Trump administration's funding freeze for foreign medical research to hit European scientists
ADVERTISEMENT
The Trump administration has frozen funding for most collaborations between medical researchers in the United States and abroad, with ripple effects to come for thousands of Europe-based scientists.
The US National Institutes of Health (NIH) – the world's largest biomedical research agency – cited a lack of transparency around how its money is spent overseas and the need to protect US national security in the policy issued on Thursday.
The NIH allocated more than $35 billion (€33.6 billion) to universities, medical schools, and other institutions in 2023. Most of that money is spent in the US, but organisations there often partner with research teams based abroad.
These international partners are considered NIH sub-awardees, and are now in the new policy's crosshairs.
In 2023, the most recent year with data available, there were 4,800 NIH-funded projects with collaborators in Europe,
US government data
shows, though that doesn't necessarily mean they are all active.
Related
Europe wants to poach US academics in wake of Trump funding cuts. Can it entice them to move?
The projects span everything from HIV vaccine development to discovering how certain genes raise the risk of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD).
The policy immediately eliminates all future grants, including the possibility of renewal for ongoing projects. The NIH plans to replace the sub-award programme with another funding mechanism by late September.
The agency said that it is not revoking funding for current projects that have foreign partners, but left open the possibility that it could do so in the future.
For Maria Yazdanbakhsh, who heads the Leiden University Center for Infectious Diseases in the Netherlands, the policy creates uncertainty for the future of international collaboration on medical research – such as her NIH-funded project working toward a more effective malaria vaccine.
Related
Health in 2024: The biggest medical breakthroughs and research that gave us hope this year
'We were going to apply for more funding to continue with the exciting outcomes of the project,' Yazdanbakhsh told Euronews Health, adding that 'we will be affected in the future, where promising work is halted and is not taken further'.
Going forward, Europe-based researchers can apply for direct funding from the NIH, which is rarely awarded to scientists outside the US. The agency said this will enable it to track how the money is spent more closely.
This fiscal year, the NIH is directly funding only
17 Europe-based projects
, down from 129 last year; 10 are based in the United Kingdom, while there are two each in France and the Netherlands, and one each in Sweden, Finland, and Austria.
For now, these direct grants are not on the chopping block, but researchers say they fear they could be next.
Direct awards from the US NIH to institutions in Europe
'There are far-reaching consequences,' Nicola Stonehouse, a virologist at the University of Leeds studying enteroviruses on an NIH-funded grant, told Euronews Health.
'How easy it's going to be for people outside of the US to be involved in these [medical research] projects going forward, that's an open question,' she added. The decision 'really damages international collaboration'.
ADVERTISEMENT
Dr Alain Fischer, an immunologist and emeritus professor at the Collège de France, noted that these sub-awards typically aren't for much money, telling Euronews Health the change is 'more symbolic than anything else'.
Scientists are used to working with peers from other institutions and countries, often without any money attached, Fischer said.
Related
Who is Jay Bhattacharya, Donald Trump's pick to lead the National Institutes of Health?
But the NIH sub-awardee cutoff will present 'an additional hurdle' that will squeeze international collaboration at a time when securing funding is already highly competitive, he said.
The foreign funding freeze is the Trump administration's latest move to reshape the country's scientific establishment. In recent months, the NIH has cancelled hundreds of grants and cut billions of dollars in overhead costs for biomedical research, which has been challenged in court.
ADVERTISEMENT
The NIH and its parent agency, the US health department, did not respond to a Euronews Health request for details on how the new policy will affect Europe-based scientists in particular.
But in a statement, NIH chief Dr Jay Bhattacharya cited a recent audit by the US government watchdog, which found oversight-related problems for 36 per cent of sub-awards issued outside of the US.
Related
European scientists call for 3% of GDP to be devoted to research
He said the change will 'enhance our capabilities to provide effective oversight and management of these financial obligations in support of rigorous scientific research'.
Meanwhile, Tazdanbakhsh called on European Union policymakers to take steps to minimise the impact of US cuts on European scientists.
ADVERTISEMENT
'I wish the [European Commission] would find mechanisms to mitigate such risks,' she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Trump-Musk showdown threatens US space plans
So when President Donald Trump threatened on Thursday to cancel Elon Musk's federal contracts, space watchers snapped to attention. Musk, the world's richest person, shot back that he would mothball Dragon -- the capsule NASA relies on for crew flights -- before retracting the threat a few hours later. For now, experts say mutual dependence should keep a full-blown rupture at bay, but the episode exposes just how disruptive any break could be. Founded in 2002, SpaceX leapfrogged legacy contractors to become the world's dominant launch provider. Driven by Musk's ambition to make humanity multiplanetary, it is now NASA's sole means of sending astronauts to the ISS -- a symbol of post–Cold War cooperation and a testbed for deeper space missions. Space monopoly? The company has completed 10 regular crew rotations to the orbiting lab and is contracted for four more, under a deal worth nearly $5 billion. That's just part of a broader portfolio that includes $4 billion from NASA for developing Starship, the next-generation megarocket; nearly $6 billion from the Space Force for launch services; and a reported $1.8 billion for Starshield, a classified spy satellite network. Were Dragon grounded, the United States would again be forced to rely on Russian Soyuz rockets for ISS access -- as it did between 2011 and 2020, following the Space Shuttle's retirement and before Crew Dragon entered service. "Under the current geopolitical climate, that would not be optimal," space analyst Laura Forczyk told AFP. NASA had hoped Boeing's Starliner would provide redundancy, but persistent delays -- and a failed crewed test last year -- have kept it grounded. Even Northrop Grumman's cargo missions now rely on SpaceX's Falcon 9, the workhorse of its rocket fleet. The situation also casts a shadow over NASA's Artemis program. A lunar lander variant of Starship is slated for Artemis III and IV, the next US crewed Moon missions. If Starship were sidelined, rival Blue Origin could benefit -- but the timeline would almost certainly slip, giving China, which aims to land humans by 2030, a chance to get there first, Forczyk warned. "There are very few launch vehicles as capable as Falcon 9 -- it isn't feasible to walk away as easily as President Trump might assume," she said. Still, the feud could sour Trump on space altogether, she added, complicating NASA's long-term plans. SpaceX isn't entirely dependent on the US government. Starlink subscriptions and commercial launches account for a significant share of its revenue, and the company also flies private missions. The next, with partner Axiom Space, will carry astronauts from India, Poland, and Hungary, funded by their respective governments. Private power, public risk But losing US government contracts would still be a major blow. "It's such a doomsday scenario for both parties that it's hard to envision how US space efforts would fill the gap," Clayton Swope, deputy director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told AFP. "Both sides have every reason to bridge the disagreement and get back to business." Signs of a rift emerged last weekend, when the White House abruptly withdrew its nomination of e-payments billionaire Jared Isaacman -- a close Musk ally who has twice flown to space with SpaceX -- as NASA administrator. On a recent podcast, Isaacman said he believed he was dropped because "some people had some axes to grind, and I was a good, visible target." The broader episode could also reignite debate over Washington's reliance on commercial partners, particularly when one company holds such a dominant position. Swope noted that while the US government has long favored buying services from industry, military leaders tend to prefer owning the systems they depend on. "This is just another data point that might bolster the case for why it can be risky," he said. "I think that seed has been planted in a lot of people's minds -- that it might not be worth the trust."
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
Musk threatens to decommission SpaceX's Dragon capsule in Trump feud
SpaceX founder Elon Musk has threatened to decommission a key space capsule used to take supplies to the International Space Station as part of his ignited feud with US President Donald Trump. Musk started the conflict by calling Trump's "Big Bold Beautiful Bill," a budget reconciliation bill, a "digusting abomination" on his social media platform X. The post ignited a series of back-and-forth blows between Trump and Musk over social media. Trump then threatened to cancel government contracts given to Musk's SpaceX and Starlink internet services, which Musk then responded to by saying he would decommission the Dragon spacecraft immediately. Musk later said he wouldn't decommission the craft in response to an account called Alaska (with no apparently relation to the US State) that called the back and forth a "shame" and asked Musk to "step back for a few days," to "cool off." The Dragon capsule, developed with the help of government contracts, is an important part of keeping the International Space Station (ISS) running. The US' space agency NASA also relies heavily on SpaceX for other programmes including launching science missions and, later this decade, returning astronauts to the surface of the Moon. SpaceX is the only US company capable right now of transporting crews to and from the space station, using its four-person Dragon capsules. Boeing's Starliner capsule has flown astronauts only once; last year's test flight went so badly that the two NASA astronauts had to hitch a ride back to Earth via SpaceX in March, more than nine months after launching last June. SpaceX also uses a Dragon capsule for its own privately run missions. The next one of those is due to fly next week on a trip chartered by Axiom Space, a Houston company. The company has used its rockets to launch several science missions for NASA as well as military equipment. Last year, SpaceX also won a NASA contract to help bring the space station out of orbit when it is no longer usable. SpaceX's Starship mega rocket is what NASA has picked to get astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon for the first two landing missions. Russia's Soyuz capsules are the only other means of getting crews to the space station right now. The Soyuz capsules hold three people at a time. For now, each Soyuz launch carries two Russians and one NASA astronaut, and each SpaceX launch has one Russian on board under a barter system. That way, in an emergency requiring a capsule to return, there is always someone from the US and Russia on board. With its first crew launch for NASA in 2020 — the first orbital flight of a crew by a private company - SpaceX enabled NASA to reduce its reliance on Russia for crew transport. The Russian flights had been costing the US tens of millions of dollars per seat, for years. NASA has also used Russian spacecraft for cargo, along with US contractor Northrup Grumman. The EU published a digital strategy on Thursday to diversify and expand digital alliances with "like-minded partners" such as Japan, South Korea, Canada and India, but no mention was made of the US. This year, digital trade agreements with Singapore and South Korea were signed to facilitate data flows - despite critics warning it could pave the way for threats to personal data. The bloc also plans to structure its growing diplomatic network through the creation of a Digital Partnership Network, aimed at connecting these relationships in a more strategic and coordinated way. But while the strategy highlights a wide array of partners, the absence of references to further meeting under the EU-US Trade and Technology Council (TTC) with the United States was notable. This forum of discussion between the two blocs on trade and technology was created in 2020 to de-escalate tensions during US President Donald Trump's first mandate. Quizzed by Euronews on the future of the TTC, Tech Commissioner Henna Virkkunen replied that trade negotiations were currently the priority - without elaborating. While the EU's other big tech competitor, China, is also absent from the strategy – Virkkunen said that digital cooperation will be discussed during the July 2025 EU-China summit. In its immediate neighbourhood, the bloc is prioritising integration with the EU Digital Single Market notably for Ukraine, Moldova and the Western Balkans – to assist integration into the EU. These countries will benefit from support to align with EU rules on areas such as digital identity, secure infrastructure and regulatory frameworks, paving the way for potential mutual recognition of digital services. In Africa, Asia and Latin America, the strategy builds on the Global Gateway initiative, the EU's strategic response to China's Belt and Road adopted in 2021. Through this framework, the EU is co-financing the deployment of secure submarine cables, AI factories, and digital public infrastructure, while, according to Commissioner Virkkunen, promoting European tech standards and regulatory models abroad. The Commission said that they will move forward with the implementation of new digital partnerships, including preparations for agreements with countries in the Southern Neighbourhood and sub-Saharan Africa. A dedicated Tech Business Offer, a mix of private and public EU investment, will be rolled out to support digital projects in partner countries. A first meeting of the new Digital Partnership Network is also planned, involving representatives from the EU and its partner countries. Meanwhile, joint research programmes are set to be launched with Japan, Canada and South Korea, notably in quantum technologies and semiconductors.
France 24
2 days ago
- France 24
Japanese company abandons Moon landing mission after losing contact with spacecraft
Japan 's hopes of achieving its first soft touchdown on the Moon by a private company were dashed Friday when the mission was aborted after an assumed crash-landing, the startup said. Tokyo-based ispace had hoped to make history as only the third private firm -- and the first outside the United States -- to achieve a controlled arrival on the lunar surface. But "based on the currently available data... it is currently assumed that the lander likely performed a hard landing", the startup said. "It is unlikely that communication with the lander will be restored" so "it has been decided to conclude the mission", ispace said in a statement. The failure comes two years after a prior mission ended in a crash. The company's unmanned Resilience spacecraft began its daunting final descent and "successfully fired its main engine as planned to begin deceleration", ispace said Friday. Mission control confirmed that the lander's positioning was "nearly vertical" -- but contact was then lost, with the mood on a livestream from mission control turning sombre. Technical problems meant "the lander was unable to decelerate sufficiently to reach the required speed for the planned lunar landing", ispace said. High-profile payloads To date, only five nations have achieved soft lunar landings: the Soviet Union, the United States, China, India, and most recently Japan. Now, private companies are joining the race, promising cheaper and more frequent access to space. On board the Resilience lander were several high-profile payloads. They included Tenacious, a Luxembourg -built micro rover; a water electrolyser to split molecules into hydrogen and oxygen; a food production experiment; and a deep-space radiation probe. The rover also carried "Moonhouse" -- a small model home designed by Swedish artist Mikael Genberg. "I take the fact that the second attempt failed to land seriously," CEO Takeshi Hakamada told reporters. "But the most important thing is to use this result" for future missions, he said, describing a "strong will to move on, although we have to carefully analyse what happened". Last year, Houston-based Intuitive Machines became the first private enterprise to reach the Moon. Though its uncrewed lander touched down at an awkward angle, it still managed to complete tests and transmit photos. Then in March this year, Firefly Aerospace's Blue Ghost -- launched on the same SpaceX rocket as ispace's Resilience -- aced its lunar landing attempt. Never quit The mood ahead of Friday's attempt had been celebratory, with a watch party also held by ispace's US branch in Washington. After contact was lost, announcers on an ispace livestream signed off with the message: "Never quit the lunar quest." The mission had also aimed to collect two lunar soil samples and sell them to NASA for $5,000. Though the samples would remain on the Moon, the symbolic transaction is meant to strengthen the US stance that commercial activity -- though not sovereign claims -- should be allowed on celestial bodies. Landing on the Moon is highly challenging as spacecraft must rely on precisely controlled thruster burning to slow their descent over treacherous terrain. Intuitive Machines' second attempt at a Moon landing ended in disappointment in late March. Its spacecraft Athena, designed to touch down on a spot called the Mons Mouton plateau -- closer to the lunar south pole than any previous mission -- tipped over and was unable to recharge its solar-powered batteries.
