logo
Deport all foreign criminals, says Labour MP in attack on ECHR

Deport all foreign criminals, says Labour MP in attack on ECHR

Yahoo25-03-2025

Ministers should set aside the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and deport foreign criminals, a Labour MP has said.
Jonathan Brash, the MP for Hartlepool, said the Government should exercise its 'perfectly legitimate' right to deport criminals by saying ECHR Article 8 rights to a family life do not apply in such cases.
He is thought to be the first Labour MP to publicly declare that the Government should ignore the ECHR in order to return convicted foreign criminals back to their home countries.
It follows a series of cases exposed by The Telegraph where illegal migrants or convicted foreign criminals have used human rights laws to remain in the UK or halt their deportations. Many have used Article 8 of the ECHR, which protects the right to respect for private and family life.
They include an Albanian criminal who avoided deportation after claiming his son had an aversion to foreign chicken nuggets and a Pakistani paedophile, who was jailed for child sex offences but escaped removal from the UK as it would be 'unduly harsh' on his children.
Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, is considering whether to restrict foreign criminals and illegal migrants from exploiting the ECHR to block their deportations.
She is reviewing how Article 8 of the ECHR, which guarantees the right to family life, is being applied by immigration courts to ensure that it is being interpreted in a 'sensible' and 'proportionate' way.
Speaking on GB News, Jonathan Brash said: 'I don't think it's a particularly controversial view to say that if our government wants to deport a foreign criminal, they should be able to.
'The ECHR allows for that in issues of public safety and national security. It's perfectly legitimate for a government to say Article 8 is not applying here, we are deporting a foreign criminal.
'And if that's a controversial virtual view for anyone, I don't know what they're thinking about, because quite frankly, if someone is a danger to the public in this country, they should be deported. It's as simple as that.
He added: 'If you are a criminal and you are proposing harm to the British people, and you're not from this country and you're here illegally, you should be deported.
'It can't really be much simpler than that, and we have to get to a position where we deliver that. I think reviewing how it's applied, as has happened in other countries, very successfully is exactly the right thing to do.
Other Labour MPs - particularly from Red Wall constituencies where Nigel Farage's Reform party is a major threat - support restrictions on judges increasingly expansionist interpretations of the ECHR to overturn deportation orders.
Labour MPs attended a briefing on Monday evening with a leading barrister on the issue in Parliament which has been organised by Dan Carden, the MP for Liverpool Walton.
Writing for Politics.co.uk, Jonathan Hinder, the MP for Pendle and Clitheroe, said: 'Yvette Cooper is right to at least be considering how some of its articles are being applied in the courts.
'When the voters say 'we want the Government to reduce illegal migration', it is entirely reasonable for them to think that the elected governments of these islands can deliver that.'
Connor Naismith, the MP for Crewe and Nantwich, said that recent rulings based on human rights rules were eroding voters' trust in politicians.
He warned: 'People tell me that they don't feel like their politicians can really change things. The truth is they're not entirely wrong.
'Artificial structures and outsourced decisions have limited our democracy and the Prime Minister is right to take this on.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prosecutors tell judge government plans to deport Abrego Garcia to a country that's not El Salvador
Prosecutors tell judge government plans to deport Abrego Garcia to a country that's not El Salvador

San Francisco Chronicle​

time3 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Prosecutors tell judge government plans to deport Abrego Garcia to a country that's not El Salvador

Federal prosecutors told a judge on Thursday that the government plans to initiate removal proceedings against Kilmar Abrego Garcia and to deport him to a country that is not El Salvador upon his release from a Tennessee jail. But the prosecutors also said that they would comply with all court orders and that their plans are not imminent. Attorneys for Abrego Garcia earlier asked a federal judge in Maryland to order his return to that state when he is released from jail in Tennessee, an arrangement that would prevent likely attempts by immigration officials to quickly deport Abrego Garcia. The Maryland construction worker became a flashpoint over President Donald Trump's immigration policies after he was mistakenly deported to his native El Salvador in March. He's been in jail in Tennessee since he was returned to the U.S. on June 7 to face federal charges of human smuggling. U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes in Nashville has ruled that Abrego Garcia has a right to be released while awaiting trial. But she decided Wednesday to keep him in custody for at least a few more days over concerns that U.S. immigration officials would swiftly try to deport him again. Abrego Garcia's attorneys in Maryland, where his wife is suing the Trump administration over his March deportation, have offered up a possible solution. They've asked the federal judge overseeing the lawsuit to direct the government to bring him to Maryland while he awaits trial in Tennessee. 'If this Court does not act swiftly, then the Government is likely to whisk Abrego Garcia away to some place far from Maryland,' Abrego Garcia's attorneys wrote in their request to U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis in Greenbelt. Abrego Garcia lived in Maryland, just outside Washington, with his American wife and children for more than a decade. His deportation violated a U.S. immigration judge's order in 2019 that barred his expulsion to his native country. The judge had found that Abrego Garcia faced a credible threat from gangs who had terrorized him and his family. The Trump administration described its violation of the immigration judge's 2019 order as an administrative error. Trump and other officials doubled down on claims Abrego Garcia was in the MS-13 gang, an accusation that Abrego Garcia denies. Abrego Garcia pleaded not guilty on June 13 to smuggling charges that his attorneys have characterized as an attempt to justify his mistaken expulsion to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Those charges stem from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding in Tennessee, during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers without luggage. Holmes, the magistrate judge in Tennessee, wrote in a ruling on Sunday that federal prosecutors failed to show that Abrego Garcia was a flight risk or a danger to the community. During a court hearing on Wednesday, Holmes set specific conditions for his release that included Abrego Garcia living with his brother, a U.S. citizen, in Maryland. But she held off on releasing him over concerns that prosecutors can't prevent U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement from deporting him. Holmes expressed doubts about her own power to require anything more than prosecutors using their best efforts to secure the cooperation of ICE. 'I have no reservations about my ability to direct the local U.S. Attorney's office,' the judge said. 'I don't think I have any authority over ICE.' Acting U.S. Attorney Rob McGuire told the judge he would do 'the best I can' to secure the cooperation of ICE. But the prosecutor noted, 'That's a separate agency with separate leadership and separate directions. I will coordinate, but I can't tell them what to do.'

Residents Clash With Sao Paulo Plan to Transform Favela
Residents Clash With Sao Paulo Plan to Transform Favela

Bloomberg

time3 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Residents Clash With Sao Paulo Plan to Transform Favela

A major plan to revamp Campos Eliseos in central Sao Paulo has led to clashes between the government and residents who say they're being forcibly removed from the neighborhood's Favela do Moinho, where many have lived for decades. The $970 million initiative includes consolidating government buildings in the neighborhood and removing the notorious drug-use area known as Cracolandia in an effort to spur new investment. While the government housing company claims residents agreed to voluntarily relocate and that it is offering them financial aid to find new homes in and around the area, tensions remain. Many locals are skeptical about whether this latest attempt to transform the neighborhood will succeed where previous efforts have failed, or just displace existing inhabitants, Carolina Pulice reports. Today on CityLab:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store