logo
All of Trump's options as president faces his most consequential decision yet

All of Trump's options as president faces his most consequential decision yet

Daily Mirror5 hours ago

Will Donald Trump bow to Netanyahu's calls for escalation in the Middle East, hold his nerve and wait, or listen to MAGA voices urging him to pull back from the brink?
Donald Trump is facing the most consequential decision of his presidency since returning to the White House.
The US president must decide whether to carry out military strikes on Iran and risk dragging America into a new Middle East war, or resist the pressure and stand by his campaign promise to end 'forever wars'. The former reality TV star-turned-president has signed off on detailed strike plans, including the use of bunker-busting bombs to target Iran's underground nuclear sites, but has so far stopped short of giving the final order to attack.

'There are a lot of things in motion,' a senior US official told the Mirror. 'But the President wants to keep his options open until the very last moment.' Trump is walking a geopolitical tightrope, caught between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's demands for American military might, growing MAGA sentiment at home, and his own instinct for spectacle and legacy.

Trump himself summed up the dilemma from the Oval Office this week: 'I like to make the final decision one second before it's due. Especially with war, things change with war. It can go from one extreme to the other.' He is reportedly wary of becoming 'bogged down' in the region but is open to arguments that limited, decisive strikes could deliver a clear win and a legacy-defining moment.
Whether he yields to Netanyahu, backs MAGA or tries to thread the needle may come down to a single question: Does Trump see more glory in restraint or retribution? As one Washington source put it: 'This won't just be about strategy. It'll be about ego. Trump wants to be remembered; the question is for what.'
As the world waits, what options does Trump now have?
Option One: Strike and secure his place in history
Sources say Trump is being heavily lobbied by Netanyahu, who insists only the United States has the firepower to 'end Iran's nuclear ambitions once and for all'. The Israeli leader claims Tehran is mere weeks away from a working bomb - a point US spies disagree with - and has urged Trump to act before it's too late.
With Israel already bombing Iranian enrichment and missile sites, and claiming to have assassinated top nuclear scientists, Netanyahu wants Washington to deliver the final blow. And for Trump, the lure of legacy could be decisive. One adviser said: 'He wants to be remembered as the man who ended Iran's nuclear programme. Barack Obama gave them a deal. Trump wants to be the one who took the bomb away.'

That thinking plays directly to Trump's ego - a man who craves being seen as strong, decisive, and history-making. Yet the risks are colossal. Iran has already warned that any US involvement will result in 'irreparable damage'. American bases in Iraq, Egypt, Qatar, Kuwait and the Gulf are within striking range, and a wider regional conflict could erupt almost overnight.
Option Two: Stay the course and wait
So far, Trump has tried to balance strength with restraint. He has deployed additional warships and bombers to the region and remains in close contact with Israeli officials. But he has also signalled he wants to see how far Israel can go alone before committing US firepower.

European diplomats say US allies were told over the weekend that the White House would assess Israel's progress during the initial phase of operations before making a final call. Privately, Pentagon officials fear a 'limited' strike could spiral, and Trump himself is keenly aware of the risks.
'He doesn't want to look weak,' said one insider. 'But he doesn't want to sleepwalk into another war either.' Waiting allows Trump to keep the pressure on Iran while avoiding direct involvement for now. But it is a delicate gamble. One miscalculation or American casualty could force his hand.

Option Three: Step back and stick to MAGA
The loudest opposition to any military action is coming not from opposition Democrats, but from Trump's own base. MAGA-aligned voices like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon and Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene have all urged the president to avoid another 'endless war in the Middle East'.
Greene said true Trump supporters 'do not support foreign intervention' and accused Republicans backing strikes of being 'fake America First'. Their message echoes Trump's re-election campaign pledges.
He won the White House twice by promising to bring US troops home, tear up international entanglements, and put 'America First.' A source close to the Trump campaign said: 'If he goes to war, he betrays his base. They didn't elect him to be Bush. They elected him to end these wars.'
But MAGA's message clashes with Trump's desire to look strong on Iran. Walking away could be spun as weakness, something the president finds anathema.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Irish leaders call for ‘immediate de-escalation' between Iran and Israel
Irish leaders call for ‘immediate de-escalation' between Iran and Israel

Leader Live

time21 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Irish leaders call for ‘immediate de-escalation' between Iran and Israel

Irish premier Micheal Martin said Iran should make clear it will not pursue further enrichment of uranium. Irish deputy premier Simon Harris, who is also the minister for foreign affairs, said work was ongoing at EU level to engage with citizens in Israel and Iran who may wish to leave. Iran and Israel have been striking each other's territory for a week, deepening the crisis in the Middle East. Israel said it launched an attack to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran has insisted its nuclear programme is peaceful, but it is the only non-nuclear-armed state to enrich uranium up to 60%, far in excess of the levels required for power stations and a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%. After a missile attack on a hospital in southern Israel, defence minister Israel Katz said Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 'absolutely should not continue to exist'. US President Donald Trump has also reportedly been considering involving the US by targeting a uranium enrichment facility in Iran. Asked what role Ireland can play in the crisis, Mr Martin said Ireland and the EU can urge 'restraint and de-escalation'. 'The world needs stability and it needs peace – and dialogue is the way to resolve the nuclear issue in terms of Iran,' the Taoiseach told RTE Radio. 'Iran has been a malign actor in the Middle East for quite a long time in terms of supporting Hezbollah, Hamas the Houthis – it's a theocratic autocratic state. 'But there was dialogue on the way between Iran and the United States on that issue, I think that should restart. 'I think Iran should make it very clear that it will not pursue further enrichment of uranium, or indeed progress to developing nuclear bomb capacity.' Meanwhile, Mr Harris said there was a 'massive effort' at EU level to support citizens and diplomats in Iran and Israel. He said the EU was engaging with Germany, France and the UK to persuade the Iranians back into talks. 'It is almost impossible to overstate the potential danger of this, if there ends up being involvement of other countries, or indeed spill-over into other countries,' he said on Thursday. 'Ireland, whilst far away in one way, does obviously have a number of citizens in both countries, have a significant number of troops in Lebanon, is very concerned about the situation in Palestine, so there's quite a lot of moving parts in this.' He told RTE Radio: 'Nobody wants to see Iran with nuclear capabilities. 'Everybody is aware of the dangers that Iran poses, but at the same time, the way you resolve these issues is through the talks that were scheduled to take place and which were obviously ultimately postponed as a result of Israeli (incursion).' He said Irish embassies had contacted citizens in Iran and Israel on Wednesday who would like to leave when the opportunity arises. There are around 29 Irish citizens and 12 dependants in Iran, and 200 Irish citizens in Israel. 'There's the massive effort at a European level to make sure we try to provide support to our own citizens and our own diplomats in what is becoming a really dangerous environment and a really difficult environment in which to operate from and function from as well,' he told RTE Radio. He said that as the airspace is closed in Iran, evacuation would mean going over the land border, and for those in Israel it means travelling to Jordan or Egypt. 'There are a number of options available to us. We're working very closely with a number of member states, and we're also having to now, in a very serious way, also look at how we best support our diplomats, because the situation is deteriorating quite significantly in terms of being able to effectively operate in the country, and also obviously safety and security issues,' he said.

Fear and hope as Israel and Iran exchange barrages of missile and drone strikes
Fear and hope as Israel and Iran exchange barrages of missile and drone strikes

NBC News

time26 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Fear and hope as Israel and Iran exchange barrages of missile and drone strikes

'Everything happened so fast. I didn't expect that. We heard some fighter jets, we saw some air defense systems shooting objects which were probably drones,' he said. 'We are all terrified, and we don't know what to predict, but we don't want this war.' As the first explosions were going off, people started sending panicked messages to their relatives abroad. Azam Jangravi, an Iranian human rights advocate who lives in Canada, showed NBC News the texts she received from her 17-year-old cousin, Donya, in Tehran. 'It's so frightening,' the girl wrote. 'While the call to prayer is being broadcasted, you keep hearing these booms, one after another.' Like Jangravi, thousands of Iranians abroad have been anxiously trying to reach their relatives back home, but with very little luck. Communications are patchy and increasingly difficult. According to the site NetBlocks, which monitors internet access worldwide, on Thursday there was a near-total internet blackout in the country as Iranian authorities have shut down the network. For Jangravi, Iranians are being caught between two warring sides. 'Two governments are fighting on our land,' she said. 'In the first days of the war, people were happy because they thought they'd kill Khamenei, but right now they don't have any hope,' she said referring to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store