North Dakota governor's veto ‘clear and unambiguous,' attorney general says
Attorney General Drew Wrigley and Chief Deputy Attorney General Claire Ness talk to reporters June 11, 2025, about an opinion related to Gov. Kelly Armstrong's veto. (Mary Steurer/North Dakota Monitor)
North Dakota's attorney general said Wednesday Gov. Kelly Armstrong's veto was 'sound,' dismissing a differing conclusion by legislative staff that his intent was unclear and the Legislature should hold a special session to fix the error.
The opinion by Attorney General Drew Wrigley means $35 million for housing programs Armstrong's office unintentionally crossed out in a May line-item veto can move forward unless the matter is challenged in court or the Legislature reconvenes.
Armstrong's veto message for the Industrial Commission budget described cutting $150,000 set aside for a Native American-focused organization to fund a homelessness liaison position. But a markup of the bill also crossed out a $35 million appropriation for affordable housing and homelessness — funding Armstrong had intended to leave intact. His office later said there had been a 'staff markup error.'
'Prudent remedy' for veto error is special session, Legislative Council advises
Since then, the Legislature has been trying to figure out what actions, if any, must be taken to address the veto — including the possibility of calling a special session.
Wrigley found that the unintentional markup does not change the substance of the veto because Armstrong's written veto message was 'clear and unambiguous' about what parts of Senate Bill 2014 he intended to cut.
He said in a Wednesday press conference that a 'visual image' should not 'take precedence over the written orders, the detailed description offered by the one person with the power to veto.'
Attorneys for North Dakota's legislative branch in a Friday memo took a very different position, advising the Legislature that calling a special session would be the 'prudent remedy' for the mistake.
In its memo, Legislative Council said legal precedent suggests the marked-up bill is part of the official veto document.
'It would not be appropriate to allow the Governor and Attorney General to resolve the ambiguity by agreement,' the memo states. Doing so could have unintended consequences for how ambiguous vetoes are handled in the future, Legislative Council said.
Wrigley called the Legislative Council memo a 'political document' and said the Attorney General's Office has the final say on the matter unless the issue is challenged in court.
'The power in question is strictly the governor's power and it has to be in compliance with the constitution and laws of North Dakota,' he told the North Dakota Monitor last week. 'That's the only assessment here. There's no role for this in Legislative Council. They have no authority in this regard.'
Armstrong, whose office requested the opinion, in a statement agreed with Wrigley's findings.
'We appreciate the Attorney General's determination, which clarifies the matter, avoids the cost of a special session and nullifies the flawed interpretation that initially blew this up into something much bigger than it needed to be,' he said.
A special session is estimated to cost $65,000 per day, Legislative Council has said.
The Legislature could still decide to reconvene for a special session to override the veto if it chooses to, Wrigley said.
Legislative Council Director John Bjornson said the office did not immediately have a statement on the opinion.
This story was updated.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Attorney General Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mat-Su mayor files to run as a Republican for Alaska governor
Jun. 12—Edna DeVries, mayor of the Mat-Su Borough, announced on Thursday that she is running as a Republican to be Alaska's next governor. DeVries, 83, has been mayor of the Mat-Su since 2021. She moved to Palmer in 1969 and was mayor of the city for over five years. She served two years as a state senator in the 1980s. In a Thursday interview, DeVries said there are many issues facing Alaska and that she wants to focus on "listening to people, transparency in government and limited government." DeVries, a conservative, said that she feels "very strongly" about election integrity and touted a 2022 ban on voting machines in the Mat-Su borough. She said that she supports following a statutory Permanent Fund dividend, and said Alaska needs to "rein in spending" to address its fiscal challenges. "We need to live within our means. And I don't see the state doing that right now," she said. DeVries said that she is a supporter of school choice. She was critical of a substantial education funding boost approved by the Legislature this year. She said that "we need to have some accountability." DeVries on Thursday filed a letter of intent with the Division of Elections to run as governor next year. That is the first step in launching a campaign, allowing the candidate to raise and spend money. DeVries said filing that letter is "sort of a testing of the waters." "Let's see what the response is out there, and get out and talk to the people to see if they see the same needs in our state as I do," she added. Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy, a Republican, is in the penultimate year of his second term. The Alaska Constitution forbids governors from holding office for a third consecutive term. Three other Republicans have filed letters of intent to run for governor in the November 2026 election: Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom, former Fairbanks Sen. Click Bishop, and business owner Bernadette Wilson.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lawmakers pass tax increases on corporations, highest earners, but governor remains an obstacle
() The Maine Legislature on Thursday passed measures that would raise the tax rate on corporations and alter the state's tax brackets to provide relief for the middle class. Another proposal that specifically sought to raise taxes on millionaires, however, was rejected. All of these were determined by a handful, or in some instances just one, vote. And with such narrow margins, the chambers will be unlikely to overcome a potential veto from Gov. Janet Mills, who has already expressed her opposition. The advance of these tax changes comes amid the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee finalizing a budget plan to send to the Maine House of Representatives and Senate for approval, and the potential for increased tax revenue could be consequential. Advocates and some Democratic lawmakers specifically pushed for the Legislature to adjust taxes as a means to continue to fund the health and child care programs that Mills proposed cutting in her budget proposal. So far, only some of those proposals have made it into the committee's budget plan. Notably, the committee rejected Mills' suggested cuts to childcare worker stipends and Head Start. Meanwhile, the committee included some initiatives to save or raise money, such as rolling back funding for mental health programs and pensions, as well as increasing the cigarette excise tax. Both chambers backed LD 229, which would increase the base of the state's tax brackets. It would do this by both increasing the number of tax brackets and by adding a top tax bracket for high income earners. Maine currently has three tax brackets with tax rates of 5.8%, 6.75% and 7.15%. The top tax bracket is currently for any individual making more than $61,600. The bill would add two more brackets for the highest earners, which would be taxed at 7.75% and 8.95%. In the Senate, several critics of the bill said that raising tax rates on the wealthiest individuals would drive investors away. Though tax committee co-chair Sen. Nicole Grohowski (D-Hancock) said the state's tax code is currently 'upside down,' asking more proportionately from earners in the middle than those at the top. 'This bill is here to fix that,' she said. The ideas in this bill are not new, and could lend themselves to a veto, again. Mills' administration testified against the bill during its public hearing, reiterating many of the same concerns the governor had when she vetoed a bill last year that sought to adjust Maine's tax bracelets by adding a new top tax rate of 8.45% and expanding the lower tax brackets. While describing the bill as well intentioned in her veto message, the governor said the bill wouldn't reduce the tax burden for lower-income people because of the state's many exemptions, deductions and credits that more people have become eligible for in recent years. The governor also cited possible state budget challenges if Maine were to increase its reliance on a small number of taxpayers whose income is disproportionately composed of often volatile business. The other bill both chambers backed is LD 1879, which would raise the tax rate on corporations to support the agricultural economy, though the Mills administration is also opposed to this plan. Specifically, it would increase the top marginal corporate income tax rate to 10% on income over $3,500,000 for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026. This revenue would then be distributed to various funds and programs, such as the dairy stabilization support fund, agricultural marketing loan fund and business recovery and resilience fund, among others. Michael Allen, associate commissioner for tax policy in the Department of Administrative and Financial Services, testified against the bill on behalf of Mills during the public hearing, noting that it would make Maine's top marginal corporate income tax rate among the highest in the country. He also noted a number of technical concerns with the proposal. While both chambers have now passed LD 1879, it took several attempts for them to get on the same page. While the House initially passed this bill 77-67, the Senate failed to pass it with a 13-18 vote and subsequently voted against it without a roll call, returning it to the lower chamber in nonconcurrence. On Wednesday, House Minority Leader Billy Bob Faulkingham (R-Winter Harbor) tried to recede and concur but his motion failed 65-78. The House then insisted on its vote to pass the bill and the Senate tabled it when it was sent back to that body on Wednesday. But on Thursday the Senate changed course, voting 18-16 to recede and concur with the House. Both chambers narrowly rejected what is commonly referred to as a 'millionaire's tax.' The proposal, LD 1089, was amended to a lower surcharge than initially proposed. It would place an income tax surcharge of 2% on the portion of a resident's taxable income beyond $1 million for single filers, $1.5 million for heads of households and $2 million for married people filing jointly. This revenue would then go toward funding public K-12 education. Originally, the bill sought to tax income over $1 million by an additional 4%, which would have mirrored a law recently passed in Massachusetts. The House failed to pass the measure 70-72 on Wednesday before voting against it without a roll call. The Senate ultimately did the same Thursday, after an initial vote to pass it failed 17-18. The Mills administration has also testified against this bill. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lombardo at 76 vetoes, a record; family leave, medical debt bills among victims
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo has outdone himself, vetoing more bills — 76 so far — than the 75 pieces of legislation he rejected two years ago. It's a single-session record, and he has until midnight Friday to issue more vetoes. The fate of a 77th bill — Senate Bill 305, which would have elevated lacrosse to a sanctioned high school sport — appeared to be in limbo. Lombardo's veto was communicated to the Nevada secretary of state, but the bill was removed from the Legislature's list of vetoes. The Democrat-controlled Nevada Legislature tried again this year to pass a few bills Lombardo vetoed two years ago — gun control, rent control provisions and some legislation on health care — but mostly, Lombardo's vetoes this year were or new proposals. With relatively little power in the Legislature, Nevada Republicans are relying on Lombardo to stand firm against Democrats. By midday on Wednesday, notices had been published on 65 vetoes (including nine Senate bills) since the Legislature adjourned. Later Wednesday afternoon, another batch of vetoes were posted, this time 12 Assembly bills. One of those bills would have expanded paid family leave for both state employees and workers in private business. FAMILY LEAVE: Assembly Bill 388 (AB388) had passed in the Assembly, 26-16, and narrowly in the Senate, 11-9, with one senator excused absent. The bill would have applied to companies with 50 or more employees. Lombardo said mandating family leave for workers would 'severely disrupt the economic stability of businesses across Nevada.' 'Nevada has long prided itself on maintaining a business-friendly environment — one that supports growth, innovation, and job creation,' the governor's veto message said. 'Now is not the time to introduce broad, burdensome mandates that would significantly disrupt this balance, particularly for Nevada's small and mid-sized businesses.' Democratic Assem. Selena La Rue Hatch, who sponsored the bill, said as it moved to the governor's desk on June 2: 'No one should have to choose between a paycheck and caring for a newborn, an ailing parent, or their own health.' A Progressive group commented, 'This veto sends a clear message: working families are not the priority. Governor Lombardo had a chance to stand with Nevada's families—and he instead chose to stand with business interests,' a statement from Battle Born Progress leader Shelbie Swartz said. Other bills that Lombardo rejected Wednesday include: CENSORSHIP: AB416 would have prevented school districts from making their own decisions on limiting access to books and other materials. The bill would have allowed access to materials that had not been deemed obscene by the courts. That's just too slow, according to Lombardo's veto message. 'Because AB 416 disconnects parents and schools from decisions best made at the local level and is constitutionally dubious, I cannot support it,' he said. MEDICAL DEBT: AB204 would have outlawed predatory practices related to collecting medical debts. Advocates said it could reduce the financial harm caused by unexpected or unaffordable medical bills, calling medical debt one of the state's most common and damaging forms of consumer debt. While acknowledging the need for reforms, Lombardo rejected the bill. He said it could undermine fairness by discouraging responsible payment, and could increase health care costs in the long run. 'This veto sends the wrong message to the thousands of Nevada families struggling to pay for basic healthcare,' according to Adam Zarrin, director of government affairs at The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. 'At a time when people are rationing medications, delaying care, and going into debt just to stay healthy, the Governor chose to stand with the status quo instead of with patients.' DRESS CODE: AB320 added leniency to courtroom dress codes, an attempt to recognize that community members might have different ideas what 'professional' attire means — and not everyone can afford a suit. It would have taken away the court's ability to penalize people solely for the way they dressed in court. Lombardo said in his veto message that the intent was understandable, but the bill had practical and legal problems. The bill lacks clear enforcement standards and improperly intrudes on courts' authority, he said. HEALTH CARE OVERCHARGES: AB282 required medical care providers to respond to patients who reported they were overcharged. When the overcharge was confirmed, providers would be required to issue refunds or face a fine if they missed a deadline. Lombardo said medical billing is complex, and the bill oversimplified how things actually work, putting an unfair share of responsibility for overpayments on providers. COMMUNITY BENEFITS: AB226 would have required a 'community benefits' agreement for companies receiving tax abatements from the state. Recent agreements including the A's stadium deal, Allegiant Stadium and other big projects have carried conditions that have been lumped under community benefits. Lombardo said it sends the wrong message as Nevada tries to bring in new businesses. Also vetoed by Lombardo on Wednesday: AB213, AB328, AB414, AB441, AB588 and AB600. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
