logo
What artificial food dye bans mean for your health and fridge

What artificial food dye bans mean for your health and fridge

CBS News26-03-2025

Growing concerns about the
health effects of food dyes
have led to a
new West Virginia law
banning seven artificial food dyes – but what does this mean for those in other states? And where else are bans in place?
Dr. Céline Gounder, CBS News medical contributor and editor-at-large for public health at KFF Health News, told "CBS Mornings Plus" Wednesday that the impact of West Virginia's move is yet to be seen.
"If this had been California or New York or Texas, that is a different thing, because then you're really having such a big impact on the market. Do manufacturers want to make something different for one state like California versus the rest of the country?" she said. "West Virginia is pretty small, so it's hard to know if this is really just going to mean certain foods just won't be sold in West Virginia, as opposed to separate products being developed for West Virginia."
Nationally, at least 30 color additives are
approved by the Federal Drug Administration
for use in food and drinks, including nine artificial dyes. Those nine require batch certification, meaning the FDA analyzes a sample from each batch of the additive to check if it meets certain requirements before it can be used.
The West Virginia ban is the most sweeping state level food dye regulation in the U.S. and includes:
Starting Aug. 1, these dies will not be in school meals in the state. Starting in January 2028, the dyes, along with preservatives butylated hydroxyanisole and propylparaben, will not be allowed in any foods, beverages or over-the-counter drugs sold in the state.
While you may not know these dyes by name, they can show up in your foods. Red No. 40, for example, can be found in salami, Yellow No. 6 in chicken bullion and Blue No. 1 in canned peas.
Gounder noted that states can follow what's known as the precautionary principle, "which is basically, 'better safe than sorry'" to ban food additives. The FDA, however, needs to go through a scientific process and show evidence of a risk first.
West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey cited Health and Human Services Secretary
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s "Make American Healthy Again"
campaign in a statement released March 24 about the ban.
"West Virginia ranks at the bottom of many public health metrics, which is why there's no better place to lead the Make America Healthy Again mission," he said. "By eliminating harmful chemicals from our food, we're taking steps toward improving the health of our residents and protecting our children from significant long-term health and learning challenges."
Gounder also acknowledged Kennedy's influence.
"It's interesting because this is actually kind of importing European-style regulation to what is a very red, conservative state — so not what you would think of, but I think this is the influence of MAHA," she said. "Frankly, people on both sides of the aisle are really supportive of being healthier in this respect."
In 2023, California became the first state in the U.S. to issue a
ban
of Red No. 3 as well as potassium bromate, brominated vegetable oil and propylparaben. The ban starts in 2027.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom
also signed
legislation
, taking effect in 2028, that bans schools from serving or selling food and drinks with Blue No. 1, Blue No. 2, Green No. 3, Red No. 40, Yellow No. 5 and Yellow No. 6.
Several other states have introduced varying levels of bans or regulations on color additives, according to the
Environmental Working Group
, which advocates for changing industry health standards.
In January, the FDA announced its decision to
revoke the authorization
for one dye, Red No. 3, to be added to foods, after evidence showed a link between the dye and cancer in laboratory animals. Red 3, which is made of petroleum, is what gives a bright cherry-red color to a lot of foods and candies. It has already been banned in cosmetics and topical medications since 1990.
Companies are working to
update their products
to comply with the FDA's decision. They have until Jan. 15, 2027, to stop using the dye, the agency said.
Hundreds of food brands, including products ranging from candy and fruit cups to snack chips and tomato sauce, have contained Red 3 at some point, according to databases maintained by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture
and the nonprofit
Environmental Working Group
, as well as nutrition labels disclosed by food companies.
At the end of 2024, the FDA said it has not formally reevaluated the safety of
Red No. 40
, or Red 40 for short, in over a decade.
Jim Jones
, the former deputy commissioner for human foods, warned at the time their budget was too small.
An FDA study published
in 2016
estimated that children are exposed to Red 40 the most from drinks, frozen desserts and cereal.
Databases published by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture
and nonprofit
Environmental Working Group
tally thousands of foods with Red 40. Medications and cosmetics also have it.
In 2011, a panel of the FDA's food advisers voted against a warning like one that
authorities in Europe issued
for dyes, including Red 40, that says they "may have an adverse effect on activity and attention in children." Most of the advisers said at the time they thought studies fell short of proving causality.
The agency's science board concluded in 2019 that "most children have no effects from consuming foods containing color additives, though some evidence suggested that certain children may be part of a sensitive subpopulation," an FDA spokesperson said.
Gounder said there is "some evidence, at least for some kids" that these dyes can increase certain risks, including hyperactivity, sleeplessness and inattention.
"So especially for those kids where that impact has been seen, and taking those foods away relieves those symptoms, for those kids, especially, it is a good thing," she said.
Most calls to restrict Red 40 stem from research commissioned by British food authorities
in 2007
, which linked increases of hyperactivity in children to mixtures of synthetic dyes.
"If you talk to parents whose kids are sensitive to dyes, they'll tell you how difficult it is to avoid dyes and what a huge change it was for their entire household to try to get these dyes out of their kids' diets," environmental health consultant Lisa Lefferts
previously told CBS News.
For Red 3, the FDA has long said that it does not think evidence of it causing cancer applied to humans, but officials said their hand was forced by a law requiring the agency to pull additives that are cancerous in animals. A post on
the FDA's website
states, "claims that the use of FD&C Red No. 3 in food and in ingested drugs puts people at risk are not supported by the available scientific information."
If you want to limit dye intake, experts say to pay attention to labels.
"You can't look at the color. Even white foods may have synthetic dyes to make it brighter," Gounder previously said.
Alexander Tin
and
Emily Mae Czachor
contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FDA Announces Recall of Over 20 Million Eggs After Salmonella Outbreak in 7 States
FDA Announces Recall of Over 20 Million Eggs After Salmonella Outbreak in 7 States

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

FDA Announces Recall of Over 20 Million Eggs After Salmonella Outbreak in 7 States

On June 6, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that August Egg Company of Hilmar, California, is recalling over 1,700,000 dozen brown cage-free and brown certified organic eggs, totaling over 20 million eggs. The recall was initiated in response to an ongoing investigation by the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) into a multistate outbreak of Salmonella that has sickened 79 people and resulted in 21 hospitalizations so far. While the eggs were produced by August Egg Company, they were sold under multiple brand names at restaurants and retailers. This recall includes eggs sold in 6-, 12-, and 18-count packs as well as larger restaurant boxes under the following brand names: Clover, First Street, Nulaid, O Organics, Marketside, Raley's, Simple Truth, Sun Harvest, and Sunnyside. The recalled eggs were distributed from Feb. 3, 2025, through May 6, 2025, to Walmart locations in nine states: Arizona, California, Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Washington, and Wyoming, These eggs have "sell by" dates ranging from March 4, 2025, to June 4, 2025. The eggs were also distributed from Feb. 3, 2025, through May 15, 2025, to several retailers in California and Nevada, including Save Mart, FoodMaxx, Lucky, Smart & Final, Safeway, Raley's, Food 4 Less, and Ralphs. These eggs have "sell by" dates ranging from March 4, 2025, to June 19, 2025. At this time, the Salmonella outbreak investigation is ongoing, with illnesses reported in seven states: Arizona, California, Kentucky, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, and Washington. The FDA is working to determine if the eggs were distributed to any other retailers in additional states. The recall may be updated as more information becomes available. You can identify the recalled eggs by checking the side of the carton. The recalled eggs feature a printed Julian Date on the side between '32' and '126' followed by a plant code number 'P-6562' or 'CA-5330' on the egg carton or package. The recalled eggs sold to consumers are packed in fiber or plastic cartons, with the above codes printed on one side of the carton. Here is a full list of the recalled eggs, along with their identifying information: Item Name Plant Number Carton UPC Clover Organic Large Brown 12 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 070852010427 First Street Cage Free Large Brown Loose (1 case = 150 eggs) P-6562 or CA-5330 041512039638 Nulaid Medium Brown Cage Free 12 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 071230021042 Nulaid Jumbo Brown Cage Free 12 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 071230021011 O Organics Cage Free Large Brown 6 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 079893401522 O Organics Large Brown 12 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 079893401508 O Organics Large Brown 18 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 079893401546 Marketside Organic Large Cage Free Brown 12 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 681131122771 Marketside Organic Large Cage Free Brown 18 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 681131122801 Marketside Large Cage Free Brown 12 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 681131122764 Marketside Large Cage Free Brown 18 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 681131122795 Raley's Large Cage Free Brown 12 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 046567033310 Raley's Large Cage Free Brown 18 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 046567040325 Raley's Organic Large Cage Free Brown 12 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 046567028798 Raley's Organic Large Cage Free Brown 18 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 046567040295 Simple Truth Medium Brown Cage Free 18 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 011110099327 Simple Truth Large Brown Cage Free 18 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 011110873743 Sun Harvest Organic Cage Free Large Brown 12 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 041512131950 Sun Harvest Organic Cage Free Large Brown 18 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 041512145162 Sunnyside Large Brown Cage Free 12 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 717544211747 Sunnyside Large Brown Cage Free 18 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 717544211754 Sunnyside Organic Cage Free Large Brown 12 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 717544201441 Sunnyside Organic Cage Free Large Brown 18 eggs P-6562 or CA-5330 717544211761 Loose Small Brown Cage Free (1 box = 6 flats) (1 flat = 30 eggs) P-6562 or CA-5330 NA Loose Medium Brown Cage Free (1 box = 6 flats) (1 flat = 30 eggs) P-6562 or CA-5330 NA Loose Medium Brown Organic (1 box = 6 flats) (1 flat = 30 eggs) P-6562 or CA-5330 NA Loose Large Brown Organic (1 box = 6 flats) (1 flat = 30 eggs) P-6562 or CA-5330 NA Loose Jumbo Brown Cage Free (1 box = 5 flats) (1 flat = 20 eggs) P-6562 or CA-5330 NA Loose Jumbo Brown Organic (1 box = 5 flats) (1 flat = 20 eggs) P-6562 or CA-5330 NA You can also view photos of the labels on the FDA website. The recalled eggs are no longer in stores, but the FDA is concerned they may still be in consumers' homes. Per FDA guidance, check your refrigerators for the recalled brown cage-free and brown certified organic eggs. If you have the recalled eggs, throw them away or return them to the original place of purchase for a full refund. If you stored the eggs without their original packaging and can't tell if they are part of this outbreak, the FDA urges you to discard them out of an abundance of caution. Additionally, be sure to carefully clean and sanitize any surfaces that may have come in contact with the contaminated eggs. Further questions about this recall may be directed to August Egg Company at 1-800-710-2554, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. PT. If you believe you have already consumed the recalled eggs, you should monitor yourself for symptoms of a Salmonella infection. The most common symptoms include diarrhea, stomach cramps, dehydration, vomiting, and fever higher than 102°F—and, typically, symptoms begin between six hours and six days after eating the contaminated food. If you're experiencing any of those symptoms, contact your healthcare provider. While most individuals feel better after four to seven days, Salmonella can cause serious infections in children, older individuals, and those with weakened immune systems. To learn more about Salmonella, visit the CDC website. Read the original article on ALLRECIPES

Big Data Can Make America Healthier. How to Do It Right
Big Data Can Make America Healthier. How to Do It Right

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Big Data Can Make America Healthier. How to Do It Right

Credit - Ezra Bailey—Getty Images Big data can help make Americans healthier, and the Trump Administration has stated—in its recently released Make America Healthy Again report and elsewhere—that building a national big-data platform is one of its primary goals. As scientists who use large data sets to study health, we're excited about its potential and the willingness of the federal government to invest in it, particularly since big data has been underutilized in the U.S. compared with other developed countries—and since the number of ways it can be used grows nearly daily. It's a huge opportunity. But there are lots of concerns when assembling sensitive health data and combining it with other sensitive data, like credit scores, tax records, employment, educational records, and more. Some of those concerns with the Administration's plans have already surfaced. The Administration's first goal of assembling big data to studying autism has left some worried that if used inappropriately, such data could lead to harm, rather than help, for those with autism. Others worry that big data could be used to perform and justify shoddy research that supports predetermined conclusions without adhering to rigorous scientific methods—a concern reinforced by the discovery that the Make America Healthy Again report cited non-existent sources to support its claims. So how can we reap the benefits of big data while minimizing its risks? Here are some guiding principles: The health care system already possesses health data on millions of Americans. Medical records are now almost always digitized, permitting doctors' notes, medical imaging, laboratory tests, insurance claims, and more to be linked (in theory) across doctors' offices, hospitals, nursing homes, and any other place people receive care. However, data collected about a patient in one setting often doesn't get connected to data from other settings—making it hard for researchers to get a full picture of what, exactly, is happening to each of us within the larger health care system. Read More: Gun Injuries of All Kinds Go Up During Hunting Season The federal government also has data on us that can be connected to health care data to answer important questions. For example, comprehensive and detailed data on Americans' occupations linked with health, insurance, and other data could help shed more light on relationships between our work and our health—helping to better answer curious questions like why taxi drivers are less likely to die from Alzheimer's disease or why female physicians don't outlive their male colleagues. The first step of making big data more helpful is to simply link the data—which, while possible, is difficult to accomplish without centralized effort. Once linkages have been made, data can be anonymized so that those studying sensitive questions aren't privy to confidential information about specific individuals. In addition to governmental data, many other sources of data can provide insights into our health. For example, smartwatches not only have data on how our hearts are beating (e.g., they can identify abnormal heart rhythms like atrial fibrillation), but they can also identify subtle changes in mobility that might be predictive of early neuromuscular diseases like Parkinson's disease. Meanwhile, grocery stores have data on the foods we eat, and with increasing interest in how diet affects our lives, these data could be linked to detailed measures of health. Read More: Could the Shingles Vaccine Help Prevent Dementia? Similarly, social-media platforms possess data that can offer insights into changes in our mental health, and through large-scale analysis of online photos could even identify, in real time, early visible markers of disease. These are moonshots, of course, and whether we want to use data in this way is an open question. But the potential to improve health could be large. Creating a way for scientists to link outside data to existing government and health data—while responsibly maintaining individual anonymity after the linkage—could open many novel research opportunities. Keeping all of these data sources organized, secure, and accessible to scientists is a tall order. Researchers who use big data often dedicate substantial resources to finding the data they need, organizing it, and ensuring its accuracy; the better the database is maintained, the easier it is for researchers to actually perform their analyses. The secure online platform where Medicare and other government health care data are currently accessed has been described by researchers as 'tedious and prone to system errors' and in need of major improvements. Meanwhile, security concerns have led the government to stop letting researchers store the data on their own secure servers, the easiest and most cost-effective way to actually work with the data. Access to Medicare data by researchers has become prohibitively expensive, costing about $30,000 a year or more for a single user to work on one project using the online platform. Read More: Why We Can't Rely on Science Alone to Make Public Health Decisions Proposals to drastically cut medical research funding have been reported, and if passed, these research funding cuts will come at the cost of discoveries to improve health that will never be made. High-quality research of any kind requires investment, whether it's in a biology lab under a microscope or working with data on powerful computers. A new data platform is only as valuable as researchers' ability to access it in a functional and cost-effective way. Any roadmap to designing a national data platform that links together health care and other sensitive data must consider the many valid concerns about collecting data in the U.S., including privacy concerns and how data will be used. The Pew Research Center finds that large majorities of Americans say they are concerned about how the government uses data collected about them (71%), while also admitting that they have little to no understanding of what the government even does with such data (77%). Here are some strategies—in addition to many of the cybersecurity and privacy safeguards already in place—to both protect the data and help earn the public trust: Mistrust and unease with government data collection is readily traceable to historical abuse of Americans' data (as well as recent allegations of improper access), so it's not surprising that many are wary of the Trump Administration's plans. Ensuring data cannot be weaponized by the government against individuals is perhaps the single biggest barrier to creating a useful database, but it can be done. Those currently using federal health care data must already undergo training and comply with very high data-security standards. Misuse of the data—such as even attempting to figure out the identity of an anonymous individual in the data—or failure to protect patient privacy can lead to criminal penalties. A platform of sensitive data without well-delineated restrictions on who can use it and what they can use it for is a recipe for problems. Other ongoing efforts by the Administration to compile data under the vague goal of 'increasing government efficiency' have been met with pushback and lawsuits from organizations concerned about data being used against members of the public. Current use of federal health data also requires researchers to provide the government detailed plans to justify the use of specific data. This allows the government to ensure that no more data than is needed to answer the specific question is provided to researchers. Read More: Why Do Taxi Drivers Have a Lower Risk of Alzheimer's? Researchers must also obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board prior to accessing and analyzing data, a second checkpoint. These boards, which exist in light of egregious failures of medical research ethics in the 20th century, help ensure that analyses are designed to minimize risk to patients—even if it is only their data, and not their bodies, at risk. Transparency into who is using this sensitive data and what exactly they are doing with it can engender trust between researchers and the American public. Just like researchers already do for clinical trials, those accessing the data platform should specify their plans in advance, and those plans should be easily and publicly available. Transparency around which data were accessed and what computer code was used to analyze it not only promotes trust, but such data- and code-sharing practices among researchers make it easier to appraise the quality of the work, identify mistakes, and root out misconduct. We can only assume that Americans' unease with governmental data use stems from knowledge that, as with all powerful tools, linked data has the potential to be used in potentially harmful ways. But when in the hands of qualified scientists using rigorous scientific methods and privacy safeguards, a robust real-world data platform like this could lead to new discoveries about how all of us can lead healthier lives. Contact us at letters@

Health-E Commerce® expands telehealth offerings with LifeMD™ to provide sleep treatments via FSA Store® and HSA Store®
Health-E Commerce® expands telehealth offerings with LifeMD™ to provide sleep treatments via FSA Store® and HSA Store®

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Health-E Commerce® expands telehealth offerings with LifeMD™ to provide sleep treatments via FSA Store® and HSA Store®

New collaboration delivers 50% off prescription sleep support for new customers who are struggling with insomnia and sleep disruption DALLAS, June 9, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Health-E Commerce, the parent brand of FSA Store and HSA Store, the first and leading online stores dedicated to selling only FSA- and HSA-eligible products and services, announced today that it has expanded its telehealth collaboration with LifeMD™, a leader in virtual care. This latest initiative gives FSA and HSA users affordable, convenient access to FDA-approved prescription sleep treatments at a time when better sleep care is urgently needed. According to the CDC, insufficient sleep is linked to higher risks of obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and depression, which means expanded access to treatment is not just beneficial, it's essential. The arrangement allows new customers who shop at FSA Store or HSA Store to receive 50% off prescription sleep medications from LifeMD, with no in-person appointments required. Following a free virtual consultation, approved patients can have non-addictive, physician-prescribed treatments discreetly delivered to their door, making it easier than ever to address sleep concerns with clinically backed solutions. "The connection between sleep and our overall physical and mental health is undeniable, and poor sleep can even impact our productivity at work and our overall quality of life," said Keri Kaiser, chief revenue officer for Health-E Commerce. "The expansion of our telehealth collaboration with LifeMD gives consumers more options for diagnosing and treating sleep disorders and improving sleep health, while saving money by using tax-free FSA- and HSA-eligible services. We're proud to simplify access to care for millions of Americans and to maximize their healthcare dollars." Many individuals who experience poor sleep rely on over-the-counter remedies that may not be effective for persistent insomnia or sleep disruptions. Fortunately, LifeMD's prescription sleep solutions are designed to address the root causes of poor sleep with medications that target sleep onset, duration, and quality, including Ramelteon, Doxepin, and Trazodone. Eligibility for prescription treatments is determined by a licensed LifeMD physician and backed by LifeMD's 4.9-star patient satisfaction rating. "We're proud to expand our telehealth collaboration with Health-E Commerce to give individuals and families who are enrolled in FSAs and HSAs access to clinical support to improve sleep health and their overall quality of life," said Nicholas Alvarez, co-founder and chief acquisition & growth officer at LifeMD. "Everyone deserves access to quality medical care that is convenient and affordable, and by collaborating with FSA Store and HSA Store, we are able to effectively extend the reach of our services to individuals and families across the country." LifeMD's sleep solutions are now available at and alongside other telehealth services for home sleep apnea testing, CPAP devices and supplies, CPAP alternatives, and more. This launch reinforces Health-E Commerce's mission to make tax-free healthcare dollars work harder for the more than 70 million Americans enrolled in pre-tax health accounts. To learn more or access eligible sleep health services and products, visit or About Health-E CommerceHealth-E Commerce is the parent brand to FSA Store and HSA Store, online stores that serve the 70+ million consumers enrolled in pre-tax health and wellness accounts. The company also created Caring Mill®, a popular private-label line of health products through which a portion of every purchase is donated to the Children's Health Fund. Since 2010, the Health-E Commerce brands have led the direct-to-consumer e-commerce market for exclusively pre-tax health and wellness benefits. Health-E Commerce plays an essential role in expanding eligibility for important new product and telehealth categories within the list of eligible medical expenses. About LifeMDLifeMD offers telemedicine, access to laboratory and pharmacy services, and specialized treatment across more than 200 conditions, including primary care, men's and women's health, weight management, and hormone therapy. The Company leverages a vertically-integrated, proprietary digital care platform, a 50-state affiliated medical group, and a U.S.-based patient care center to increase access to high-quality and affordable care. For more information, please visit View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Health-E Commerce Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store