logo
Can Elon Musk get Tesla back on track? Here are four road bumps

Can Elon Musk get Tesla back on track? Here are four road bumps

Yahooa day ago

After a tumultuous months-long period by President Trump's side, Elon Musk is turning his attention back to his companies, including the stumbling electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc.
Musk announced on X last week that his time as a special government employee was over.
Tesla investors welcomed the news, hoping that Musk's departure from Washington would boost his car company's reputation and lagging performance.
Since Musk began his role leading the White House advisory team called the Department of Government Efficiency in January, Tesla's stock has fallen roughly 12%. On Tuesday, the shares closed at $332, down 3.5%.
The Austin, Texas-based company — which has a significant manufacturing operation in Fremont, Calif., and is the dominant EV company in the state — has been the subject of protests and vandalism as Musk, the company's chief executive, aligned himself with Trump and made controversial spending cuts on behalf of the federal government. The brand damage spread outside the U.S. to Europe, where monthly sales in 32 countries fell nearly 50% in April.
Read more: Tesla profit falls in the wake of brand controversy and tariffs
"It was very important for Musk to end this chapter and start working on Tesla's next stage of growth," Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives said. "Now he can get back to what he's supposed to be doing."
As the executive shifts his focus back to Tesla, here are four challenges experts say he must tackle:
By associating himself with the president and the Trump administration's erratic actions, Musk alienated a large swath of his customers. Many Tesla drivers are liberal-leaning, industry analysts said, and were drawn to the company's environmental mission to take gas cars off the road.
In protest over Musk's activities, some Tesla drivers, including celebrities, began selling or getting rid of their vehicles. Others sported new bumper stickers that said, "I bought this before we knew Elon was crazy."
In February, Tesla topped the list of brands that lost the most resale value year over year, according to data provided by Karl Brauer, an analyst with iSeeCars.com. The price of a used Tesla Model S and Model Y each dropped by about 16% in February from a year earlier.
'Price is a reflection of supply and demand,' Brauer said. 'So it could be that nobody wants to buy them anymore, or that there's a massive influx of them available, or both.'
Read more: 'I've been betrayed.' Tesla drivers are pushing back on Elon Musk
Now that he's left Washington, Musk will have to prove that his attention is on Tesla and that he isn't prioritizing political agendas. Ives estimated that about 5% to 10% of the brand damage sustained during Musk's stint in the capital will be permanent.
'Tesla has become a political symbol around the world and that's not a good thing,' said Ives, who has an "outperform" rating on Tesla's stock. "But there are much brighter days ahead now that Musk is no longer in the White House."
Musk has made lofty promises for years about the capabilities of Tesla's self-driving technology and plans for a robotaxi service. Though he has often over-exaggerated his progress, Musk has taken important steps toward commercializing autonomous driving technology.
The future of his company depends on whether he can follow through, experts said.
"Musk's top priority should be autonomy and robotics," Ives said. "With these technologies, I believe Tesla's market cap could reach $2 trillion." The company is currently valued at just over $1 trillion.
According to claims Musk has made, Tesla drivers will one day be able to sleep in their car as it drives them across the country. Tesla's robotaxis will roam city streets, and humanoid robots dubbed Optimus will perform everyday tasks.
Read more: Tesla Optimus bots were remotely operated at Cybercab event
Brauer compared the emergence of autonomous driving technology to a change on the scale of the internet or smartphones. But it's still far off, he said. Although the driverless taxi company Waymo is already operating in a few cities including Santa Monica, it could take 10 to 15 years for the technology to become widely accessible and integrated into society, Brauer said.
Tesla remains the dominant force in the electric vehicle market, but rapidly increasing competition from traditional carmakers and other EV manufacturers have thinned sales, Brauer said.
Major manufacturers including Ford and Chevy have released lines of their own electric vehicles, while promising startups such as Irvine-based Rivian have cut into Tesla's market share. At the same time, demand for electric vehicles is plateauing as the market gets saturated, Brauer said.
Read more: The plan for Irvine EV maker Rivian to emerge from its 'awkward teenage years'
Tesla's profit plummeted 71% in the first quarter to $409 million as the company faced a flurry of setbacks, including a falloff in automotive sales and rising competition.
To keep up and remain viable, Tesla will have to reassess aspects of its business model.
"Many people, I think including Musk himself, have realized that the current business model is pretty much played out," Brauer said. "He's not going to substantially increase his revenue and his profit selling these same electric cars."
Read more: With an executive order, Trump casts doubt on the future of EVs in California
Tesla could receive a boost in sales if it successfully launched an affordable model accessible to more customers, but despite rumors and claims by executives, a release date has not been announced.
The company could be further hurt by the loss of a $7,500 federal electric vehicle credit, which encourages sales and is likely to be eliminated by the Trump administration.
While chargers for electric vehicles are ubiquitous in many parts of California, infrastructure is lacking throughout large areas of the country — and that's a problem. For the U.S. to rely more heavily on EVs, significant progress has to be made on the network of charging stations, Brauer said.
Read more: Broken chargers, lax oversight: How California's troubled EV charging stations threaten emission goals
Finding a time and place to charge is an obstacle for many Tesla drivers and limits the range of customers Tesla can reach. The lack of a fully comprehensive charging network would also hinder Musk's plans to operate a nationwide robotaxi service, Brauer said.
In California, many chargers are broken or have been intentionally damaged by protesters.
Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Interior Department approves modifying federal coal mining project in Montana
Interior Department approves modifying federal coal mining project in Montana

UPI

time17 minutes ago

  • UPI

Interior Department approves modifying federal coal mining project in Montana

The Department of the Interior Friday announced approval of a mining plan modification for Bull Mountains coal mine in Montana. It authorizes Signal Peak Energy LLC to mine roughly 22.8 million tons of federal coal. Secretary of Interior Doug Burgum (pictured in April) touted it as an example of "energy leadership." File Photo by Ken Cedeno/UPI | License Photo June 6 (UPI) -- The Department of the Interior on Friday announced approval of a mining plan modification for Bull Mountains coal mine in Montana. It authorizes Signal Peak Energy LLC to mine roughly 22.8 million tons of federal coal. It also permits the company to mine 34.5 million tons of adjacent non-federal coal. The mine is in Musselshell and Yellowstone counties and exports coal to Japan and South Korea. "By unlocking access to coal in America, we are not only fueling jobs here at home, but we are also standing shoulder-to-shoulder with our allies abroad," Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement. The Trump administration policy of increasing fossil fuel production stands in stark contrast to Biden administration policies. In October 2024 the Biden administration announced $428 million in funding for 14 federal energy projects in small towns historically known for coal production. The Trump administration is in the process of attempting to undo that clean energy approach while doubling down on coal, oil and gas production. For the Bulls Mountain coal mine, the Interior Department said Friday it is using emergency permitting procedures to disregard normal environmental review. The Interior Department said in an April statement that the procedures reduce what would normally be "a multi-year review process down to just 28 days at most." The department asserts that the procedures using the radically shortened review process still upholds environmental standards. "The Bull Mountains project is proof that we can meet urgent energy needs, work with local communities and uphold strong environmental standards," Acting Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management Adam Suess in a statement. The Interior Department said it is using "alternative arrangements" for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act, the 1969 law requiring federal agencies to assess potential environmental effects of their decisions. According to the Interior Department, "These alternative arrangements apply both to actions not likely to have significant environmental impacts and to actions likely to have significant environmental impacts." The Trump administration is using a so-called national energy emergency declared by President Donald Trump on Jan. 20 to avoid fully complying with full environmental regulations agencies would normally have to follow. Under the alternative arrangements, companies would notify the department they want those alternative arrangements. The official responsible for reviewing the application would then "prepare a focused, concise, and timely environmental impact statement addressing the purpose and need for the proposed action, alternatives, and a brief description of environmental effects." According to the Interior Department, the Bull Mountains project is expected to generate "over $1 billion in combined local, state and county economic benefits, including wages, taxes and business activity."

BRP Inc. (DOOO): A Bull Case Theory
BRP Inc. (DOOO): A Bull Case Theory

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

BRP Inc. (DOOO): A Bull Case Theory

We came across a bullish thesis on BRP Inc. (DOOO) on Kroker Equity Research's Substack. In this article, we will summarize the bulls' thesis on DOOO. BRP Inc. (DOOO)'s share was trading at $40.55 as of 29th May. DOOO's trailing and forward P/E were 22.68 and 10.18 respectively according to Yahoo Finance. BRP Inc. presents a compelling long-term investment case as a dominant player in the recreational powersports market with iconic brands like Ski-Doo, Sea-Doo, and Can-Am. Despite facing steep earnings decline in FY2025 after record profits in FY2024, this downturn appears cyclical rather than structural. The company proactively scaled back production to realign inventory, a decision that impacted short-term results but positions BRP well for a healthier rebound. Its diversified portfolio across seasons and product lines, coupled with a robust parts and accessories business, supports recurring revenues and reinforces its competitive moat. Strategic moves like exiting the underperforming boat segment and investing in electric powersports show management's focus on long-term profitability and innovation, potentially capturing a first-mover advantage in electrification. The company's capital allocation is shareholder-friendly, maintaining dividends and buybacks even through the downturn, reflecting management's confidence in its intrinsic value. Currently trading at low valuation multiples, BRP appears significantly undervalued relative to its normalized earnings potential. A return to historical earnings levels could drive a meaningful re-rating. While the timing of recovery remains uncertain, the brand's strong consumer resonance and the cyclical nature of the downturn suggest eventual mean reversion. Key risks include continued weakness in consumer demand, elevated dealer inventories, and macroeconomic headwinds like interest rates and fuel prices. However, for patient investors, BRP offers the chance to buy a high-quality, market-leading business at a discounted price, with upside potential as the cycle turns and management's strategic initiatives begin to pay off. For a comprehensive analysis of another standout stock covered by the same author, we recommend reading our summary of their bullish thesis on Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). BRP Inc. (DOOO) is not on our list of the 30 Most Popular Stocks Among Hedge Funds. As per our database, 10 hedge fund portfolios held DOOO at the end of the first quarter which was 8 in the previous quarter. While we acknowledge the potential of DOOO as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 8 Best Wide Moat Stocks to Buy Now and 30 Most Important AI Stocks According to BlackRock. Disclosure: None. This article was originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Senate Republicans revise ban on state AI regulations in bid to preserve controversial provision
Senate Republicans revise ban on state AI regulations in bid to preserve controversial provision

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Senate Republicans revise ban on state AI regulations in bid to preserve controversial provision

WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Republicans have made changes to their party's sweeping tax bill in hopes of preserving a new policy that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence for a decade. In legislative text unveiled Thursday night, Senate Republicans proposed denying states federal funding for broadband projects if they regulate AI. That's a change from a provision in the House-passed version of the tax overhaul that simply banned any current or future AI regulations by the states for 10 years. 'These provisions fulfill the mandate given to President Trump and Congressional Republicans by the voters: to unleash America's full economic potential and keep her safe from enemies,' Sen. Ted Cruz, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said in a statement announcing the changes. The proposed ban has angered state lawmakers in Democratic and Republican-led states and alarmed some digital safety advocates concerned about how AI will develop as the technology rapidly advances. But leading AI executives, including OpenAI's Sam Altman, have made the case to senators that a 'patchwork' of state AI regulations would cripple innovation. Some House Republicans are also uneasy with the provision. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., came out against the AI regulatory moratorium in the House bill after voting for it. She said she had not read that section of the bill. 'We should be reducing federal power and preserving state power. Not the other way around,' Greene wrote on social media. Senate Republicans made their change in an attempt to follow the special process being used to pass the tax bill with a simple majority vote. To comply with those rules, any provision needs to deal primarily with the federal budget and not government policy. Republican leaders argue, essentially, that by setting conditions for states to receive certain federal appropriations — in this instance, funding for broadband internet infrastructure — they would meet the Senate's standard for using a majority vote. Cruz told reporters Thursday that he will make his case next week to Senate parliamentarian on why the revised ban satisfies the rules. The parliamentarian is the chamber's advisor on its proper rules and procedures. While the parliamentarian's ruling are not binding, senators of both parties have adhered to their findings in the past. Senators generally argue that Congress should take the lead on regulating AI but so far the two parties have been unable to broker a deal that is acceptable to Republicans' and Democrats' divergent concerns. The GOP legislation also includes significant changes to how the federal government auctions commercial spectrum ranges. Those new provisions expand the range of spectrum available for commercial use, an issue that has divided lawmakers over how to balance questions of national security alongside providing telecommunications firms access to more frequencies for commercial wireless use. Senators are aiming to pass the tax package, which extends the 2017 rate cuts and other breaks from President Donald Trump's first term along with new tax breaks and steep cuts to social programs, later this month. Matt Brown, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store