Turkey's Erdogan appoints legal team to draft new constitution
Mr Erdogan, who has led Turkey as president since 2014 and was prime minister for more than a decade before that, has advocated for a new constitution arguing that the current one, which was drafted following a military coup in 1980, is outdated and retains elements of military influence even though it was amended several times.
'As of yesterday, I have assigned 10 legal experts to begin their work, and with this effort, we will proceed with the preparations for the new constitution,' Mr Erdogan told his ruling party's local administrators in a speech.
'For 23 years, we have repeatedly demonstrated our sincere intention to crown our democracy with a new civilian and libertarian constitution.'
Under the current constitution, Mr Erdogan cannot run again unless early elections are called or the legal framework is changed.
Critics see the push for a new constitution as a possible path for re-election, allowing legal changes that would bypass the constitutional term limits.
Mr Erdogan, who has grown increasingly authoritarian over the years, has denied seeking a new constitution in order to remain in power, saying last week, 'we want the new constitution not for ourselves, but our country'.
Mr Erdogan's ruling party and its nationalist allies lack the votes needed to usher in a new constitution.
Some analysts believe the government's recent effort to end the decades-long conflict with the militant Kurdistan Workers' Party, or PKK, is part of a strategy to gain the support of a pro-Kurdish party in parliament for the new charter.
The effort to introduce a new constitution comes months after Ekrem Imamoglu, the popular mayor of Istanbul and a key Erdogan rival, was arrested and jailed on corruption charges.
His arrest has been widely viewed as politically motivated, although the government insists Turkey's judiciary is independent and free of political influence.
It triggered widespread demonstrations calling for his release and an end to Turkey's democratic backsliding under Mr Erdogan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
Turkey's Erdogan repeats opposition to interest rates, but says economic plan to continue
ANKARA, May 30 (Reuters) - Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan on Friday vowed to continue his opposition to interest rates, while saying Ankara was determined to press on with its current economic programme until all of its goals are achieved. Turkey had launched the programme to reverse the effects of Erdogan's unorthodox views that interest rates cause inflation. Under the programme, the central bank had tightened its policy to contain rampant inflation and a currency crisis caused by the president's perceived influence over monetary policy. Speaking at a Global Islamic Economy Summit in Istanbul, Erdogan, a self-proclaimed "enemy" of interest rates, said work must be done to change and find alternatives to what he called an interest rates-based economic system, and added such a system cannot be viewed as legitimate. "I have always opposed the distorted system that deepens inequalities, disrupts income justice, and turns billions of people into the slaves of a handful of capitalists. I oppose it again. I have often said that, no matter what, we cannot view as legitimate interest rates and an economic system based on interest rates," Erdogan said. "I will continue to voice my longing for an interest rate-free economy from now on too. We will not turn back from our battle for the economic order based on interest rates to change," he added. However, the president also vowed to continue implementing the economic agenda drafted by his finance minister, Mehmet Simsek, in order to chart a path of disinflation after consumer prices in Turkey soared. "We are determined to implement our economic programme, with which we have made noteworthy progress over the past two years, until it reaches its goals," he said, and added that the end goal was to achieve single-digit inflation.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Met Police silent after unlawful seizure of journalist Asa Winstanley's property
A reported 10 officers from the Metropolitan Police had raided Asa Winstanley's home in October 2024 and confiscated items including his laptop and mobile phone, despite having no legal right to do so. The police force then put in a retrospective request for a Production Order, which would have made their actions lawful. However, it was denied earlier this week. Winstanley writes for the pro-Palestine website Electronic Intifada as well as running a Substack blog called Palestine is Still the Issue. READ MORE: BBC Question Time audience member in fiery Israel exchange with Labour MP Writing on his blog after the court ruling, Winstanley said: 'My legal team successfully argued that the police should have instead asked to speak to me, rather than raiding my home and seizing the devices I use for my journalism.' He went on: 'Even the police themselves, in November correspondence with my lawyers, conceded that the warrants they used to search my home were unlawful. 'In any event, there was no need for them to access private devices and documents simply to confirm the author of a public Twitter account. Such access would have endangered my contacts and violated my duty to protect my journalistic sources. 'To date, I have been neither arrested nor charged with any crime. 'I call on the police to drop their ongoing investigation into my tweets and to apologise for the unlawful raid on my home and seizure of my devices. They should provide compensation for the harm caused to me and my family, as well as for any detriment to my journalistic contacts and sources.' Asa Winstanley (Image: X/Asa Winstanley) The National Union of Journalists had supported Winstanley. Its general secretary, Laura Davison, said: 'This ruling resoundingly affirms journalists' right to protect sources as enshrined in law. 'The seizure of our member's property was a brazen attempt to intimidate journalists working in the public interest. Abusing counter-terror legislation to stifle press freedom undermines public trust in the police, journalists' safety, and democracy. 'Just weeks ago the UK Prime Minister stood up in Parliament and spoke about the importance of a free press and independent journalism. We urge the government to make good on their words and prevent the targeting of journalists, like Asa Winstanley, through raids and detentions. 'We welcome the judge's verdict and seek urgent clarity on police plans to prevent further unlawful investigations of journalists.' Winstanley was represented by solicitor Tayab Ali, from Bindmans. READ MORE: Gerry Adams wins €100k in libel trial as jury finds BBC 'did not act in good faith' Ali said: 'This ruling is a resounding victory for press freedom and the rule of law. The actions of the police, raiding a journalist's home under the guise of counter-terrorism, were not only unlawful but a grave threat to the democratic principle that journalists must be able to work without fear of state harassment. 'The court recognised that the warrants were unlawfully obtained, the police conduct was unjustified, and their attempt to retrospectively legitimise the raid failed. This case was not about national security, it was about silencing a journalist who had made comments on the situation in Gaza. 'The police acted improperly by applying for warrants at the Magistrates Court where there simply is no power to retain journalistic and privileged material and despite repeated warnings refused to concede they had acted unlawfully. 'The police should now urgently review why this happened and what policy decisions led to this unlawful violation on journalistic freedom.' The Solicitors Journal reported that the "significant ruling has raised questions about the conduct of the police and their subsequent failure to issue an apology or discontinue the ongoing investigation into Winstanley's journalistic work". The Met Police have still not responded to a request for a comment put in on May 28.
Edinburgh Live
4 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
Next country on Vladimir Putin's hit list after Ukraine named by former CIA chief
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A former CIA chief has issued a stark warning that Vladimir Putin could expand his aggressive campaign into Europe if he succeeds in Ukraine, with one particular nation in his crosshairs. David Petraeus, who led the agency from 2011 to 2012, cautioned that the Russian leader might target the Baltic states next, particularly after intensifying attacks in Ukraine. According to Petraeus, Putin is poised for a significant summer offensive, having ramped up drone and missile strikes to weaken Ukrainian resolve. Now, Petraeus believes, Putin's ambition is to conquer all of Ukraine before advancing on a country he often mentions. During a session at the Policy Exchange think-tank in London, Mr Petraeus outlined Russia's strategy to oust Zelensky and install a pro-Russian regime. "Russia seeks to remove Zelensky and replace him with a pro-Russian puppet," he declared, suggesting that the Kremlin's ultimate goal is to "install a puppet leader and to control all of Ukraine". Petraeus then warned that following this, Putin's gaze would turn towards "one of the Baltic states", adding, "Once that's done, you are going to see them focus on one of the Baltic states," reports the Mirror. He specifically highlighted Lithuania as a potential target, noting: "Lithuania has featured prominently in his speeches and we should have listened a lot more." Long before the conflict in Ukraine erupted in 2022, Putin had repeatedly claimed that Ukraine was an integral part of Russia, asserting that Ukrainians and Russians were "one people". In 2020, he declared: "Kyiv is the mother of Russian cities. Ancient Rus' is our common source and we cannot live without each other." Similar assertions have been made about Lithuania by Kremlin-supported entities. The prominent Russian foreign-policy institute MGIMO released a 400-page tome on Lithuanian history, alleging it was founded solely as a vehicle for Polish terrorism. The publication, which includes a foreword penned by Putin's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, further contends that Lithuania's secession from the disintegrating USSR in 1991 was illegitimate and undemocratic. Lithuanian authorities are acutely conscious of Russia's overt antagonism towards their nation, having recently disclosed an evacuation strategy for their capital, Vilnius, in case of an invasion. The national government has also channelled funds into fortifying its border defences, particularly at a vital border juncture known as the Suwałki Gap. This location has long been regarded as one of the most probable launch points for a Russian assault on Lithuania, with Lithuanian Deputy Defence Minister Tomas Godliauskas informing POLITICO that the enhancements are "critical to us from a security and defence perspective". Mr Godliauskas further remarked: "They've always been part of our civil-military planning as key ground routes for allied support during a crisis."
