Teenagers in England typically have ‘worse socio-emotional skills'
Teenagers in England typically have worse socio-emotional skills than their peers in other countries, a report has suggested.
The socio-emotional skills of pupils aged 15-16 in England are significantly weaker than many of their peers in comparator countries, according to the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER).
If left unaddressed, these weaknesses could have consequences for young people's future employability, the researchers have warned.
The NFER study examines the socio-emotional skills of young people in England – based on scores of assertiveness, co-operation, curiosity, emotional control, empathy, persistence and stress resistance – compared to those of other countries that were part of a major international study.
The 2022 Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa), which is an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) study, measured the socio-emotional skills of 15-year-olds in 31 countries.
The NFER research, funded by the Nuffield Foundation, said: 'Young people in England typically have worse socio-emotional skills at the end of lower secondary school (age 15/16) than the OECD average, and inequalities in these skills are also greater in England than any other country in our data.'
Researchers found that England ranks in the bottom ten countries of the countries that measured socio-emotional skills in the OECD study.
The working paper added: 'Inequalities in children's socio-emotional skills are also higher in England than any other country in our data, which appears to be driven by large inequalities in children's emotional control, stress resistance, assertiveness and perseverance.'
Researchers have suggested that the relatively poor socio-emotional skills of 15-16 year olds in England could be an indication that young people have lower Essential Employment Skills (EES) when they leave education than their peers across the OECD.
The report also found that 15-16-year-olds in the UK typically have better maths, reading and science skills compared to their peers across OECD countries.
But inequalities in these skills are 'marginally greater' in the UK and they have not narrowed over the past decade, it added.
The study has called on the Government to explore what more it could do to incentivise schools to promote the development of children's socio-emotional skills – like communication and collaboration.
It also called on the government to create a clear Early Years workforce strategy as it highlighted the importance of high-quality Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) for children's skill development.
Jude Hillary, the programme's principal investigator and NFER's co-head of UK policy and practice, said: 'Socio-emotional skills are very important for young people's employment prospects as well as their life satisfaction and general wellbeing.
'This research suggests we need to do more, earlier in children's lives to support their social and emotional development and give them the best possible start.
'If we fail to prioritise these skills, we are potentially not just limiting individual wellbeing and potential – we are weakening the future workforce and economy of the UK.'
The NFER report also called on the Government to consider introducing targeted funding for disadvantaged pupils in 16-19 education.
Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'Socio-emotional skills are important not just in the workplace but for forming strong and successful relationships in all areas of life, and the inequalities identified in this report are concerning.
'We agree that more needs to be done to support the social and emotional development of all children from a young age.
'Improving access to early years education is key to closing the disadvantage gap, and this will require an uplift in funding and staffing levels.'
He added: 'We have long called for reform of the pupil premium to provide funding for disadvantaged 16 to 19 year-olds which matches that for younger pupils.
'Educational inequalities do not disappear at this age, and this should be reflected in funding levels to ensure schools and colleges are able to support all students as they prepare to enter the workplace or engage in further study.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26-05-2025
- Yahoo
Estonia eschews phone bans in schools and takes leap into AI
While many schools in England have banned smartphones, in Estonia – regarded as the new European education powerhouse – students are regularly asked to use their devices in class, and from September they will be given their own AI accounts. The small Baltic country – population 1.4 million – has quietly become Europe's top performer in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's programme for international student assessment (Pisa), overtaking its near neighbour Finland. In the most recent Pisa round, held in 2022 with results published a year later, Estonia came top in Europe for maths, science and creative thinking, and second to Ireland in reading. Formerly part of the Soviet Union, it now outperforms countries with far larger populations and bigger budgets. There are multiple reasons for Estonia's success but its embrace of all things digital sets it apart. While England and other nations curtail phone use in school amid concerns that it undermines concentration and mental health, teachers in Estonia actively encourage pupils to use theirs as a learning tool. Now Estonia is launching a national initiative called AI Leap, which it says will equip students and teachers with 'world-class artificial intelligence tools and skills'. Licences are being negotiated with OpenAI, which will make Estonia a testbed for AI in schools. The aim is to provide free access to top-tier AI learning tools for 58,000 students and 5,000 teachers by 2027, starting with 16- and 17-year-olds this September. Teachers will be trained in the technology, focusing on self-directed learning and digital ethics, and prioritising educational equity and AI literacy. Officials say it will make Estonia 'one of the smartest AI-using nations, not just the most tech-saturated'. Kristina Kallas, Estonia's minister of education and research, said during a visit to London this week for the Education World Forum: 'I know the scepticism and carefulness of most of the European countries regarding screens, mobile phones and technology. The thing is that in the Estonian case, society in general is much more open and prone to using digital tools and services. Teachers are no different.' Kallas said there were no mobile phone bans in schools in Estonia. On the contrary: a smartphone is seen as part and parcel of Estonia's highly successful digital education policy. 'I've not heard of any problems, to be honest,' she said. 'The schools establish the rules, which are followed on a local level. We use mobile phones for learning purposes.' She added: 'We have local elections coming in October this year. In local elections, 16-year-olds can vote, and they can vote online through their mobile phones. So we want them to use mobile phones to do their civic duty, to participate in an election, to get the information, to analyse the political platforms. 'It's a little bit strange if we would not allow them to use them in school, in an educational setting. That would be a very confusing message to 16-year-olds – vote online, vote on a mobile, but don't use ChatGPT on your phone to do education learning.' Kallas insisted: 'We are not banning. We've given guidelines, especially regarding younger children – younger than 12 and 13 years old – when it comes to how mobile phones should be used or should not be used, but most schools have regulated it themselves. 'They have regulated it so that mobile phones are not used during the breaks, and in the lessons they are used when the teacher asks for the phones to be taken out because there is some assignment or exercise that is done with the help of phones.' Rather than trying to resist new technology, Estonia has embraced it. In 1997 there was huge investment in computers and network infrastructure as part of its Tiigrihüpe (Tiger Leap) programme. All schools were rapidly connected to the internet. Now smartphones and AI are seen as the next step. Kallas talks about an AI revolution entailing the end of essays for homework, a farewell to the memorise/repeat/apply learning model relied on for hundreds of years, and a shift to oral exams. The challenge is to develop higher cognitive skills in young people, because AI can do the rest better and faster. 'It's a matter of urgency,' she said. 'We are facing this evolutionary, developmental challenge now. We either evolve into faster-thinking and higher-level-thinking creatures, or the technology will take over our consciousness.'
Time Business News
18-05-2025
- Time Business News
An Overview of the Top Biodegradability and Compostability Testing Standards and their Differences
Understanding the Various Biodegradability and Compostability Testing Standards In an era where sustainability has become a global priority, both businesses and consumers are actively seeking environmentally friendly solutions. One important aspect gaining attention is the testing of biodegradability and compostability. These tests ensure that materials, products, and packaging meet specific environmental standards, contributing to a healthier planet. Various biodegradability and compostability testing standards and methods exist to assess the environmental impact of products. These standards differ based on the type of material being evaluated, the intended application of the product, and the specific environmental conditions being simulated. What is Biodegradability and Compostability Testing? Biodegradability testing evaluates a material's ability to break down into natural elements (like water, carbon dioxide, and biomass) through the action of microorganisms within a specific timeframe. Compostability testing encompasses biodegradability as well as disintegration and ecotoxicity testing. It assesses whether a material can decompose in composting environments without leaving toxic residues. Let us explore the various biodegradability and compostability testing standards and some of the key differences between the different protocols. OECD 301 and 302 Series – Ready and Ultimate Biodegradability: Application: These tests apply to a wide range of substances, not limited to plastics. Testing Conditions: They evaluate aerobic biodegradation in various environments, including water and soil. Duration: The tests are typically shorter term, spanning four weeks or longer. These tests apply to a wide range of substances, not limited to plastics. OECD 311 and ASTM D5210 – Anaerobic Biodegradation: Application: This standard is used for the assessment of biodegradability under anaerobic conditions. Testing Conditions: It simulates the conditions found in anaerobic digesters using a digestive sludge as the biomass, where oxygen is limited. Duration: The test period is typically longer than aerobic tests, often lasting two months. This standard is used for the assessment of biodegradability under anaerobic conditions. OECD 306 and ISO 17556: Application: These tests are applicable to a wide range of substances, not limited to plastics. Testing Conditions: They evaluate aerobic biodegradation in marine seawater environments. Duration: The tests are typically over a two-month testing period. These tests are applicable to a wide range of substances, not limited to plastics. ISO 16221 and ASTM D5988 – Aerobic Biodegradation in Soil: Application: These tests are applicable to a wide range of substances, not limited to plastics. Testing Conditions: It assesses aerobic biodegradation in soil under controlled laboratory conditions. Duration: The test typically lasts for six months, simulating the breakdown of materials in a soil environment. These tests are applicable to a wide range of substances, not limited to plastics. ASTM D6400 – Compostability: Application: This standard is relevant for products claiming to be compostable under industrial composting conditions. This standard was designed to evaluate plastic materials. However, it is commonly applied to materials/products that fall outside of these specific definitions. Testing Conditions: They assess the ability of materials to undergo composting in industrial composting facilities. Duration: Composting testing consists of multiple tiers of testing that include biodegradability, disintegration, and ecotoxicity. The total process usually takes a minimum of six months. This standard is relevant for products claiming to be compostable under industrial composting conditions. This standard was designed to evaluate plastic materials. However, it is commonly applied to materials/products that fall outside of these specific definitions. ASTM D6868 – Compostability: Application: This standard is relevant for products claiming to be compostable under industrial composting conditions. This standard was designed to assess products that only incorporate plastics/polymers as coatings or additives. However, it is commonly applied to materials/products that fall outside of these specific definitions. Testing Conditions: They assess the ability of materials to undergo composting in industrial composting facilities. Duration: Composting testing consists of multiple tiers of testing that include biodegradability, disintegration, and ecotoxicity. The total process usually takes a minimum of six months. This standard is relevant for products claiming to be compostable under industrial composting conditions. This standard was designed to assess products that only incorporate plastics/polymers as coatings or additives. However, it is commonly applied to materials/products that fall outside of these specific definitions. *This standard requires that any plastic coating or polymeric additives present in the product be evaluated for biodegradability individually. The ASTM D6868 also offers a testing alternative for chemically unmodified materials of natural origin. EN 13432 – Compostability: Application: This European standard is specifically for packaging materials. Testing Conditions: It assesses compostability under controlled composting conditions. Duration: Composting testing consists of multiple tiers of testing that include biodegradability, disintegration, and ecotoxicity. The total process usually takes a minimum of six months. This European standard is specifically for packaging materials. AS 5810 – Compostability: Application: This Australian standard is relevant for products claiming to be compostable under home composting conditions. This standard was designed to evaluate plastic materials. However, it is commonly applied to materials/products that fall outside of these specific definitions. Testing Conditions: It assesses compostability under home composting conditions. Duration: Composting testing consists of multiple tiers of testing that include biodegradability, disintegration, and ecotoxicity. The total process usually takes a minimum of six months. This Australian standard is relevant for products claiming to be compostable under home composting conditions. This standard was designed to evaluate plastic materials. However, it is commonly applied to materials/products that fall outside of these specific definitions. It is important to note that these standards are often specific to certain types of materials or products (e.g., plastics, packaging, etc.). When evaluating biodegradability and compostability claims, it is crucial to use the appropriate biodegradability and compostability testing standard that aligns with the intended application and disposal conditions of the product in question. Additionally, the regulatory landscape may vary by region, and compliance with specific standards may be required for certain markets. Please contact RespirTek at 228.392.7977 to schedule a free 30-minute consultation with our technical team to learn more about the various biodegradability and compostability testing standards, and which standard best suits your overall objectives. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Entrepreneur
16-05-2025
- Entrepreneur
College Majors With the Lowest Unemployment Rates: Report
An analysis of employment data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York shows that some humanities majors rank higher than STEM majors in employment prospects. Majoring in nutrition, art history, or philosophy could set you up for more employment success than majoring in a STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) field like chemistry or physics. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York tracked the unemployment rate for recent college graduates ages 22 to 27 and found that it hit 5.5% in February, above the 2.6% rate experienced by college graduates of all ages. The bank published data that month showing that some college majors were more affected by unemployment than others. According to the bank, the college majors with the lowest unemployment rates for the calendar year 2023 were nutrition sciences, construction services, and animal/plant sciences. Each of these majors had unemployment rates of 1% or lower among college graduates ages 22 to 27. Art history had an unemployment rate of 3% and philosophy of 3.2%, each below the national average nationwide unemployment rate of 4.2% in April. Related: Goldman Sachs CIO Says Coders Should Take Philosophy Classes — Here's Why Meanwhile, college majors in computer science, chemistry, and physics had much higher unemployment rates of 6% or higher post-graduation. Computer science and computer engineering students had unemployment rates of 6.1% and 7.5%, respectively. Still, those fields were among the most highly compensated. Both computer engineering and computer science had median early-career annual earnings of $80,000, one of the highest out of any discipline. In comparison, art history majors earned $45,000 per year while philosophy majors made $48,000 and nutrition majors $75,000. All three fields had higher salaries than the median personal income in the U.S. in 2023, which was $42,220. Over 32% of computer science college graduates went on to obtain master's degrees or higher, compared to 48% of art history and nutrition students, and 58% of philosophy majors. Most students who majored in chemistry or physics also obtained graduate degrees. Nearly 68% of physics and 66% of chemistry students in college decided to pursue and receive higher degrees. Physics graduates were among the most highly compensated, with median annual earnings of $70,000. Chemistry lagged behind with a median yearly pay of $55,000. Related: These 3 Professions Are Most Likely to Vanish in the Next 20 Years Due to AI, According to a New Report Companies are increasing their recruitment of humanities majors to obtain diverse perspectives. Last year, BlackRock's chief operating officer, Robert Goldstein, spoke at a conference about the investment company's need for humanities majors, even though the firm focuses on finance and technology. "We have more and more conviction that we need people who majored in history or English, in things that have nothing to do with finance or technology," Goldstein said. "It's that diversity of thinking and diversity of people and diversity of looking at different ways to solve problems, that really fuels innovation." According to Federal Reserve Bank of New York data, history majors and English majors each made around $45,000 in median annual earnings, with an unemployment rate of around 4.6%. Goldman Sachs' Chief Information Officer, Marco Argenti, also noted last year that a standard engineering degree might not suffice anymore, particularly as AI learns to write high-quality code. Argenti suggested that it may be necessary to pair a computer science degree with an additional degree in philosophy. In April, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella stated that the company's engineers are using AI to write 20% to 30% of code, while Google CEO Sundar Pichai said on an earnings call that Google was using AI to write "well over 30%" of new code. Related: 'Maybe We Do Need Less Software Engineers': Sam Altman Says Mastering AI Tools Is the New 'Learn to Code'
