Trump's ex-surgeon general suggests new nominee Casey Means lacks needed qualifications
Trump's ex-surgeon general suggests new nominee Casey Means lacks needed qualifications Trump's former surgeon general says holding a medical license is essential for the position. Trump nominee Casey Means doesn't have one.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Trump selects influencer Doctor Casey Means as Surgeon General
US President Donald Trump has selected health entrepreneur and wellness influencer Dr. Casey Means as the US Surgeon General.
unbranded - Newsworthy
Means is not a practicing physician and does not have an active medical license.
Adams pointed to the surgeon general's legal obligation to serve as vice admiral of the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps
WASHINGTON ― Dr. Jerome Adams, the former U.S. surgeon general during President Donald Trump's first term, called into question the qualifications of Trump's new nominee for the post, Casey Means, as he argued the surgeon general must hold a medical license to carry out the job's duties.
Means is not a practicing physician and does not have an active medical license.
Without mentioning Means by name, Adams outlined his position in a May 22 post on X. Adams acknowledged that no explicit federal law mandates the surgeon general be a licensed physician. But he pointed to the surgeon general's legal obligation to serve as vice admiral of the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, a uniformed service of health professionals for the federal government.
To be commissioned as an officer in the PHSCC, a physician must hold a current valid medical medical license in addition to completing one year of a medical residency or another accredited postgraduate medical program.
Adams said the PHSCC qualifications are "implicitly (and legally) essential" to serve as surgeon general.
Since Trump nominated Means ‒ a 37-year-old Stanford University-educated wellness influencer ‒ as surgeon general on May 7, she has drawn scrutiny for her lack of medical license. Means' Oregon medical license expired in 2019 and was moved to inactive in January 2024.
More: Who is Casey Means? Trump's new surgeon general nominee sparks drama
Means also dropped out of a five-year medical residency program as an otolaryngologist at Oregon Health & Science University months before completing it. Yet she appears to still satisfy the PHSCC's requirement that physicians have one year of postgraduation education.
"The Surgeon General's position as a trusted public health authority and physician makes full training and licensure a critical expectation in addition to an implicit legal requirement," Adams wrote.
More: President Trump changes his mind on nomination for surgeon general
He compared the credentials to an Army general meeting "the minimum qualifications to serve in the military" before being promoted to lead other troops held to the same standards.
"This is in no way a personal criticism of any candidate, but a clarification for the sake of the integrity of the PHSCC that I was blessed and honored to lead," he added. "Failure to maintain these requirements not only compromises the mission and credibility of the service, but opens the PHS and HHS to lawsuits from others denied a commission or promotion, or terminated due to failure to meet these legal standards."
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Trump tapped Means after withdrawing his first pick for the role, Dr. Janette Nesheiwat, a Fox News medical contributor.
Means, a close ally of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is an advocate for metabolic health and preventing chronic disease, who has a large social media following. Trump has lauded Means for having "impeccable 'MAHA' credentials," referring to Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again movement.
But Means has attracted scrutiny from health professionals over her background and the ire from some on the far-right including activist Laura Loomer, an influential voice for Trump. Loomer has criticized Means' lack of medical license and accused her of having a "history being a Marxist tree hugger."
Adams, an anesthesiologist and former state health commissioner of Indiana, served as Trump's only surgeon general during his first term, from 2017 to 2021. After leaving the White House, Adams joined Purdue University as executive director of the Center for Community Health Enhancement and Learning.
Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
24 minutes ago
- CBS News
WorldPride is in Washington, D.C. this year. The Trump administration is prompting fears, mixed emotions.
What we know about canceled LGBTQ events at the Kennedy Center This year, WorldPride is coming to Washington, D.C. A series of events, organized by the nonprofit InterPride, aims to bring visibility and awareness of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer issues to an international stage. This year's location is leaving the community conflicted about showing up to the nation's capital amid an administration that has targeted them. Zoe Stoller, a licensed social worker based in Philadelphia, said they're excited to be amongst the queer and trans community at WorldPride, but told CBS News the Trump administration has "definitely been on my mind." "D.C. is not necessarily a place that many people would think of as super safe and comfortable right now, given the current administration and their attacks on the LGBTQ community, especially trans people, especially trans youth," they said. Meg Ten Eyck, founder and CEO of travel platform EveryQueer and vice chairman of the board of directors for the International LGBTQ Travel Association, has been to dozens of Pride events across the world, from the miles-long parade at New York City's WorldPride to a Pride in Kyiv, Ukraine in 2015 that was targeted with Molotov cocktails amid protests. "What is happening socially and politically changes the feeling of the Pride that you are attending," she said, adding she anticipates WorldPride this year is going to bring "an astronomical amount of fear and sadness from people" as well as some potential violence. "I think the community is terrified, and I think our instinct as humans is to want structure and to want answers," she said. "There will be a lot of people who are drawn to this particular pride as a giant 'F*** you' to the administration, and there will be a lot of people who are incentivized into negative behaviors that may not necessarily be characteristic of who they are because of that fear and misinformation and general dissatisfaction with human rights violations that are happening in a lot of different ways." New York City's annual Pride March commemorates the 1969 uprising by members of the LGBTQ community at the Stonewall Inn in Greenwich Village. Bing Guan/Bloomberg via Getty Images Comments across social media have also highlighted the mixed emotions. In a video about WorldPride posted to TikTok earlier this month, a top comment with more than 2,000 likes says: "Being real... I'm not going this year. I'm scared." Another reads: "Couldn't pay me enough to attend a mass gathering like this in this political climate." But others had a different take, including this commenter who wrote: "Don't let them make us scared we deserve happiness too." While some may choose to skip this year's events due to safety concerns, Stoller predicts their absence will be filled with others eager to take a stand. "Folks who may not have attended in the past, might not have felt motivated to show up, to protest, to be in this current political climate and make their voices heard — those folks might come out of the woodworks," they said. For those with layered identities, navigating Pride this year is even more complex. David D. Marshall, founder and CEO of Journey to Josiah Inc., a Baltimore-based adoption nonprofit, said the feeling of a "robust need to fight" is met with the reality that, for people of color, showing up is a "a whole different experience" to White LGBTQ people. "There is a fear in general when it comes to black people, because there is a direct target put on our backs when it comes to any sort of protest," he said, adding "it's a time for people of different privilege, or allies, to show up." And for others, more pressing matters are taking precedence over the problems posed by Pride. "When we're thinking about the grand scheme of things, (Pride) just hasn't been on the list," Marshall admitted, adding his own organization is grappling with federal funding cuts and those in his circles are "fighting to maintain our own livelihoods" amid the dismantling of DEI – diversity, equity and inclusion – roles. "The option to fold is not there, because the work still needs to be done. The need has not gone anywhere but there are now some additional barriers," he said. Why is WorldPride in D.C.? While the Trump administration has rolled back several protections for LGBTQ people, especially for trans individuals, WorldPride locations are bid on years in advance, meaning the nation's capital was decided before President Trump was re-elected. "No one could have anticipated what was going to happen," Ten Eyck said, adding there are fears around what the administration may do if there are protests on federal land, since it would be their jurisdiction. "(For some people), federal charges result in you losing your career and your income and your stability." But there's an important distinction between who's in office and who makes up the city, she added. "Yeah, (Mr.) Trump has the White House and sort of lives in D.C., but the District of Columbia goes deeply democratic in every single election, regardless of who's in the federal administration. So, having and hosting a large global pride celebration is aligned with the citizens of D.C.'s politic and will, but it is not aligned with the federal government stance." Members and allies of the LGBTQ community cheer on a Pride car parade as it leaves from Freedom Plaza in Washington, DC. Drew Angerer / Getty Images Stoller, who has more than 50,000 Instagram followers, has seen this contrast causing discussions among their online community as well, with many questioning whether it's safe or appropriate to attend. "D.C. still can be a very safe, open, accepting place. But of course, the people who are in charge, who now are living in D.C. definitely affect the vibes and feelings of that," they said. The Trump administration has already made itself known ahead of the celebration. Last month, several Pride events at the Kennedy Center were canceled or relocated as the institution pivots under President Trump's leadership. June Crenshaw, deputy director of nonprofit organization Capital Pride Alliance that is helping host to WorldPride, said the organization is finding other paths for the celebration, but added, "the fact we have to maneuver in this way is disappointing." According to the WorldPride website, "top-to-bottom safety protocol" is in place, assuring the same level of preparation as high-security events like inaugurations. "Efforts include pre-event web-related surveillance, on-site security/police, advanced life support stations, roving medic teams, aerial surveillance and anti-scaling systems and barricades where applicable," the site notes. "The 2-day street festival will be fenced with a secure entrance. Capital Pride is augmenting DC's efforts with additional private security." How to celebrate Pride outside of Washington, D.C. If unsure about attending WorldPride this year, Stroller encourages people to prioritize their emotional and physical safety above all else. "If you are feeling worried for your safety, for your emotions, for your well-being, listen to your gut," they said. People march during the Pride Parade in Boston, Massachusetts. JOSEPH PREZIOSO/AFP via Getty Images Black LGBTQ people are also having to figure out another approach "that may not necessarily be showing up in these very public spaces," Marshall added. "Does that mean that one group has decided not to fight? No, it's a matter of how. What is going to be the thing that is not going to cost us our lives?" he said. Ten Eyck adds there are plenty of ways to "show up" for the community without being in Washington physically, including supporting your local Pride party or LGBT center as well as "putting your money where your morals are." "If you're a federal employee who can fight from the inside, if you're a teacher who can fight from the inside, if you're a public health professional who can fight from the inside, we need you more in those roles than we need you on the National Mall," she said.
Axios
41 minutes ago
- Axios
RFK Jr.'s on-the-fly health policy strategy
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s tenure as the nation's top health official is becoming increasingly known for abrupt policy pronouncements based on limited or sketchy evidence that perplex health care providers, industries and patients. Why it matters: While Kennedy has branded himself as a change agent bringing "radical transparency" to a bloated federal bureaucracy and promoting "gold standard" science, the results have at times been chaotic, even exposing rifts between President Trump's circle and Kennedy's own base. State of play: The Kennedy-led Make America Healthy Again Commission report on causes of childhood illness became a focus last week for a series of erroneous and fabricated references, first reported by NOTUS. The White House had to quickly correct those errors. New policies that Kennedy rolled out over the preceding two weeks that limited access to COVID vaccines also evidenced what some critics characterize as an on-the-fly approach, and delivered contradictory messages on whether healthy kids and pregnant women should get the shots. While Health and Human Services cited a lack of evidence in favor of annual COVID booster strategy for healthy people, public health experts said the administration provided scant evidence for switching from the current system. The commentary announcing the change includes just eight citations, one of which is an opinion piece from current Food and Drug Administration commissioner Marty Makary. What they're saying: HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said Kennedy is "doing what previous administrations would not" in going against the policymaking status quo. "His approach is deliberate — not traditional for Washington, but urgently needed for a nation that has lost trust in public health institutions," Nixon told Axios in an email. "By leveraging direct communication tools like social media, Secretary Kennedy is modernizing how HHS engages with the public, reaching Americans where they are, and with the radical transparency they deserve." Yes, but: Health industry players have been left wondering what the actual rules of the road are, and how to implement policies that could change day by day. "There's a new inconsistency every day," said Michael Osterholm, director of the University of Minnesota's Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy. "For many of us, what we're concerned about is that this is all merging into one anti-vaccine message, and it also is merging into [the administration thinking] 'We can do whatever we want from a regulatory oversight standpoint,'" he said. The false citations in the MAHA Commission report are an example of how even pieces of Kennedy's health care agenda with broader appeal are being carried out "in a way that is unserious," said Chris Meekins, a managing director at Raymond James and health official in the first Trump administration. Zoom out: The pace of the changes and the sometimes abrupt way they're communicated mirrors other parts of the Trump administration. Many recent announcements out of HHS come directly from Kennedy and appear on social media before they're reflected on official government webpages. It's not dissimilar to how President Trump has taken to announcing tariff policies on social media. A Truth Social post from the president can send financial markets spiraling. Reality check: While public health policy shifts abruptly and outside the typical channels, other HHS hallmarks like Medicare payment rules are moving through their typical processes under Kennedy, at least so far. What we're watching: Whether Kennedy's aggressive policymaking eventually undermines his agenda by angering stakeholders who are even closer to Trump than he is.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's safety research cuts heighten workplace risks, federal workers warn
Drastic cuts at a federal workplace safety research agency increase the risk of illness and injury for workers across the US and undermine preparations for public health emergencies, fired employees warn. The Trump administration ordered widespread layoffs at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, inside the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, when it issued a 'reduction in force' notice to some 85% of the agency's 1,100 workers employees on 1 April. While some of those terminations were later reversed following pushback from labor unions and the public, only 328 employees were reinstated. Related: 'So many are devastated': Trump's federal firings and their ripple effect 'An immediate impact is that we're not as prepared for some type of public health emergency,' said Dr Micah Niemeier-Walsh, an industrial hygienist at Niosh in Ohio, who was fired, and then reinstated. 'Long term, the Trump administration talks about wanting to bring back or expand certain sectors of the economy like mining or manufacturing. Those are jobs that really rely on Niosh work.' Jennica Bellanca, for example, worked to train emergency responders in mining in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Her role was terminated. 'It's such a hard thing. Everyone here works so hard to help support the health and safety of mine workers and other workers,' she said, noting that small companies do not have the resources to invest in alternative safety programs. 'I'm just concerned that nobody else is going to fill this gap. There's a reason that the government provides this safety net. 'In our case, the safety net is to help workers go home to their families every day and make sure that nothing bad happens.' Bellanca questioned a central argument for the cuts – efficiency in federal government spending – by noting that long-term research projects may now go unreleased. When we're gone, there's going to be nobody to get this information out Jennica Bellanca, former trainer for emergency responders 'When we're gone, there's going to be nobody to get this information out,' she said. 'And because we were so abruptly, sort of cut off in the middle of projects, all of this work that we've done, we're not able to get this out, released, as a full public product. In my mind, that's a waste of government money.' Niemeier-Walsh, the vice-president of American Federal of Government Employees Local 3840, said the reduction in force was the 'final, massive blow to our work' after earlier limitations on travel, communications and remote work imposed since Donald Trump took office in January. 'Our ability to be as successful as we have been as an institute relies on the rest of the Niosh employees coming back because our work is so interconnected,' said Niemeier-Walsh. 'I'm very, very concerned what this means for every single American worker if we're not able to fully restore Niosh. These cuts are not based in science. They're not based on the public health need. They're based on politics, and that's bad for the health of the American people.' Related: Mass resignations at labor department threaten workers in US and overseas, warn staff – as more cuts loom She cited as an example the employees in the health hazard evaluation program, which was established to reduce workplace risks and recommend ways to mitigate dangers, who were reinstated after earlier cuts. But they rely on chemists to develop analytical methods to measure chemicals in the workplace, and engineers to design solutions; these chemists and engineers have not been reinstated, she said. Since the agency was founded in 1970, recordable workplace illnesses and injuries and fatalities have been drastically reduced in the US. The rate of non-fatal workplace injuries and illnesses declined from 10.9 cases per 100 full-time workers in 1972 to 2.4 in 2023. The AFL-CIO, the largest federation of labor unions in the US, and several other labor unions filed a lawsuit this month to restore the cut programs at Niosh, arguing the cuts 'directly threaten the lives of workers whose safety and health depend on Niosh' services that are congressionally mandated. Even though some of the initial cuts have been reversed,'we have deep concerns that the whole reason Niosh was started to begin with is still eliminated,' said Rebecca Reindel, the director of occupational safety and health at the AFL-CIO, who noted that the agency's founding mandate was to assure every man and woman in the US has safe and healthful working conditions. Reindel expressed particular concern about disruption to long-term research projects. Related: US workers feel effects of Trump cuts: 'I am seeing my work dry up' 'All of this research work that they do, where they have these big cohorts, they've been following people for 40 years,' she said. 'And now they're just cut off for these occupational prospective cohorts, where they follow them over years to see what kind of diseases are developing. 'If we're just staffing those cohorts now, we're really losing 40 years worth of work. Even if they restart them, we're going to have lost so many people to follow up.' A spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services did not comment on the record. Its secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, was working to ensure Niosh critical services remain intact and continue as the agency streamlines its operations, they claimed.
