
The deranged dictator's son livetweeting torture from his basement
The man's eyes are filled with terror, his shoulders bare, his once prominent beard has gone. Reduced to a state of desperation, he seems to be imploring a tormentor for mercy.
In some dictatorships, torture occurs furtively in underground cells, but the ordeal of Edward Ssebuufu, a prominent opposition activist, shows that Uganda under President Yoweri Museveni is brazenly different.
Ssebuufu's suffering was not just displayed to the world but posted live on X (formerly Twitter), proudly and boisterously, in all its stages of sadism. This was done not by an over-zealous secret policeman but by the social media account of the dictator's Sandhurst -educated son, General Muhoozi Kainerugaba.
And the son is not some marginalised embarrassment but the Commander of Uganda's Armed Forces and the man most likely to succeed his 80-year-old father as President.
The sons of despots have often been accused of brutish behaviour – Col Muammar Gaddafi 's one-time heir, Saif al-Islam, carries an indictment for alleged crimes against humanity – yet only Kainerugaba has apparently chosen to live-post his cruelty to 1.1 million social media followers.
In those posts, Kainerugaba's X account revels in Ssebuufu's agony and degradation, describing how the prisoner was supposedly 'crying' and 'urinating', before adding: 'I still have to castrate him.'
Kainerugaba, who graduated in political science from Nottingham University in 1997 and passed out of Sandhurst in 2000, proclaims his ambition to ascend to the pinnacle of power.
That prospect might chill many Ugandans who remember the blood-soaked reign of another soldier, Idi Amin, yet the reality is that Kainerugaba has every chance of achieving his goal.
When old age eventually strikes down Museveni, who seized the presidency nearly 40 years ago, the son's command of the army would place him in pole position to ensure a hereditary succession in a country that calls itself a Republic.
'I would really worry about the prospect of him becoming President,' says one Ugandan journalist with calculated understatement. 'But when I set aside my personal feelings and analyse it objectively, I find that there's a real possibility of this happening.'
Kainerugaba's previous outbursts have already earned him notoriety. He has variously praised Vladimir Putin as a 'hero'; offered to send Ugandan troops to fight for Russia; threatened to invade neighbouring Kenya ('two weeks to capture Nairobi'); and announced his desire to marry Giorgia Meloni, the Italian Prime Minister.
His profile page on X carries an image of Robert Powell playing Jesus Christ in the 1977 miniseries Jesus of Nazareth.
If Kainerugaba, 51, represents the future of Uganda, his latest excess may be the most instructive.
Ssebuufu, Head of Security for Uganda's opposition leader Robert Kyagulanyi (better known by his stage name Bobi Wine), disappeared after being arrested near the capital, Kampala, on April 27.
Four days later, Kainerugaba's X account announced that Ssebuufu was 'in my basement'.
Then came a stream of tweets glorying in the torment of the prisoner. 'The beards were the first thing the boys removed. After he finished crying and urinating,' reads one post.
'If you see Eddie's head now he looks like an egg. Totally clean,' says the next.
Then: 'Eddie started crying as soon as the boys grabbed him.'
Kainerugaba's account describes how the prisoner was being forced to defer to an image of the President. 'Eddie is looking very smart these days. The boys have tuned him well. He salutes Mzee's [Museveni's] picture every day before breakfast.'
Over and again, the posts under Kainerugaba's name threaten to inflict the same ordeal on Wine, derisively referred to as 'Kabobi'.
'Next is Kabobi!' says one post. 'I have never joked in my life. I don't know why people think my tweets are jokes.'
Whether Ssebuufu's torture was taking place in the basement of Kainerugaba's own house in Kampala is unclear, though one post says as much. The regime has a network of locations, known without irony as 'safe houses', where opposition activists are regularly detained and abused. Ssebuufu may have been held in one of them.
On May 5, eight days after his arrest, he appeared in court in the town of Masaka, 80 miles south-west of Kampala, unable to stand without help.
Ssebuufu, also known as Eddie Mutwe, was charged with robbery and remanded in custody in Masaka prison, where over 1,000 inmates occupy a jail designed for half that number.
Two days later, Wine was allowed to visit Ssebuufu. Afterwards the opposition leader, visibly shaken, described exactly what he had learnt of his friend's suffering.
'We saw him and he was tortured very badly,' said Wine. 'He was tortured for three days and on the third day Muhoozi Kainerugaba came himself personally and beat him, tortured him, and his men tortured Eddie Mutwe in the presence of Muhoozi. He was electrocuted, he was waterboarded and so many terrible things happened to him.'
Wine's description of Ssebuufu's ordeal tallied with Kainerugaba's social media posts. 'He was forced to salute Museveni's picture every day,' said the opposition leader. 'He was stripped naked and, later on, when he was given a piece of cloth, he was only given a Museveni T-shirt.'
Lawyers representing Ssebuufu were allowed to visit him and confirmed his torture, though without mentioning Kainerugaba's personal involvement.
'He has been over-tortured for all the days he has been in detention, in irregular detention,' said Magellan Kazibwe, one of Ssebuufu's lawyers.
'He has told me and my colleague that he was tortured every day, five times, and they were beating him using these wires of electricity. They were electrocuting him. They were squeezing him, including his private parts. He is in great pain. He has not accessed any doctor up to now. He is in a very appalling and bad health state.'
Ssebuufu was later reported to have received treatment at Masaka prison's medical facility.
The fate of his security chief will be bitterly familiar to Wine, who endured 10 days of beatings and torture in military barracks in 2018. His injuries were so severe that he had to leave Uganda for medical care in the United States.
When he ran against Museveni in the last presidential election, Wine was arrested in the middle of the campaign. As supporters mounted street protests demanding his release, the security forces opened fire with live rounds, killing at least 54 people in Kampala in November 2020 and arresting thousands more.
On polling day, January 15 2021, Wine was placed under house arrest while the regime disconnected Uganda from the internet and announced a rigged result, giving him 34 per cent of the vote and handing Museveni victory with 58 per cent.
Now, Wine is preparing to run against Museveni once again in the election due in January next year, which will also mark the 40th anniversary of the President capturing Kampala as a rebel leader and taking power in January 1986.
In the first decade of his rule, Museveni managed to stabilise Uganda after years of ruinous civil war and the dictatorships of Idi Amin and Milton Obote. At that time, Britain and America regarded him as a reformer who deserved their support.
They continued to indulge Museveni even as he twice rewrote the constitution to prolong his grip on power, first by abolishing term limits and then removing the age limit. Even now, as Museveni resorts to torture and repression against his opponents – and Kainerugaba waits in the wings – Uganda still receives £31.6 million of British aid.
Wine, a musician and actor raised in one of Kampala's poorest areas, has built an opposition movement, the National Unity Platform, that carries the hopes of Ugandans who strive to escape their dictatorship.
The agony of Edward Ssebuufu reminds them of the risks of defying Museveni. The dictator's son, who appeared to glory in the suffering of a human being, reminds Ugandans of the rule that may await them.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Police tear gas activists protesting the death in police custody of a Kenyan blogger
Kenyan police tear gassed activists twice as they marched to the main police station in the capital Nairobi during a protest Monday against the death of a blogger in police custody under unclear circumstances. Albert Ojwang was found dead while in custody at the Central Police Station and police attributed his death to 'hitting his head against the cell wall," but activists have questioned the cause of death. Ojwang was arrested Friday in Homa Bay in western Kenya and driven 400 kilometers (248 miles) to Nairobi for what police said was publishing 'false information' about a top police official on social media. This blogger's death comes almost a year after several activists and protesters were killed and abducted by Kenyan police during finance bill protests in 2024. Economic frustration remains high, despite the proposed taxes being scrapped last year. 'Our demands are still not met. The joblessness they had last year is tenfold. The killings are still happening," said Ndungi Githuku, activist from the People's Liberation Party. "So, nothing was resolved out of the protests that we had. We have freedom that is half baked. This country belongs to the rich, so it is time for the poor to rise. This is what is going to happen (on the anniversary) in a few days.' The Kenyan police said the Independent Policing Oversight Authority has launched an investigation. Officers who were on duty when Ojwang died in custody will also not be returning to work while they await the outcome of investigations, said police Inspector-General Douglas Kanja. However, many are skeptical of the proceedings. 'Until now they (Kenya Police) have not told us the truth. We know there were more injuries. They have decided to sacrifice junior officers. We want justice for Ojwang and many others who have lost their lives,' said Hussein Khalid from the Vocal Africa human rights organization. Rights group Amnesty Kenya said in a statement that Ojwang's arrest raises serious questions and that the results of the IPOA report must be made public and any officers found responsible must be held fully accountable. 'We are in an era whereby speaking against the government is a crime, complaining against poor leadership and mismanagement of public affairs is a crime. I pity (Ojwang's) 5-month-old baby and wife. I am protesting extrajudicial killings — one of us is all of us,' said activist Ouma Paul Oyao. Ojwang's death continued to spark outrage online and has renewed calls for protests to demand accountability from the government. 'This government is actually urging us to come out in the street again. They are saying they have not repented; they are saying that they will continue abducting and assassinating us. So, what we are saying (is) that it's better to shout and die than to keep quiet and be gotten from our homes while we are quiet,' said Githuku of the People's Liberation Party.


BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Opposition calls for ‘vote of conscience' on Israel Bonds
Opposition parties have requested a free 'vote of conscience' on a motion calling on the Government to stop the Central Bank from facilitating the sale of Israel Bonds. The Central Bank of Ireland is the designated authority in relation to the sale of Israel Bonds in the EU. Advertisement Israel Bonds have been advertised as supporting the country's economy, and more recently, websites promoting the securities emphasise their role in supporting Israel's military operations in Gaza. The Central Bank is responsible for assessing whether a prospectus for the offer of securities is in compliance with requirements of the EU Prospectus Regulation, with the authority saying approval should not be viewed as 'an endorsement of the issuer'. Protesters have demonstrated outside the Central Bank and called for legislation that would give Ireland the power to refuse the sale of Israeli 'war bonds' over human rights concerns. Last month, a Sinn Féin bill which would have imposed restrictions securities on behalf of Israel was defeated after the Government voted against the draft legislation. Advertisement On Wednesday, the Dáil will vote on a motion on the matter brought by a number of opposition parties during the Social Democrats' time. The motion says the bonds are intended to fund the war in Gaza and argues Ireland has an obligations under the Genocide Convention to use all means likely to have a deterrent effect on those suspected of preparing genocide. Speaking to reporters on Monday, Social Democrats TD Sinead Gibney said: 'We have failed as an international community to prevent a genocide from happening so now we have to do everything in our power to make sure that we stop it.' She added: 'We are urging the Government to allow a free vote, a vote of conscience, because we believe that this is something that many TDs will support if given the opportunity. Advertisement 'And we absolutely urge the government to support this motion.' Sinn Féin TD Sean Crowe said he believes the gap between the vote on the Sinn Féin Bill and this motion will given TDs 'time to reflect'. My statement on the #Madleen . The question we should be asking today is not the merits or otherwise of a flotilla but how the world is shamefully turning a blind eye to children starving in Gaza and to a humanitarian catastrophe — Simon Harris TD (@SimonHarrisTD) June 9, 2025 Meanwhile, Tánaiste and Foreign Affairs Minister Simon Harris called on Israel to lift a blockade on aid into Gaza. It comes after Israeli forces stopped a Gaza-bound aid boat and detained activists on board early on Monday, enforcing a longstanding blockade of the Palestinian territory. Advertisement Mr Harris said the vessel was an 'unarmed civilian effort' to get food and medicine to the 'starving people of Gaza' in the midst of 'devastation and catastrophic humanitarian conditions'. Ireland Boylan accuses Government of 'cop out' on Occupied... Read More He added: 'The UN and humanitarian organisations must be allowed to work independently and do their job. 'It is a shame on the world and international community that people are starving in Gaza. 'The question we should be asking today is not a debate about the merits or not of the flotilla but how it has come to this; that the world is turning a blind eye to starving children in Gaza.' Advertisement


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Iraqi avoids deportation after claiming he would be killed for affair with colonel's wife
An Iraqi asylum seeker avoided being removed from the UK after claiming that he had a love affair with the wife of a 'powerful' colonel in his home country. The Iraqi sought protection in the UK after he arrived by arguing that he could be killed if he was sent back to the Middle Eastern country over his affair. The man, in his mid-20s, said he fell in love with a young woman in Iraq and had a relationship with her after she married a colonel in the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK). The Home Office tried to remove the man – named only as 'BM' – over a 'lack of credibility' in his case. He also lost his case at a lower tier immigration tribunal, following suggestions that the colonel might not even exist. But he won an appeal at the upper tribunal and has been granted permission to have his case heard again. If he is successful, he could be allowed to stay in the UK. The case, disclosed in court papers, is the latest example uncovered by The Telegraph where illegal migrants or convicted foreign criminals have been able to remain in the UK or halt their deportations on human rights grounds. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has announced plans to curb judges' powers to block deportations with new legally-enforced 'common sense' rules to clarify how judges interpret the European Convention on Human Rights and strengthen the public interest test. The court was told that the Iraqi, known as BM to protect his anonymity, claimed protection after he came to the adverse attention of a 'powerful military leader'. The hearing, in Manchester, was told he met and fell in love with a young woman, named only as 'N', in 2018. It heard that BM's uncle approached N's family to ask if the pair could be married. However, the proposal was refused as N's family had arranged for her to marry a peshmerga colonel in the PUK army. However, the relationship continued and they planned to elope. Later, BM found out that the colonel had discovered the affair. Fearing being killed, he fled Iraq in October 2020, believing that his situation fell within the scope of the Refugee Convention. The Home Office said it did not accept that BM was at any current risk of serious harm, given that he had not provided any evidence about the colonel. BM took the case to an appeal at the first-tier tribunal. He provided evidence that included photographs of a man in military uniform, which he identified as the colonel. He also showed that N had contacted him and asked him to come to Kirkuk, an Iraqi city of around one million people. She said they would go to Sulaymaniyah, near the Iranian border, from there. 'Lack of credibility' However, the first-tier tribunal found a lack of credibility in this claim, given that the entire area is under the control of the PUK. There were also inconsistencies in respect to certain dates provided. He also said he had lost his ID card in 2017. The tribunal questioned how he had lived for three years without a card. It also said that he could have claimed asylum in France on his way to the UK. He lost his case but appealed to the upper tribunal where Judge Gaenor Bruce found that newly provided Facebook images were sufficient evidence that the colonel existed, given their consistency with BM's asylum interview. She also concluded that the couple intended to elope to neighbouring Iran and that this is why they met in Sulaymaniyah. Judge Bruce concluded: '[BM] submitted that his immutable characteristic was the fact that he had been in an extramarital affair, contrary to the social norms in Iraqi Kurdistan, and offending the 'honour' of N's family and husband.' The original decision to not allow his asylum on human rights grounds was set aside with a new decision to be made. The Iraqi man's anonymity was upheld.