'We all felt the weight of responsibility' - Covid five years on
Today marks five years since Guernsey went into lockdown in a bid to curb the spread of coronavirus.With only one community case, the then Chief Minister Deputy Gavin St Pier told us to "stay at home".Looking back on that moment, he said he was aware that he was making a "historically momentous decision".By the end of March 2023, Guernsey had reported 35,326 cases of Covid-19 and 41 people died from the virus.
St Pier said the restrictions on movement in lockdown had not been seen since the Nazi occupation during World War Two.He said: "The restrictions were arguably even more restrictive than in some parts of that period, in terms of people literally being confined to their homes and unable to move."As chief minister, St Pier was also the chair of the Civil Contingences Authority (CCA), which was the body that enacted emergency legislation to put lockdown rules into law.To help make his decisions, he was getting advice from the Director of Public Health Dr Nicola Brink.St Pier said Guernsey and other jurisdictions "were all working to the same model of the potential impact on the population and the risk of excess deaths"."I think we were working to a model that was suggesting it could have been 1,800 unexpected deaths."
While making his decisions on how to react to the pandemic, St Pier said he had to think of both the health and economic implications of them."It was tricky, trying to weigh up all the factors and also not knowing the likely length of lockdown. "It ended up being longer than we expected at the outset but, obviously, significantly shorter than elsewhere."I think the consequences were quite difficult to foresee and the best we could do was make decisions with the information available and keep adjusting our decisions as we went through the process."
'I expected legal challenges'
Sir Richard Collas was bailiff at the time, just weeks away from retiring.While the bailiff is not a permeant member of the CCA, Sir Richard said he was invited to be part of the discussions.He said: "It was hugely impressive, people usually criticise the States for being slow, indecisive and not doing things, but when it came to it decisions were taken quickly." During lockdown, the island's community adopted the "Guernsey Together" attitude and heeded the advice from government.Sir Richard said the level of compliance took him by surprise."I wasn't sure that people would comply, I expected that there might be legal challenges to those, and those challenges would need to be dealt with very quickly."One of the law changes the CCA put through at my suggestion was to enable the Court of Appeal to sit remotely - most of the barristers and judges are practising in the UK who come over to Guernsey and the law requires that they are required to sit in person."That would've been impossible in lockdown, we wouldn't have gotten barristers to come over here for a court sitting on the basis they'd have two weeks in a hotel room."
After St Pier had made the announcement that the islands were to lockdown, Sir Richard addressed the bailiwick in an online video. Looking back at the video Sir Richard said: "I was nervous doing it because I was conscious of the importance of it. It didn't feel like I had sufficient time to prepare."I think with the knowledge I had from my son about how serious this could be, I think that helped me to be quite stern and say 'you've got to comply' because that was the sort of lecture I was getting from my son [who worked in intensive care in London]."That video address would be the final time Sir Richard would be in the bailiff's office as its holder.
'So many acts of kindness'
Dr Brink played an important part of Guernsey's pandemic response.She was the person giving the politicians the facts and forecasts to help in their decision-making.In the days leading up to lockdown, Dr Brink said the island "didn't have the tools" to deal with the virus."Our on-island testing hadn't yet been fully developed, it came online about a week later. Our swab-to-result was about a week so our ability to respond in real-time was very limited."We all felt the weight of responsibility at that stage," she said.The public team worked unrelenting hours during lockdown, Dr Brink remembers, getting into work at 06:00 and not leaving until about 23:00, seven days a week."There were so many acts of kindness that it's so difficult to quantify them all."I can remember one night when we were working at 11pm, none of us had had any supper and we were absolutely exhausted and there was a bang on the window outside Le Vauquiedor - and someone had dropped off a whole pile of food for us."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
4 hours ago
- Wales Online
Lack of parks in part of Swansea 'a disgrace' but things are set to change
Lack of parks in part of Swansea 'a disgrace' but things are set to change A councillor claimed money had been set aside for new parks years ago, but nothing had happened. Now it seems things are finally moving Cllr Sam Bennett by land off Langdon Road, SA1, where a play area has long been planned and will be built (Image: Sam Bennett ) A lack of play areas in Swansea's SA1 - described as a "disgrace" by one councillor - is being addressed. Two new parks are to be created at the former docklands area off Langdon Road. Between them they'll include a pump track for BMX and scooter riders, a basketball area, play equipment, green space, benches and seats, trees, hedgerows and wildflowers. Swansea Council said they would be built in the coming months and that some preparatory work had started. Never miss a Swansea story by signing up to our newsletter here Cllr Sam Bennett, who was elected to represent the waterfront area in 2022 for the first time, said £1 million had been put aside for three new parks years ago and that he had regularly sought updates from the council on behalf of residents in SA1. He said he'd been told work would start at various points from 2022 onwards but that nothing had happened. He said he was assured earlier this year that work would start this May, and that he hadn't seen any sign of it yet. "The situation with the parks in SA1 is simply a disgrace," said the Liberal Democrat councillor. "In the 2022 (council) elections Labour made a big fanfare they had the £1 million for the parks in an effort to persuade the residents of SA1 to vote for them. Three years down the line, and residents still do not have even one park." Article continues below Another view of the land off Langdon Road where one of two new parks will be created (Image: Richard Youle ) Labour council leader Rob Stewart responded by saying Cllr Bennett had been kept fully updated on the plans for two new parks and had indicated in previous meetings he was happy with the progress being made. Cllr Stewart said topsoil had been delivered in preparation for the coming work. "It's therefore disappointing to see the local councillor claim works are not underway," he said. "He knows council officers and the administration are working hard to deliver these as soon as possible." Cllr Stewart said more than £8 million had been spent upgrading or creating new play areas at around 60 sites in Swansea by the Labour-run authority - including the Amy Dillwyn Park by Swansea Building Society Arena - since the Covid pandemic. He said this was many more than in the previous two decades including when the Lib-Dems were in power. Land at the far end of Langdon Road, near the Ibis Hotel, where the second park in SA1 will be created (Image: Richard Youle ) The situation in SA1 goes back to 2018 when the council's planning committee approved a legal agreement with landowner, the Welsh Government, for the council to create three public spaces with a children's play area. Welsh ministers were to provide £1 million for the work. It is understood the council has had the money for around six years, although the pandemic put a stop to many projects. Two sites off Langdon Road are being taken forward for new parks. Cllr Robert Francis-Davies, cabinet member for investment, regeneration, events and tourism, said soil for the new parks was being excavated and reused from places including Singleton Boating Lake. "We're confident that these great new places will be welcomed by residents of SA1 and that locals and visitors alike will work with us to keep the facilities in top shape for years to come," he said. Article continues below
The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Who's in charge? CDC's leadership 'crisis' apparent amid new COVID-19 vaccine guidance
There was a notable absence last week when U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced in a 58-second video that the government would no longer endorse the COVID-19 vaccine for healthy children or pregnant women. The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — the person who typically signs off on federal vaccine recommendations — was nowhere to be seen. The CDC, a $9.2 billion-a-year agency tasked with reviewing life-saving vaccines, monitoring diseases and watching for budding threats to Americans' health, is without a clear leader. 'I've been disappointed that we haven't had an aggressive director since — February, March, April, May — fighting for the resources that CDC needs,' said Dr. Robert Redfield, who served as CDC director under the first Trump administration and supported Kennedy's nomination as the nation's health secretary. $9.2 billion-a-year agency without leader as nomination awaits The leadership vacuum at a foremost federal public health agency has existed for months, after President Donald Trump suddenly withdrew his first pick for CDC director in March. A hearing for his new nominee — the agency's former acting director Susan Monarez — has not been scheduled because she has not submitted all the paperwork necessary to proceed, according to a spokesman for Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., who will oversee the nomination. HHS did not answer written questions about Monarez's nomination, her current role at the CDC or her salary. An employee directory lists Monarez, a longtime government employee, as a staffer for the NIH under the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health. Redfield described Kennedy as 'very supportive' of Monarez's nomination. Instead, a lawyer and political appointee with no medical experience is 'carrying out some of the duties' of director at the agency that for seven decades has been led by someone with a medical degree. Matthew Buzzelli, who is also the chief of staff at the CDC, is 'surrounded by highly qualified medical professionals and advisors to help fulfill these duties as appropriate,' Andrew Nixon, an HHS spokesperson said in a statement. Adding to the confusion was an employee-wide email sent last week that thanked 'new acting directors who shave stepped up to the plate." The email, signed by Monarez, listed her as the acting director. It was was sent just days after Kennedy said at a Senate hearing that Monarez had been replaced by Buzzelli. The lack of a confirmed director will be a problem if a public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic or a rapid uptick in measles cases hits, said Michael Osterholm, an epidemiologist at the University of Minnesota. 'CDC is a crisis, waiting for a crisis to happen,' said Osterholm. 'At this point, I couldn't tell you for the life of me who was going to pull what trigger in a crisis situation." An acting director rarely seen, and stalled decisions At CDC headquarters in Atlanta, employees say Monarez was rarely heard from between late January – when she was appointed acting director – and late March, when Trump nominated her. She also has not held any of the 'all hands' meetings that were customary under previous CDC chiefs, according to several staffers. One employee, who insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to the media and fears being fired if identified said Monarez has been almost invisible since her nomination, adding that her absence has been cited by other leaders as an excuse for delaying action. The situation already has led to confusion. In April, a 15-member CDC advisory panel of outside experts met to discuss vaccine policy. The panel makes recommendations to the CDC Director, who routinely signs off on them. But it was unclear during the meeting who would be reviewing the panel's recommendations, which included the expansion of RSV vaccinations for adults and a new combination shot as another option to protect teens against meningitis. HHS officials said the recommendations were going to Buzzelli, but then weeks passed with no decision. A month after the meeting ended, the CDC posted on a web site that Kennedy had signed off on recommendations for travelers against chikungunya, a viral disease transmitted to humans by mosquitos. But there continues to be no word about a decision about the other vaccine recommendations. Controversial COVID-19 vaccine recommendations bypassed CDC panel The problem was accentuated again last week, when Kennedy rolled out recommendations for the COVID-19 vaccine saying they were no longer recommended for healthy children or pregnant women, even though expectant mothers are considered a high-risk group if they contract the virus. Kennedy made the surprise announcement without input from the CDC advisory panel that has historically made recommendations on the nation's vaccine schedule. The CDC days later posted revised guidance that said healthy kids and pregnant women may get the shots. Nixon, the HHS spokesman, said CDC staff were consulted on the recommendations, but would not provide staffer's names or titles. He also did not provide the specific data or research that Kennedy reviewed to reach his conclusion on the new COVID-19 recommendations, just weeks after he said that he did not think 'people should be taking medical advice' from him. 'As Secretary Kennedy said, there is a clear lack of data to support the repeat booster strategy in children,' Nixon said in a statement. Research shows that pregnant women are at higher risk of severe illness, mechanical ventilation and death, when they contract COVID-19 infections. During the height of the pandemic, deaths of women during pregnancy or shortly after childbirth soared to their highest level in 50 years. Vaccinations also have been recommended for pregnant women because it passes immunity to newborns who are too young for vaccines and also vulnerable to infections. Nixon did not address a written question about recommendations for pregnant women. Kennedy's decision to bypass the the advisory panel and announce new COVID-19 recommendations on his own prompted a key CDC official who works with the committee – Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos – to announce her resignation last Friday. 'My career in public health and vaccinology started with a deep-seated desire to help the most vulnerable members of our population, and that is not something I am able to continue doing in this role,' she wrote in an email seen by an Associated Press reporter. Signs are mounting that the CDC has been 'sidelined' from key decision-making under Kennedy's watch, said Dr. Anand Parekh, the chief medical adviser for The Bipartisan Policy Center. 'It's difficult to ascertain how we will reverse the chronic disease epidemic or be prepared for myriad public health emergencies without a strong CDC and visible, empowered director,' Parekh said. 'It's also worth noting that every community in the country is served by a local or state public health department that depends on the scientific expertise of the CDC and the leadership of the CDC director.'
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Have your say on extending free school meals to all school children
Keir Starmer has announced plans to extend free school meals to all children in families receiving Universal Credit in England in a bid to tackle child hunger in the classroom - and we want to hear your thoughts Keir Starmer has announced that over half a million more children will be eligible for free school meals from next year - and we want to know if you think the benefit should be expanded to all school pupils. In a landmark move, the Prime Minister revealed plans to extend the vital support to all children in families receiving Universal Credit in England. This support could save parents a staggering £500 a year, which could ease cost-of-living pressures while helping children achieve at school, the PM said. The move marks a major milestone in the Mirror's free school meals campaign, which strives to tackle child hunger in the classroom. Research has shown that free school meals help pupils concentrate and reduce disruption in class. Writing in the Mirror last night, Mr Starmer penned: "I want every child to have every opportunity and the best support to aim high, achieve good grades, and get the best education possible. That's why today I'm proud to announce that over half a million more children will get a free school meal every day. "All children in a household on Universal Credit will now be eligible, giving them the support they need to learn and thrive." In a message addressed to Mirror readers, he said: "My government will leave no stone unturned in our pursuit to give every child the best start in life." Currently, all children in England can get free school meals until the end of Year 2 but after that they only qualify if their family gets certain benefits. Youngsters whose families claim Universal Credit only qualify if their household earns less than £7,400-a-year after benefits. From September 2026, every child in a household receiving UC will be entitled to a free, nutritious hot meal. According to the Government, the move would lift 100,000 children out of poverty, while more than 500,000 kids are expected to benefit from the change. It comes after alarming research by School Food Matters last year found 38 per cent of teachers reported that pupils in their classes were regularly too hungry to learn, while 24 per cent of heads said their school was operating a foodbank. In January 2024, around 2.1 million pupils - nearly one in four (24.6%) - in England were eligible for free school meals, a concerning increase from 1.44 million at the start of the Covid pandemic, highlighting growing pressures on household budgets. The decision comes as pressure mounts on the Government to do more to address rising levels of child poverty. Former PM Gordon Brown said last month that Labour must act now to help "austerity's children" as 4.8 million kids could be living in hardship by 2029. The plans have been hailed a "game changer" by campaigners, as Nick Harrison, chief executive of the Sutton Trust social mobility charity, said: "This is a significant step towards taking hunger out of the classroom. "Children can't learn effectively when hungry, so this announcement not only helps to tackle the effects of child poverty, but will also likely help improve education outcomes for disadvantaged young people." Daniel Kebede, General Secretary of the National Education Union, which campaigned alongside the Mirror, said: "After years of joint campaigning, knowing tens of thousands more children will benefit from a hot, healthy school meal is the good news NEU members have been waiting for. "But we won't stop there. The cost of living still impacts too many children, so we continue to call for Free School Meals for all." Following the PM's announcement, we want to know if you think all school children should be given free school meals. Vote in our poll HERE to have your say.
