Raymond J. de Souza: Parliament needs to shed its 'Rat Pack' rowdiness

National Post

18-05-2025

Forty years ago a light-hearted moment in Parliament indicated darker days ahead.
Article content
In May 1985 the ' Rat Pack' made up T-shirts and presented one to John Turner, the leader of the opposition. It was thought some innocent fun, a bit of brio for a deflated Liberal party. Even if it was fun then, it hasn't been for a long time.
Article content
After the 1984 Mulroney landslide, the Liberals were in rough shape, reduced to only 40 MPs, only 10 more than the NDP, and wondering about their relevance. Into that vacuum stepped four MPs — young, brash and attention-seeking. They pilloried the Mulroney government in question period, especially in regard to patronage and assorted scandals. They brought energy to the dispirited, dreary Grits.
Article content
Article content
They got the nickname 'Rat Pack' and revelled in it. Brian Tobin of Newfoundland was the senior 'statesman' of the group, having been first elected in 1980. The other three were part of the 1984 intake: Sheila Copps of Hamilton, Ont., John Nunziata from Toronto and Don Boudria from east of Ottawa.
Article content
Article content
Parliament had only been broadcast since the late 1970s. Television was introduced to inform, but carried with it the potential to outrage. The Rat Pack brought the outrage in abundance. It made for good television, contemporary with salacious daytime talk shows and 15 years ahead of reality television.
Article content
The Rat Pack was politically effective. Turner encouraged them because they brought new vigour; Brian Mulroney's cabinet — John Crosbie most of all — inveighed against them as they held it to account; the media loved them for generating easy-to-cover controversy; and the public rewarded the Rat Pack with the higher profiles that led to three of the four becoming cabinet ministers.
Article content
The proudly progressive Rat Pack would be loath to consider themselves progenitors of Trumpian politics, but the all-outrage-all-the-time, name-calling, hyper-partisan, attack-dog style is not a matter of liberal or conservative. It may be more compatible with populist politicians, but that it was perfected by the Liberal Rat Pack demonstrates that it is malleable packaging that can be wrapped around shifting content.
Article content
Article content
Parliament will resume sitting in 10 days with the genuine grace of having King Charles III read the Speech from the Throne. It was an inspired invitation from Prime Minister Mark Carney, and there is no doubt that His Majesty's visit will inspire patriotism and pride in a sovereign Canada.
Article content
Article content
It will be the perfect occasion to restore the dignity of Parliament, especially question period in the House of Commons. For those who can bear to watch, the affair is marked by duelling ovations, each side leaping to its feet to feverishly applaud any and all utterances, no matter how banal, devoid of wit, or empty of substance. When not standing in a cacophonous uproar, they are seated, barracking in a never-ending orgy of argy-bargy.
Article content
It doesn't have to be that way. Alberta showed the way some years ago, after Jason Kenney won the Progressive Conservative leadership in 2017. After witnessing the raucous spectacle of the legislature (before he had a seat), he vowed to do something about it if elected. When he entered the legislature in 2018 as leader of the United Conservative Party in opposition, he declared unilateral disarmament. His caucus would not applaud, heckle or thump their desks. In early 2019, he promised, if elected premier, the UCP would change the standing orders to demand decorum all around. He did, and Albertans could be proud of the MLAs on both sides. Regrettably, those reforms have not endured under his successor.