logo
Will Gov Lamont run again? Here's what he said

Will Gov Lamont run again? Here's what he said

Yahoo2 days ago

Gov. Ned Lamont declined to give an answer Thursday on the question of whether he will run for a third term as governor — a difficult feat that has only been accomplished by one other politician in the past 200 years.
He discussed the question Thursday in his office, just 12 hours after the legislative session concluded.
'I'm thinking about it seriously. I love the job. I think Susan and I are a pretty good team,' Lamont said.
'That's not a yes or a no though,' he said. 'That's a I'm thinking about it seriously. I'm thinking about it with Susan. I'm thinking about it with Annie Lamont.'
There's no timeframe for making or announcing a decision, the governor said.
'I'm a lot more inclined and interested in keeping going, keep this positive momentum going than I was six months ago,' he said, noting that he'd put the issue on hold during the 'tricky' budget season.
Alluding to a potential recession caused by President Donald Trump's economic policies, Lamont said now may be the time for an experienced leader who had navigated the COVID pandemic, knows how to handle the unconventional and unpredictable president.
'I worked with him for the first two years. I know some of the players down there. That makes a big difference …. You've got to navigate through incredible uncertainties since every week there's another change incoming. … It just makes me think this may be a good place for me to be,' he said.
'I'm working with the White House on things like energy… but if you want to come to one of my schools and try to take a Dreamer out of that classroom, I'll be standing there at the door. I don't need to go out and pick a fight but I think people know where I stand.'
Even giants of Connecticut politics including Abe Ribicoff, Ella Grasso and Lowell P. Weicker, did not serve for a third term.
The only person to win three four-year terms was Republican John G. Rowland, who resigned during his third term amid a corruption scandal.
Some insiders had predicted that Lamont would run again, while others said they simply did not know.
For Lamont, it was a highly personal decision. Many politicians make the decision simply based on whether they believe they can win or not.
In Lamont's case, he is currently 71 years old and would be 73 at the start of his third term in January 2027. He would then be 77 years old at the end of the four-year term. Another factor is whether his wife, Annie, would retire. She has declined to retire and is still working at 68 as a highly successful venture capitalist who specializes in the health care industry.
Lamont planned a press conference for Thursday morning in his Capitol office, but he declined to say Wednesday night whether he would answer the biggest question in Connecticut politics by announcing whether he will run.
When asked by The Courant if he would be talking Thursday about his future plans, Lamont said, 'I think I am, yeah.'
Asked if he would reveal his decision Wednesday night, he responded, 'No. Then you won't show up tomorrow. I'm just going to go over the budget, what it means, and where it takes us. … Hey, thanks, guys.'
The question of whether Lamont would run again in November 2026 has been hanging over the Connecticut political world for at least a year.
If Lamont were not on the ballot, a crowded field of possible candidates could jump into the race, including Lt. Gov. Susan Bysiewicz of Middletown, state Attorney General William Tong of Stamford, Comptroller Sean Scanlon of Guilford, and former Hartford mayor Luke Bronin, among others.
Depending on who decides to run, their positions would immediately open up, meaning there could be primaries for sought-after positions like attorney general and comptroller.
On the Republican side, longtime candidate Matthew Corey has already announced he is running for lieutenant governor. Corey has run unsuccessfully two times against U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy of Hartford in 2018 and 2024, and he lost three times against U.S. Rep. John B. Larson of East Hartford in 2012, 2014, and 2016.
Lamont said he believes that the 2025 session was successful, with a two-year budget that he said will promote opportunity and affordability.
'Look what we did on child care. Look what we did on special ed,' Lamont told Capitol reporters. He touted the passage of his plan to fund universal pre-kindergarten for families making up to $100,000 a year and his plan to constrain special education costs that have stressed municipal budgets for years.
He also applauded the passage of a housing policy bill that encourages towns to create affordable housing to address the state's housing crisis. Target numbers of units each town should have, such as a fair share percentage, were unhelpful, he said.
'You gotta lighten up on the regulations.'
Concerning the session, Lamont said, 'I think it was pretty good. We're on time. We've got a balanced budget. … We're making some strategic investments. We're not raising taxes – at least on individuals. I don't think we broke the spending cap. We'll be paying down over a billion dollars in pension debt yet again. That didn't happen before I got here.'
Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@courant.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How the Vatican manages money and where Pope Leo XIV might find more
How the Vatican manages money and where Pope Leo XIV might find more

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

How the Vatican manages money and where Pope Leo XIV might find more

VATICAN CITY (AP) — The world's smallest country has a big budget problem. The Vatican doesn't tax its residents or issue bonds. It primarily finances the Catholic Church's central government through donations that have been plunging, ticket sales for the Vatican Museums, as well as income from investments and an underperforming real estate portfolio. The last year the Holy See published a consolidated budget, in 2022, it projected 770 million euros ($878 million), with the bulk paying for embassies around the world and Vatican media operations. In recent years, it hasn't been able to cover costs. That leaves Pope Leo XIV facing challenges to drum up the funds needed to pull his city-state out of the red. Withering donations Anyone can donate money to the Vatican, but the regular sources come in two main forms. Canon law requires bishops around the world to pay an annual fee, with amounts varying and at bishops' discretion 'according to the resources of their dioceses.' U.S. bishops contributed over one-third of the $22 million (19.3 million euros) collected annually under the provision from 2021-2023, according to Vatican data. The other main source of annual donations is more well-known to ordinary Catholics: Peter's Pence, a special collection usually taken on the last Sunday of June. From 2021-2023, individual Catholics in the U.S. gave an average $27 million (23.7 million euros) to Peter's Pence, more than half the global total. American generosity hasn't prevented overall Peter's Pence contributions from cratering. After hitting a high of $101 million (88.6 million euros) in 2006, contributions hovered around $75 million (66.8 million euros) during the 2010's then tanked to $47 million (41.2 million euros) during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, when many churches were closed. Donations remained low in the following years, amid revelations of the Vatican's bungled investment in a London property, a former Harrod's warehouse that it hoped to develop into luxury apartments. The scandal and ensuing trial confirmed that the vast majority of Peter's Pence contributions had funded the Holy See's budgetary shortfalls, not papal charity initiatives as many parishioners had been led to believe. Peter's Pence donations rose slightly in 2023 and Vatican officials expect more growth going forward, in part because there has traditionally been a bump immediately after papal elections. New donors The Vatican bank and the city state's governorate, which controls the museums, also make annual contributions to the pope. As recently as a decade ago, the bank gave the pope around 55 million euros ($62.7 million) a year to help with the budget. But the amounts have dwindled; the bank gave nothing specifically to the pope in 2023, despite registering a net profit of 30 million euros ($34.2 million), according to its financial statements. The governorate's giving has likewise dropped off. Some Vatican officials ask how the Holy See can credibly ask donors to be more generous when its own institutions are holding back. Leo will need to attract donations from outside the U.S., no small task given the different culture of philanthropy, said the Rev. Robert Gahl, director of the Church Management Program at Catholic University of America's business school. He noted that in Europe there is much less of a tradition (and tax advantage) of individual philanthropy, with corporations and government entities doing most of the donating or allocating designated tax dollars. Even more important is leaving behind the 'mendicant mentality' of fundraising to address a particular problem, and instead encouraging Catholics to invest in the church as a project, he said. Speaking right after Leo's installation ceremony in St. Peter's Square, which drew around 200,000 people, Gahl asked: 'Don't you think there were a lot of people there that would have loved to contribute to that and to the pontificate?' In the U.S., donation baskets are passed around at every Sunday Mass. Not so at the Vatican. Untapped real estate The Vatican has 4,249 properties in Italy and 1,200 more in London, Paris, Geneva and Lausanne, Switzerland. Only about one-fifth are rented at fair market value, according to the annual report from the APSA patrimony office, which manages them. Some 70% generate no income because they house Vatican or other church offices; the remaining 10% are rented at reduced rents to Vatican employees. In 2023, these properties only generated 35 million euros ($39.9 million) in profit. Financial analysts have long identified such undervalued real estate as a source of potential revenue. But Ward Fitzgerald, the president of the U.S.-based Papal Foundation, which finances papal charities, said the Vatican should also be willing to sell properties, especially those too expensive to maintain. Many bishops are wrestling with similar downsizing questions as the number of church-going Catholics in parts of the U.S. and Europe shrinks and once-full churches stand empty. Toward that end, the Vatican recently sold the property housing its embassy in Tokyo's high-end Sanbancho neighborhood, near the Imperial Palace, to a developer building a 13-story apartment complex, according to the Kensetsu News trade journal. Yet there has long been institutional reluctance to part with even money-losing properties. Witness the Vatican announcement in 2021 that the cash-strapped Fatebenefratelli Catholic hospital in Rome, run by a religious order, would not be sold. Pope Francis simultaneously created a Vatican fundraising foundation to keep it and other Catholic hospitals afloat. 'They have to come to grips with the fact that they own so much real estate that is not serving the mission of the church,' said Fitzgerald, who built a career in real estate private equity. ___ AP reporter Mari Yamaguchi in Tokyo contributed. ___ Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids
Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Riot police, anti-ICE protesters square off in Los Angeles after raids

By Jane Ross and Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Helmeted police in riot gear turned out on Friday evening in a tense confrontation with protesters in downtown Los Angeles, after a day of federal immigration raids in which dozens of people across the city were reported to be taken into custody. Live Reuters video showed Los Angeles Police Department officers lined up on a downtown street wielding batons and what appeared to be tear gas rifles, facing off with demonstrators after authorities had ordered crowds of protesters to disperse around nightfall. Early in the standoff, some protesters hurled chunks of broken concrete toward officers, and police responded by firing volleys of tear gas and pepper spray. Police also fired "flash-bang" concussion rounds. It was not clear whether there were any immediate arrests. An LAPD spokesperson, Drake Madison, told Reuters that police on the scene had declared an unlawful assembly, meaning that those who failed to leave the area were subject to arrest. Television news footage earlier in the day showed caravans of unmarked military-style vehicles and vans loaded with uniformed federal agents streaming through Los Angeles streets as part of the immigration enforcement operation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents targeted several locations, including a Home Depot in the city's Wetlake District, an apparel store in the Fashion District and a clothing warehouse in South Los Angeles, according to the Los Angeles City News Service (CNS). CNS and other local media reported dozens of people were taken into custody during the raids, the latest in a series of such sweeps conducted in a number of cities as part of President Donald Trump's extensive crackdown on illegal immigration. The Republican president has vowed to arrest and deport undocumented migrants in record numbers. The LAPD did not take part in the immigration enforcement action. It was deployed to quell civil unrest after crowds protesting the deportation raids spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on the walls of a federal court building and massed outside a nearby jail where some of the detainees were believed to be held. Impromptu demonstrations had also erupted at some of the raid locations earlier in the day. One organized labor executive, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union of California, was injured and detained by ICE at one site, according to an SEIU statement. The union said Huerta was arrested "while exercising his First Amendment right to observe and document law enforcement activity." No details about the nature or severity of Huerta's injury were given. It was not clear whether he was charged with a crime. ICE did not immediately respond to a request from Reuters for information about its enforcement actions or Huerta's detention. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass issued a statement condemning the immigration raids, saying, "these tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city."

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

timean hour ago

Judge says administration can dismantle the Institute of Museum and Library Services

WASHINGTON -- A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Association to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress. But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims. He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims. The American Library Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Donald Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.' The agency's appointed acting director then placed many agency staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board. The institute has roughly 75 employees and issued more than $266 million in grants last year. However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the museum and library services institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store