Report: 50 Venezuelans Sent to Salvadoran Prison Entered the U.S. Legally, Contrary to White House Claims
The Trump administration insists that the Venezuelan men it sent to a notoriously brutal prison in El Salvador were all "illegal aliens" connected to a violent gang, but at least 50 of them entered the country legally, according to a new report by the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank.
David J. Bier, director of immigration policy at the Cato Institute, tried to gather information on 238 Venezuelan men identified by CBS News who were sent to El Salvador by the Trump administration earlier this year—an incomplete list because the administration has never released a full manifest. Of the 90 cases where Bier could determine a method of entry, 50 men had entered the country legally as refugees, parolees, or temporary visa holders. They were vetted in advance and entered the U.S. through an official border crossing point. That is, they violated no immigration law.
The Cato report follows a CBS News investigation that also found that 75 percent of the men on the list had no criminal record in the U.S. or abroad.
"The basic framework that [Trump administration officials] are putting forward to the public is that these people aren't entitled to any rights in the United States because they were here illegally, and therefore they can do whatever they want with them," Bier says. "Obviously, there's a lot to take issue with that premise to begin with, but our review shows that in fact, they're doing this to people who did come legally and did follow immigration laws, and so whatever argument they're making is just not applicable to those people."
And the number of legal immigrants makes it hard to believe that it was a mistake.
"It's not just one or two administrative errors, as they like to say," Bier continues. "This was an intentional campaign that they've carried out to include legal immigrants in the group that they sent to El Salvador."
The Trump administration claims the men are "criminal terrorists" connected to Tren de Aragua (TdA), a violent Venezuelan gang. The White House justified their summary expulsion from the U.S. and incarceration in an El Salvador prison under a dubious invocation of the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) of 1798, claiming that they were part of an "invasion" or "predatory incursion" of the U.S.
Under an extraordinary deal with El Salvador, the Trump administration sent those men to Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT), a maximum-security prison camp. The administration has claimed its sweeping powers under the AEA allow it to detain and deport suspected TdA members without any judicial review or due process.
But media investigations have shown that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) determined some of those men were TdA "terrorists" based on innocuous tattoos that DHS claimed were gang-related. In reality, the pictures of alleged TdA tattoos that DHS relied on were lifted from unrelated social media.
"For instance, DHS obtained its TdA 'Jordan' from a Michael Jordan fan account in the United States," the Cato report says. "It pulled its AK-47 tattoo from a Turkish tattoo artist."
For example, the report says that one of the 50 Venezuelan men, Gustavo Adolfo Aguilera Aguero, entered the U.S. legally as a parolee in 2023, but U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) targeted him for his tattoos: "a crown with his son's name, a star with his and his mom's name, and a song lyric 'real until death' from Puerto Rican reggaeton artists Anuel AA."
Despite this, DHS has continued to claim, both in individual cases where evidence shows otherwise and generally, that these men were illegal aliens.
In response to a request for comment for this story, the DHS continued to insist that CECOT detainees all entered the U.S. illegally, without providing any refutation of Cato's report.
"Illegal aliens in CECOT have final deportation orders and are high threat criminals," DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement to Reason. "The media should take a beat from doing the bidding of vicious alien gangsters, peddling their false sob stories and finally write about American victims."
"Many of the individuals that are counted as 'non-criminals' are actually terrorists, human rights abusers, gangsters and more; they just don't have a rap sheet in the U.S." McLaughlin continued. "Further, every single one of these individuals committed a crime when they came into this country illegally. It is not an accurate description to say they are 'non-criminals.' This deceptive categorization is devoid of reality and misleads the American public."
For Bier, the most worrying implication of his findings is what would have happened if courts hadn't blocked the deportation flights after the first day.
"The most shocking thing I think is just the scale of this," Bier says. "This was 50 in one day, right? [The Trump administration] got shut down after that, at least partially. What would we be seeing if this was allowed to continue? They're not hiding their intention to continue it, either. This would be hundreds and hundreds of people, thousands over the course of a year, being sent to a foreign prison without any charges against them, without any due process. It's just incredible."
Of course, it's important to note that migrants who enter the country illegally are still entitled to due process under the Constitution, no matter how much the Trump White House insists they're not. But as George Mason University law professor Ilya Somin wrote, the Cato report underscores the lawlessness of the AEA removals.
"Elsewhere, I have argued that the distinction between legal and illegal immigration is not as morally significant as many tend to think," Somin wrote at The Volokh Conspiracy. "Nonetheless, the fact that most of the AEA deportees have no criminal records and many (perhaps a majority) entered the US legally makes the Trump Administration's actions even more odious than they would be otherwise. David Bier is right to call them a 'crime against humanity.'"
The post Report: 50 Venezuelans Sent to Salvadoran Prison Entered the U.S. Legally, Contrary to White House Claims appeared first on Reason.com.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
11 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Budget Drops Protections For State Medical Cannabis Programs
The White House budget request for 2026 omits language that has protected state-regulated medical ... More cannabis operators from federal prosecution for more than decade. The Trump administration's budget request for the 2026 fiscal year drops provisions that have protected state medical cannabis programs for more than a decade, online cannabis news outlet Marijuana Moment reported on Monday. The budget provision has blocked federal law enforcement agencies from spending resources to investigate or prosecute businesses operating in compliance with state-authorized medical cannabis programs, despite the continued prohibition of marijuana under federal law. 'This provision, which has been in place since 2014, protects patients, caregivers, and medical cannabis providers in the 39 states that have legalized medical access from federal interference or criminal prosecution,' the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) wrote in a statement. 'Prior to the passage of this protection, federal prosecutors routinely took actions against patients and dispensaries in legal states.' The budget restriction was first adopted by Congress in 2014 and has been included in the federal budget every year since. But the Trump administration's budget request for the 2026 fiscal year released last week does not include the language. Similarly, the budget requests for each of the four years of President Donald Trump's first term omitted the protections for state-regulated medical cannabis operators. The administration of President Barack Obama also left the language prohibiting federal interference with regulated medical marijuana businesses out its budget requests following the initial adoption of the provisions. By contrast, the administration budget requests for all fours years of Joseph Biden's presidency included the protections for state-legal medical marijuana businesses. While the budget request illustrates the Trump administration's spending policies and priorities, Congress has the constitutional responsibility and authority for appropriations legislation. The congressional budget has included the language every year since 2014, despite attempts by both Democratic and Republican administrations to drop the provision. 'Today, more than half the country, including 36 states and Washington, D.C., have embraced medical marijuana, and for the past 10 years, the Rohrabacher-Farr Amendment has prevented the Department of Justice from using federal funds to stop states from implementing their medical marijuana programs,' Laura A. Bianchi, co-founding partner of the cannabis and psychedelics law firm Bianchi and Brandt, writes in an email. 'Rolling back these protections would mark a significant setback for marijuana reform. Ultimately, Congress will have the final say, and the industry remains hopeful that they will uphold these vital safeguards.' When Trump signed previous appropriations bill including the protections for medical cannabis operators after requesting they be removed, his administration issued a statement that it 'will treat this provision consistent with the President's constitutional responsibility to faithfully execute the laws of the United States.' The statement, which was issued on three separate occasions, was widely interpreted to suggest that the Trump administration might ignore the budget restriction. The omission of the protections for state-legal medical cannabis programs in the Trump administration's 2026 budget request is likely to disappoint supporters of cannabis policy reform who were encouraged by the president's apparent support for decriminalizing marijuana during the 2024 election campaign. In September, Trump suggested he supported reclassifying marijuana under federal drug laws and that he would back state efforts to legalize recreational cannabis. 'As President, we will continue to focus on research to unlock the medical uses of marijuana to a Schedule 3 drug, and work with Congress to pass common sense laws, including safe banking for state authorized companies, and supporting states rights to pass marijuana laws, like in Florida, that work so well for their citizens,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, according to a report from Marijuana Moment.


Bloomberg
11 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
China In Wait and See Mode: Cameron Johnson
US-China trade talks do not appear to be progressing as President Trump said via social media, China's leader Xi Jinping is "extremely hard to a deal with." Tidalwave Solutions Senior Partner Cameron Johnson has more on the story. (Source: Bloomberg)


CNN
12 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump administration returns migrant hastily deported to Mexico back to the US
A Guatemalan national who says he was wrongfully deported to Mexico last month is back in the United States, his legal team told CNN, in what appears to mark the first time the Trump administration has brought back a migrant after a judge ordered the administration to facilitate their return. OCG, a pseudonym the migrant is using in the case, landed in the United States on Wednesday and made contact with a member of the litigation team challenging the Trump administration's moves to send migrants to countries where they have no ties, according to Trina Realmuto, executive director of the National Immigration Litigation Alliance. The team expects he will be taken into the custody of the Department of Homeland Security, though it's unclear where he'll be detained, Realmuto told CNN. This is a developing story and will be updated.