Woman who died in Galway house fire was a death row survivor wrongfully convicted of murder
A 76-year-old woman who died in a house fire in Galway has been named as Sonia 'Sunny' Jacobs, who served 17 years in prison, including time on death row, after she was wrongfully convicted of the murder of a US policeman and a Canadian constable.
Ms Jacobs perished after a blaze broke out at her bungalow near Casla in Go Galway on Tuesday morning.
Advertisement
A man in his 30s, who is understood to have been her carer, also died in the incident at Gleann Mhic Mhuireann.
Gardaí and the emergency services were alerted to the fire at 6:20am on Tuesday.
The bodies of the man and woman were recovered from inside the property. The scene has been preserved for a technical examination. Postmortem examinations will be carried out at University Hospital Galway.
Ms Jacobs was placed on death row in Florida in 1976 having been wrongfully convicted of a double murder.
Advertisement
Her son was nine whilst her daughter was just 10 months old when she went to prison. When Sunny Jacobs was freed in 1992, her son Eric was a married father whilst her daughter Christina was 16 years old.
Ms Jacobs told the BBC in 2017 that when she went to jail when she was a 'mother, a daughter and a wife' and by the time she came out she was a 'grandmother, an orphan and a widow.'
Ms Jacobs and Jesse Joseph Tafero, the father of the younger of her two children, were tried separately, convicted, and sentenced to death by the same judge for the murders of two police officers at a rest stop off of Interstate 95 in Broward County, Florida in 1976.
Ms Jacobs and Mr Tafero had been travelling with their two young children Eric and Christina when their car broke down. They were trying to get home to North Carolina. A man Jesse knew called Walter Rhodes agreed to drive the couple and their children home.
Advertisement
Sunny fell asleep with the children in the back seat, but was startled awake by a policeman knocking on the window of the parked car.
The officer was Philip Black, a Florida Highway Patrol trooper and his friend Donald Irwin a Canadian constable who was on holiday. She said that gunfire broke out and Black and Irwin were slain.
Jacobs and Tafero maintained from the beginning that Rhodes had shot the officers, and that they had nothing to do with it. Although there were two eyewitnesses to events surrounding the murders, neither contradicted Jacobs' and Tafero's version of what happened. Nor was their version contradicted by physical evidence.
Both Tafero and Rhodes had gunpowder residue on their hands, a fact that was consistent with Tafero's claim that Rhodes handed him the gun after shooting the officers. There was no gunpowder residue on Jacobs' hands.
Advertisement
The convictions of Jacobs and Tafero rested primarily on the testimony of Rhodes, who was allowed to plead guilty to a reduced charge of second-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison.
In 1981, the Florida Supreme Court commuted the sentence of Ms Jacobs to life in prison. Mr Tafero was not so lucky. He was put to death in 1990.
After the execution, Mr Rhodes confessed he had fired the fatal shots confirming both Jesse's and Sunny's long-maintained innocence. Sunny was freed in 1992 when she was 45 years old.
Ms Jacob's subsquently met and married Peter Pringle in 2013. Mr Pringle had been sentenced to death in 1980 in Dublin for the murder of two gardaí, John Morley and Henry Byrne, in a bank raid in Ballaghaderreen in Roscommon.
Advertisement
He served 15 years in jail before he was released in 1995 after his convictions for the July 1980 murders were deemed unsafe.
Following her release from prison Sunny Jacob's campaigned for the abolition of the death penalty. She met Mr Pringle at an Amnesty International event in 1998. He was also involved in advocacy work. Mr Pringle died on New Year's Eve 2022 at the age of 84.
In an interview with The Guardian newspaper in 2013 Mr Pringle said that he was 'deeply touched' when he heard about the story of Ms Jacobs.
'I just had to talk to her. There was this spiritual connection there."
Ms Jacobs told the paper that she had to learn how to do things all over again when she was freed from prison in 1992.
'I had to learn how to make a living, be a mother and simply be a person again. It was very difficult, but at the same time I wanted to get past it.
I wouldn't say my experience haunts me, but it's always there. Everyone gets challenged in life and you can either spend the rest of your life looking backwards, or you can make a decision to keep going. That's the choice I made."
Ireland
Timetable of case against former Armagh GAA captai...
Read More
While Ms Jacobs was in prison her parents, who looked after her children, died in a plane crash. She said that her focus was on rebuilding her relationship with her children once she was freed. In her Guardian interview she said that she had never expected to find love again.
"I'd given up on meeting anyone. I just accepted that not everyone was meant to have a partner. But then I met Peter."
The pair set up the Sunny Healing Centre in rural Connemara where they offered a space for healing and respite to individuals who had faced miscarriages of justice.
Ms Jacobs was also an author and spoke at universities and conferences. Oscar winning actress Susan Sarandon played Sunny in the movie 'The Exonerated' which was released in 2005.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
37 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Man (67) jailed for subjecting his younger sisters to 'horrific' and repeated sexual abuse
A man who subjected two of his younger sisters to 'horrific' and repeated sexual abuse in the 1970s has been jailed for four-and-a-half years. Bernard Brennan (67), formerly of Rathfarnham, Dublin, but most recently residing in the United States, pleaded guilty to 11 counts of indecent assault in various locations within the State between 1972 and 1975. He has no previous convictions. Advertisement His sisters, Yvonne Crist and Paula Fay, waived their anonymity so Brennan could be named. Passing sentence in the Central Criminal Court on Thursday, Mr Justice Paul McDermott said the facts of the case were 'appalling'. He said that while the abuse Brennan pleaded guilty to fell under the historic term of 'indecent assault', today the abuse would constitute offences that have a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. However, he noted the court was bound by law to the maximum penalty of two years' imprisonment and that Brennan was a juvenile when he committed the abuse. Advertisement Brennan pleaded guilty in advance of his trial date to four counts of indecent assault against Ms Crist and seven counts of indecent assault against Ms Fay. Ms Crist was aged 13, while Ms Fay was just seven years old when the abuse started. Mr Justice McDermott said some of the abuse perpetrated against the sisters was 'horrific to hear and to describe'. He said they gave 'eloquent, moving statements' outlining the horrors they have experienced and the pain they have suffered as a result of the abuse. He said the devastation the abuse caused was 'unspeakable' and the penalties to be imposed were 'by reason of history and nothing else'. He set a headline sentence of 21 months for each count and reduced this to 15 months, taking mitigating factors into account. He imposed four concurrent sentences of 15 months on Brennan, amounting to five years' imprisonment. Advertisement He reduced this to four-and-a-half years and backdated it to when Brennan went into custody earlier this year. At a previous hearing, Detective Garda Neil Fogarty told Patrick McCullough BL, prosecuting, that in relation to Ms Fay, the abuse started when the then seven-year-old was called in to the house by Brennan – then aged 14 years old – and forced to take off her clothes in front of a group of local boys. Brennan touched her inappropriately in front of these boys and from then on the abuse escalated, to include oral rape. He would wake her in the night to abuse her. The court heard he threatened Ms Fay that their family would be split up if she told anyone about the abuse. Advertisement Ms Crist was 13 and Brennan was aged 15 when he started abusing her. He would wake her in the night, sexually assault her and make her watch pornography. He digitally penetrated her and performed oral sex on her. She was afraid to call out or tell her parents for fear of physical punishment, the court heard. Brennan subjected both girls to abuse in front of and with a third party, the court heard. A letter was found from Brennan to his father, dated 2012, in which he apologised to his parents for abusing his sisters, but stated that he had no memory of it. Advertisement In her victim impact statement, Ms Crist said it has been hard to trust anyone in her life except her sister. 'Incest has affected me, and I have had to bury it deep inside,' she said. 'You took my innocence, and I will never forget that,' she said. 'I have become a strong person, and I have met these challenges head-to-head.' 'I forgave you, my brother, a long time ago, but I have had to hang onto the past until now. The truth has now been told, and you will now be known as a sexual predator for the rest of your life.' 'You have put us through hell,' she added. 'May you never find peace again.' Ms Fay also read her victim impact statement to the court, in which she said she was 'silenced' in her childhood and felt 'invisible, worthless and inferior'. 'Growing up as a child, I always felt incapable, insufficient and inadequate,' she said. 'I should have felt safe in my childhood home.' 'I struggle with being alone because that's when the thoughts of self-doubt come back.' She said the legal process has been a long and arduous one, starting back in 2021. 'I have felt so much freedom since, and so much weight lifted off my shoulders,' she said. 'I chose to survive. Today, I truly became a survivor. I now have justice.' Det Gda Fogarty agreed with Miska Hanahoe BL, defending, that her client has no previous convictions in Ireland or any other jurisdiction. The garda agreed with counsel that he immediately stated he would travel from the United States to Ireland and indicated that he would plead guilty. Ms Hanahoe said her client offers an unreserved apology to both of the injured parties. She said Brennan has suffered profound guilt and shame throughout his life. Ireland Two teenagers sentenced for roles in rape of girl... Read More Counsel said he grew up in a violent home and that his only sexual education was from pornography, which he re-enacted. She said her client has no memory of the abuse but does not dispute the evidence of his sisters. She said he has never tried to minimise his wrongdoing. He asked the court to take into account that the Probation Services have placed him at low risk of reoffending, that he has co-operated fully with the gardaí, that he has shown remorse, and his age at the time of the offending. If you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this article, you can call the national 24-hour Rape Crisis Helpline at 1800-77 8888, access text service and webchat options at or visit Rape Crisis Help .
BreakingNews.ie
37 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
JP Magnier handed €50,000 in 'brown' envelopes to estate agent in land sale, court hears
The High Court has heard that billionaire bloodstock magnate John Magnier's son, JP, handed over two "brown" envelopes containing a total of €50,000 in cash to an estate agent involved in a failed €15 million property deal which were delivered to the beneficiaries of the estate as a show of "appreciation". The court also heard that a solicitor involved in the proposed conveyance of Barne Estate, Co Tipperary, the subject of a legal action by John Magnier - who alleges a €15 million deal was reneged upon by the vendors - has told the High Court that an agreement was in place between the parties before an exclusivity document was signed. Advertisement Joseph Fitzpatrick, of Smithwick Solicitors, was giving evidence in the hearing on Thursday and told counsel for the Barne Estate that he secured an exclusivity agreement signed by both sides to run from August 31st to September 22nd after hands were allegedly shaken on the deal. Lawyers acting for Mr Magnier, founder of the world-famous Coolmore Stud, have claimed before the High Court that a US-based construction magnate, Maurice Regan, the preferred buyer, engaged in a "full-frontal assault" on Mr Magnier's claimed deal to buy the 751-acre tract. Mr Magnier's proceedings claim that Barne Estate reneged on the alleged deal, preferring to sell the land at the higher price of €22.25 million to Mr Regan, the founder of the New York building firm JT Magen. Mr Magnier – along with his adult children - wants to enforce the alleged deal. Advertisement The Magnier side says the deal was struck at an August 22, 2023, kitchen meeting at Mr Magnier's Coolmore home. They also claim an exclusivity agreement that was in effect from August 31 to September 30 stipulated that the estate would not permit its representatives to solicit or encourage any expression of interest, inquiry or offer on the property from anyone other than Mr Magnier. Barne Estate has been held for the benefit of Richard Thomson-Moore and others by a Jersey trust. The Magnier side has sued the Barne Estate, Mr Thomson-Moore and three companies of IQEQ (Jersey) Ltd group, seeking to enforce the purported deal, which they say had been "unequivocally" agreed. The Barne defendants say there was never any such agreement, as they needed the consent of the trustees to finalise any agreement, and subsequently they preferred to sell the estate to Mr Regan. Advertisement Mr Regan is not a party to the case. Mr Magnier's son, JP, told Paul Gallagher SC, for the Magnier side, that his father asked him to get €50,000 in cash on September 8, 2023, and to put it into two envelopes to be given to the Thomson-Moores. He said the money was an "appreciation" for letting the Magnier side onto the Barne land, for their loyalty in honouring the deal and because they were allegedly "cash strapped". JP Magnier said he put the money into two envelopes and gave it to the estate agent at Barne Estate for them to be passed on to the Thomson-Moores. Advertisement On September 11, 2023, however, he said the estate agent met with JP Magnier and "pushed" the envelopes in his direction, saying that the Thomson-Moores were concerned that their farm manager may have seen the original transaction. Niall F Buckley SC, for the Barne side, asked what colour the envelopes were and was told by JP Magnier that they were brown. Mr Buckley put it to JP Magnier that the envelopes were to keep the Thomson-Moores "sweet", as John Magnier was concerned they were going to pull out of the deal. JP Magnier said his father never said that to him. "I take it you didn't ask for a receipt?" asked Mr Buckley. JP Magnier replied: "No." Advertisement "Doesn't that say it all," remarked Mr Buckley. "Knowing what you did about my clients' family circumstances and the need for them to provide for their child and given the vast amount of land you have, did it ever occur to you to let this one go?" "It wouldn't be my call," said JP Magnier. Mr Fitzpatrick told Martin Hayden SC, for the Barne Estate, that the exclusivity agreement was not to further any negotiation but to keep the "status quo" of the alleged sale agreement in order to further the preparation and receipt of the contracts. "Exclusivity was not for negotiations going forward but to facilitate the contract," said Mr Fitzpatrick. Ireland Supreme Court decision on compensation over power... Read More Mr Fitzpatrick said Mr Magnier had deposited €15 million in the Smithwicks' client account before any purported contract was signed in order to "show good faith". However, a week before the exclusivity agreement expired, the Thomson-Moores said they were taking tax advice, he said. "We invited them to a meeting and that was refused, then the extension of the exclusivity was refused. It was clear they had no intention of signing with us and were running down the clock," said Mr Fitzpatrick. The case continues in two weeks' time before Mr Justice Max Barrett.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Supreme Court decision on compensation over power lines could affect thousands of landowners
A Supreme Court decision that compensation can be awarded for depreciation of the value of lands due to having electricity power lines installed across them could potentially affect thousands of landowners. The five judge court rejected arguments by the Electricity Supply Board (ESB) that a property arbitrator was not entitled to include compensation for land depreciation – referred to in the relevant 19th century law as 'injurious affection' – in an award of €39,500 statutory compensation to a couple over power lines installed across their farm. Advertisement Arbitrator Peter Good, since deceased, had made the award to Peter and Rose O'Reilly concerning lands owned by them at Crubany, Co Cavan. Compensation for 'injurious affection' formed a substantial part of the award, and its inclusion was successfully appealed by the ESB to the High Court. The couple appealed the High Court to the Court of Appeal, which decided the matter raised issues of public importance requiring determination by the Supreme Court. On Friday, Mr Justice Brian Murray, giving the court's main judgment, upheld arguments by Peter Bland SC, with barrister Michael O'Donnell, instructed by solicitor Gabriel Toolan, that the entitlement to compensation includes for 'injurious affection'. Advertisement The case arose after the couple entered landowner agreements with the ESB in 2011. In return for unobstructed access to their lands to construct electric lines, they were entitled to compensation under the Electricity Supply Act 1927. The main issue in the Supreme Court appeal concerned the extent of the right to compensation. Mr Good decided that, as well as compensation for the loss of value of house sites on the land holding across which the lines travel, they were entitled to compensation for injurious affection, or general loss of value of their entire holding. Among his findings, Mr Justice Murray said none of the legal authorities demand a 'perfect equation' between the compensation mandated by the Constitution for interference with property interests, and the compensation enabled either by developments of the common law or by early Victorian legislation governing the compulsory acquisition of property. The ESB was correct in saying the exercise of powers conferred by section 53 of the 1927 Act did not give rise to the transfer or creation of interests 'in land', he said. There was therefore no basis on which it could be said that the 'injurious affection' provisions of the 1845 Land Clauses Consolidation Act were automatically incorporated into the procedure for deciding compensation under the 1927 Act. Advertisement No significance could be attached to the fact that the 1927 Act did not expressly include or exclude those provisions, he said. Ireland 'Author' of property fraud scheme faces prison ter... Read More He said the High Court had erred if it found the Acquisition of Land (Assessment of Compensation) Act 1919 operated in any way to preclude a claimant seeking compensation for injurious affection or depreciation of the value of their holding caused by the presence of the electric lines, poles and pylons, he said. In other findings, he held Mr Good erred when he fixed compensation for the anticipated exercise of the power of re-entry onto the lands. He upheld the High Court decision that there was no breach by Mr Good, in his handling of the matter, of the ESB's right to fair procedures. The precise amount of compensation was referred for decision, in line with the court's findings, by a new arbitrator. In a separate concurring judgment, Mr Justice Seamus Woulfe agreed with his colleague on all issues other than the constitutional issue and said he was reserving his position on that issue to an appropriate case.
