logo
UN Charter: A founding document violated and ignored

UN Charter: A founding document violated and ignored

Straits Times14 hours ago

Delegates watch during a special session of the Human Rights Council at the United Nations in Geneva, Switzerland, on June 20. PHOTO: REUTERS
Eighty years ago on June 26, 50 countries came together in the ashes of World War II to sign the United Nations' founding charter in order 'to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war'.
UN secretary-general Antonio Guterres insisted this week the Charter 'is a promise of peace, dignity and cooperation among nations'.
But critics say the organisation has been utterly helpless in stopping the countless conflicts that have broken out since and continue around the globe today.
Here is a look at the UN Charter's history.
Main principles
Conceived in the early years of World War II and signed on June 26, 1945, in San Francisco, the charter paved the way for the creation of the United Nations on October 24, 1945.
In 19 chapters and 111 articles, the Charter lays out the principles of international relations, including the peaceful settlement of disputes, sovereignty and equality between states, humanitarian cooperation, and respect for human rights.
If there is a threat to global peace, Chapter VII gives the UN Security Council the power to impose sanctions to enforce its decisions or even deploy military force.
The Charter, which is very difficult to amend, also establishes the Security Council, with its five veto-wielding permanent members, the General Assembly and the Secretariat, as well as the International Court of Justice.
The United Nations currently has 193 member states.
'Impunity reigns'
But for all the good words, the Charter's principles have been continually violated across the planet for eight decades.
Member states rarely agree whether self-determination trumps non-interference in a state's internal affairs, or if the right to self-defense can justify acts of aggression.
In the most recent example, Tehran, backed by veto-wielding China, accused Washington of violating the UN Charter by striking Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend, an act the United States justified by the right to 'collective self-defence'.
And the international community has never really addressed the 'crime of aggression', said Ms Gissou Nia, a fellow with the Atlantic Council think tank, be it Russia's war against Ukraine or the US invasion of Iraq.
'And once impunity reigns on one set of violations, one that's never dealt with, it continues, and countries use it as justification for the actions that they take,' Ms Nia told AFP.
She added: 'For self-defence, you really have to show evidence of an imminent attack. I think that it's one of the more contentious issues that involve the UN Charter and the narrative has really gotten away from us.'
Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 was denounced as a clear violation of the Charter by Guterres and the General Assembly, but not by the Security Council, where Russia has a veto.
And even though the Charter allows for persistent violators to be expelled from the UN, that has never happened.
In 1974, the UN did, however, suspend South Africa from the General Assembly over the crimes of apartheid, a ban that lasted two decades. AFP
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel says Iran's Supreme Leader avoided assassination by going underground
Israel says Iran's Supreme Leader avoided assassination by going underground

Straits Times

time10 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Israel says Iran's Supreme Leader avoided assassination by going underground

FILE PHOTO: Defence Minister Israel Katz, then Israel's foreign minister, looks on, amid the ongoing conflict in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, in Jerusalem, November 7, 2024. REUTERS/Ronen Zvulun/File Photo Israel would have killed Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei were it possible during the countries' 12-day war, Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Thursday. "I estimate that if Khamenei had been in our sights, we would have taken him out," Katz said in the interview with Israel's Kan public television. "But Khamenei understood this, went underground to very great depths, and broke off contacts with the commanders who replaced those commanders who were eliminated, so it wasn't realistic in the end," he said. Israel killed several top Iranian commanders and nuclear scientists on June 13 at the start of the war. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. President Donald Trump had both suggested at various times during the air war that Khamenei's life could be in danger as regime change could be a result of the war that ended with a U.S.-brokered ceasefire on Tuesday. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium, US defence chief says
No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium, US defence chief says

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium, US defence chief says

No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium, US defence chief says WASHINGTON - US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on June 26 said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme over the weekend. US military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities with more than a dozen 13,607kg bunker buster bombs. The results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far the strikes may have set back Iran's nuclear programme. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Mr Hegseth said in an often fiery news conference. US President Donald Trump, who watched the news conference, echoed his defence secretary, saying it would have taken too long to remove anything. 'The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of facility,' Mr Trump, without providing evidence, wrote on his social media platform Truth Social. Several experts cautioned this week that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of Fordow before the strike early on the morning of June 21, and could be hiding it and other nuclear components in locations unknown to Israel, the US and United Nations nuclear inspectors. They noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing 'unusual activity' at Fordow on June 19 and 20, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on June 22 that most of the near weapons-grade 60 per cent highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the US attack. The Financial Times, citing European capitals, reported that Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact since its stockpile was not concentrated in Fordow. Mr Hegseth's comments denying those claims came at a news briefing where he accused the media of downplaying the success of US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme following a leaked, preliminary assessment from the Defence Intelligence Agency suggesting they may have only set back Iran by months. Mr Hegseth said the assessment was low confidence, and, citing comments from Central Intelligence Agency director John Ratcliffe, said it had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear programme was severely damaged by recent US strikes, and that it would take years to rebuild. Media hatred In the news conference, Mr Hegseth spent large portions of the time criticising the media, without evidence, for having an anti-Trump bias. 'It's in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad,' Mr Hegseth said. 'There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that... because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined,' he said. Mr Trump, who announced the press conference on Truth Social early on June 26 , praised it as: 'One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' News Conferences I have ever seen!' On X, Mr Hegseth thanked Mr Trump for his praise. During the press conference, the top US general largely stuck to technical details, going into the history of the bunker busting bombs used. General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, showed a video testing the bombs on a bunker like the ones struck on June 21. Gen Caine declined to provide his own assessment of the strike and deferred to the intelligence community. He denied being under any pressure to change his assessment to present a more optimistic view of the US strikes. He also said he would not change his assessment due to politics. Uniformed military officials are supposed to remain apolitical and provide their best military advice. 'I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking, and that's exactly what I've done,' he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium, US defense chief says
No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium, US defense chief says

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

No known intelligence that Iran moved uranium, US defense chief says

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Air Force General Dan Caine, speak during a press conference at the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, U.S., June 26, 2025. REUTERS/Idrees Ali WASHINGTON - U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear program over the weekend. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Hegseth said. After the strikes, several experts also cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of Fordow before the strike early Sunday morning and could be hiding it and other nuclear components in locations unknown to Israel, the U.S. and U.N. nuclear inspectors. They noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the near weapons-grade 60% highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the U.S. attack. Hegseth's comments denying those claims came at a news briefing where he accused the media of downplaying the success of U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear program following a leaked, preliminary assessment from the Defense Intelligence Agency suggesting they may have only set back Iran by months. Hegseth said the assessment was low confidence, and, citing comments from CIA Director John Ratcliffe, said it had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged by recent U.S. strikes, and that it would take years to rebuild. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store