logo
EPA chief urges Mexico to help deliver ‘100% solution' to clean up polluted Tijuana River

EPA chief urges Mexico to help deliver ‘100% solution' to clean up polluted Tijuana River

U.S. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin on Tuesday called for Mexico and the U.S. to develop a '100% solution' to stop the flow of raw sewage from Tijuana that has polluted the Tijuana River and left communities near the border coping with foul odors and beaches that are often closed because of high bacteria levels.
'Americans on our side of the border who have been dealing with this for decades are out of patience,' Zeldin said during a news conference in San Diego. 'They want action and they're right.'
Zeldin visited the river north of the border and met with Mexican government officials as well as local officials in San Diego County. He said the Trump administration is seeking 'max collaboration and extreme urgency to end a crisis that should have ended a long time ago.'
The Tijuana River has been plagued with untreated sewage and industrial waste from Tijuana for decades. The city's growth has far outpaced the existing sewage treatment plants, and inadequate and broken facilities spew waste into the river, polluting the water and air in Imperial Beach and other communities near the border.
Zeldin met for about 90 minutes on Monday night with Mexican Environment Secretary Alicia Bárcena and other Mexican officials, who he said indicated that Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and her administration are 'fully committed to doing their part to resolving this issue.'
Bárcena said in a post on social media that it was a 'very productive meeting.'
'We agreed to reinforce our joint actions,' Bárcena said, 'to accelerate the projects to address the sanitation of Rio Tijuana for the well-being of our communities.'
Zeldin said Mexico still needs to provide $88 million that it previously pledged in a 2022 agreement. He said that U.S. and Mexican officials soon plan to draw up a 'specific statement from both countries' outlining actions the Mexican government will take to help address the problems.
'We all need to be on the same page on the 100% solution from the U.S. side that if all of these things on that list get done, this crisis is over,' Zeldin said.
He didn't discuss costs or a timetable, but said the goal should be to 'to get every project done as fast as humanly possible.'
The environmental group American Rivers last week ranked the Tijuana River No. 2 on its annual list of the nation's most endangered rivers, up from No. 9 on the list last year. The group said it elevated the river on the list to bring greater attention to the waterway's chronic pollution problems and the lack of action to clean it up.
Environmental advocates have urged the U.S. government to prioritize fixing and expanding the South Bay International Wastewater Treatment Plant north of the border, which handles sewage from Tijuana and is in disrepair.
Zeldin toured the South Bay plant, where he met with Imperial Beach Mayor Paloma Aguirre and other officials. With him were members of Congress including Reps. Darrell Issa (R-Vista) and Mike Levin (D-San Juan Capistrano).
Levin said the U.S. government has appropriated $653 million for fixing and expanding the South Bay wastewater plant — an amount that steadily increased after an initial $300 million was committed in 2020.
'We've got to get those shovels in the ground,' Levin said. 'We've got to get the South Bay plant up and running, doubled in capacity, as quickly as possible.'
Zeldin also said he was meeting with Navy SEALs who train in the area and have suffered illnesses because of the polluted water.
In a recent report, the Department of Defense said about 1,100 cases of illness were reported among Navy SEALS and other service members who were exposed to high levels of bacteria when they trained in and around the ocean near the border.
'This has been a problem for decades. It hasn't been corrected. It's only gotten worse,' said Dan'l Steward, a retired Navy captain and former SEAL who lives in Coronado but did not attend Tuesday's events.
Decades ago, Steward got sick after basic underwater SEAL training and had to take antibiotics to recover. Steward said he has heard similar stories from SEALs and candidates who undergo training along the beaches in Coronado.
'It's a national security issue,' Steward said. For Navy personnel in the area, he said, 'it's limiting them in their ability to properly train, and it's endangering their lives for the ones that are going through basic training in particular.'
Others affected, he said, include Marines, Coast Guard service members and Border Patrol agents. Steward said his daughter, while surfing nearby, became sick with an infection from a type of bacteria called MRSA, which is resistant to many antibiotics.
'The United States has a role to help improve the situation, even though their plants are south of the border,' Steward said. 'We all have a role to play here. And I also feel that's the only way to solve the problem.'
Ramon Chairez, director of environmental advocacy for the Encinitas-based nonprofit group Un Mar de Colores, said he'd like to see various actions taken on the U.S. side of the border, including working to dismantle culverts where polluted water cascades down and sends polluted water vapor and gases into the air.
Chairez said he thought Zeldin's focus on collaboration between Mexico and the U.S. made sense.
'Overall, I think the general tone is pointing more towards holding Mexico accountable, although there's some acknowledgment that it's going to be a collaborative effort on both sides of the border,' Chairez said.
One topic that wasn't discussed but has contributed to the problems, he said, is that many U.S.-based companies have set up factories on the Mexican side of the border.
'I didn't hear a word about maquiladoras and factories and industries on the Mexican side and holding them accountable,' he said. 'There's American and California-based corporations operating all along the border, and especially in Tijuana, and they're polluting the river just as much.'
Matthew Tejada, senior vice president of environmental health for the Natural Resources Defense Fund, said the commitments from U.S. officials sound good, but he also said delivering on those pledges will be more complicated because of cuts in budget and staffing. He noted that Zeldin has said he wants to eliminate 65% of the Environmental Protection Agency's budget.
'It will be an interesting trick for EPA to achieve exactly those sorts of outcomes while they are internally tearing down the very staff and systems they need to actually make those changes happen,' Tejada said.
He said the Trump administration's recent actions, including cutting funding and rolling back environmental protection measures, are 'making it that much harder for this country to actually have clean air, clean land and clean water.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

As Trump celebrates Army's founding, his critics take to the streets
As Trump celebrates Army's founding, his critics take to the streets

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

As Trump celebrates Army's founding, his critics take to the streets

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But no celebration of history takes place in a political vacuum. And protesters in large cities and small towns from Seattle to Key West, Florida, showed up to demonstrate against how Trump is making use of the modern force. His decisions over the past week to federalize the National Guard and call Marines into the streets of Los Angeles, in support of his immigration roundups, have rekindled a debate about whether he is abusing the powers of the commander in chief. Advertisement So even before Trump presided over the parade, the country was divided by a split-screen show of force. Roughly 2,000 protests, under the slogan 'No Kings,' pushed back against what the crowds decried as authoritarian overreach. While big-city rallies attracted the attention and the cameras, smaller events were organized in rural areas, including three dozen in Indiana, a state Trump won last November by 19 points. Advertisement In Dallas, another stronghold of Trump's support, crowds of protesters stretched across a wide street for at least five blocks. The Houston protest looked more like a block party, with dances to Mexican music and cool-offs in a fountain. In Pittsburgh, on a clear day, there was a festival atmosphere, with some chanting 'Shut ICE down,' a reference to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. In Waukesha, Wisconsin, about 1,500 people marched through the streets in an area where Trump had won with 59 percent of the vote. 'This is beyond my wildest dreams,' said Dawn Lawien, an organizer. And even in downtown Los Angeles, the National Guard members stationed on Broadway near the federal courthouse were not the target of the crowd's anger; Trump was. Protesters fist-bumped the troops and thanked them for their service. Elected leaders and law enforcement officials in California and across the country encouraged protesters to remain peaceful, and organizers of the No Kings demonstrations called on participants to focus on 'nonviolent action.' In Houston, some demonstrators handed out flowers to police officers who were securing the route of the protest. But Saturday opened with an ominous turn in Minnesota when a person pretending to be a police officer assassinated a Democratic state lawmaker and attempted to kill a second. Authorities subsequently asked people to refrain from attending 'No Kings' events in the state, reporting that materials referencing the gatherings were found in the vehicle of the suspect, who remained at large Saturday afternoon. Advertisement Back in Washington, organizers of the America250 events, for which this is the first big production, were selling a 'dedicated VIP experience' to large donors, and red MAGA hats to the president's supporters. It is also Trump's 79th birthday, though he has insisted the celebration is about the Army, not him. The streets will be filled, organizers say, with veterans of the Korea and Vietnam conflicts, along with those who fought in Afghanistan and Iraq, two wars that Trump — and many Democrats — have declared were wastes of lives and money. Trump has defended the spending of as much as $45 million — including the cost of repairing Washington's streets from the damage expected from rolling 60-ton tanks down Constitution Avenue — as a small price to pay to stoke national pride and to remind the world of America's hard power. He told an interviewer on NBC last month that the price tag was 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.' 'We have the greatest missiles in the world,' he continued. 'We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest Army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it.' But to some of Trump's critics, it is conduct unbecoming a superpower. In the first Trump term, that view was shared by military leaders who dissuaded him from replicating the French show of force. They have since been ousted, replaced by true believers like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News pundit who is expected to stand alongside Trump in the reviewing stand. Advertisement Trump's political advisers are betting that half the country or more will enjoy watching the display of Army history — there will be World War I tanks and World War II equipment — and his 'America First' declarations. Parades are pure showmanship, and Trump is the master showman. Yet a military parade is also an unvarnished celebration of America's hard power, even if this one is dominated by huge equipment, like the M-1 Abrams tank, that seems antiquated in an age of drones and cyberweapons. And it comes at a moment the administration has been ridiculing as wasteful such efforts as global aid, battling HIV or backing basic research at universities that Trump has gone to war against. The parade's estimated cost will amount to about one-fifth of the annual budget of the Voice of America, which had millions of listeners around the world until Trump took it off the air this spring. The protests, which organizers deliberately kept outside Washington to avoid focusing more attention on the military celebration, have been planned for many weeks, as opposition to the administration's efforts to dismiss expert opinion, oust the 'deep state' and silence critics have mounted. Trump's decision to move 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines into Los Angeles asserted a role for the military at home, which was exactly what had given the Continental Congress pause about creating a colonial army at all. Now that same concern, 250 years later, is expected to give the weekend protests mass and weight. They have been further fueled by Trump's speech at Fort Bragg in North Carolina last week, when he lumped peaceful protesters with 'troublemakers, agitators, insurrectionists,' and later said anyone protesting in Washington would be met with 'very big force.' Advertisement In the run-up to the parade, those differences broke out on Capitol Hill, when Hegseth defended the use of troops at home and suggested preparations were underway 'if there are other riots, in places where law enforcement officers are threatened,' so that 'we would have the capability to surge National Guard there.' Organizers of the protest marches range from the American Civil Liberties Union to abortion rights and gun violence groups, but also include the 'Hands Off!' protesters who argue Trump has threatened Social Security, Medicaid and education budgets. They they have folded together, though, under the 'No Kings' group, which has called for a 'day of defiance' Saturday. 'We want to create contrast,' said Leah Greenberg, co-founder of a group called Indivisible organize the protest in Philadelphia, where the Continental Congress met to create that first army force. 'Not conflict.'

‘Political violence is a sickness': Elected officials worry that attacks will escalate
‘Political violence is a sickness': Elected officials worry that attacks will escalate

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

‘Political violence is a sickness': Elected officials worry that attacks will escalate

Republican and Democratic politicians are warning about rising violence targeting elected officials in the aftermath of a series of attacks, including the killing of a state official in Minnesota on Saturday. Within the last year, there have been multiple assassination attempts against President Donald Trump, an arson attack on Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's residence, and the killing of two Israeli Embassy staffers in Washington — setting a new cycle of violence in the country. That violence culminated this weekend after two Minnesota lawmakers and their spouses were shot in their own homes, leaving two dead and two others seriously wounded. Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, formerly the Democratic nominee for vice president, went so far as to direct his public safety department to recommend citizens avoid political events out of fear for their safety. Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon warned that the brutality his state witnessed on Saturday was not unique to Minnesota, but rather part of the broader trend of political animosity turning into acts of harm. 'Political violence is a sickness,' Simon, a Democrat, said. 'And unfortunately, it's on the rise. I want to be real clear here, we've had recent examples on both sides of the political spectrum. I am really very worried about where this is all headed.' He added that 'to perpetrate it, to encourage it, to pretend to ignore it, all of those things will only further poison our democracy, and I — all of us — have to work hard now more than ever, to reinforce the idea that we have to settle our political differences lawfully, peacefully and ultimately at the ballot box.' According to lawmakers from across the political spectrum, threats of violence and even murder that were once rare are now commonplace, as tensions amid heightened polarization spill over into charged confrontations. 'We're all getting death threats pretty regularly, and violent threats,' Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) said of his congressional colleagues. 'You go online and you just see all of the vile and hate and vitriol that is pulsing through mostly right wing politics and platforms, but there's some of it on the left too.' And the threats don't just begin and end online. 'People have showed up outside my home,' Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for governor next year, said. 'We've had swatting attacks, we've had bomb threats. I've experienced all three of those things at my home. When things like this happen, it is a devastating reminder of the reality that we're living in in this moment.' In 2020, several men were accused of plotting to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer in order to start a civil war. Two suspects were later convicted on charges related to the incident. President Donald Trump recently floated pardoning the men convicted in the kidnapping plot. Huffman said he and other members of Congress are 'taking all kinds of precautions' to boost their safety that they never before would have thought necessary in the U.S. Federal campaign finance officials signed off last year on allowing members of Congress and candidates to use campaign cash for a wide array of personal security measures due to the threats they now routinely face. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), who has young children, said he, too, had beefed up his security in the past year, because 'people have lost all sense of responsibleness and civility.' Lawler said that the 'volatility' in political discourse has 'gotten so hot that people have lost perspective,' resulting in people 'making decisions that result in bodily harm of elected officials and the general public.' 'I think both parties have to recognize that some of the rhetoric really results in grave consequences,' the New York representative added, referencing the attempts on Trump's life in July and September. 'And how things are described, how people talk about actions being taken by the government, just all of it is destructive towards the public discourse, and frankly, put people's lives in jeopardy. And I hope people wake up to it, because it really is destructive.' Members of Congress and Capitol police have been warning about an increase in threats to federal lawmakers for years. But the spike is particularly acute for state lawmakers, many of whom only work part time and do not have the resources that federal elected officials have. 'If Trump has literally the best security in the world, ostensibly, and can't stop it, how could they feel safe?' said Amanda Litman, the co-founder of the Democratic candidate recruitment group Run for Something. 'And I think the thing we came back to is — we want to be really honest with folks — there's nothing we can do to guarantee safety at all times. All we can do is control what we can control.' But some political experts said that the rise in violence is further inflamed by the rhetoric and actions pushed by the Trump administration and other Republicans. 'I mean, it's not rocket science,' Harvard political scientist Steve Levitsky, who co-authored the book 'How Democracies Die' in 2018, said. 'You condone the January 6 insurrection. You pardon them all, or virtually all of them, including those who physically assaulted police officers, and you treat them as heroes. You send around unmarked cars with masked vigilante like agents, abducting people off the streets. You politicize the armed forces and send them in threatening violence upon peaceful protesters. And you condone the physical assault of a or arrest of a U.S. senator for peaceful expression of his views. … You've created an atmosphere that's not just permissive of political violence, it encourages political violence.' Republican politicians are aware of the problem and say so privately, Levitsky said, but are 'worried' to speak up publicly. Trump said of the shootings on Saturday that 'such horrific violence will not be tolerated in the United States of America.' The White House did not immediately respond to Levitsky's criticism. The escalating violence comes amid heightened political tension, including millions of Americans pouring onto the streets to protest on Saturday as a counter to Trump's multi-million dollar military parade and the administration's recent immigration crackdowns. Huffman noted the challenge for Democrats of threading the needle between resistance to the president, who Democrats have characterized as an authoritarian leader, and maintaining non-escalatory, peaceful protests. 'I don't want to pull punches, I don't want to stand down in any way, but I don't want to fan the flames that could lead to violence, and so I just try to strike that difficult balance,' Huffman said. 'We're also fighting for democracy and our rights against an authoritarian president who's trying to be a dictator, and you can't sugarcoat that, it's just reality.' 'So how do you confront that without contributing to this ladder of escalation that could lead to violence?' he asked. 'It's not simple.'

John Fetterman and Bill Maher agree chaos in LA and Dem reaction to riots will be ‘good for Trump'
John Fetterman and Bill Maher agree chaos in LA and Dem reaction to riots will be ‘good for Trump'

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

John Fetterman and Bill Maher agree chaos in LA and Dem reaction to riots will be ‘good for Trump'

Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., and 'Real Time' host Bill Maher agreed on Friday that the optics of Democrats defending the anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles will be 'good for Trump' as scenes of chaos from the riots continue to go viral on social media. Maher noted that some on the left condemned Fetterman after he denounced the violence happening in the streets of Los Angeles and agreed that 'it doesn't do the Democratic Party any good to defend' the violent protests. Advertisement Fetterman issued a strong message on X Monday evening denouncing the riots in L.A. and included a now-infamous photo showing a rioter standing on a car while waving the Mexican flag surrounded by raging flames. 'I agree. When they see it in a campaign ad, when they see the guy with the Mexican flag and the Waymo burning behind him, it's going to be good for Trump,' said Maher. Fetterman concurred, noting that most Americans don't want to see Los Angeles 'on fire twice in just six months now.' 3 Fetterman blasts progressives who have been sympathetic to Iran, Hamas. Youtube/ Real Time with Bill Maher Advertisement 3 Serious rioting takes place in downtown Los Angeles hundred of law enforcement are deployed as are National Guard. Toby Canham for NY Post 3 Maher noted that some on the left condemned Fetterman after he denounced the violence happening in the streets of Los Angeles. Youtube/ Real Time with Bill Maher Reflecting on the political impact of such imagery, he asked, 'And those optics, I just run that through — like what's the people in Scranton might see those kinds of images and those kinds of videos?' Maher then emphasized that Fetterman's views on free speech and immigration still align with core Democratic values, and those who are calling him out are doing so because he's not a 'progressive,' adding that 'we don't even know what these terms mean' in today's political climate. Advertisement The 'Real Time' host said that he sees himself as an 'old-school Democrat,' to which Fetterman agreed. 'That's the thing,' Fetterman replied. 'It's like your values — I don't think have changed — I know mine haven't really changed. But I think our party has changed and now if you actually kind of point out and call out a lot of these things, you know, you do take a political price for a lot of those things.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store