logo
Polluted SA air killed 42,000 in 2023, study finds — yet loopholes persist

Polluted SA air killed 42,000 in 2023, study finds — yet loopholes persist

Air pollution cost South Africa more than R960bn and 42,000 lives in 2023, a new report finds, but the government keeps extending emissions exemptions.
In 2023 alone, 42,000 South Africans died from exposure to fine particle pollution (PM2.5), including more than 1,300 children under five, according to a new report released on 3 June by Greenpeace Africa and the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA).
The report, Unmasking the Toll of Fine Particle Pollution in South Africa, estimates that PM2.5 pollution cost the country more than R960-billion in 2023 – equivalent to 14% of GDP – through premature deaths, illness, lost productivity and overburdened health systems.
PM2.5 refers to airborne particles smaller than 2.5 micrometres, mainly formed by burning coal and fuel. These particles, as CREA analyst Lauri Myllyvirta previously explained to Daily Maverick, are 'small enough to pass from lungs to the bloodstream and wreak havoc on all our internal organs'.
Communities in the Highveld region and Gauteng and Mpumalanga provinces, which are home to the country's largest coal-fired power plants and industrial zones, are hardest hit.
Professor Rajen Naidoo, head of Occupational and Environmental Health at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, said that the report adds to reports over the years which have emphasised the serious health risks faced by South Africans due to air pollution and its inadequate regulation.
'While the headlines are likely to be grabbed by the number of deaths (rightly so), it must be borne in mind that for every death, there are those with disabling chronic conditions caused by air pollution,' said Naidoo. He highlighted that the report captured this through the measure called years lived with disability (YLD).
According to the report, in 2023, exposure to PM2.5 particles led to more than 100,000 years lived with disability in South Africa, due to chronic diseases like lung and heart conditions, strokes, and diabetes:
'Exposure to PM2.5 also contributes significantly to chronic diseases and disabilities of the overall population. Annual exposure to PM2.5 is associated with 26,000 years lived with disability (YLDs) due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; 20,000 YLDs due to stroke; 64,000 YLDs due to diabetes; and 19,000 due to Alzheimer's and other dementias.'
'The real burden lies in the most disadvantaged communities near coal-fired power stations, already marginalised and now also carrying the health burden,' said Naidoo.
He said children in these areas were affected even before birth, with pollution and poverty combining to weaken immune systems, stunt development and trap families in cycles of poor health.
A call to end exemptions
'Science is unequivocal,' said Cynthia Moyo, climate and energy campaigner at Greenpeace Africa. 'The air South Africans breathe is toxic, and the corporations driving this crisis must no longer be protected by silence or inaction.'
Greenpeace Africa is calling for:
An immediate end to air pollution exemptions for major emitters;
Full enforcement of national air quality standards;
A just transition to renewable energy that centres affected communities; and
Public access to real-time pollution data.
The report also shows that if South Africa were to follow the World Health Organization (WHO) air quality standards guidelines for PM2.5, it could prevent up to 33,000 deaths a year.
The WHO's guideline for PM2.5 is five micrograms per cubic metre (µg/m³) as an annual average.
South Africa's existing national standards for PM2.5 are pretty weak at 20 µg/m³ annual average, but it isn't even meeting those. The report found that South Africans were breathing air with 26 µg/m³ PM2.5 on average.
The report points out that if South Africa were to meet existing national standards (20 µg/m³ annual average), it could save more than 9,000 lives annually.
Why do we emit more than the law allows?
The National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act sets both Minimum Emission Standards (MES), which industries are allowed to emit, and Ambient Air Quality Standards, the pollution limits for outdoor air.
In 2020, the MES for total particulate matter was updated to 50 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/Nm³), down from 100 mg/Nm³. Even with a decreased limit, this remains far higher than global benchmarks. Even so, Eskom could not comply.
Instead, it applied for and received exemptions. As Daily Maverick has reported, Eskom has repeatedly secured postponements and exemptions from complying with MES.
In March 2025, the government granted further exemptions for several power stations, citing the need to avert deepening the country's electricity crisis.
While the exemptions come with 'strict conditions' – including pollution controls, air quality monitoring and emissions reporting – critics say these are seldom enforced with rigour or transparency.
The 2022 high court ruling in the 'Deadly Air' case found that the government's failure to enforce air quality standards in the Highveld Priority Area violated residents' constitutional rights. Yet, the latest exemptions suggest energy security continues to trump environmental and health concerns.
The CREA/Greenpeace report argues that these exemptions have enabled major polluters, particularly Eskom, to delay emissions reductions, prolonging dangerously high pollution levels.
The report urges the government to end exemptions, tighten enforcement and align air quality standards with the WHO's latest guidelines.
'South Africa's Constitution guarantees the right to a healthy environment, but that right is being violated every day by polluters,' added Dr Jamie Kelly, health impact assessment team lead at CREA. 'Communities deserve clean air, not corporate impunity.'
How do we know PM2.5 kills?
The report's estimates are based on globally recognised models that link PM2.5 exposure to premature deaths from heart disease, stroke, respiratory illness and more.
Dr Rosa Gierens, data scientist and co-author of the report, explained that these integrated exposure-response functions, endorsed by the WHO, use decades of large epidemiological studies to estimate 'excess deaths' – lives lost due to unsafe air. Research consistently shows that when PM2.5 levels fall, mortality also decreases.
The report combined PM2.5 concentrations (sourced from satellite data, ground monitoring and atmospheric models) with population and health data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) database to calculate health impacts.
This approach, used in peer-reviewed global health research, allows researchers to estimate disease risk across age groups and conditions while adjusting for factors such as smoking and income.
Profits over people
'Behind these deaths lies a simple truth: polluters are poisoning our air and putting profits above people,' said Greenpeace Africa.
As Jesse Burton from the Energy Systems Research Group at UCT p reviously told Daily Maverick, 'Air pollution control might seem like a 'nice to have', but pollution has very real impacts on people's lives and livelihoods, including sickness, premature deaths and work days lost.'
Naidoo also questioned who truly benefited from 'cheap' coal power. 'Coal provides cheap electricity for the major industrial enterprises with their tax privileges, while the state then has to take care of those who suffer the health consequences of air pollution.' DM

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NGO highlights mental health support for men with prostate cancer
NGO highlights mental health support for men with prostate cancer

The South African

timean hour ago

  • The South African

NGO highlights mental health support for men with prostate cancer

A prostate cancer diagnosis can take its toll on men's mental health. That's according to mental health advocacy organisation, the South African Federation for Mental Health (SAFMH). July marks Men's Health Month, which raises awareness of preventable health problems in men and boys. SAFMH is marking the month under the theme 'Prostate cancer and men's mental health'. Prostate cancer is the most common cancer affecting men around the world. This was recently highlighted when former US President Joe Biden announced his diagnosis in May. About 1 in 15 South African men will be diagnosed with the condition at some point in their lifetime, according to the 2022 National Cancer Registry. However, if detected early, the cancer can be treated and overcome. According to SAFMH, research increasingly highlights the importance of mental healthcare for patients with the condition. In fact, men with the diagnosis have a higher risk of developing mental health conditions. Cancer patients commonly experience anxiety and depression. Men with prostate cancer may also experience treatment side effects that impact on sexual health. In turn, that can negatively affect mood and relationships. In an article, SAFMH shared the experience of David, a patient who faced the condition. He described the impact of the diagnosis on his mental health: 'What if the medication didn't work? What if I suffered the same fate as my friend's father? I went from feeling angry to feeling uncertain, which led to a feeling of desperation.' Encouragingly, however, research indicates that long-term mental health support for men with the diagnosis could assist with increasing their life expectancy. David encourages men with prostate cancer to seek professional mental health support, and to communicate openly with their loved ones. He said: 'Be willing to discuss and communicate your feelings, fears, and physical condition openly with your loved ones and your therapist. That is the only way for them to understand what you are going through, and that makes it easier for them to adjust and assist you with coping with the cancer. He added: 'Most importantly, do not lose hope. Take it one day at a time, be kind to yourself and to those around you. Stick to your treatment plan even if it is hard…In the end, it's worth it!' SAFMH highlights the following organisations for South Africans facing a prostate cancer diagnosis: CANSA: offers resources and support options Cancer Alliance: resources and support groups For general mental health support, you can contact the South African Depression and Anxiety Group (SADAG) hotline on 0800 567 567. Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 0211. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

NHI is fiscally impossible, says the Health Funders Association
NHI is fiscally impossible, says the Health Funders Association

TimesLIVE

time2 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

NHI is fiscally impossible, says the Health Funders Association

The Health Funders Association (HFA) has described the National Health Insurance (NHI) Act as fiscally impossible and has tabled a hybrid funding model that will enable private healthcare providers to provide services in tandem with the NHI. The HFA, accounting for 46% of the private healthcare market and representing 21 medical schemes and three administrators, this week became the latest entity to legally challenge the NHI for undermining the right of medical aid members to choose how to access health services. HFA commissioned an independent study released this week which found the NHI required substantial tax far beyond South Africa's fiscal capacity. 'What's more, the proposed model offers no guarantee of improved outcomes, while restricting the mechanisms that currently drive quality and innovation in health care,' said the FHA. Commenting on the report, HFA CEO Thoneshan Naidoo said South Africa needs a healthcare system that delivers equitable, quality care for all. 'However, in its current form, and without private sector collaboration, the NHI Act is fiscally impossible and operationally unworkable, and threatens the stability of the economy and health system affecting everyone in South Africa,' he said. Naidoo said the NHI Act centralises control of all healthcare financing in a single, state-run fund, removing the ability of medical schemes to offer cover for healthcare services reimbursable by the NHI. 'We continue to advocate for a more inclusive, hybrid funding model that incorporates medical schemes in NHI. We believe such a model would expand access to care while protecting the rights of all South Africans,' said Naidoo. The NHI, which introduces universal health coverage, has been challenged in court by Solidarity, the Board of Healthcare Funders, the South African Private Practitioners Forum, the Hospital Association of South Africa and the South African Medical Association. Foster Mohale, the health spokesperson, on Friday confirmed the department had received court papers. 'This is case number six. We have an evolving court process and we'll allow that process to take its course,' said Mohale. FHA commissioned a report by Genesis Analytics, which showed that personal income tax will need to increase from the current average rate of 21% to an average of 46% of income, pushing marginal tax rates in the lowest income bracket from 18% to 41%, and in the highest bracket from 45% to 68%. The Genesis model also considered a scenario of pooling existing healthcare expenditure, citing that personal income tax would need to increase from its average of 21% to 31%. At the same time, medical scheme members would face a 43% reduction in the level of healthcare services relative to what they currently received. 'In simple terms, the equation for medical scheme members therefore becomes 'Pay 1.5 times more tax for 43% less healthcare'. Such tax increases are fiscally impossible, particularly given South Africa's narrow personal income tax base of 7.4-million tax payers,' said the FHA.

Health Funders Association challenges NHI Act over cost and constitutionality
Health Funders Association challenges NHI Act over cost and constitutionality

eNCA

time10 hours ago

  • eNCA

Health Funders Association challenges NHI Act over cost and constitutionality

JOHANNESBURG – The Health Funders Association (HFA) is mounting a legal challenge against key aspects of the newly signed National Health Insurance (NHI) Act, citing serious constitutional and economic concerns. HFA CEO Thoneshan Naidoo says while the organisation supports the goal of universal healthcare, the current NHI framework is fundamentally flawed. 'The debate around national health insurance has been ongoing for years,' said Naidoo. 'Unfortunately, despite consistently raising our concerns, we've now been forced to take legal action.' The HFA commissioned an independent expert to assess the economic impact of implementing the NHI as it currently stands. The findings are stark: For South Africa to provide the same level of care promised under the NHI -- equivalent to what private medical schemes currently offer -- it would require the country's 7.4 million taxpayers to double their current tax contributions , a cost Naidoo says is simply unaffordable. In addition to the financial strain, Naidoo highlighted a massive shortfall in human resources. 'To provide the same level of care across the population, we would need an additional 286,000 healthcare professionals, which the country currently does not have,' he added. Naidoo maintains the Act, in its current form, is economically unsustainable and constitutionally questionable, and does not align with the realities of South Africa's healthcare infrastructure. The legal challenge is expected to intensify debate around the future of healthcare reform in the country.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store