Ryanair tells cabin crews they have to give back £1,000s in pay
The budget airline told some flight attendants in Spain that they must return the five months' worth of salary increases after a judge ruled the pay deal was invalid
Ryanair has instructed some of its Spanish cabin crew to return pay increases amounting to thousands of pounds amidst a legal dispute with a union.
The airline had previously agreed to a pay rise with Spain's CCOO union last year. However, another union, the Union Sindical Obrera (USO), challenged the agreement in January, leading to a judge in Spain's High Court ruling that the pay deal was invalid.
As a result, Ryanair has now informed USO union members that they must repay five months' worth of salary increases. In a letter obtained by PA news agency, Ryanair informed employees that the court ruling "created an overpayment situation".
"You were paid higher salaries in the period from October 24 to March 25 that have now been declared null and void," it stated. "We are willing to offer a repayment plan of 12 months with the deductions starting in the payslip of June."
Do you work at Ryanair and have a story to tell? Email webtravel@reachplc.com
Separately, Ryanair agreed a limited pay deal with members of the other union, CCOO, which exempts them from the pay clawback. The USO revealed that the pay rises Ryanair is demanding union members to return could be as much as 3,000 euros (£2,525).
A spokesperson for USO said that Ryanair is engaging in "union-based discrimination". They added that Ryanair also "encouraged (with constant emails and multiple deadline changes to do it) to sign up with CCOO to avoid the penalties".
In a separate letter sent by Ryanair to the union, it described attempts to contest the repayments as "farcical". The airline penned a stern response: "If you wish to pursue legal action against us for complying with the outcome of the court case that you won, that is entirely a matter for you."
It went on to state that USO members "will be contacted and informed of the amounts they owe as a consequence of your actions".
A representative from Ryanair weighed in, saying: "USO are complaining about pay cuts that result from their court case. Ryanair is complying with the court case that USO took to cut pay while it is under appeal."
The spokesperson also highlighted the union's limited influence: "USO are a tiny minority union with no support from our crew, the vast majority of whom have their pay and conditions protected by an agreement with CCOO."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
7 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Luis Diaz comments after Liverpool stung Barcelona with £90m transfer premium
Barcelona were planning to swoop for Liverpool winger Luis Diaz this summer, but the Colombian has pledged his future to the Reds, who insist he's going nowhere Luis Diaz has reaffirmed his commitment to Liverpool, rejecting advances from Barcelona in a move that underscores the Reds' newfound dominance in the transfer market. It also signals a seismic shift in their rivalry with the Catalan giants, who were hoping to lure Diaz to the Camp Nou this summer. Once upon a time, Barcelona held an almost magnetic pull over Liverpool's top players, particularly those from South America. Luis Suarez, Philippe Coutinho and Javier Mascherano all traded Merseyside for Catalonia, with their dreams of donning the Blaugrana shirt proving irresistible. So frequent were these raids that Liverpool, stung by Coutinho's £142million departure in 2018, inserted a cunning £90m premium clause into the deal, forcing Barcelona to pay a hefty surcharge for any future Anfield signings. This stipulation meant that the club would have to pay an additional £90m on top of any agreed transfer fee for future Liverpool players. The clause only lasted until the end of the 2019/20 season, but it was a defensive measure born of necessity, a way to protect their stars from the Spanish giants' grasp. It proved particularly valuable as Jurgen Klopp's squad blossomed, with standout talents like Mohamed Salah, Sadio Mane, Alisson Becker, and Virgil van Dijk rising to prominence in that period. Fast forward to 2025, and the tables have turned. Diaz, who has two years remaining on his Liverpool deal, has made it clear he has no intention of leaving Merseyside, even if a contract extension isn't agreed this summer. "I'm very happy at Liverpool - I've always said so. They've welcomed me very well," the Colombian told to beIN SPORTS ahead of Colombia's clash with Peru on Friday. "If Liverpool gives us a good extension, or I have to see out my two-year contract, I'll be happy." His words carry weight, not just for their sincerity but for what they reveal about the shifting dynamics between the two clubs. Diaz's contentment at Liverpool is a testament to the club's resurgence under Arne Slot, who guided the Reds to just their second Premier League title last month. Diaz contributed 17 goals and eight assists in 50 appearances across the season - his best return since joining from Porto in 2022. His growing importance to Liverpool is clear - underscored by the club's firm stance that he is not for sale. Even if he were, Barcelona no longer wield the same allure they once did, particularly when it comes to prying talent from Merseyside. Liverpool are evidently no longer a stepping stone but a final destination - a far cry from the observation made by club legend Steven Gerrard in 2015. In his autobiography 'My Story', Gerrard correctly predicted Barcelona would go after Coutinho, and reckoned Liverpool might find it "tricky" to keep hold of the Brazilian because "the lure of going to [Barcelona or Real Madrid] is so strong for any South American player." But Diaz appears to have resisted the urge, even in spite of Barcelona's La Liga-winning campaign and the high-octane football they were showcasing in the Champions League prior to their semi-final exit at the hands of Inter Milan. The £90m premium clause from the Coutinho deal is now a relic of a bygone era, a reminder of when Liverpool had to fend off Barcelona's advances with contractual ingenuity. Today, they do so with the confidence of a club at the pinnacle of European football. Diaz's decision to stay, coupled with Liverpool's swift rejection of Barcelona's approach, sends a clear message: Anfield is where dreams are made rather than imagined, and the Reds are no longer anyone's feeder club.
Telegraph
11 hours ago
- Telegraph
British holidaymakers to miss out on compensation after EU rule change
Britons will miss out on compensation for delayed flights after Brussels adopted a rule change following complaints from airlines. Payouts that were previously triggered by delays exceeding three hours will now only be made after four hours of holdups, European transport ministers agreed. The new regulation, hammered out following a decade of discussions and bargaining over passenger compensation, will apply to all services from EU countries to the UK. For the time being, travellers headed from Britain to the Continent will still qualify for a refund when flight delays hit the three-hour mark, unless they are flying with an EU-registered airline. While raising the compensation threshold, ministers also agreed to increase the minimum level of payment from €250 (£210) to €300 for shorter journeys and to €500 for those above 3,500km (2,175 miles). The original regulation, known as EU261, was passed in 2004 with the aim of ensuring that passengers received money and assistance in the event of flights being cancelled at short notice. Following Brexit, the UK adopted it into law so that the rights of travellers remained unchanged. However, the Government will now have to decide whether to adopt the amendments for outbound flights or stick with the original version. Taking no action might be welcomed by consumer groups but would have consequences for UK airlines, which would be at a disadvantage to their European rivals. It could also affect fares, with Ryanair having claimed that EU261 costs passengers £7 per ticket. Airlines for Europe, an industry group, had pressed for a higher compensation threshold, arguing that extending it to five hours – as originally proposed by the European Commission – would allow 70pc of flights that are cancelled to be rescued. It argued said that airlines inevitably scrapped flights once compensation was triggered, especially since the payouts involved were often higher than the ticket prices charged. It said a five-hour threshold would have made it more practical for carriers to fly in replacement aircraft so that more flights would get away, potentially benefiting 10m passengers a year. A spokesman said: 'Getting to their destination is the primary concern of passengers, even if it means getting to bed or arriving at their holiday resort late. But with a low cancellation threshold it makes more sense to call off the flight and take that hit.' Airlines have also railed against the fact that the compensation applies whether delays are caused by a crew shortage or technical issue that might be laid at their door, or by severe weather or air traffic control issues beyond their control. A number of extraordinary circumstances are expected to be added as part of revisions to 31 different air passenger rights. The revisions must still clear the European Parliament but are expected to become law in the bloc by the end of the year. The Department for Transport said the UK did not have to amend its legislation in line with any changes from the EU, and that any potential future reforms would require careful consideration on their merits, and be subject to public consultation.
Scotsman
15 hours ago
- Scotsman
In the insane world of budget airlines better pack your canoe
You pay extra for anything other than the smallest item of baggage (Picture: Adobe) There is a joke currently doing the rounds, which you may well have already heard. I've had it told to me by several friends, and have also seen it on Facebook. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... In the story, RyanAir boss Michael O'Leary notices a sign in a pub window reading 'Happy hour, Guinness £3 a pint'. O'Leary goes to the bar and orders his drink. The bartender asks if he wants a glass, O'Leary says he does and the barman replies 'That will be an extra £2.50'. The customer grudgingly pays up and is about to rest his pint on the counter, when he is told 'Ah, sir, if you're wanting to use the bar, that's an extra pound.' O'Leary angrily walks away from the bar and goes to sit at a table to be told 'Now, sir, if you want to take a seat that will cost an extra £3.50.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'This is outrageous. How can you expect to get away with this?' moans O'Leary, to which the barman replies 'Well, we are the only pub in town selling Guinness at £3 a pint'. OK, a fairly predictable joke, but it's funny because it's true. As I discovered when I checked in for my flight home from the Brighton Fringe. I travelled down by train, a much longer journey than by air but environmentally more responsible. And also with less restrictions on the amount of luggage I could carry, so I took two bags, both of which were fully packed. I flew back from Gatwick on Monday on EasyJet. I had booked a basic ticket which allowed me to carry on one small cabin bag, which had to fit under the seat in front. If I also wanted to take a larger cabin bag to go in the overhead locker, it was going to cost an extra £43.48, which was nearly as much as the original ticket. There's a lengthy price list for bulky items too. For example, it only costs fifty quid to take a canoe on the plane. That's utter madness. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad All 'budget airlines' such as RyanAir operate broadly similar policies. You pay extra for anything other than the smallest item of baggage, then there is an additional charge if you want to choose which seat you sit in. If you're daft enough, you can even order a meal voucher. Presumably the people purchasing this have never had a look through the EasyJet in-flight menu. Anyway, when I came to pack for my flight, there was no way all my stuff would fit in a bag under the seat. The suit I was wearing on stage all week was one I had bought at Primark several years previously for around fifty quid. I know, I shop at EasyJet and Primark. That's how well comedy pays. The suit served its purpose, as it looked OK from a distance and under stage lighting. Up close, you could easily tell it was an extremely cheap piece of tailoring. To take it back to Edinburgh was going to cost roughly the same as the value of the garment. I donated it to a charity shop. In what insane world is it cheaper to buy a suit than to take it home on a plane? Next time I fly, I'm packing everything into a canoe.
