
Margaret Atwood calls Canada-U.S. tensions ‘most direct threat since the War of 1812'
TORONTO - Margaret Atwood says it feels 'very weird' to see reality mirror 'The Handmaid's Tale' as the dystopian series comes to an end.
The show, adapted from the Canadian author's 1985 novel and filmed largely in and around Toronto, aired its final episode on Crave this week.
Starring Elisabeth Moss as June Osborne — a woman forced into reproductive servitude under a brutal theocratic regime — 'The Handmaid's Tale' is set in a totalitarian society that strips women of their rights and autonomy.
Since its debut, the series has often felt reflective of real-world politics, especially during Donald Trump's presidency. It premièred amid a growing cultural reckoning over reproductive rights and authoritarian rhetoric, and its imagery even bled into protest movements — with women's rights activists donning red robes and white bonnets based on the show's costume design.
'That's uncanny. Trump won the first time in 2016 when we were in the middle of shooting Season 1, and we all woke up the next day and said, 'We're in a different series,'' Atwood said in Toronto on Thursday while in town to receive an honour at The Hollywood Reporter's Women in Entertainment Canada Awards.
Although the script hadn't changed, she said, 'the frame changed, and people viewed it way differently than they would have if Hillary Clinton had won. If she'd won, it would've been, 'We missed the bullet.' But when he won, people were going, 'Here it comes.''
With Trump now back in office, Atwood reflected on the series' conclusion and the strange timing: 'It's very weird. But we'll be launching 'The Testaments' Season 1 in less than a year, and that's weird too,' she said, referring to the Hulu sequel series based on Atwood's 2019 novel.
''The Testaments' takes place after 'The Handmaid's Tale,' when a resistance is already building. As they do.'
That sense of resistance also applies to the current political tension between Canada and the U.S., as growing anxieties over trade disputes and cultural sovereignty are bubbling to the surface — and, in Atwood's view, reaching a level of urgency not seen in decades.
'I've seen that movie a couple of times, but under different circumstances,' she says.
'I think this is the most direct threat we've had since the War of 1812.'
The author notes Canada's had a renewed spirit of patriotism she hasn't witnessed in years.
'I know there's a degree of 'yay Canada' that I haven't seen since the 1980s. So it's very interesting for me, and quite new for a lot of young people. They're probably thinking, 'What just happened? What's going on? Is this real?'
Still, she says, Canadians shouldn't panic just yet.
'To cheer you up, the States and Canada are both members of (NATO),' she says, explaining that if the U.S. took any hostile action it would first have to exit the alliance, which would then have to defend Canada. 'So how much of a world war do you want to get into?'
And while some Canadians are calling for homegrown artists to step up amid rising calls for cultural protectionism, Atwood believes true artistic expression can't be forced.
'You can't order artists to do anything, and if you are ordering them and they're obeying you, they're just propaganda tools,' she says.
'So let the artists rip, they'll make their own decisions, they will create their own things, and then you can decide what you think about them.'
Ultimately, Atwood has cautious optimism about the public's ability to recognize warning signs before dystopian fiction becomes lived reality. 'I don't see people running around in red outfits with bonnets yet, so we still have hope,' she says with a smile.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 29, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
28 minutes ago
- New York Times
What We Know About the Conflict Over a Trans Athlete in a California Track Meet
A transgender girl in California qualified for this week's state high school track and field meet, and her inclusion in the two-day event has angered people who do not believe that trans girls should compete in girls' events. They believe that trans girls hold a physical advantage and say that allowing them to take part is unfair. Her participation has fueled a political debate that has reached the White House: President Trump has threatened to pull federal funding from the state if it lets the trans girl, AB Hernandez, compete at the meet. Civil rights advocates have denounced the threat as bullying behavior. Now the eyes of the president, the governor, conservative activists and transgender rights groups will be on the meet, which began Friday in Clovis, near Fresno. It's arguably the most competitive high school track and field meet in the nation. Here's what to know: What events is the trans girl competing in? Hernandez qualified for the meet in three events: the high jump, the long jump and the triple jump. On Friday, she finished as the top qualifier in all three events and advanced to Saturday's finals. There, medals typically go to the top nine athletes. She is one of the favorites in the long jump and the triple jump. What is the gist of the debate? People who are against trans girls' competing in girls' events believe that those athletes hold unfair advantages over other competitors. Athletes who were born male, they say, have a physiological edge — including muscle mass and bone length — that they retain even after their transition. They think that physical edge makes it harder for all girls to have an equal chance at making teams, qualifying for meets and winning. In California, trans girls have had the right to compete in girls' events since 2013, when a law was passed that said students could participate in school sports in the category that matched their gender identity. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TVLine's Performer of the Week: Elisabeth Moss
THE PERFORMER | Elisabeth Moss THE SHOW | The Handmaid's Tale More from TVLine Your Friends & Neighbors Finale Reveals Who Killed Paul - Will You Come Back for Season 2? The Morning Show Sets Season 4 Premiere Date, Confirms Jon Hamm's Return - See First Photos The Handmaid's Tale Boss Reveals the Character He Almost Killed Off in the Series Finale (But Didn't) THE EPISODE | 'The Handmaid's Tale' (May 27, 2025) THE PERFORMANCE | We'll admit: We're not entirely sure how June survived to see the end of The Handmaid's Tale. But praise be that she did, because Elisabeth Moss was utterly magnificent in the series' final episode. Moss has repeatedly demonstrated how June's inner strength carried her through situations that should have destroyed her. That internal fortitude became second nature to the character, and Moss' direct gaze into the camera — so often employed when all hope seemed lost — became a powerful signal that June would not be broken. But with Gilead's defeat (in Boston, at least), June suddenly found herself on uneven footing. What does the de facto leader of a rebellion do when she's suddenly faced with choices for her future? Or, more startlingly, a future at all? The emotional armor with which Moss fortified her character was considerable — and even more striking when it fell away, as it did in the scenes with June's baby daughter, Nichole, and her mom, Holly. First, June confessed to her child that she couldn't stay to raise her while Gilead's horrors raged elsewhere, especially with Nichole's sister, Hannah, still in the theocracy's grasp. Moss' whispered monologue gave way to tears as the reality of the situation consumed June, all of her feelings of failure and shame pouring out when she and Holly discussed the future. It was the most vulnerable we'd seen June in a long time, and Moss was absolutely stunning. We'd be remiss not to highlight the serenity Moss imbued in June as the hour came to a close and her story began anew. Here was a character who'd endured unimaginable suffering but emerged stronger, played by an actress at the top of her craft. Nolite te bastardes carborundorum, indeed. Scroll down to see who got Honorable Mention shout-outs this week… Paddy Considine's Kevin is one of the few Harrigans who operates on an even keel, which made the character's breakdown in Sunday's MobLand all the more shocking. Another reason? Considine's striking performance as Conrad's son finally confronted the trauma he'd carried for years. The emotional maelstrom began with Kevin calmly marveling at the fact that the man who had repeatedly raped him in juvenile detention didn't even remember his name or face. But the disbelief on Considine's face quickly gave way to pain, his voice wavering as he told the former guard that he had ruined his life. Almost as soon as he pulled his gun, Kevin fell apart — Considine slumping in his chair, folding in on himself as he sobbed. Then, when his rapist had the audacity to mention his children, Considine snapped Kevin back into his sense of duty, pulling an emotional about-face so swiftly we're still reeling. It turns out Kevin is a looser cannon than we'd imagined, and we're eager to see what Considine does with him in this week's season finale. — K.R. Your Friends & Neighbors threw a bunch of plot twists at us in its freshman season, but one constant was the surprisingly tender relationship between exes Coop and Mel, brought to life by co-stars Jon Hamm and Amanda Peet. Hamm found some of Coop's warmest moments playing against Mel, and Peet refused to turn Mel into a stereotypically vengeful ex-wife. In this week's finale, both actors were hitting on all cylinders as Mel confronted Coop about his upcoming murder trial. Peet let us see how truly worried Mel was about Coop's future, and Hamm unleashed a season's worth of frustrations in a shouting tirade. In the end, Coop was exonerated, and Hamm and Peet showed us a bit of the old spark between Coop and Mel as they slow-danced at a swanky gala. The fancy cars and daring robberies might grab the headlines, but Hamm and Peet's stellar work made sure that Coop and Mel's relationship was the secret heart of it all. — Dave Nemetz Most sincerely, it boils down to this: If I hadn't known that Archie Panjabi would be appearing on Doctor Who this season, I'm not entirely sure I would have recognized her as the Rani — especially when she fully embodied the character in this week's 'Wish World.' As a new form of the iconic Whoniverse villain, Panjabi adopted a swagger that would humble even Kalinda Sharma, and put an amount of Colman's mustard on her line readings that could have dressed a hundred frankfurters. The Rani is a ruthless, renegade Time Lord, and Panjabi fittingly went all in with her performance, with animated movements that in ways evoked the Wicked Witch of the West. It's Friday night as I write this, so I'm curious to see what the finale holds for Panjabi's high-camp villainess. But it's sure to be one hell of a time. — Matt Webb Mitovich Which performance(s) knocked your socks off this week? Tell us in the comments! Best of TVLine Young Sheldon Easter Eggs: Every Nod to The Big Bang Theory (and Every Future Reveal) Across 7 Seasons Weirdest TV Crossovers: Always Sunny Meets Abbott, Family Guy vs. Simpsons, Nine-Nine Recruits New Girl and More ER Turns 30: See the Original County General Crew, Then and Now


CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Analysis: The Mount Rushmore of things people want to name after Trump
Sadly for President Donald Trump's most ardent fans, there's probably no room left on Mount Rushmore. There's also a law on the books since 1866 that forbids placing the likeness of a living person on US currency. But those obstacles have not stopped members of Congress from introducing legislation to honor their leader larger-than-life in stone and on legal tender. There are proposals to place Trump on the $100 bill, perhaps replacing Benjamin Franklin, or on an as-yet unprinted $250 bill. None of these ideas seem likely to become law, but they are emblematic of a trend of similar efforts to flatter the president. Another idea formalized in an official legislative proposal would withhold funds from the Washington Metro Area Transit Authority, WMATA, until it is renamed 'WMAGA.' DC's Metrorail commuter train, better known as the Metro, would be renamed the 'Trump Train.' Sometimes, just saying MAGA doesn't go far enough. While nobody should expect to get on the Trump Train near the White House any time soon, there's a real possibility every new baby could get a Trump Account. An early draft of the megabill on Capitol Hill riffed on Democratic proposals to give each American baby some seed money at birth. At first, the plan was to call this money 'MAGA Accounts.' The name was changed to 'Trump Accounts' in the version that passed the House. We'll see if the idea makes it through the Senate. The president will also receive a big birthday bash at taxpayer expense. There will be a spectacular display of US military might to honor the US Army's 250th birthday and Flag Day, which happen to coincide with Trump's birthday on June 14. 'I view it for Flag Day, not necessarily my birthday,' Trump told NBC News in a recent interview. 'Somebody put it together.' Another proposal in Congress would make Trump's birthday (and Flag Day) a national holiday. There may also be a fighter jet whose name nods at Trump's presidency. 'It'll be known as the F-47. The generals picked a title. And it's a beautiful number. F-47,' Trump said during an appearance in the Oval Office announcing the new contract for Boeing to build a sixth-generation fighter. Trump, in his second term, is the 47th president. And before you ask, no, the F-14 Tomcat did not memorialize 14th US President Franklin Pierce any more than the F-16 Fighting Falcon memorialized Abraham Lincoln. There is at least a conversation in conservative media outlets about placing Trump on Mount Rushmore, the South Dakota rock face that honors George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt and Lincoln. 'A lot of people wonder: Will we ever see President Trump's face on Mount Rushmore? What do you think?' Trump's daughter-in-law, the Fox News host and former RNC official Lara Trump, asked Interior Secretary Doug Burgum. 'Well, they certainly have room for it there,' Burgum said, despite evidence to the contrary. The National Park Service has worked with an engineering firm in past decades to explore the structural integrity of the rock face, and there is no more carvable space, a spokesperson told the Argus Leader in 2020. And the monument is a completed work of art by the sculptor Gutzon Borglum. During Trump's first term, then-South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem gave him a $1,100 bust of Mount Rushmore featuring his face, knowing he'd appreciate the gesture. She's now his homeland security secretary. Trump's eponymous company is pursuing golf, hotel and residential projects in far-flung locations – the Middle East, Indonesia and India. And the company that runs his social media platform bears his initials as its stock ticker. One place that features the faces of living people on its currency is the United Kingdom, which honors its king in that way. But Trump already does have a currency of sorts – a memecoin, which has made a few people a lot of money, including Trump. He celebrated its top investors in a controversial 'personal time' event at his Trump-branded golf course earlier this month. Another proposal on Capitol Hill would rename Dulles Airport for Trump, which would give the DC region its second airport named for a Republican. It was President Bill Clinton who signed the bipartisan legislation giving Ronald Reagan's name to Washington National Airport in 1998. The move was controversial, but ultimately bipartisan. From CNN's report at the time: The Reagan Legacy Project of the Americans for Tax Reform, a conservative group, launched the airport campaign last year as part of a wider effort to put his name on buildings and his face on Mount Rushmore… Some Democrats offered to name practically anything else for Reagan except that airport, suggesting the Pentagon or Dulles International Airport. Others suggested Reagan had been honored enough with a new office building and a new Nimitz-class aircraft carrier, both of which carry his name. It can take a long, coordinated campaign to get something like an airport named for someone. Reagan was still alive at the time, but suffering from Alzheimer's, and a full 10 years out of office. Will there still be energy to name things for Trump 10 years from now?