California brings new state reparations bills amid Trump onslaught on DEI: ‘The fight for justice'
Amid the Trump administration's full throated attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion, Black lawmakers in California introduced a package of reparations bills to start the new legislative session.
Black legislators say these attacks on racial equity make it even more imperative to implement reparations in California, the first state in the US to undertake such a process, which has become a blueprint for other state-level reparations programs.
'With the constant attacks on civil rights and the rolling back of decades of progress, it is essential that we continue the fight for justice,' said the state senator Akilah Weber Pierson, chair of the congressional Black caucus.
The bills, which are based on recommendations from the California reparations taskforce's landmark 2023 report, include measures that could give priority in public university admission for descendants of enslaved people, update the public elementary and high-school curriculum to include the 'impacts of segregation, slavery, and systemic discrimination', and require government agencies to conduct racial equity analysis.
Related: LA Times reportedly removes new AI tool from story after it downplayed KKK
It's the second package of reparations legislation introduced by the Black caucus. Last year, only seven of the 16 reparations bills introduced were signed into law. Most notable among them was a formal apology for the state's role in perpetuating slavery. Internal division, as well as a veto from Gavin Newsom, the state governor, led to three of the caucus' signature bills – including one that could have created the mechanism for cash payments – being defeated.
Now, in addition to a political climate that's becoming increasingly hostile to any attempts at advancing racial equity, the Black caucus faces a growing chorus of frustration from reparations advocates who are demanding even more ambitious policy proposals and swift implementation.
'We are very confident in our package, which includes bills that have bipartisan support,' Weber Pierson said. 'The fact that Republicans support our efforts shows that, even in the current political climate, the need to repair the centuries of harm imposed on Black Americans goes beyond political affiliations – it is a moral obligation.'
One of the main points of contention between the Black caucus and some reparations advocates is around the proposal to create – and fund – an agency to oversee statewide reparations programs.
In the final days of the last legislative session, bowing to pressure from Newsom's office, which wanted to see additional genealogy studies to determine eligibility included in the bill, the caucus pulled the package entirely. Dozens of advocates rushed to the state Capitol to protest in a heated standoff against legislators.
Last month, the caucus reintroduced a version of this bill that, to the frustration of advocates, includes additional research requirements to determine eligibility for recipients.
Even Kamilah Moore, the former taskforce chair, has been critical of this strategy. 'They created a different agency that's dependent on an additional study on genealogy,' she said. 'I think it was a mistake.'
The taskforce made more than 100 recommendations in its 1,000-page report, Moore said, and the caucus should use those as its North Star. Yet she says they have 'deviated' from the course.
Now, Moore and a group of reparations advocates are collaborating with an unlikely ally, Republican assembly member Bill Essayli – a Trump supporter who has expressed support for reparations in the past – to introduce a different version of the bill.
While it draws on the Black caucus' original proposal that was pulled from a vote at the last minute, Essayli's version calls for the creation of a body called the Freedmen's affairs agency that would be modeled after the federal program that supported formerly enslaved people after the civil war.
This agency could place fewer conditions on eligibility for reparations programs and payments.
'We already did a study, called the California reparations taskforce,' said organizer Chris Lodgson, who works with the reparations advocacy group Coalition for a Just and Equitable California (CJEC). He also helped to draft the Freedmen affairs agency with Essayli. 'What we're interested in is actual implementation.'
Another criticism leveled against the Black caucus is how it's spending the $12m Newsom included in last year's state budget for reparations implementations. None of the money has been used yet, Weber Pierson's office told the Guardian. The proposed genealogical research alone would cost an estimated $6m.
Advocates are frustrated that the money has still not been used, and that if a large chunk is spent on additional research, it could be siphoned away from any reparations programs, including any cash programs that groups such as CJEC have been pushing. Cash reparations were a central feature of the taskforce's recommendations and could be part of the compensation both agencies would be tasked with considering.
When asked about cash reparations, a spokesperson for the Black caucus said that 'substantial economic resources must be granted to Black Californians to correct the generational harms that were inflicted'.
We already did a study ... What we're interested in is actual implementation
Chris Lodgson
Newsom has shied away from addressing the issue directly, saying only that reparations are 'about much more than cash payments' in an interview with Fox News after the release of the report. His office told the Guardian his position has not changed.
Essayli told the Guardian his bill 'is not about cash reparations, it's about recognition and real opportunity to realize the American dream'.
Meanwhile, as the Trump administration attempts to remove DEI measures in federal programs, firing personnel and weakening civil rights protections, a broader movement against racial equity is gaining momentum. (Trump himself hasn't specifically addressed California's reparations agenda since taking office again.)
The supreme court's ruling in 2023 banning the use of affirmative action has impacted Black enrollment rates at some elite universities, and the University of California system was sued earlier this month for allegedly continuing to use affirmative action policy.
Nearly 70 anti-DEI cases have been filed since 2024, according to a tracking database compiled by NYU School of Law. This list includes the lawsuit filed against the Evanston municipal reparations program by a conservative legal group, which argues the program is unconstitutional because it discriminates based on race.
It's been an 'engineered onslaught' of these legal cases, said attorney Lisa Holder, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative. About a year ago, Holder co-founded a coalition of law firms and civil rights attorneys to fight back. The goal is to 'defend, protect and advance policies along the spectrum of diversity, equity, inclusion, to repairing the harm', she said.
States have to stand up and be the voice of resistance ... the voice for marginalized people
Areva Martin
'This work for justice is a marathon,' said lawyer Areva Martin, who helped to negotiate a $5.9m settlement with the city of Palm Springs for a group of survivors and descendants that were forcibly evicted from their homes in the 1960s. The predominantly Black and Latino neighborhood, called Section 14, was razed by the city to make way for urban renewal projects.
'States have to stand up and be the voice of resistance, be the voice for marginalized people,' she said.
On a federal level, legislation to study and develop reparations programs, HR 40, which was first introduced by the late representative John Conyers in 1989, was reintroduced in February by representative Ayanna Pressley.
Pressley described the present moment as a 'painful inflection point' in an interview with NBC News, and vowed to keep working to 'blunt the assaults from a hostile administration', especially when it comes to civil rights.
California leads the way nationally as both a bulwark for civil rights protection and advancing racial equity, but also as an example for what a state reparations process can look like.
'California has a lot of eyes on it, and so what happens here is really informing a lot of places,' said organizer Kristin Nimmers, who works with the group California Black Power Network. 'California organizers are helping different movements across the nation.'
Related: It's been a year of modest victories and tough losses for California's reparations movement. What comes next?
Both New York and Illinois are in the process of developing their own reparations legislation, and New Jersey has created a community-run reparations council.
The New York reparations commission, formed by the governor last year, is expected to release its report sometime this year. And the Illinois African descent-citizens reparations commission is expected to release a harm report in early 2026.
'California has provided incredible inspiration,' said New York City-based reparations organizer Trevor Smith, co-founder of the community organization BLIS Collective.
'New York has the opportunity to build off that foundation, while taking a unique approach that reflects our own history,' he said.
The work of California's congressional Black caucus 'sets a framework for the rest of the country on how to repair historical harms', Weber Pierson said.
'It transcends who is in office. It is something that must be done, and will get done.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

31 minutes ago
In their own words: Trump, Newsom trade insults and barbs over National Guard in Los Angeles
The swiftly evolving situation in the Los Angeles area over protests surrounding immigration enforcement actions has also cued up a public spat between President Donald Trump and Gov. Gavin Newsom, the California governor who has been one of the Republican president's most vocal Democratic critics. After Trump on Sunday called up 2,000 National Guard troops to respond, Newsom said he would sue the administration, a promise on which the state followed through a day later. Trump cited a legal provision that allows him to mobilize federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States." The president also agreed with one of his top advisers that maybe the governor should be arrested. Here's a look at back-and-forth between Trump and Newsom in their own words: 'You have violent people, and we're not gonna let them get away with it.' — Trump, Sunday, in remarks to reporters in Morristown, New Jersey. ___ Newsom's ire has been elevated over Trump's decision to, without his support, call up the California National Guard for deployment into his state. In a letter Sunday, Newsom called on Trump to rescind the Guard deployment, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty.' The governor, who was in Los Angeles meeting with local law enforcement and other officials, also told protesters they were playing into Trump's plans and would face arrest for violence or property destruction. 'Trump wants chaos and he's instigated violence,' he said. 'Stay peaceful. Stay focused. Don't give him the excuse he's looking for.' In an interview with MSNBC, Newsom said Sunday he had spoken with Trump 'late Friday night,' after the protests had begun, but said deploying the National Guard 'never came up.' "We talked for almost 20 minutes, and he — barely, this issue never came up. I mean, I kept trying to talk about LA, he wanted to talk about all these other issues," Newsom said. 'We had a very decent conversation.' 'He never once brought up the National Guard,' Newsom said of Trump, calling him 'a stone-cold liar.' Saying, 'I did call him the other night,' Trump told reporters Sunday that he told Newsom in that call: ''Look you've got to take care of this. Otherwise I'm sending in the troops.' ... That's what we did.' On Monday, Trump posted on social media that Los Angeles would have been 'completely obliterated' without his intervention and referred to Newsom as 'Newscum,' a pejorative moniker he has used to refer to the governor. 'We are suing Donald Trump. This is a manufactured crisis. He is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution.' — Newsom, Monday, X post. ___ As Newsom promised, California officials sued the Trump administration on Monday, with the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, arguing that the deployment of troops 'trampled' on the state's sovereignty and pushing for a restraining order. The initial deployment of 300 National Guard troops was expected to quickly expand to the full 2,000 that were authorized by Trump. Late Monday, Trump authorized an additional 2,000 National Guard troops. Ahead of that move, Newsom accused the president of inflaming tensions, breaching state sovereignty and wasting resources, while warning protesters not to 'take Trump's bait.' Teasing the suit, Newsom told MSNBC that he saw the deployment as 'an illegal act, an immoral act, an unconstitutional act.' Asked Monday about the lawsuit, Trump said it was 'interesting' and argued 'that place would be burning down' without the federal government's intervention. 'I'm very happy I got involved," Trump added. "I think Gavin in his own way is very happy I got involved.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing." — Trump, Monday, in remarks to reporters. ___ Tom Homan, the Trump administration's border czar, previously warned that anyone, including public officials, would be arrested if they obstructed federal immigration enforcement. Newsom's initial response to Homan, during the MSNBC interview and in subsequent posts on his own social media: 'Come and get me, tough guy.' On Monday Trump seemed to agree with his border chief, telling reporters, 'I would do it if I were Tom.' 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. "He's done a terrible job. Look — I like Gavin, he's a nice guy, but he's grossly incompetent, everybody knows." Homan later said there was 'no discussion' about actually arresting Newsom, but reiterated that 'no one's above the law.' wrote Monday on X that they represented 'a day I hoped I would never see in America' and said Trump's call for his arrest marked 'an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.'


Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
MAGA Supporters Counter Anti-ICE Protests: 'Go Back to Mexico'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Several Donald Trump supporters in Tampa, Florida, have started counter-protests to anti-ICE, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, demonstrations. Video footage posted on X, formerly Twitter, shows a man holding a red "MAGA country" flag chanting "we want ICE" and telling a woman holding a Mexican flag: "If you love Mexico, go back to Mexico." In another clip, a group of men can be seen holding a Trump-Vance banner, before move for a truck coming through. Hundreds gathered outside Tampa's City Hall to protest on Monday, after a weekend of violent clashes between anti-ICE demonstrators and law enforcement. Police intervened during some heated moments between anti-ICE protesters and counter-protesters but there was no violence, according to Tampa broadcaster FOX13. This is a developing story - more to follow.

Business of Fashion
33 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
Attorney for Deported Makeup Artist: If ‘It Could Happen to Him … It Could Happen to You.'
In a defiant speech, Lindsay Toczylowski, president and co-founder of social justice legal firm Immigrant Defenders Law Center, called the deportation of undocumented immigrants without due process a direct attack on democracy. Her client, Andry José Hernández Romero, a 31-year-old Venezuelan makeup artist seeking asylum in the US, was in March deported to El Salvador, where he was taken to the country's notorious CECOT prison along with over 200 other Venezuelan and Salvadoran deportees. The American Civil Liberties Union, which is suing the Trump administration over its use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport undocumented immigrants without due process, said in court filings that the government relied solely on Romero's tattoos to incorrectly label him a violent gang member. Family and supporters say they fear for the safety of Romero, who is gay and was seeking asylum after being persecuted for his sexual orientation in Venezuela. He has not been seen or heard from since his arrival in El Salvador, including by his legal representation. 'The only fight that we lose is the one we give up on… It's about the future of our democracy and the country we want to live in,' she said, speaking at The Business of Beauty Global Forum in Napa Valley, California. 'His story is the embodiment of it could happen to him, it could happen to me, it could happen to you, it could happen to any one of us. It's why the rule of law is so important. It's why due process is so important.' Toczylowski also addressed escalating tensions in Los Angeles, where President Donald Trump has sent thousands of National Guard and Marines to quell protests against ICE deportation roundups in the city. Opponents of the move, including California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles mayor Karen Bass, say the decision to send troops was disproportionate to the small number of violent incidents associated with the protests, and will only inflame the situation. On Monday, protests spread to other cities around the country. 'There are more than 200 residents of Los Angeles that have been picked up off the streets,' said Toczylowski. 'I have watched masked agents in plain clothes push people into service elevators in the middle of federal buildings in downtown LA in the last two weeks. This is an all-out assault on the values that we hold as Angelenos, as Californians, as Americans.' She said one of the most important methods of pushing back against the Trump administration's immigration actions, whether in LA or El Salvador, is to speak out against them as often, and as forcefully as possible. 'The moment that we stop talking about [Romero], about his story and others like him is the moment that the Trump administration is successful in completing the disappearance of Andry José Hernández Romero,' she said.