Karen Greig eyeing revenge ahead of Manchester Thunder Netball Super League opener
Manchester Thunder coach Karen Greig admits she is eyeing 'retribution' when they face champions Loughborough Lightning in their Netball Super League opener at the AO Arena on Sunday.
Greig's side won 17 out of their 18 league games last year, finishing six points clear of second-place Loughborough.
But Lightning beat them 70-54 in the Grand Final to clinch the league title - and Greig has revenge in her sights.
READ MORE: Mason Greenwood Man United reunion set as talks confirmed - 'I am very confident'
READ MORE: Man City will rename the Etihad Stadium in time for Brighton game
She said: 'You look at it and think it's retribution. You would like to go into it confidently. We have a squad that can go out there and pull out a good result against them.
'Hopefully, we have got enough in the tank to face Loughborough and get that retribution and stamp our authority on the direction we want to take the league this year.'
It is the seventh Netball Manchester Live at the AO Arena - moved from their regular home, the Belle Vue Sports Village - and last season almost 4,500 fans saw the Thunder beat London Pulse 44-40.
Greig, whose team will also play at the M&S Arena in Liverpool for the first time, said: 'We love the AO Arena. It's like our second home, going out to the arena and playing in front of what we always say are the best fans in the league, the loudest.
'Over the last few years, we have managed to get about 4,500 people through the doors of the arena.
'If we can get between 4,000 and 5,000 into that first game again, that will be a success.
'I would always say to people, buy your tickets and come along because until you have seen netball in full flight at that level, you don't know what it is.
'And it's exciting. It's fast. Those players work hard. They are athletic. It's a physical game and an exciting game.
'So if we can get bums on seats in that first game, I think it stands us in good stead.'
Manchester Thunder last won the Grand Final in 2022 and Greig is confident of reclaiming their crown this new campaign.
Unlike last year, they were victorious against Loughborough Lightning three years ago, winning 60-53 at the Copper Box Arena, London.
She added: 'I am quietly confident that we can get there. If you had asked me that question back in September or October when we had a full squad of 10 that we signed, I'd say I was fairly confident.
'We have had some injuries in pre-season and a pregnancy too, so we have lost three out of our ten players, which is a chunk.
'But this year will be a different journey for us. We're going to have a tough start to the season.
'We know we've got players down that we are hoping to get back in towards the end of the season.
'It is not going to be straightforward. It's going to be tough. We will have to overcome some obstacles at the start of the season.
'But if we can get into that top four come the business end of the season, then we all know in sport, top four, semi-finals, finals, anything can happen. And we need to be up there and punch our weight.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
'Overwhelmed' Wassell relishing return to Scotland squad
Emma Wassell says the gallows humour of the Scotland dressing room is keeping a smile on her face during what she describes as an "overwhelming" return to the international camp. After major surgery to remove a tumour that was found in her chest last September, the 30-year-old lock is now targeting August's World Cup in England after being included in the initial 38-woman training squad. Advertisement As she readjusts to the demands of international rugby, the former Loughborough Lightning star admits she's enjoying some lively locker-room banter. "They keep me very, very humble shall I say," Wassell said. "I get a lot of grief" Any time the tumour's brought up everyone's like; 'oh, she had a tumour? Who knew?', we joke about it a lot. "There's a lot of banter around and any time I don't get my way, I try to say; 'guys, I had a tumour', and they're like 'shut up!', so it's pretty light-hearted." The fact she can now laugh about it all shows not just how far she's come physically, but also mentally. Not that the reintroduction to international-level training has been easy. Advertisement "Something I've found quite overwhelming - given I've trained for three or four months myself – is to now be put back in this environment where all the girls are pushing each other and there's a level of pressure around you. "It's been a little bit overwhelming but in the best way possible. " Her aim now is making the final World Cup squad for a tournament she thinks could be a game-changer for Scottish rugby. "It's the closest I'll definitely get to a home World Cup and I just think it could be huge for women's rugby in general," she added. "For Scotland, it will really push us on a bit more in terms of growing the game."
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Pulse beat Thunder to go top of Super League
London Pulse produced a determined display to move back to the top of the Netball Super League with a 58-48 win at Manchester Thunder. Pulse were 17-10 in front after the first quarter but the hosts reduced the deficit to three points as the visitors led 27-24 at half-time. Advertisement However, Pulse stepped up their game and were 44-37 up at the end of the third quarter before going on to secure victory. Olivia Tchine scored a game-high 27 goals for Pulse, while Elmere van der Berg scored 23 for the Thunder, who remain third with one round of fixtures to go before the play-offs. "The second quarter, in particular, was a bit disappointing," said London Pulse head coach Sam Bird. "We just took our foot off the pedal a little bit. We just lost a little bit of focus. That is certainly something I want to be improving on. "When they got their brains back together and they came out really hard I thought they did really well. Advertisement "It's a difficult place to come. It's really good for the players to play that well away." The three points meant Pulse are two points clear of second-placed Loughborough Lightning. Both teams are guaranteed a top two finish and will contest the major semi-final in the play-offs with the winner going through to the final. The loser will face the winner of the minor semi-final between third and fourth - which will be between Manchester Thunder and London Mavericks - to determine the other finalist. Loughborough Lightning had briefly gone top of the table with a dominant 79-58 win against London Mavericks on Friday. Advertisement Lightning, who have won three of the previous four Grand Finals, were in control throughout and opened a 23-12 lead at the end of the first quarter. That set the tone for the contest, with Samantha Wallace-Joseph finishing with 24 goals for the victors, and Ella Clark and Berri Neil also impressing with 14 and 13 goals respectively. Emily Andrew contributed 24 goals for the fourth-placed Mavericks. Birmingham Panthers won 75-69 in the opening match of the round on Thursday. On Sunday, Georgia Rowe scored 43 goals to help bottom side Cardiff Dragons beat Leeds Rhinos 60-52 and move within a point of their opponents in the table.
New York Times
3 days ago
- New York Times
Scientifically testing the footballs Pep Guardiola and Mikel Arteta complained about in 2024-25
Walk into the reception of the Sports Technology Institute at Loughborough University and your eyes are drawn immediately to a pristine glass cabinet on the left. In it, among other things, are basketballs, a cricket helmet, golf club heads, sprinting spikes, a commemorative coin from the London 2012 Olympics, and a middle section dedicated to 12 footballs: one for every men's European Championship and World Cup since 2002, neatly organised in two rows of six. Loughborough conducted testing on all of those for Adidas, the details of which are listed on a small plaque next to each one — and go as deep as aerodynamics and performance testing to surface texture modelling. That, if anything, makes them a little overqualified to test our hypothesis: were Mikel Arteta and Pep Guardiola simply displaying a self-serving bias when, respectively, they criticised Puma's Carabao Cup and Mitre's FA Cup balls last season? 'It flies and grips differently to a Premier League ball, you have to adapt to it, ' Arteta said after his Arsenal side lost against Newcastle United in the first leg of their semi-final in January. 'We kicked a lot of balls over the bar. It's tricky that these balls fly a lot.' Ten of their 23 shots were off target and only three were on target. Teams, including at academy sides, are given competition-specific balls to train with before matches. Perhaps Arteta's side needed more shooting practice (their chances are illustrated below). Guardiola was even more scathing in March when Manchester City came from behind to beat Plymouth Argyle 3-1 in the FA Cup fifth round. Advertisement 'The ball in the Champions League is exceptional, the ball in the Premier League is exceptional, this one isn't,' he said. 'It's difficult to control. 'You know how many shots went over? Normally, the ball goes in.' 'When you lose it (sounds like) you're complaining, but the ball is not right. It's the truth. In many years, it's happened in the FA Cup and Carabao Cup — it's a business and they come to agreements.' Armed with a bag of match-replica balls (which are worth more than you might think, in some cases well over £100) and some falsifiable hypotheses, it takes four hours to conduct what Loughborough call 'light touch testing'. Fair enough, they have actual studies to be doing. For context, researcher Ieuan Williams, who has just finished a PhD rooted in testing footballs, explained a project he once carried out for Adidas. With five versions of a model of the brand's Predator boots, various trial conditions amounted to 350 kicks with their bespoke robot (more on that later), which took him days to complete — and he works quickly. A mix of player testing and the use of Loughborough's kicking robot is enough to get a 'sense and understanding about why some balls perform differently, and why the perception of players can have a big impact'. We start outside with three Loughborough University players, all right-footed. Each player has five goes at striking the ball from the same central spot 24 yards out. They can choose the technique and aim for the crossbar. First up is Puma's Orbita 1 Carabao Cup ball, then the Mitre FA Cup Ultimax Pro, and finally Nike's 2024-25 Flight, which was used in the Premier League. This kind of testing only accounts for one-tenth of their typical research, not because it is unimportant, but because outdoor and human conditions make things harder to control (and thus definitive conclusions more difficult to draw). Professor Andy Harland, an associate dean for enterprise at Loughborough — frankly, a guru in this field — explains that 'the relative time taken for player versus robot testing, allied with the greater natural variation in the player data, is why we tend to favour the robot'. Advertisement 'Players can perceive things, and one of our big challenges at the moment is trying to get those minor differences that players feel and try and translate them into mechanical tests,' Williams says. They are working on some tests, but 'can't say anything yet'. A very expensive and high-speed camera (which records at 1,000 frames per second) is set up perpendicular to the ball, capturing a slow-motion video of each strike. With an in-house algorithm, they use it to quantify velocity and spin. 'You can see some patterns in players,' says Professor Harland. He has conducted tests on every Adidas men's major tournament ball since 2002. What Professor Harland does not know about ball testing isn't worth knowing. For instance, he explains Diego Forlan's success with the infamously unpredictable Jabulani ball at the 2010 South Africa World Cup owes to different ball-striking techniques — with his laces at altitude (where reduced air resistance makes objects fly faster) and curled finishes at sea level (where the atmosphere makes them move more). Professor Harland tells me that each World Cup match can have up to 30 balls specifically provided for it, all stamped with the date and teams playing. Then, he explains how the iconic star designs on the Champions League balls, a mix of pentagons and hexagons, make the flight more readable in the air because they turn into straight dark lines as the ball spins. 'Players adjust their kicks differently,' Professor Harland explains of the testing done with our three balls. One player 'showed a higher and tighter launch angle', another 'showed greater variation'. Unique physiology means everyone kicks differently from a biomechanical perspective, and thus players interact with different balls in unique ways. One player, after four kicks with one ball, said he needed to change his run-up, and there were different opinions as to which balls had bigger 'sweet spots'. 'Two of the players clearly chose to apply higher spin rates to certain balls. But the balls they did this with were different,' Professor Harland explains. One spun the Mitre FA Cup and Nike Premier League balls 'significantly higher' than the Puma Carabao Cup one. 'Some players show decent repeatability with repeated kicks of the same ball, occasionally a player will show a large variation with a particular ball — for reasons we can only speculate about.' One player in our test demonstrated more consistency with Mitre's FA Cup ball, for example. Professor Harland says he would need a bigger sample to make confident conclusions but a trend from the player testing came from two players kicking the Nike Premier League ball more consistently. It 'gave some curious results'. 'Overall, the Mitre ball generated greater spin than the Puma and Nike. These differences were not statistically significant, but of greater significance than the differences in speed.' Advertisement Interestingly, Nike's marketing for the Flight 2024-25 Premier League ball talks about how its 'moulded grooves disrupt airflow to reduce drag and keep the ball stable in the air', with four fused panels intending to increase the size of the sweet spot. So, to conclude from the first part of the testing procedure, Arteta and Guardiola's claims seem to have some scientific support. Follow the Club World Cup on The Athletic this summer… Williams apologises for the mess as he walks into the lab. It is not quite at the level of a mad scientist's lair but there are machines under repair, whiteboards displaying various scribbles, equations and stats, and stockpiles of miscellaneous sporting equipment. Even at the end of the academic year, they are busy. He asks if I want a guided tour. Of course I want a guided tour. After showing me two world-leading golf-ball testers (giant robotic arms to which club heads are attached), Williams pops into an office to retrieve what he calls a 'more-authentic human head', featuring a realistic brain for concussion research, before we return to the kicking robot. Next to it is a giant trolley filled with 30 footballs. He speaks about the 'generations' of balls and how they have changed. They start with the 'old leather generation, which would be the uncoated one with laces. Then they moved to being laceless with coatings — they were more water repellent, but still hand-stitched. Then they moved to synthetic, hand-stitched, 32/18 panels. At the turn of the millennium, Adidas moved towards — and others have followed — thermal bonding.' Adidas' 2004 Roteiro was the first ball to be thermally bonded rather than hand-stitched, and Loughborough helped test its impact. From there, Williams says, 'people started to go, 'Well, these don't have to be regular shapes any longer. We can do crazy things with panels'.' Puma's Carabao Cup ball has eight panels and the Mitre FA Cup has just four panels. 'Classically, you'd have an 18- or 32-panel ball,' Williams explains, noting the evolution towards single-digit panels. 'There's been a bit of a readjustment and now we need to make sure that the ball flies properly again, which has made a load of investment in that. So the Al-Rihla (World Cup 2022 ball) was 20 panels — it's getting back to the 18 to 32 range again.' 'Making sure the ball flies properly again' brings us neatly to the kicking robot. Behind a robust plastic screen stands the 640kg (1,400lb) machine that amounts to a mechanical arm with a foot last and boot attached. Slightly unusually, only left-footed boots can be applied — they use it to test boots, too — that are a size U.S. 9 or UK 8.5. Typically, it is set up for lace strikes. They have tested more wrapped, curled finishes, which is why there are marks on the glass from the ball hitting it. Cinematography lights shine bright, with a similar camera system set up outside, plus a TV screen on which they can broadcast the slow-motion footage live. The robot contraption all hooks up to a motor that Williams controls from a nearby desk. A crash mat is on the far wall, behind some green netting, into which the ball is smashed. The robot produces so much force — and is so loud — that, for safety reasons, Williams calls out 'three, two, one… FIRING' before every kick. For more robust testing, they nail it into the floor to improve consistency, which is why there are holes in the ground. Williams explains how it 'rattles and shakes'. The robot is not as cutting-edge as it was in 2006 when Professor Harland and other researchers, with Adidas' support, developed it. Notwithstanding, Williams says this is one of only three such models anywhere in the world: Nike has one in Portland, Oregon, and Adidas another at its HQ in Germany. Advertisement The benefit, Professor Harland explains, is they can set the robot to a 'fixed leg speed and fixed ball position. This should give a near-identical kick each time.' The five-kick test for each ball is repeated, with the robot set at 20 metres a second to replicate kicking speeds of players outside. Between kicks, Williams has to unlock and open the door, retrieve the ball and locate the tee it sits on (it ends up in some obscure places) and then reset it for the next one. It is rather menial work that can define what version of a ball millions see at a World Cup or European Championship. Professor Harland's top-line from the data: 'The results show some clustering and marginal differences between balls in terms of speed and launch angle — but nothing statistically significant.' A bigger sample and more varied kicking conditions, such as changing the valve position or launch angle, could change results, 'but nothing immediately obvious' presents itself. 'Robot testing confirmed very clear uniformity between balls, and much tighter consistency of kick — as you would expect. 'This is consistent with what we would expect to see from top-level FIFA-approved match balls. They satisfy the standard that constrains size, shape, mass and rebound, among other things.' So while the players showed individual differences in how they kicked the balls (and these are important), on a more objective level, they were remarkably similar. Bizarrely, in the early codified laws of the game, there were no rules for balls. These only came in from 1872. Now, balls must pass FIFA's 'Quality Programme for Footballs' test, which gives about a 10 per cent leeway for balls in circumference, weight and pressure. The tolerance lines are even tighter at the top level, with FIFA introducing testing from 1995 onwards. It takes place at the EMPA lab in St Gallen, Switzerland, and six prototypes of a ball have to be sent for each batch of tests. 'We do some slightly more advanced tests (than FIFA)', Williams says. These include a shooter test: firing a ball repeatedly to see how quickly (or not) it degrades; a rebound/height drop test; stiffness testing; and, amusingly, a test of sphericity — just how round is it? Advertisement 'There's so much market competitiveness now and so many other things going on, like sensors in the ball, the invention of fuse welding as a joining mechanism. There's such a broad range of balls on the market currently, each of which players quite like. 'The aerodynamic designs have been really important but, in the broad picture, that doesn't make a massive difference to the ball — that's small percentages.' With Puma replacing Nike as the Premier League's match-ball provider from next season, meaning a different ball manufacturer and inevitable managerial complaints, Williams makes a wry, but evidence-backed summation: 'A football broadly is a football.' And, as Arteta himself pointed out in January, players will just have to adapt to it. (Top photos: Getty Images; design: Kelsea Petersen/The Athletic)
