logo
Britain's economic failures are fuelling the masculinity crisis

Britain's economic failures are fuelling the masculinity crisis

Telegraph14-04-2025

There has been some desperate straw clutching over the last week as confidence in the US plummets and American voters prepare to be poorer.
Setting aside Donald Trump's recent backtracking, there has been a lot of chest-thumping pro-tariff talk about hyper-masculinity. Brush away those thoughts about economic hardship boys, because these tariffs are set to be the ultimate testosterone boost.
Given that a recent poll by Marquette Law School showed that non-college white men were most likely to back the tariffs, it's an obvious pitch.
Fox News pundits have already been plugging the idea, arguing that tariffs will bring back a 'manly' workforce because 'when you sit behind a screen all day, it makes you a woman'.
Apparently, the trade war will cure America of its 'crisis of masculinity' by bringing alpha-male jobs back, even if the economy has completely imploded by then.
Britain needs to pay careful attention to America's growing obsession with traditional 'manliness' because the same problems are happening here. We should be asking why the tariffs have struck such a chord with so many non-college white men, because in Britain, men are giving up on work faster than anywhere else in the richest parts of the world.
The proportion of men aged 16 to 64 participating in Britain's labour force has plunged from a record high of 84pc in 2009 to 80.9pc in 2024 – a much bigger drop than in the US. Men are working shorter hours too, with only those over 65 putting in more hours since Covid.
The outlook is particularly worrying among young men, as a growing number are not entering the working world at all. The number of 16-24-year-old men not in education, employment or training (Neets) is up 40pc since Covid, compared to just 7pc among women.
The feeling of hopelessness starts from a worryingly young age, too – one in five 15-year-old boys in this country say they have low life satisfaction, according to The Children's Society's 2022 report.
There are plenty of reasons why this is happening, but one often overlooked corner of the argument is how the definition of masculinity and any problems that follow correlate with economic policy. Studies have shown a clear link between economic and personal strife.
A group of economists from MIT, the University of California and the University of Zurich warned in 2017 that 'trade shocks differentially reduce employment and earnings, raise the prevalence of idleness, and elevate premature mortality among young males', adding that shocks to male relative earnings 'reduce marriage and fertility'.
This, they said, increases the number of children living in below-poverty, single-headed households.
Despite huge cultural changes in family dynamics in recent decades, with more women working and more fathers involved at home, 70pc of men as young as 18 still believe that they should be the primary breadwinner in a relationship, according to a study of 3,000 UK adults conducted by Starling Bank last year.
Studies have found that men in so-called 'medium-status' jobs are more miserable than women who are in the same position. In short, they are less willing to consider themselves professional 'average Joes' than women.
At the same time, more people feel detached from their employer and overall job satisfaction levels are falling. With self-esteem so closely tied to employment status, those who feel career success isn't on the cards for them might be more likely to give up before they even get started and instead search for meaning elsewhere.
The social contract that many men thought they were buying into – work hard, buy a house, have a family – seems out of reach for many.
Work doesn't seem to be working and further gloom in the UK jobs market won't help matters. Britain is now suffering the worst downturn in the jobs market since lockdown, fuelled by a lack of job openings and an increase in redundancies.
I have heard from men who have been desperately applying for jobs for months with no response, while others have given up and moved abroad.
Men still earn more than women and continue to rule the roost in powerful leadership positions, but in reality, that high-profile club makes up a small percentage of the male population. Low wages and rising benefits have left millions of others adrift. How does Britain help them?
The centre of attention here has understandably been on the social side, looking at smartphones, families, role models and the education system. All of that is important. But Donald Trump's focus on the economic impact has clearly struck a chord with lost men in the US.
Economic opportunities have changed enormously as male-dominated sectors shrink. Yet his tariffs won't be the answer.
Although it's true that the decline of sectors such as manufacturing has impacted male identity as the number of well-paid jobs for non-graduates has shrunk, a potential post-tariff recession combined with hard labour and inevitably low pay will not fix broken men.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Defense rests case in second trial of Karen Read for Boston police officer boyfriend's death
Defense rests case in second trial of Karen Read for Boston police officer boyfriend's death

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Defense rests case in second trial of Karen Read for Boston police officer boyfriend's death

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.

'There is no Plan B': Republicans make a daring bet on the debt limit
'There is no Plan B': Republicans make a daring bet on the debt limit

NBC News

time44 minutes ago

  • NBC News

'There is no Plan B': Republicans make a daring bet on the debt limit

WASHINGTON — As Republicans barrel toward a critical deadline this summer to lift the debt ceiling, they say there's no 'Plan B' to avert an economically disastrous default if they fail to pass the massive bill for President Donald Trump's agenda in time. Congressional Republicans are eyeing increasing the debt limit by $4 trillion to $5 trillion so the government can keep borrowing to meet the country's obligations. It's part of their broader domestic policy package, which the Senate needs to pass before it can go back through the House and ultimately to Trump's desk for his signature. And the GOP only has three votes to spare in both chambers. 'There is no Plan B,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said Tuesday when asked by NBC News if he has a backup plan for the debt limit. 'It's Plan A. We have to get it done. Failure is not an option.' It's a risky gamble by GOP leaders, who are putting all their chips on passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act by the debt ceiling deadline. 'We're going to get reconciliation done,' Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo., said when asked what the party's fallback plan is on the debt ceiling. (Reconciliation refers to the budget process Republicans are using to pass their bill, which allows them to bypass the 60-vote threshold in the Senate and cut Democrats out of the process.) The Treasury Department has urged Congress to raise the debt ceiling "by mid-July" to safely avoid default. The Congressional Budget Office projected this week that the deadline may be later, 'between mid-August and the end of September,' although that won't be official unless the Treasury Department agrees. If Republicans fail to pass their sprawling bill in time, they would need to negotiate with Democrats to pass a standalone debt limit extension through the 60-vote process in the Se nate. But there have been no negotiations between party leaders on that front, according to Republican and Democratic aides with knowledge of the dynamics. One GOP aide said the party is 'full steam ahead on Plan A' and suggested there may still be time to consider a fallback if they absolutely need to. Some Republicans say it's a deliberate tactic to drive up the urgency of passing their filibuster-proof bill. 'We should be set an expectation that we're getting this done in July, and it includes the debt ceiling,' said Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C. 'I think the minute you start talking about a backup plan, you're going to have a backup plan.' If Republican leaders eventually decide they want to cut a bipartisan deal on the debt ceiling, it's unclear what — if anything — Democrats would demand. Some, like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, of Massachusetts, and Rep. Brendan Boyle, of Pennsylvania., have insisted on abolishing the debt limit entirely in order to prevent the full faith and credit of the United States from being used as leverage in policy negotiations. That's an idea Trump recently endorsed. 'I am very pleased to announce that, after all of these years, I agree with Senator Elizabeth Warren on SOMETHING,' Trump wrote on Truth Social last week. 'The Debt Limit should be entirely scrapped to prevent an Economic catastrophe.' But there's scant support within the GOP for it, as Republicans have found success using it to extract concessions from Democratic presidents in the past. There's no indication that Democrats would respond in kind this year if Republicans came to them and asked for their votes on the debt ceiling. 'I'm not debating hypotheticals,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said when asked what he'd want in exchange.

Trump trade deal shows how vital China's rare-earth metals are to US defense firms
Trump trade deal shows how vital China's rare-earth metals are to US defense firms

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Trump trade deal shows how vital China's rare-earth metals are to US defense firms

The draft trade agreement with China announced by Donald Trump on Wednesday would ease concerns from top US military suppliers about rare-earth metals and magnets that, if cut off permanently, could hobble production of everything from smart bombs to fighter jets to submarines and other weapons in the US arsenal. While the deal has not yet been finalised, it may reassure major defense companies such as Lockheed Martin, the largest US user of samarium – a rare-earth metal used in military-grade magnets – whose supply is entirely controlled by China. The issue of China's export restrictions on the metals and magnets was so important that Trump specifically mentioned them as part of his announcement of a broader trade agreement with China that would reduce US tariffs to 55% and Chinese tariffs to 10%. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me,' Trump wrote. 'Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China.' Rare earths are crucial to the production of F-35 fighter jets, Virginia- and Columbia-class nuclear-powered submarines, Tomahawk missiles, radar systems, unmanned aerial vehicles and smart bombs, according to Gracelin Baskaran of the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a thinktank. China in April imposed export restrictions on seven rare earth elements during the tough negotiations over Trump's new tariffs. China also targeted the aerospace and defense industries by limiting 15 US entities with ties to the industry from receiving dual-use goods. 'The United States is already on the back foot when it comes to manufacturing these defense technologies,' Baskaran said in an interview published by CSIS. 'China is rapidly expanding its munitions production and acquiring advanced weapons systems and equipment at a pace five to six times faster than the United States. While China is preparing with a wartime mindset, the United States continues to operate under peacetime conditions.' Trump has amassed a team of foreign policy China hawks, including a number who have warned that the US should focus more on the pacing threat posed by China over the coming decades instead of current conflicts in Ukraine or the Middle East. 'Even before the latest restrictions, the US defense industrial base struggled with limited capacity and lacked the ability to scale up production to meet defense technology demands,' she continued. 'Further bans on critical minerals inputs will only widen the gap, enabling China to strengthen its military capabilities more quickly than the United States.' China and the United States had agreed last month in Geneva to pause the implementation of sky-high tariffs that would have delivered a severe economic blow to manufacturers and consumers in the US, as well as exporters in China. But China maintained export licenses on rare-earth metals used by both defense producers and carmakers that threatened to upend global supply chains and imperil production in the United States. In particular, China has a stranglehold on the production and export of samarium, a magnet used in combination with cobalt to provide highly durable magnets used to withstand the intense temperatures in military-grade tech. China produces the entire world's supply of the rare-earth metal. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion In particular, the magnets are important for the production of guided missiles, satellite-guided 'smart bombs', and aircrafts, including fighter jets, according to Apex Magnets, a supplier. Those supplies of weapons have been depleted through deliveries of missiles and other ordnance to Ukraine and to the Israeli military. Pentagon planners and other officials in the administration of Joe Biden, regularly squared off over whether foreign weapons deliveries expose a US vulnerability in case it faced off with a major military power. In order to break the deadlock, secretary of state Marco Rubio also abruptly announced plans to cancel hundreds of thousands of visas for Chinese students in the United States. While publicly that was said as a plan to root out Chinese spies in US higher education, Axios reported that the visa ban was also motivated by China's obstinance on resuming rare earths exports. The breakthrough comes as Trump is planning to display US military prowess at a parade in Washington DC this weekend that has been seen as an attempt to flex American muscle and reinforce the US president's bonafides as a supporter of the military. Trump in 2019 ordered the Pentagon to find new sources of procuring rare earth minerals, in particular samarium, because the US did not have the capacity to produce them domestically. The initiative was 'essential to the national defense', he said then.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store