Downie, whose constituency is home to a number of UK defence contractors, said: 'If it is the policy of your government that public money should not be spent on ammunition and military equipment to defend our country, can I ask if you believe our armed forces should have equipment at all and, if so, how would you otherwise suggest this is funded? The row came after Sir Keir Starmer pledged to increase defence spending and make the UK battle ready, supporting more than 25,000 jobs in the sector in Scotland. But it emerged the Scottish Government was refusing financial support to a welding site in Glasgow because the project involved an 'attack submarine'. Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs Mairi Gougeon told the BBC Sunday Show that public money should not be spent on ammunition or military equipment. She was defending the Scottish Government's failure to support the creation of thousands of jobs by Rolls-Royce, adding that the SNP had a 'long-standing' policy against giving money to munitions companies. A major row ensued with Rolls-Royce disputing that it is a 'munitions' company, while John Healey, the Labour UK Government defence secretary, said he could 'hardly believe' a Scottish nationalist government would stand in the way of skills development in Scotland. Yesterday Scottish Labour deputy leader, Dame Jackie Baillie, told the MSPs at Holyrood: 'The Scottish Government's position is frankly incoherent and their policy on state funded aid for defence is all over the place and applied selectively.' She pointed out that the Government-owned shipyard Ferguson Marine is carrying out subcontractor work for the Royal Navy's Type 26 frigate programme - arguing 'there are munitions on the frigate'. Dame Jackie asked: 'What does the Government believe the Army, the Navy and the air force should defend the country with? 'Pea shooters, bows and arrows, a telling off?' SNP business minister Richard Lochhead who was in the firing line said the SNP administration 'values the role of the defence sector' north of the Border and had allocated £45million of support to defence companies through enterprise agencies. He said governments must take into account 'ethical considerations' when funding the sector. Meanwhile, Mr Downie also raised serious concerns in his letter to the FM that Scottish ministers were routinely failing to acknowledge the importance of Scotland's defence industry and its workforce. He said: 'I am sure that these recent manoeuvres by your Ministers to undermine their work will be deeply felt and is something, I hope, you would wish to distance yourself from. 'A failure to do so would, sadly, lead me to the conclusion that you are and the opportunity to provide a pathway to highly skilled jobs across Scotland, particularly for young people from working class communities in constituencies such as mine.' 'I hope you will see the inconsistency and ludicrous nature of the position adopted by the Cabinet Secretary over the weekend. Last year we revealed how SNP Ministers had failed to meet Babcock for three years. One of the UK's largest engineering firms it works on the Royal Navy's Dreadnought Class nuclear submarines and runs a Naval yard at Rosyth, Fife. Both John Swinney and Kate Forbes neglected to attend the steel-cutting ceremony for the new HMS Formidable frigate - despite it representing a significant milestone in the construction of Type 31 frigates. Ministers were also absent from the steel-cutting ceremony for HMS Birmingham at BAE Systems' Govan yard in April 2023, part of the £4.2billion Type 26 frigate programme. The row over Rolls-Royce, which is ready to support an enormous submarine welding centre in Glasgow, came after it was revealed a £2.5million grant from Scottish Enterprise was withheld due to a party ban on 'munitions' funding. Steve Carlier, president of submarines at Rolls-Royce, warned the FM the project 'cannot continue' without the public funding. A Scottish Government spokesman repeated its long-standing policy position is that it does not use public money to support the manufacture of munitions. He added: 'We recognise the importance of the aerospace, defence and shipbuilding sectors for Scotland's economy, and are committed to ensuring Scotland is the home of manufacturing and innovation. Ministers continue to engage with industries across the country, including the defence sector, as part of this work. 'We have received the letter and will respond in due course.'


Scotsman
9 hours ago
- Scotsman
Why looming £2bn benefits black hole can't be filled by more SNP tax hikes
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Last week my friend and colleague Douglas Ross MSP was thrown out of the Scottish Parliament chamber after heckling the First Minister John Swinney. He had taken exception to Swinney's deflection – after a serious question from Scots Tory leader Russell Findlay on how farming will have to adapt should the pursuit for net zero continue – with an irrelevant reference to the impact of Brexit. I can understand Ross's frustration at the inability to get straight answers from SNP ministers. It all adds to the burden of evidence that Holyrood as an institution is in urgent need of reform to ensure that opposition MSPs are better able to get the answers they need for their constituents, and that ministers can less easily avoid giving serious responses. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Given the inadequacies of the parliamentary chamber, we should be particularly grateful to external bodies such as the Scottish Fiscal Commission (SFC) for the detailed work they do analysing the Scottish Government's finances. Their latest report, published just last week, contains some stark warnings about the looming black hole in Holyrood funding, as a direct result of SNP policy decisions. Getting John Swinney to answer a question can prove frustrating, but he will need to find one for the looming black hole in the Scottish Government's finances (Picture: Jane Barlow/pool) | Getty Images Record funding, crumbling services We are presently in a scenario where the total amount of money available to Scottish ministers to spend is at record levels, even taking account of inflation. According to the SFC, total Scottish Government funding in the current financial year 2025-26 will be £59.6 billion, around £800 million more than was originally thought. This is against a backdrop of record high taxation across the UK, with even higher taxes in Scotland, again thanks to SNP choices. And yet, despite all this extra money, all around us we see crumbling public services and cuts being made to vital projects. Something simply doesn't add up, but the SFC is helping by putting their fingers on some of the reasons for this mismatch. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There are two major drivers of increased spending within the Scottish Budget. The first is the award of above-inflation public sector pay deals which, as the SFC point out, have exceeded the Scottish Government's published public pay policy. No one would object to public servants receiving more pay if that were in exchange for greater efficiency, but the second part of that equation appears to be missing. Clever politics? The other area is around welfare spending. Whilst even the UK Labour government has recognised the risks from an ever-expanding benefits bill, the SNP are heading in the opposite direction. The SFC forecasts that spending on devolved social security payments will increase from £6.9 billion in the current financial year to a staggering £9.4bn in 2030-31. When related to the Barnett Formula funding received from the UK Government, this leaves the Scottish Budget with an estimated £2.1 billion black hole in 2029-30. Now it is entirely a matter for the SNP to decide they are going to prioritise spending on benefits above other areas such as the NHS, schools, or infrastructure. It may even be clever politics to do so, to help create a body of voters reliant upon those benefits who will, in turn, reward the SNP with their votes. But none of this helps pay for the ever-expanding cost of benefits in Scotland, which is growing faster than other parts of the UK. And it is clear that SNP ministers have absolutely no idea how they are going to fund this growth. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Increasing taxes further to try and fill the gap is unlikely to be the answer. Already we hear concerns from Scottish business that differential rates of both personal income tax and land and buildings transaction tax (LBTT) make it increasingly difficult to attract higher earners to relocate to Scotland from other parts of the UK. 'Economic performance gap' As the SFC points out in their report, higher tax rates are not actually delivering the revenues that were projected. On a straight-line basis, the income tax hikes implemented by the SNP should be raising a net sum of £1.674 billion for the Scottish Government. But the actual projected income tax net position, compared to what it would have been prior to the devolution of Scottish income tax, is just £616 million. That means there is an astonishing £1 billion gap between what Scotland's higher income tax rates might have added to the Scottish Budget, and what they are actually projected to deliver. The SFC refers to this figure as the 'economic performance gap', which is largely made up of slower aggregate earnings and employment growth in Scotland compared with the rest of the UK, alongside effects from Scottish and UK policies, taxpayer behaviour, and differences in the sectoral make-up of the Scottish economy and in the distribution of incomes between Scotland and the rest of the UK. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In simple terms, if the Scottish economy was growing at least at the same rate as the UK as a whole, with similar increases in average earnings, we would have £1 billion more to spend on public services than we currently have, and the SNP would be halfway towards meeting the ever-expanding costs of additional welfare spending. It once again demonstrates the overriding need for Scottish ministers to focus on economic growth. A faster growing economy, where we could at least match UK average rates, would generate the wealth we need to pay the bills, without the requirement for counter-productive taxes on higher earners which we can see are already having a dampening effect on economic growth. SNP ministers now have some very serious questions to answer about their tax and spending plans going forward. We can only hope that it won't take more outbursts in the Holyrood chamber to get the answers we all require.