logo
RFK Jr. says annual COVID-19 shots no longer advised for healthy children and pregnant women – a public health expert explains the new guidance

RFK Jr. says annual COVID-19 shots no longer advised for healthy children and pregnant women – a public health expert explains the new guidance

Yahooa day ago

On May 27, 2025, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention will no longer include the COVID-19 vaccine on the list of immunizations it recommends for healthy children and pregnant women.
The announcement, made in a video posted on the social platform X, comes on the heels of another announcement, made on May 20, in which the Food and Drug Administration revealed that it will approve new versions of the vaccine only for adults 65 years of age and older and for people with one or more risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes. The agency will require vaccine manufacturers to conduct clinical trials to demonstrate that the vaccine benefits low-risk groups.
The Conversation U.S. asked Libby Richards, a nursing professor from Purdue University involved in public health promotion, to explain what these announcements mean for the general public.
Currently, getting a yearly COVID-19 vaccine is recommended for everyone ages 6 months and older, regardless of their health risk.
In the video announcing the plan to remove the vaccine from the CDC's recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and healthy pregnant women, Kennedy spoke alongside National Institutes of Health Director Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Marty Makary. The trio cited a lack of evidence to support vaccinating healthy children. They did not explain the reason for the change to the vaccine schedule for pregnant people, who have previously been considered at high-risk for severe COVID-19.
Similarly, in the FDA announcement made a week prior, Makary and the agency's head of vaccines, Vinay Prasad, said that public health trends now support limiting vaccines to people at high risk of serious illness instead of a universal COVID-19 vaccination strategy.
Many public health experts and professional health care associations have raised concerns about Kennedy's latest announcement, saying it contradicts studies showing that COVID-19 vaccination benefits pregnant people and children. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, considered the premier professional organization for that medical specialty, reinforced the importance of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, especially to protect infants after birth. Likewise, the American Academy of Pediatrics pointed to the data on hospitalizations of children with COVID-19 during the 2024-to-2025 respiratory virus season as evidence for the importance of vaccination.
Kennedy's announcement on children and pregnant women comes roughly a month ahead of a planned meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, a panel of vaccine experts that offers guidance to the CDC on vaccine policy. The meeting was set to review guidance for the 2025-to-2026 COVID-19 vaccines. It's not typical for the CDC to alter its recommendations without input from the committee.
FDA officials Makary and Prasad also strayed from past established vaccine regulatory processes in announcing the FDA's new stance on recommendations for healthy people under age 65. Usually, the FDA broadly approves a vaccine based on whether it is safe and effective, and decisions on who should be eligible to receive it are left to the CDC, which bases its decision on the advisory committee's research-based guidance.
The advisory committee was expected to recommend a risk-based approach for the COVID-19 vaccine, but it was also expected to recommend allowing low-risk people to get annual COVID-19 vaccines if they want to. The CDC's and FDA's new policies on the vaccine will likely make it difficult for healthy people to get the vaccine.
The CDC lists several medical conditions and other factors that increase peoples' risk for severe COVID-19. These conditions include cancer, diabetes, heart disease, obesity, chronic kidney disease and some lung conditions like COPD and asthma. Pregnancy is also on the list.
The article authored by Makary and Prasad describing the FDA's new stance on the vaccine also contain a lengthy list of risk factors and notes that about 100 million to 200 million people will fall into this category and will thus be eligible to get the vaccine. Pregnancy is included. Reversing the recommendation for vaccinating healthy pregnant women thus contradicts the new framework described by the FDA.
Studies have documented that COVID-19 vaccines are safe during pregnancy and may reduce the risk of stillbirth. A study published in May 2025 using data from 26,783 pregnancies found a link between COVID-19 infection before and during pregnancy and an increased risk for spontaneous abortions.
Importantly, a 2024 analysis of 120 studies including a total of 168,444 pregnant women with COVID-19 infections did not find enough evidence to suggest the infections are a direct cause of early pregnancy loss. Nonetheless, the authors did state that COVID-19 vaccination remains a crucial preventive measure for pregnant women to reduce the overall risk of serious complications in pregnancy due to infection.
Immune changes during pregnancy increase the risk of severe illness from respiratory viruses. Vaccination during pregnancy also provides protection to the fetus that lasts into the first few months of life and is associated with a lower risk of COVID-19 related hospitalization among infants.
The changes to the CDC's and the FDA's plan for COVID-19 vaccines also leave out an important group – caregivers and household members of people at high risk of severe illness from infection. This omission leaves high-risk people more vulnerable to exposure to COVID-19 from healthy people they regularly interact with. Multiple countries with risk-based vaccination policies do include this group.
High-risk children age 6 months and older who have conditions that increase the risk of severe COVID-19 are still eligible for the vaccine. Existing vaccines already on the market will remain available, but it is unclear how long they will stay authorized and how the change in vaccine policy will affect childhood vaccination overall.
To date, millions of children have safely received the COVID-19 vaccine. Data on whether children benefit from annual COVD-19 vaccines is less clear. Parents and clinicians make vaccination decisions by weighing potential risks with potential benefits.
Not automatically. Kennedy's announcement does not broadly address healthy adults, but under the new FDA framework, healthy adults who wish to receive the fall COVID-19 vaccine will likely face obstacles. Health care providers can administer vaccines 'off-label', but insurance coverage is widely based on FDA recommendations. The new, narrower FDA approval will likely reduce both access to COVID-19 vaccines for the general public and insurance coverage for COVID-19 vaccines.
Under the Affordable Care Act, Medicare, Medicaid and private insurance providers are required to fully cover the cost of any vaccine endorsed by the CDC. Kennedy's announcement will likely limit insurance coverage for COVID-19 vaccination.
Overall, the move to focus on individual risks and benefits may overlook broader public health benefits. Communities with higher vaccination rates have fewer opportunities to spread the virus.
This is an updated version of an article originally published on May 22, 2025.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Libby Richards, Purdue University
Read more:
FDA will approve COVID-19 vaccine only for older adults and high-risk groups – a public health expert explains the new rules
Vaccines against COVID-19, the seasonal flu and RSV are our best chance of preventing a winter surge
Why pregnant people should get vaccinated for COVID-19 – a maternal care expert explains
Libby Richards has received funding from the American Nurses Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FBI's Bongino Says Agency Probing COVID-19 Origin Cover-Up as New Strain Drives Cases
FBI's Bongino Says Agency Probing COVID-19 Origin Cover-Up as New Strain Drives Cases

Epoch Times

time9 minutes ago

  • Epoch Times

FBI's Bongino Says Agency Probing COVID-19 Origin Cover-Up as New Strain Drives Cases

The FBI is investigating the alleged cover-up of the origins of COVID-19, the agency's deputy director, Dan Bongino, said on May 29, as a new strain of the virus has started to circulate in some parts of the world. 'As we read and process reports of a new COVID strain emerging, I want you to know that we are actively investigating, in multiple field offices, the cover-up of the origin of the COVID virus, along with associated matters requiring our attention,' Bongino

US Rep. Jim Jordan backs Iowa's Rep. Zach Nunn for 2026 reelection bid
US Rep. Jim Jordan backs Iowa's Rep. Zach Nunn for 2026 reelection bid

USA Today

time11 minutes ago

  • USA Today

US Rep. Jim Jordan backs Iowa's Rep. Zach Nunn for 2026 reelection bid

US Rep. Jim Jordan backs Iowa's Rep. Zach Nunn for 2026 reelection bid Show Caption Hide Caption President Trump works to sway GOP holdouts on policy bill President Donald Trump is working to clear out GOP opposition to his policy bill, meeting with lawmakers behind closed doors to sway holdouts. Republican U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan cast the political left as 'crazy' and 'mean' while he hyped up his colleague, U.S. Rep. Zach Nunn, at a special meeting of Des Moines' Westside Conservative Club. Jordan, a Republican from Ohio who chairs the House Judiciary Committee, was in Des Moines on Thursday, May 29, supporting Nunn. Nunn is running for reelection to the 3rd Congressional District next year. And the race has begun in earnest as Democrats begin entering the race. Democratic state Reps. Sarah Trone Garriott and Jennifer Konfrst have both announced their candidacies. And national Democrats have once again targeted the seat as a prime pickup opportunity. 'Thanks for getting off the sidelines and getting in the game,' Jordan told the group, which gathered at the Machine Shed Restaurant in Urbandale. 'I learned a long time ago, good things in life don't just happen. You want to accomplish anything that matters … it takes hard work, it takes sacrifice, but most importantly, it takes a willingness to assume risk.' Politics is a risky business, he said, particularly in an age of division. He said the dividing line between the parties currently is one of 'common sense.' 'We're the party of common sense and normal,' he said. 'You think about the left, it is crazy to defund the police. … It's crazy to not have a border. It is crazy to have men compete against women in sports.' He painted Democrats broadly as untrustworthy, pointing to decisions made during the COVID-19 pandemic to shut down schools and churches as well as the current conversation about whether former Democratic President Joe Biden was mentally fit to serve in office. More: $1,000 to seek asylum? House Republicans propose new immigration fees 'The left will tell a lie,' Jordan said. 'Big media will repeat the lie. Big tech will amplify the lie. And then when you tell the truth, they call you a racist or some other name. They'll attack you. They'll come at you personally because they're mean. Then pretty soon, your position will be proven accurate. So much so, in this example even, Jake Tapper wrote a book to say we were right.' Tapper is the co-author of a book that suggests aides and confidantes close to Biden shielded him from the public to hide his declining mental state. Nunn said he had recently spoken to Republican President Donald Trump about the importance of Iowa's congressional races in the coming midterm elections. 'We were just on a conversation with the President, and he said, 'You know what, everybody looks to Iowa, and they might be looking at presidential races coming up in 2028,'' Nunn said. 'But the President said, 'I am laser focused on 2026.'' Nunn again touted the tax cut and spending package that recently cleared the House of Representatives. 'It adds 10,000 new ICE agents,' he said. 'But at this point, we almost don't even need them, because the president has been so effective, they've stopped coming over themselves.' He said he believes there are people who need access to social safety net programs, but he believes the legislation, which makes massive spending cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, are for the best. 'There are important things that Washington can do for Americans,' Nunn said. 'I'll be the first to say, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and SNAP do help Americans. But they have to be used in a way to help Americans with a hand up, not a handout.' Brianne Pfannenstiel is the chief politics reporter for the Des Moines Register. Reach her at bpfann@ or 515-284-8244. Follow her on X at @brianneDMR.

Bank of England governor urges deeper ties with EU to ‘minimise' Brexit impact
Bank of England governor urges deeper ties with EU to ‘minimise' Brexit impact

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bank of England governor urges deeper ties with EU to ‘minimise' Brexit impact

Andrew Bailey has urged the UK government to deepen ties with the EU, as he warned a breakdown in global trade would make it harder for the Bank of England to control inflation. In a speech in Dublin on Thursday, the Bank's governor said a stronger relationship between London and Brussels could 'minimise negative effects' of Brexit on trade. Calling for closer cooperation on financial services as a priority, Bailey said government efforts to reset relations with the EU were a 'welcome step forward' after the UK's formal departure from the 27-country bloc in 2020. Bailey said, as a civil servant, he took no position on Brexit, and he understood there could be other reasons why voters backed leaving the EU, but he said the evidence showed that the UK's changing trade relationship had 'weighed' on Britain's economy. 'This does not mean that Brexit is wrong, because there can be other reasons for it, but it does suggest, I think powerfully, that we should do all we can to minimise negative effects on trade,' he said. The Bank's governor has previously called for the UK to strike deeper ties with Brussels to strengthen the economy, ahead of a deal agreed between Keir Starmer and the EU's Ursula von der Leyen in London earlier this month. On a day of dramatic developments in Donald Trump's increasingly erratic international trade war, Bailey said tougher barriers to trade made the economy less efficient and could therefore stoke inflation. UK inflation jumped by more than expected in April, to 3.5% from 2.6% in March, after sharp rises in water bills, energy costs and council tax. The Bank of England targets 2% inflation. Bailey warned that simmering geopolitical tensions and the fragmentation of international trade suggested the lengthy, complex manufacturing supply chains of the past were unlikely to return. 'The inevitable conclusion is that we cannot assume the supply sides of our economies behave as efficiently as they did before Covid. And this was a substantial cause of the very difficult upsurge in inflation,' he said. 'Our jobs are much harder if we face more inflexible and uncertain supply side conditions in our economies, as we appear to do today.' His comments came as figures from the Office for National Statistics showed inflation in March rose at a faster pace for private and social renters than older households who own their homes outright, extending an intergenerational gap that has opened up since September 2023. Inflation was 3.6% for private renters in the year to March compared with 1.8% for 'outright owner-occupiers', the ONS said in its latest estimate of household living costs. Social rents have also jumped, pushing up the cost of living for renters in local authority and housing association homes by 3% in the year to March. Groups representing young people and renters said the figures provided further evidence of a cost of living gap between younger people and the many older people who had paid off their mortgages and were immune to rising rents and mortgage costs. Renters tend to be much younger than the average age of outright owners. According to government figures, the average age of a private renter is 41, and 53 years in the social rented sector. Mortgage payers, another group that are younger on average than outright owners, had an inflation rate of 2.8% in the year to March. Ben Twomey, chief executive of Generation Rent, said the figures were 'a sour reminder' of the high costs renters pay to have a roof over their head. 'Homes are the foundations of our lives, but renters across the country are at constant risk of losing their homes and even ending up homeless because of soaring costs that swallow up our earnings. 'News of private renters facing the highest household costs is a sour reminder of how much of a raw deal we are getting.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store