
Virginia Lawmakers Eye State Food Safety Measures Amid Federal Rollbacks
As the federal government scales back food safety oversight, Virginia lawmakers are preparing to take matters into their own hands.
On Wednesday, state Sen. Ghazala Hashmi (D-Chesterfield) and Del. Mark Sickles (D-Fairfax) voiced growing concern over sweeping cuts to federal food safety agencies—changes they say could jeopardize public health and undermine recent policy goals championed by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
While Kennedy has spearheaded efforts to eliminate synthetic food dyes linked to health issues in children—an initiative mirrored in a Virginia law signed by Gov. Glenn Youngkin banning such additives in school meals—the state lawmakers argue that simultaneous federal rollbacks send mixed signals.
'We are seeing contradictory actions coming from the federal government,' said Hashmi. 'On the one hand, there's talk of improving health, and on the other, we're dismantling the infrastructure that ensures food safety.'
Federal Oversight Shrinks
Key federal agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Department of Agriculture (USDA), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) play critical roles in inspecting food, tracking outbreaks, and prosecuting violations. However, under recent directives tied to the Trump administration and Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, several components of this system have been dismantled:
The DOJ unit handling food-related prosecutions has been disbanded.
CDC data-tracking teams have been cut.
A Biden-era rule limiting salmonella in raw poultry was withdrawn.
Two USDA food safety advisory panels were dissolved.
The FDA has been criticized for withholding public information about foodborne illness investigations.
Hashmi pointed to a recent Washington Post investigation about an Indiana child who nearly died after consuming E. coli-contaminated lettuce. Although the FDA internally identified the contamination source, the public was never informed.
'The FDA, under the Trump and RFK administration, has decided not to name names or alert the public to real dangers,' said Hashmi. 'That lack of transparency puts lives at risk.'
State-Level Action in the Works
In response, Virginia lawmakers are exploring new state regulations to help bridge the gaps left by weakened federal oversight. As chair of the Senate Education and Health Committee, Hashmi says she's already pursuing measures modeled on her efforts to reform special education standards.
Del. Sickles, chair of the House Health and Human Services Committee, plans to make food safety a priority at a July legislative 'boot camp' focused on state health services. He emphasized that Virginia's General Assembly—long reliant on federal regulators—must now take a more active role.
'We can't afford to assume the federal government has this covered anymore,' Sickles said. 'We need to be vigilant.'
Limits of State Protections
Still, some experts warn that state-level efforts can only go so far. Sarah Sorscher, regulatory affairs director at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, noted that because food often crosses state lines, isolated policies may leave consumers vulnerable.
'Virginia could pass strong laws, but if food is coming from states with weaker standards, the risk remains,' said Sorscher. 'This is why federal coordination is so important.'
Despite these limitations, both Hashmi and Sickles say they are committed to taking all available steps to protect Virginians—especially in the absence of strong national standards.
'We are doing what we can at the state level,' Hashmi said. 'But we need federal accountability to truly keep our food safe.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who pressured India into ceasefire?: Congress demands answers on Operation Sindoor, terms of peace with Pakistan
NEW DELHI: As the fog surrounding Operation Sindoor begins to lift, the Congress on Saturday launched a direct attack on the Modi government, demanding clarity on the terms of the ceasefire with Pakistan following India's retaliatory strikes for the Pahalgam terror attack. Senior leaders Mallikarjun Kharge and Pawan Khera accused the government of 'misleading the nation' and questioned whether it had demanded the extradition of most-wanted terrorists from Islamabad. What were the conditions of peace with Pakistan? At a press conference in Delhi, Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera raised sharp questions: 'When will the terrorists behind the Pahalgam attack be caught? Who procured the RDX for Pulwama? Under what pressure was the ceasefire with Pakistan finalised?' Khera asked if India had used the moment to demand the extradition of Hafiz Saeed, Masood Azhar, and Dawood Ibrahim. 'We want strong answers to strong questions,' he said, adding, 'Was justice served to the women who lost their husbands in Pahalgam?' India had launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and PoJK in response to the attack in Pahalgam. The strikes were followed by Pakistani retaliation, which was successfully repelled by India, including airbase assaults. Kharge: 'Trump's claim contradicts Shimla Agreement' Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge added weight to the criticism, alleging that Prime Minister Narendra Modi was using the military operation for electoral gain. Referring to an interview given by India's Chief of Defence Staff (CDS) in Singapore, Kharge said, 'Important questions must be asked now that the fog of war is clearing.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trading CFD dengan Teknologi dan Kecepatan Lebih Baik IC Markets Mendaftar Undo He cited the CDS's remarks acknowledging that Indian Air Force jets were briefly grounded, recalibrated, and then redeployed within two days. 'We salute their courage. But a strategic review is urgently needed,' Kharge said. He reiterated Congress's demand for a comprehensive review of India's defence preparedness by an independent expert committee, similar to the post-Kargil assessment. Kharge also flagged former US President Donald Trump's repeated assertions that he helped broker the ceasefire. 'This is a direct affront to the Shimla Agreement. Instead of clarifying Trump's claims, PM Modi is on a campaign spree, taking credit for the bravery of our armed forces while remaining silent on the terms of the ceasefire.' Congress demands special Parliament session Calling the matter too serious to ignore, Kharge demanded that the government immediately convene a special session of Parliament to discuss Operation Sindoor and its aftermath. 'Are India and Pakistan being hyphenated again? What were the real terms behind the ceasefire announced by our Foreign Secretary on the 10th, just hours after Trump's tweet?' he asked. '140 crore patriotic Indians deserve to know this,' Kharge concluded.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump's next targets for immigration crackdowns revealed—here's the list
US President Donald Trump's administration has now revealed a broad list of 'sanctuary jurisdictions" for states, cities, and counties it criticises for 'deliberately and shamefully' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws, as per a report. A List to 'Expose and Hold Accountable' The Department of Homeland Security has reportedly published the list to 'expose lawless jurisdictions and hold them accountable' because they pushed back against federal immigration enforcement, according to DailyBeast report. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said, 'These sanctuary city politicians are endangering Americans and our law enforcement in order to protect violent criminal illegal aliens,' quoted DailyBeast. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo ALSO READ: Donald Trump binges on burgers and fries, but first lady Melania's favorite food will surprise you! Noem also mentioned that, 'We are exposing these sanctuary politicians who harbor criminal illegal aliens and defy federal law. President Trump and I will always put the safety of the American people first. Sanctuary politicians are on notice: comply with federal law,' as quoted in the report. Live Events What Are Sanctuary Jurisdictions? The DailyBeast wrote in its report, "Sanctuary jurisdictions—such as entire states like California and major cities including New York City and Chicago—are typically Democrat-run areas that limit or deny cooperation with federal immigration authorities. This includes refusing to notify Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) before releasing undocumented migrants from custody." Donald Trump's Promise of Mass Deportations According to DailyBeast, those who are named on the list would get a formal notification from the Trump administration about their alleged noncompliance with federal laws, and DHS would also demand that these jurisdictions 'immediately review and revise their policies' to align with the US president's immigration agenda. This comes as Trump has promised to conduct what he has boasted will be the largest deportation of undocumented migrants in American history during his second term in the White House, as per the report. Democratic Governors Push Back While, a Democrat, Colorado Gov. Jared Polis, said, 'It is important for local law enforcement to continue to fully cooperate with other state and federal agencies on criminal matters, including the execution of warrants. In fact, this is their duty,' adding, 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws and taken away from fighting crime,' quoted DailyBeast. FAQs What happens to places on the list? They'll receive formal warnings and be asked to change their laws to support Trump's immigration agenda. Which places are on the list? Major cities like New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and entire states such as California and Colorado have been named.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
COVID-19: US FDA approves new lower-dose Moderna-made vaccine — Check details
The U.S. approved a new COVID-19 vaccine made by Moderna late Friday but with limits on who can use it — not a replacement for the company's existing shot, but a second option. The new vaccine, mNexspike, is a step toward next-generation coronavirus vaccines. It's made in a way that allows for a lower dose — a fifth of the dose of its current COVID-19 vaccine, Spikevax — by refining its immune target. The approval 'adds an important new tool to help protect people at high risk of severe disease from COVID-19,' Stephane Bancel, Moderna's CEO, said in a statement Saturday. The Food and Drug Administration approved the new vaccine for use in all adults 65 and older, and for people age 12 to 64 who have a least one health condition that puts them at increased risk from the coronavirus. That's the same limit that the FDA set in licensing another COVID-19 vaccine option from competitor Novavax. Those restrictions are a departure from how the U.S. has handled COVID-19 vaccines until now, reflecting skepticism about vaccines from Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and other Trump officials. Moderna's existing vaccine doesn't face those limits and has long been used for anyone ages 6 months and older. The company said it expected to offer both options this fall. The FDA's approval was based on a study of 11,400 people age 12 and older that compared the new low-dose vaccine with Moderna's existing vaccine. It found the new vaccine was safe and was at least as effective — and more by some measures — than the original shot, the company said. The news came just days after the Trump administration canceled funding for Moderna to develop a vaccine against potential pandemic flu viruses, including the H5N1 bird flu, despite promising early study results. The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.