logo
Texas ICE Attorney Accused Of Running 'Racist' X Account, Black Baltimore Mayor Responds To Scathingly Racist DM, Video Of Spirit Airlines Brawl At ATL Airport Goes Viral, Social Media Challenge Allegedly Kills 13-Year-Old Black California Boy And More

Texas ICE Attorney Accused Of Running 'Racist' X Account, Black Baltimore Mayor Responds To Scathingly Racist DM, Video Of Spirit Airlines Brawl At ATL Airport Goes Viral, Social Media Challenge Allegedly Kills 13-Year-Old Black California Boy And More

Yahoo01-03-2025

An attorney who worked for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been accused of disturbing online behavior. James Rodden, who worked as the agency's assistant chief counsel, allegedly operated a 'racist, bigoted, xenophobic, hateful, harassing and dishonest' X account, according to a legal complaint filed against him. - Candace McDuffie Read More
No one is lost on the reality that racists in America have now been emboldened upon the reelection of President Donald Trump. They're so bold, they snooped themselves into the DMs of the unapologetically Black mayor of Baltimore. His response, though witty, held a lot of truth. - Kalyn Womack Read More
The price of eggs is at a historic high; inflation continues to ravage the country. All while thousands of federal employees have been suspended and thousands more immigrants have been deported. If you're like many Americans across the country who feel helpless in the midst of what seems like a national crisis, then here's your chance to participate in what could become the biggest national boycott in recent times. - Phenix S Halley Read More
A group of travelers waiting in the Atlanta airport were in for a shock when their gate became the scene of an intense fight between fellow passengers. The brawl broke out at the Spirit Airlines gate at Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport on February 19. And while it's unclear what started the confusion, the now-viral footage of the confrontation is spreading like wildfire across practically every social media platform. - Angela Johnson Read More
Black History Month has been rudely interrupted twice now for Black Ohio residents. Weeks after a neo-Nazi demonstration, police say they gave a citation to a man for driving a historically Black neighborhood for a second round of racist trolling. - Kalyn Womack Read More
Ummm… a convicted cannibal just got approved for release from prison by a psychiatric review board. The decision has received tons of backlash from legislators but one person in particular warned against the man's release: the investigator who tracked down Jeffrey Dahmer. - Kalyn Womack Read More
On Feb. 7, a Uhaul van full of neo-Nazis gathered in the predominantly Black Cincinnati suburb of Lincoln Heights. They wore masks and carried guns as they called residents racist slurs. The group of white supremacists also waved flags with red swastikas on a highway overpass. - Candace McDuffie Read More
Unfortunately, the era of participating in harmful, life-threatening social media trends is still among us. In the latest case, the trend in question is alleged to have claimed the life of a 13-year-old boy in Southern California. - Kalyn Womack Read More
Finally, the footage from a fatal San Diego police shooting has been released to the public. The video appears to show a critical piece of information that was left out of the cops' report: the 'suspect' wasn't a suspect. - Kalyn Womack Read More
One of the five cops charged in the brutal beating of Tyre Nichols is back in jail. However, his charges stem from something completely unrelated to the incident. It appears the alleged aggressive behavior his colleagues testified to has gotten him in more trouble. - Kalyn Womack Read More
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge blocks Trump anti-trans passport policy
Judge blocks Trump anti-trans passport policy

USA Today

time20 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Judge blocks Trump anti-trans passport policy

Judge blocks Trump anti-trans passport policy A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from refusing to issue passports to transgender and nonbinary Americans that reflect their gender identities, finding it was likely unconstitutional. Show Caption Hide Caption Trump's ban on transgender troops goes into effect President Trump's ban on transgender troops serving in the military is going into effect while court challenges continue. BOSTON − A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from refusing to issue passports to transgender and nonbinary Americans nationwide that reflect their gender identities, after finding it was likely unconstitutional. U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick in Boston issued a preliminary injunction that expanded an earlier order she issued in April that had stopped the U.S. State Department from enforcing the policy in the case of just six people. Trump issued an executive order immediately upon taking office that the federal government must "recognize only two sexes, male and female," and that "these sexes are not changeable." The Department of State then stopped issuing passports in anything but the applicant's biological sex. The rule caused mass confusion. Trans applicants who had already submitted their passport application, for example, were out of luck. Trans travelers were stopped and accused of using fake passports. Kobick had previously ordered the State Department to issue passports to the six trans and nonbinary people while the case plays out in court. The passport issue is just one example of Trump's government-wide rollback of trans rights. His administration has also taken measures such as banning transgender people from serving in the military, which the Supreme Court upheld in May. Contributing: Reuters

G7 statement supporting Ukraine kiboshed after U.S. demand to ‘water down' language
G7 statement supporting Ukraine kiboshed after U.S. demand to ‘water down' language

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

G7 statement supporting Ukraine kiboshed after U.S. demand to ‘water down' language

KANANASKIS, ALTA. — A joint G7 statement supporting Ukraine in the face of its invasion by Russia was kiboshed during the summit after the U.S. refused to sign on unless it was watered down, according to a Canadian government official. Coming into the two-day summit of the world's wealthiest economies, the source said six of the seven member countries (Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Italy and the U.K.) had agreed on 'strong language' for a statement supporting Ukraine. But the shared statement hit a fatal roadblock when it was presented to the Americans on Saturday, the official said during a background briefing for reporters. The U.S. delegation said it would only sign on if the language was watered down significantly, said the source. They added that the Americans were reluctant to endorse the communiqué's 'strong language' as they try to bring Russian President Vladimir Putin back to the negotiation table. The source was not able to detail what in the draft statement the U.S. wanted watered down. But the changes were too significant for the other six states and the impasse was never resolved, the source said. Instead, much of the text from the failed joint statement is expected to find its way into Canada's closing statement as chair of this G7 summit. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The impasse illustrates the growing divide within the G7 on certain issues like the war in Ukraine, with some observers suggesting that the summit is looking more like the G6 plus U.S. President Donald Trump. Trump has been far less critical of Putin and his invasion of Ukraine than his G7 compatriots during his presidency, going so far as calling for the Russian leader to rejoin the summit. Monday, Trump told reporters during a photo op with Prime Minister Mark Carney that excluding Russia from the then-G8 in 2014 was a 'big mistake.' At the time, Russia was excluded after its invasion of Crimea, a prelude to its full-scale invasion of Ukraine years later. The lack of a joint G7 statement supporting Ukraine is all the more notable because Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy travelled to Canada to attend part of the summit. All leaders except Trump, who left the summit abruptly Monday evening to tend to the growing conflict between Israel and Iran, also attended a meeting session on the situation in Ukraine Tuesday morning. During a bilateral meeting with Zelenskyy, Mark Carney announced further Canadian sanctions against dozens of Russian organizations or individuals and over $4 billion in additional support for Ukraine. Zelenskyy thanked Carney for his invitation and his 'very important words, warm words' and support for Ukraine. 'Ukraine has had, our family has had, a very difficult night, one of the biggest attacks from the very beginning of this war,' said Zelenskyy said, alluding to an overnight missile attack on Kyiv, which he said killed 12 people and injured 130. 'It was a big attack on civilian infrastructure.' National Post, with additional reporting from Tyler Dawson. cnardi@ Carney announces billions in funding for Ukraine at G7 meeting G7 leaders vow to tackle migrant smuggling and foreign interference Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.

Judge says government can't limit passport sex markers for many transgender, nonbinary people
Judge says government can't limit passport sex markers for many transgender, nonbinary people

San Francisco Chronicle​

time22 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Judge says government can't limit passport sex markers for many transgender, nonbinary people

BOSTON (AP) — A federal judge expanded a ruling Tuesday that blocked the Trump administration from enacting policy changes to sex markers on passports for many transgender and nonbinary Americans. In an executive order signed in January, the president used a narrow definition of the sexes instead of a broader conception of gender. The order says a person is male or female and it rejects the idea that someone can transition from the sex assigned at birth to another gender. U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick granted a motion to apply her earlier ruling to people who want a passport different than the male/female sex designation they were given at birth and those who want an X designation. The ruling applies only to those people who are currently without a valid passport, those whose passport is expiring within a year, and those who need to apply for a passport because theirs was lost or stolen or because they need to change their name or sex designation. Initially the ruling only applied to the six plaintiffs in the case. Last month Kobick, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, sided with the American Civil Liberties Union's motion for a preliminary injunction, which stays the action while the lawsuit plays out. It requires the State Department to allow six transgender and nonbinary people who are plaintiffs in the lawsuit to obtain passports with sex designations consistent with their gender identity. 'The Executive Order and the Passport Policy on their face classify passport applicants on the basis of sex and thus must be reviewed under intermediate judicial scrutiny,' Kobick wrote. 'That standard requires the government to demonstrate that its actions are substantially related to an important governmental interest. The government has failed to meet this standard.' In its lawsuit, the ACLU described how one woman had her passport returned with a male designation while others are too scared to submit their passports because they fear their applications might be suspended and their passports held by the State Department. Another mailed in their passport on Jan. 9 and requested a name change and to change their sex designation from male to female. That person was still waiting for their passport, the ACLU wrote in the lawsuit, and feared missing a family wedding and a botany conference this year. In response to the lawsuit, the Trump administration argued the passport policy change 'does not violate the equal protection guarantees of the Constitution.' They also contended that the president has broad discretion in setting passport policy and that plaintiffs would not be harmed by the policy, since they are still free to travel abroad.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store