
Survey: Parents shell out $3K annually on kids sports with college, pros in mind
Survey: Parents shell out $3K annually on kids sports with college, pros in mind
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Cooper Flagg's mom shares her best tips for parents navigating youth sports
Mackenzie Salmon sat down with Cooper Flagg's mom Kelly to talk about how she successfully navigated the world of youth sports.
Sports Seriously
Parents spend $3,000 annually on their children's sports, the majority of them taking action elsewhere to manage rising costs, according to New York Life's Insurance's latest Wealth Watch survey.
The results of the poll of U.S. adults with children aged 7 to 18 who participate on youth sports, conducted March 1 to 6, also suggest parents are pouring in money believing they are investing in an ultimate playoff.
"Our research suggests that parents are deeply committed to supporting their children's athletic potential – not just for the joy of sport, but as a pathway to higher education and future success," Jessica Ruggles, corporate vice president of financial wellness at New York Life, said in a release shared with USA TODAY Sports prior to Tuesday's publication of its results.
According to the nationally representative online survey of 1,036 participants whose kids play school community and travel sports, 83% of parents believe their child or children have the skills to play at the collegiate level, while 49% are confident that their child will receive an athletic scholarship and 75% believe they have the skills to play professionally despite long odds that suggest otherwise.
According to 2024 NCAA data, supplemented by data from the National Federation of State High School Associations, about 6% of high school athletes play collegiately (a lower percentage play Division 1), while less than 1% of NCAA athletes are drafted into a professional sport, according to the research.
"Many families are counting on athletic scholarships to ease the cost of college, yet those opportunities are limited and uncertain, especially in the face of injury or shifting priorities," Ruggles says.
According to the New York Life data, parents are adjusting household budgets and dipping into savings to support them, with 76% taking some kind of action to manage costs, usually by reducing spending in other areas (38%), while 20% report that they had to reduce or stop their children's participation due to financial constraints.
The Wealth Watch survey, which tracks Americans' financial goals, progress toward those goals and feelings about their ability to secure their financial futures, reflects other statistical and anecdotal evidence of a national mania over prioritizing, and even monetizing, kids sports.
Parents spent 46% more on their child's primary sport in 2024 than in 2019, according to another recent survey conducted by the Aspen Institute in partnership with Utah State University and Louisiana Tech University. That's twice the rate of price inflations in the U.S. economy during the same period, according the Aspen Institute.
According to research by the Aspen Institute, which regularly collects and distributes research and the latest trends in youth sports, parents spend more than $40 billion annually on their children's sports.
"It all starts with, I think, with the college admissions process, plus big time money in college sports, it creates this signal that goes all the way down to eight years old, probably even earlier," bestselling author and father Michael Lewis said at Aspen's recent Project Play Summit in Berkeley, California. Project Play is Aspen's initiative to build healthy communities through sports and develop nationwide access to them.
"The parents can tell themselves, 'We're doing this because you get this advantage in college,' either you get free tuition or now it's for even more, like they're going to get NIL deals and all that," said Lewis, a father and former coach of his daughter's softball team who has written two books about the youth sports experience. "It's kind of like the way people respond to way too strongly to lottery-like temptation.
"Most kids are not going to get any of that, and the parents are going to spend a lot more money than they should spend chasing this dream, sometimes the kids don't even want to be there. So I mean, when you have this prize that's dangled on the other end, and very poor education all the way through, about the likelihood of getting a prize, you're going to get a lot of distortion in people's behavior. I think education is part of it."
According NCSA College Recruiting, a college recruiting website that helps connect high school athletes with college coaches, fewer than 2% of high school athletes are offered athletic scholarships.
While the number of scholarships could increase with the House vs. NCAA settlement, thousands of current walk-on athletes stand to lose their places on Division I teams if it is approved.
"The pursuit of athletic goals can also place a real financial and emotional strain on families," New York Life's Ruggles said. "As parents make meaningful sacrifices to nurture their children's passions, it's essential to prioritize both performance and well-being. Building a trusted team – including athletic mentors and financial coaches – can give families clarity and confidence to champion their child's growth without compromising their own stability, maintaining confidence in their broader financial future."
Sports parents surveyed by New York Life had an average of $30,787 saved for their children's higher education. If you're a youth sports parents with goals of reaching college, you know that annual family dues can approach that figure.
"This kind of long-term investment reflects a belief in hard work and opportunity," Ruggles says. "But while hope and effort are essential, so is planning."
And perhaps even a shift in our priorities. Sixty-four percent of parents in the New York Life survey reported rising costs for kids sports in recent years. Nearly all of them (99%) are actively involved in their kids' sports, attending games, practices, or managing transportation.
"I think the system does not work for working families," Jennifer Siebel Newsom, the first partner of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and co-chair of the governor's council on physical fitness and mental well-being, said at the Project Play Summit. She is also a sports mom.
"The cost of entering and being a part of these clubs are increasing (and it's) is an obstacle for too many families," she said. "It's also disruptive, because, as kids are playing at higher and more competitive levels, they have pressure at school academically if they're traveling all these weekends. … That's not healthy for family dynamics.
"I just think we need a real pattern interrupt. We need to go back to local. We need to go back to kids playing rec sports, but like skilled rec sports, play based where they're building confidence, building skills, growing as a team player at their school or at their local rec center, so that it works for local families, isn't highly exorbitant, highly expensive."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Zaltos, Mantzouranis go 1-2 in hammer to help Minnesota take lead in NCAA track championships
EUGENE, Ore. (AP) — Kostas Zaltos won the NCAA hammer throw and fellow Greek thrower Angelos Mantzouranis was second to help Minnesota take the Day 1 lead at the outdoor track and field championships Wednesday. Zaltos and Mantzouranis are the first teammates to go 1-2 in the NCAA hammer throw since Virginia Tech did it in 2011. Zaltos won with a throw of 256 feet, 2 inches in the fourth round to become the first Minnesota outdoor champion since 2018 and just the third since 1971. Mantzouranis, who finished third as a freshman last year, had a personal-best 252-6. Advertisement New Mexico also went 1-2 in the 10,000 meters when freshman Ishmael Kipkurui beat defending champion Habtom Samuel with a time of 29 minutes, 7.70 seconds. Last year, Samuel became the first male in school history to win an NCAA outdoor 5,000 or 10,000 title. Minnesota sits atop the team standings with 23 points, with New Mexico and Florida tied for second at 18. Jason Swarens of Wisconsin landed a personal-best 69-8 on his final toss to win the shot put and deny Tarik Robinson-O'Hagan his fourth straight NCAA title. Swarens became the first Badger male to win a national title in the shot put and the first male thrower to win a NCAA title since Michael Lihrman won consecutive indoor weight throw titles in 2014 and '15. Aleksandr Solovev broke his own school record with a clearance of 18-11 1/2 to become the pole vault champion for Texas A&M. Advertisement Florida senior Malcolm Clemons jumped a 26-4 1/2 on his first attempt and held on to win his first national title in the long jump. Miami's Devoux Deysel won the javelin with a throw of 268-2. The men's events continue Friday at Hayward Field. ___ AP sports:


Fox News
5 hours ago
- Fox News
Female athletes contest new NCAA ruling, claiming violations of federal anti-discrimination law
Eight women's college soccer, volleyball and track and field athletes have filed an appeal challenging the House v. NCAA antitrust settlement. U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement last week, clearing the way for direct payments from universities to athletes. The eight women argue female athletes won't receive their fair share of $2.7 billion in back pay for athletes barred from making money off their name, image and likeness (NIL). Kacie Breeding of Vanderbilt; Lexi Drumm, Emma Appleman, Emmie Wannemacher, Riley Haas, Savannah Baron and Elizabeth Arnold of the College of Charleston; and Kate Johnson of Virginia lead the appeal. They all previously filed objections to the proposed settlement. Ashlyn Hare, one of the attorneys representing the athletes, said in a statement the settlement violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. "We support a settlement of the case, but not an inaccurate one that violates federal law. The calculation of past damages is based on an error that ignores Title IX and deprives female athletes of $1.1 billion," Hare said. "Paying out the money as proposed would be a massive error that would cause irreparable harm to women's sports." The House settlement figures to financially benefit football and basketball stars at the biggest schools, who are likely to receive a big chunk of the $20.5 million per year that colleges are permitted to share with athletes over the next year. Some athletes in other sports that don't make money for their schools could lose their partial scholarships or see their roster spots cut. "This is a football and basketball damages settlement with no real benefit to female athletes," Hare said. "Congress has expressly rejected efforts to exempt revenue-generating sports like football and basketball from Title IX's antidiscrimination mandate. The NCAA agreed with us. Our argument on appeal is the exact same argument the conferences and NCAA made prior to settling the case." The appeal, filed by the law firm Hutchinson Black and Cook of Boulder, Colorado, was first reported by Front Office Sports. It will be heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.


Business Wire
6 hours ago
- Business Wire
Hagens Berman Responds to Appeals to NCAA College Athlete Name, Image and Likeness Settlement
OAKLAND, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Following the federal court's final approval to a historic $20 billion plus settlement with the NCAA allowing payments and benefits to college athletes for the use of their name, image and likeness (NIL), Hagens Berman responded to the first appeal. 'If these lawyers believe that a Title IX case will succeed, they should bring it and not hijack payments to college athletes that could be lifechanging.' To address questions from NCAA athletes about the impact of the appeal, Hagens Berman issued the following statement: 'Attorneys John Clune and Ashlyn Hare of Hutchinson Black and Cook LLC and Rebecca Peterson-Fisher of Katz Banks Kumin LLP have filed a notice of their intent to appeal the historic NCAA settlement approved June 6, 2025, by Judge Claudia Wilken. 'This appeal will block payments to hundreds of thousands of athletes, delaying payments by a minimum of several months to potentially a year or more. These attorneys are pursuing an appeal based on a Title IX issue that Judge Wilken already disposed of correctly, quickly and multiple times. 'Judge Wilken noted that these attorneys cited 'no authority that Title IX applies to damages awards distributions or that damages distributions made by a claims administrator are subject to Title IX.'' 'This is an antitrust case about competition, it is not a Title IX case, and now hundreds of thousands of athletes will have to wait to recover for past wrongs that were addressed in this lawsuit in order for these attorneys to take on this unrelated issue,' added Hagens Berman co-founder and managing partner, Steve Berman, who serves as court-appointed co-lead counsel. 'If these lawyers believe that a Title IX case will succeed, they should bring it and not hijack payments to college athletes that could be lifechanging.' Straight from the Bench In Judge Wilken's June 6, 2025, opinion on the order granting final approval to the settlement, the court clearly states that it overrules objections, noting, 'There is nothing in the SA [settlement agreement] that would prevent or prohibit schools from distributing benefits and compensation pursuant to the Injunctive Relief Settlement in a manner that complies with Title IX.' Berman added, 'Judge Wilken had made that same ruling earlier in the case, theoretically allowing objectors ample time to find authority to back up their objection, and they failed. It's a shame given this utter failure they will be holding up payments to athletes. I say shame on them.' Hagens Berman represents a class of nearly 400,000 college athletes in the lawsuit in which the total value under the new revenue-sharing model is expected to exceed $20 billion over the next 10 years. The settlement resolves three pending antitrust lawsuits, House v. NCAA, Hubbard v. NCAA, and Carter v. NCAA. Class members in the three affected cases may find out more about the claim process by visiting the settlement website at . Hagens Berman is a global plaintiffs' rights complex litigation law firm with a tenacious drive for achieving real results for those harmed by corporate negligence and fraud. Since its founding in 1993, the firm's determination has earned it numerous national accolades, awards and titles of 'Most Feared Plaintiff's Firm,' MVPs and Trailblazers of class-action law. More about the law firm and its successes can be found at Follow the firm for updates and news at @ClassActionLaw.