The best Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge screen protectors
The best Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge screen protectors are made of durable tempered glass and come with a kit or tool for straightforward installation.
Below, we've assembled a list of our favorite screen protector options based on our testing experience with brands like Zagg, JETech, and others.
Among the best Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge screen protectors, our top pick is the Zagg Glass Elite Screen Protector, which features exceptionally durable tempered glass. JETech's screen protector package is a worthy budget option with two display films and camera lens protectors.
When you buy through our links, Business Insider may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more
FAQs
Does the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge need a screen protector?
Though the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge's Corning Gorilla Glass Ceramic 2 display purportedly has the same strength and scratch resistance as the Galaxy S25 Ultra's Gorilla Armor 2 screen, not even the best Samsung phone screen is immune to damage.
It's worth equipping the ultra-thin, expensive phone with a dependable screen protector and case for comprehensive protection. For top options, see our guide to the best Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge cases.
What should I look for in a Galaxy S25 Edge screen protector?
As with any of the best Android phones or best phones overall, several key aspects are worth considering when looking for a screen protector for the Galaxy S25 Edge.
Primarily, you want to ensure that the display's image resolution is not affected and that an accidental drop or encounter with an errant key will not crack the glass.
To that end, you should ensure the screen protector is durable tempered glass. While plastic screen protectors exist, they do not provide nearly the same level of protection as their tempered glass counterparts in our testing.
Will a Galaxy S25 Plus screen protector fit the Galaxy S25 Edge?
Screen protectors for the Galaxy S25 Plus and Galaxy S25 Edge are not cross-compatible due to their subtly different sizes.
If you have a Galaxy S25 Plus, refer to our compilation of the best Samsung Galaxy S25 Plus screen protectors for further guidance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
2 hours ago
- Fast Company
Why digital-native publishers like Business Insider are most exposed in the AI era
For the past year and a half, there's been a simmering concern over what AI is going to do to the workforce. Last week, that concern boiled over in a big way following back-to-back news stories: First, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei set off alarm bells by predicting that AI would wipe out half of entry-level jobs and massively drive up unemployment. As if on cue, Business Insider announced it was laying off 21% of its staff. While the two obviously aren't directly related, the one-two punch landed hard in the media business, which faces an existential threat to its business model (in a nutshell, AI answers mean less traffic than search). But like all demographics, it's important to remember that the media isn't a monolith. While AI summaries mean rapidly changing audience habits for all publishers, BI 's move emphasizes that digital-native brands are particularly vulnerable. In her memo to BI staff, CEO Barbara Peng said the company was 'going all-in on AI,' explaining that the layoffs were part of a broader strategic shift and that, going forward, the publication would need to reduce its dependence on traffic in general. In addition to cutting click-dependent areas like its commerce business, BI would launch live journalism events, double down on subscriptions, and encourage all its journalists to embrace AI tools. This is far from the publication's first move on this course. Not long ago, the company had ambitions to become a general interest brand, but after changing its name to Insider in 2021, it switched back to Business Insider less than three years later. Since then, the publication has been investing more in unique voices and talent instead of the volume content that fueled the company's rise in the 2010s, when media brands like Vice, Quartz, and Buzzfeed were dominant. The old media playbook meets a new world The thing about BI, though, is that it was one of the few success stories to come out of that era. The publication sold to Axel Springer for $343 million dollars back in 2015, just before the bottom fell out of the scale media market. Perhaps that's why it took BI so long to adapt. It's been shedding its workforce for a couple of years—now roughly half the size of its 2022 peak of 1,000 people, according to Press Gazette. Now AI is forcing the issue. Peng's memo says that 70% of BI 's business suffers from 'traffic sensitivity,' a euphemism for content designed to attract eyeballs on the open web by appearing in search, social, or feeds. Who are those people? How do you keep them coming back or transacting with your brand? In the media model BI was built for, it didn't matter—it only mattered how big the number was on any given day. Now BI is doing exactly what any media consultant would recommend: adopting tactics like paywalled subscriptions, events, newsletters, and first-party data. It's the right strategy, but for BI the moves are reactive retreats rather than proactive bets. That doesn't mean they're bad ideas, but BI 's DNA was born out of a different era. It has a brand, but is it strong enough to make the transition that AI demands? I don't mean to pick on BI, but I do think it exemplifies why digital media companies from the 2010s are likely going to have the hardest time in the AI era. Legacy mainstream outlets like The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal have built moats with their strong journalism and diverse revenue streams. On the other end, smaller digital upstarts like 404 Media, The Ankler, and The Free Press are finding success by cultivating talent, getting scoops, and offering unique perspectives. It's the brands in between—the ones that followed the same playbook as BI —now scrambling to re-architect themselves to meet this moment. Ziff Davis (owner of PCMag, Mashable, and IGN) is similarly feeling pressure, as seen in its lawsuit against OpenAI, arguing that its strategy of publishing evergreen, free content on the internet to maximize clicks has made it particularly vulnerable to substitution by AI. Experimentation isn't transformation As evidence of the BI 's all-in bet on AI, Peng talked about AI-powered features like its site search and dynamic paywall. She also mentioned that 75% of the staff were now using AI tools, specifically ChatGPT Enterprise, with the aim to get the figure to 100%. The note encourages 'bold experimentation,' and says they're building prompt libraries and sharing everyday AI use cases among staff. However, this description of AI initiatives, while directionally solid, sounds like it's still in the early stages. Contrast that with an AI-forward newsroom like Reuters, which has built modular tooling tailored to newsroom workflows, under a clear 'reduce, augment, transform' framework. It's great that they're moving forward, but without a focus on systems, transformation will be piecemeal. And while the choice of ChatGPT is expected given the company's partnership with OpenAI, pushing a single AI model over all the others is inherently limiting. For other digital media brands who fear death or downsizing, BI 's approach is instructive. It's urgent to rethink dependency on traffic, and even the lens of measuring success through traffic. Certainly, ad impressions are the KPI driving all this, and it's not going to go away overnight (or ever, really). But a long decline seems inevitable. Shifting focus from traffic to metrics that measure impact, engagement, and loyalty is step one. That's the path to cultivating direct reader relationships—essential to building media brands that are sustainable in the AI era. BI 's shift is a step in the right direction, but survival won't come from cost-cutting or tool adoption alone. The digital media brands that make it through this next wave will be the ones that know who they're for and what makes them worth returning to. That means being willing to rethink how things get made in the first place—and why.
Tom's Guide
3 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Samsung and Apple are the wrong brands to make thin phones — here's why
It's been a week since the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge launched. But even as the tech world moves on, and we witness the launch of the Nintendo Switch 2, and the build-up to WWDC 2025, it's still occupying space in my mind, and the minds of my colleagues, for being a competent but confusing device. We like the Galaxy S25 Edge plenty, but all the same it feels like the iPhone 17 Air, expected later this year, could easily beat the S25 Edge as long as it does more than just be thin, or makes fewer sacrifices like pricing or camera performance in the name of slimming things down. But there's one thing both companies could have done to help, but that Samsung has not done, and that I expect Apple won't do either. And it's the crux of why I think Samsung and Apple should leave the slim phone idea to other companies. Batteries is the obvious area where thin phones run into limitations. Less internal space requires a sacrifice of battery size and capacity, and that's exactly what we saw in our own battery testing of the Galaxy S25 Edge, which found that the S25 Edge has a battery life between around three and four and a half hours shorter than other Galaxy S25 models. This wasn't inevitable though — Samsung just needed some new tech to help. Brands like OnePlus and Honor have been launching phones with silicon-carbon battery tech — a new combination of materials for batteries that packs more power into a smaller area. This is ideal for a slim phone like the Galaxy S25 Edge, which needs a big battery to fuel its big 6.7-inch screen, but can't take the battery from the identically-sized Galaxy S25 Plus due to its reduced depth. However, Samsung elected to stick with good old lithium batteries for the S25 Edge. Which meant it's ended up with a smaller capacity than the much smaller Galaxy S25, and resulted in the underwhelming battery life results I mention above. Optimistically, a smaller battery for the rumored iPhone 17 Air will perhaps be less of an issue than it is on the Galaxy S25 Edge. Apple's good at getting the most out of smaller batteries with its in-house hardware and software, as we can see on our best phone battery life guide with the iPhone 16 Pro Max. Apple's current top iPhone lasts slightly longer on the TG custom battery test than the Galaxy S25 Ultra, but while using a 6% smaller battery. But the iPhone 17 Air would still presumably get more battery life if Apple elected to use silicon-carbon batteries. I don't have high hopes of Apple fulfilling my wish though, given how the company is normally slower than other brands to integrate new tech into its products. Just look at the iPhone Fold, or rather the current lack of one, compared to the seventh-generation foldables Samsung is expected to launch later this year. It really shows how patient Apple can be about fitting new tech to its phones. So Apple's expected reluctance to address the slim phone battery life question, and Samsung's open focus on design over outright performance with the Galaxy S25 Edge, is why these are the wrong two companies to be pushing this phone format. I don't think the slim flagship phone's going to catch on until users can be certain they'll still get a day's use out of their new phone. Silicon-carbon battery tech is the obvious way to fix this, and therefore Honor, OnePlus and other companies already experimenting with the technology should use this knowledge to show us how slim phones should be done.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Fake Job Offer That Could Cost You Everything
Think you'd never fall for a fake job offer? Think again. The fastest-growing scam in America right now isn't about Nigerian princes or shady crypto—it's texts offering high-paying jobs for easy tasks. And as the job market tightens, younger job seekers are falling hard. Business Insider reported that according to the Federal Trade Commission, Americans lost nearly $470 million to scam texts in 2024. While fake delivery notices topped the list, job offer scams were number two. These messages often impersonate companies like Temu, Amazon, or Target and promise thousands in exchange for simple tasks like rating products or boosting apps. What makes these scams particularly dangerous is how realistic they seem. Many victims are asked to share personal information, Social Security numbers, IDs, even bank details, under the guise of onboarding. The twist? Some are even told to purchase office equipment with fake checks and send back the 'overpayment,' only to discover the checks bounce after their money is long gone. The FTC's Kati Daffan says reported losses to job scams have tripled since 2020. Proofpoint's Selena Larson notes these scams thrive on emotional manipulation—excitement, urgency, and the fear of missing out on a rare opportunity. And Gen Z is especially vulnerable. Between remote work expectations, a harsh job market, and a culture that handles everything by text, many don't think twice about engaging with a recruiter over a messaging app. As one expert put it, younger users 'just click, click, click.' The rise of AI has made it even easier for scammers to craft realistic, mistake-free messages. Combine that with financial anxiety and a lack of coordinated enforcement, and you've got a scammer's dream scenario. The best defense? Slow down. Research the offer. If a job pays in crypto, conducts interviews via text, or asks for money upfront—it's likely a scam. Real employers don't operate like Fake Job Offer That Could Cost You Everything first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 5, 2025
