Improving literacy among foundation pupils must be a national priority
Addressing SA's literacy challenge from the early years is fundamental to improving quality and efficiency throughout the education system.
Our country's constitutional promise is that all South Africans should achieve their potential — and the ability to read for meaning is the primary capability which propels learning as a means of achieving that potential.
In our constitutional democracy based on democratic values, social justice and fundamental human rights, creating access to the conditions necessary to achieve literacy is the responsibility of the state — through the basic education system — and supported by families.
All of the data available on achieving foundational literacy shows not only that our children are not achieving the levels of reading performance our curriculum requires in order for pupils to succeed in primary school, but that pervasive inequalities in the conditions under which children are learning to read continue to reinforce inequality in reading achievement, and shape subsequent unequal trajectories in learning and consequent life-opportunities.
Learning to read requires the realisation that symbols in text — squiggles on pages — can represent the meaning of the spoken word.
This realisation comes from environments in which text is used for sharing information, for pleasure, for communal activities.
What follows is the acquisition of the correspondence of elements of the written text to its corresponding sound and propelled by meaning-making.
Reading to children, sharing pleasure in making sense of words on a page in storytelling, abundant opportunities to read accessible text in the first language of the child with supportive guidance where necessary are all essential for the early development of literacy ang give wings to a lifelong engagement with text for multiple purposes.
But these conditions are not equally available to all children at home and at school.
Recognising the material inequalities which perpetuate inequalities in learning achievement and taking the necessary steps to correct systemic deficiencies — particularly in schools — is an essential first step and investment in addressing injustices of access to learning.
Children who cannot read for meaning by grade 4 fall further and further behind as the curriculum increasingly depends on the independent reading of text across all subjects.
It must be a national priority to target the improvement of literacy (and numeracy) from the foundation phase of schooling as a powerful disrupter of inequality.
The steps which are necessary must include attention to the pupils most at risk of falling behind in foundational literacy and making the achievement of the conditions necessary for success non-negotiable.
Is SA, succeeding in achieving the conditions necessary for early reading achievement?
In 2024, the department of basic education released the results of the SA Systemic Evaluation (SASE) which was conducted in 2022 in schools across all provinces.
This is a sample-based assessment.
It does not assess all children as was the case with the Annual National Assessments, but gives a dipstick sense of trends.
The results are unequivocal and confirm two key findings of international comparative studies in which SA participates: by grade 3 our pupils are not reading at the required level; and the patterns of poorer reading follow the contours of under-resourcing at home and school.
T he department's SASE established a baseline that in 2022 only 20% of grade 3 pupils level demonstrate the understanding and skills required for reading in grade 3.
These results are further disaggregated across and within provinces by socioeconomic quintile
The evidence is clear that reading achievement is lower in schools serving poorer communities.
If we are to disrupt cycles of poverty, we must start with empowering children from our poorest communities to read confidently from the foundation phase.
Pervasive deficiencies in the learning and teaching environments in which children should be taking their first steps towards reading with confidence must be addressed.
This requires foundation-phase classrooms in which all pupils have access to attractive books appropriate to the child's reading development in their home/first language, in which the number of children in the class conforms with national norms so that the teacher can be in touch with and respond to the reading needs of each child, and in which all teachers are professionally supported to improve their practice.
This is not the case in schools serving the poorest children.
While the department aims for a limit of 45 pupils in a class, its 2017/18 School Monitoring Survey showed that for grade 3, 48% of classes in the poorest schools across the country had more than 40 pupils, and 23% had more than 50 pupils.
In the Free State and Limpopo, there were more than 60 in a class.
In Mpumalanga, Limpopo, and the Eastern Cape more that 20% of grade 3 teachers reported having classes larger than 70.
The survey also showed that only 46% of grade 3 children had language 'textbooks
We do not have enough data about the availability of reading material in classrooms, or for pupils to take home to read for pleasure.
Children need access to reading material to learn to read.
Investment in improving literacy in the foundation years must be a national priority.
This must go beyond broad declarations of intent and must be visible in evidence-based planning which is aligned to realistic assessments of the resources required, and the resources available accompanied by a determination to address the resource gaps.
This must be informed by the rigour of learning from research — and from evaluations of what is working in interventions in which the government and the private sector are collaborating. Mary Metcalfe is a professor of practice at the University of Johannesburg's school of public management, governance & public policy, and is a national planning commissioner.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
NPA seeks extension to finalise charges in Pule Mabe corruption case
Kamogelo Moichela | Published 9 hours ago The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has requested additional time to finalise the charge sheet in the corruption case involving former African National Congress (ANC) national spokesperson Pule Mabe. During court proceedings on Tuesday, State prosecutor Magdaline Montwedi-Mclean confirmed that while all relevant documents had been handed over to the defence, the finalised charge sheet remains outstanding. Montwedi-Mclean assured the court that the prosecution was in the final stages of preparing the charge sheet and committed to presenting it before the next scheduled hearing. "The State has since furnished all the accused with the charge sheet from the docket, which was the State's first draft of the charge sheet,' she said. The defence legal teams have requested access to the final charge sheet at least one week before the next court date, as proceedings in the corruption case. The matter was postponed to July 7, following a brief appearance by Mabe and his six co-accused at the Johannesburg Commercial Crimes Court, sitting in Palm Ridge, on Tuesday. The group faces a total of 16 charges, including fraud, money laundering, and violations of the Public Finance Management Act. The charges stem from a controversial R27 million tender awarded in 2017 to Mabe's company, Enviro Mobi, for the supply of 200 three-wheeler motorbikes to the City of Ekurhuleni. Tuesday's proceedings marked the case's return to court after a three-month adjournment, granted to allow the NPA time to furnish additional documents requested by the defence. [email protected] IOL Politics


Mail & Guardian
7 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Toxic pesticide ban a victory for people and environmental justice, say activists
The ban on the importation and use of Terbufos signals a shift toward safer, people-centred agriculture Civil society groups have welcomed the cabinet's In October last year, Commonly known as Halephirimi, Last Thursday, the The committee said the department of agriculture would lead the consultation process on the ban in line with its 2010 plan to eradicate poisonous insecticides and pesticides over a period of time and also work on identifying safer alternatives to Terbufos. The banning of Terbufos signals the beginning of the transformation of an agriculture system that is 'riven with conflict of interest, inequity, abuse of worker rights and the unchallenged hegemony of toxic chemicals,' the South African People's Tribunal on AgroToxins (SAPToA) said. 'We will now likely see the deaths of children from this poison decline rapidly just as we saw with Aldicarb was prohibited in 2016. Swanby pointed out that not only do children die from organophosphates such as Terbufos but those who survive live with a lifetime of health and neurological problems. The law governing the registration of pesticides is ancient, she noted. 'It goes back to the post-war era where these chemicals that were used in the war were being repurposed for agriculture and we know a lot more about them now than we did back then, and of course this was also the apartheid era.' With the Constitution and Bill of Rights, the pesticide registration in the country is 'incongruent with our current law', she said. 'That needs a complete overhaul and as it stands now, it suits industry but that has to really be changed as soon as possible if we want to stay safe.' Mechanisms for phasing out pesticides must be included in that law 'so it's not just automatically if you come with your pesticide and you can tick a few boxes, you automatically get registration'. 'The first port of call is to see how we phase out pesticides and how we think about the risks and benefits and what the trajectory of our agricultural production should look like in this new era with our Bill of Rights and our Constitution,' Swanby said. SAPToA noted that despite a government policy adopted in 2010 to phase out highly hazardous pesticides and a regulation being issued in 2023 to restrict Terbufos, 'business continued as usual for the chemical industry who, in the week before the Naledi children died, were still insisting they have more time to prepare for any regulations'. 'For industry, the death of our children due to their products is not an urgent matter. This cabinet decision, recognising our constitutional imperative to put the child's best interests first, marks the end of a long era where the chemical industry has undue influence over the regulation of their deadly products. 'The highest level of government has reined in corporate impunity and said that all South Africans, particularly children, have the right to a safe and healthy environment.' SAPToA said civil society would continue to push for the immediate ban of all 194 highly hazardous pesticides registered in South Africa and to reject the notion of phase-out periods subject to industry discretion, which is a 'fig leaf for industry delay and prevarication'. It is also calling for transparency in governance of agricultural toxins, beginning with making available a public database of all pesticides registered in the country as a constitutional right for all South Africans. The Human Rights Commission said the cabinet's decision to ban Terbufos is a milestone in the realisation of critical socio-economic rights, including the right to health, clean water, a safe environment and adequate food. 'It reflects an emerging shift towards a people-centred food system, where communities are empowered to determine their own approaches to production, markets, ecology, and culture, aligned with principles of social, economic, and environmental justice.'


The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
China's clever trade deal with Africa – removal of tariffs on most goods
While the US is alienating other countries with high import tariffs, China is making friends in Africa by scrapping most import tariffs. While the rest of the world is sidetracked with the unrest in the Middle East and US President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again import tariffs, China made a clever trade deal with Africa to remove tariffs on most African exports. This not only boosts its trade potential, it also expands Beijing's influence. Brendon Verster, economist at Oxford Economics Africa, says as the US retreats and turns its focus inward, China's economic incentives deepen ties, reinforcing it as Africa's key partner. 'This shift may weaken the US's leverage and reshape global alliances in China's favour, despite risks from its slowing economy.' Last week, China announced plans to eliminate all tariffs on imports from 53 African sovereign states it maintains diplomatic ties with. Eswatini is the only exception due to its recognition of Taiwan's sovereignty. The Changsha Declaration on Upholding Solidarity and Cooperation of the Global South advances the full implementation of the Beijing Declaration reached in September 2024, which in turn aims to 'jointly build an all-weather China-Africa community with a shared future for the new era,' Verster says. 'The move can be considered a push by Beijing to capitalise on the chaos caused by Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs. Although the agreement text does not mention him by name, it does note that the parties agree that the frequent occurrence of unilateralism, protectionism and economic bullying has created severe difficulties for the economic and social development and the improvement of livelihood in African countries and other developing countries.' ALSO READ: China risks its moral high ground in escalating trade tensions China rather wants to resolve disputes Verster points out that in addition, the declaration states that the parties 'call on all countries and the US in particular, to return to the right track of resolving trade disputes through consultation based on equality, respect and mutual benefit. 'The new zero-tariff pledge marks a pronounced expansion of China's previous trade policy announced last year, which removed tariffs on imports from 33 countries globally that are deemed the least developed. 'Moreover, the continent's most underdeveloped economies, which already have full access to the Chinese market, will receive additional assistance to bolster their exports. These include measures on market access, inspection and quarantine and customs clearance.' Before the latest announcement, Chinese trade already dominated across Africa. Among the continent's major economies, the Asian giant outstrips the US as an export destination by a significant margin, especially in the DRC, accounting for 66% of goods exports, Angola (46.4%), Zimbabwe (20.1%) and Zambia (18.7%). ALSO READ: China challenges Trump's economic 'bullying' US ahead of China in some African economies However, Verster says, the US is still ahead of China in several economies, such as in Lesotho, Mauritius, Morocco, Egypt, Nigeria and Kenya. He also points out that apart from trade, China is almost on par with the US in terms of foreign direct investment (FDI). According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's 2023 World Investment Report, FDI inflows to Africa from the US totalled $45 billion in 2021, down from $50 billion in 2017. FDI inflows from China were recorded at $44 billion in 2021, slightly higher than the $43 billion registered in 2017. This chart shows how China's trade deal solidifies an already solid position as Africa's key trade partner: Source: International Trade Centre, *Includes Hong Kong ALSO READ: SA eyes boost in trade with China at November expo China's removal of tariffs has implications for power dynamics with US Verster says China's step to remove all tariffs on most African goods has important implications for the continent as well as the evolving power dynamics between the US and China. 'From a geopolitical standpoint, China's move is a long-term bet on African alignment and growth as well as a deepening of its commitment to South-South cooperation. 'The US has been moving away from these policies and China's removal of tariffs is part of a wider architecture that also includes concessional loans and large-scale infrastructure spending. As Washington turns its focus inward and its engagement in Africa becomes increasingly transactional or conditional, Beijing is stepping in to fill the void with consistent and unconditional economic incentives.' He says China is entrenching its position as Africa's most significant economic partner and expanding the continent's export potential. 'The strategic move significantly boosts China's soft power and trade leverage, especially given the US's decisions to tighten trade restrictions and cut development funding. 'African countries stand to gain from potential export diversification, increased foreign exchange earnings and closer integration into global value chains. Still, the Chinese economy is losing steam, which could weigh on its import demand.' ALSO READ: China welcomes Cyril – and tightens ties with 8 agreements Africa to become major player in critical minerals market Verster says Africa is also poised to become a major player in the critical minerals market as the world shifts to sustainable practices. 'Beijing's move could be considered an attempt to keep the continent close as the scramble for critical minerals ramps up and China seeks to assert its dominance over these supply chains.' As China's trade diplomacy cultivates closer bilateral ties, the broader implication is a gradual decline in US influence in Africa. Verster believes that African leaders might be more inclined to support China's viewpoints on the global stage, which would diminish Western influence. 'Furthermore, Western attempts to establish international trade regulations or impose sanctions may lose their effectiveness as African economies become more integrated with Chinese supply chains and trade networks. 'In short, Beijing's zero-tariff policy is not just a trade initiative but a strategic manoeuvre to reshape its alliances with Africa, reduce the US's leverage and embed China more deeply in the African continent's economic and political future.'