logo
Adeel Akhtar: ‘It seemed late in the day to start noticing Asian actors … we've been here a really long time'

Adeel Akhtar: ‘It seemed late in the day to start noticing Asian actors … we've been here a really long time'

The Guardian4 hours ago

A decade ago, it would have been rare to have an Asian actor playing the British prime minister or leader of the opposition. But in the space of a couple of years, Adeel Akhtar has done both. He was the PM in the Netflix drama Black Doves, which took the world by storm last year, and now he's stepping into the shoes of a man vying to be leader of the opposition at London's National Theatre.
For Akhtar, who has been working as an actor for more than two decades, there has been an undeniable shift in the kind of roles he's been offered in recent years. The British Asian experience is no longer a niche subject.
'I wouldn't dream of being offered these types of roles previously,' the 44-year-old tells me when we meet at the National during a Friday lunchtime. 'We're sort of redefining the idea of what an everyman can or should be. We're suddenly in a situation for it not to be a massive thing to be Asian and to be the prime minister; it's just accepted. You can be critiqued in the same way as anyone else, and it doesn't matter what your heritage is. Which really wasn't the case when I first started out. You would find yourself playing a particular type of role over and over again.'
Of course that reflects changes in both British politics – we are, after all, living in the wake of 'Dishy Rishi' in No 10 – as well as evolving attitudes to casting. From Meera Syal to Riz Ahmed to Dev Patel, we're seeing more brown actors stepping into roles where their ethnicity and background are merely incidental, and not the main focus.
'I'm blessed to be able to present some really complicated ideas, and help move conversations on. Working at the National has always been a massive dream,' Akhtar says.
He plays the lead in The Estate, which premieres in early July. Directed by Daniel Raggett and written by Shaan Sahota (a full-time doctor in the NHS), the play explores fictional MP Angad Singh's attempt to become leader of his party.
For Akhtar, it is an opportunity to probe biases within cultures, politics and society. Singh finds out he doesn't have his party's backing, and interrogates the reasons behind that. At the same time, he learns that he has inherited his father's entire estate, while his sisters 'have been completely overlooked'.
The play is based on Sahota's own experiences of growing up in a south Asian community, but Angad's personal sphere is distinct from his political sphere – it doesn't influence his running for leader, and his politics isn't affected by his heritage.
Akhtar may not be a household name yet, but it feels as if he's been in everything. His recent credits are like a roll-call of every massive show on TV over the past few years: Utopia, The Night Manager, Killing Eve, Sweet Tooth, Sherwood, Fool Me Once, Showtrial. He has also starred in films including The Big Sick, The Nest and 2021's critically acclaimed Ali & Ava.
I wait for Akhtar in a small meeting room within the network of nondescript tunnels of the National Theatre building. When he arrives, it's like seeing an old acquaintance. He's wearing a loose blazer from the Salvation Army, rolled-up khakis and a pair of black trainers he 'bought for £30 online'. A faded cap sits askew on his head, giving him the look of a mischievous schoolkid.
Akhtar's dark, hooded eyes and turned-down mouth mean he's described as 'hangdog' in almost every interview he's given, but they're also what make him so relatable. He tells me people often stop him when he's out and about for 'pleasant chats' like they would with a pal. What do they want to talk about?
'Oh, everything,' he says. 'The themes of the shows I'm in, my performance. Particularly Sherwood, which seemed to elicit a huge reaction from people.' Akhtar's devastating portrayal of a man who hides in the forest after killing his son's wife in James Graham's crime drama has often been referred to as a show-stealing performance.
Born in London to a Pakistani father (one of Britain's first Black immigration officers) and an Indo-Kenyan mother, Akhtar knew early on that he wanted to be an actor. As a child he attended speech and drama classes because his parents believed they were elocution lessons that could teach him to 'speak properly'. It was here, during a reading of Lewis Carroll's poem Jabberwocky, that he found his love for performing. He went to boarding school in Cheltenham, where he was one of just a handful of brown kids and had stones thrown at him, then did a law degree due to pressure from his father, before retraining at the Actors Studio drama school in New York.
It was in 2002, on his way to audition for the drama school, that he experienced a life-changing incident. Upon arrival at JFK, a fleet of FBI cars pulled up alongside the plane, handcuffed him and took him away. They had mistaken him for a terror suspect.
'I was detained for hours,' he says. 'This was just post 9/11, so everything you're doing is suspicious and triggering, just because of the colour of your skin.' It was a harrowing experience that sparked years of reflection. 'For ages my name was on the system, so every time I travelled to the States I'd set off an alarm and have to be questioned.'
It is ironic that his first film role that same year was as a 9/11 hijacker in Let's Roll: The Story of Flight 93. But Akhtar has said his experience has actually informed some of the work he's chosen to take on, that he's drawn to stories about people who lack a safety net and put their misguided faith in systems that don't serve them.
His first major role came a few years later, aged 30, in Chris Morris's 2010 cult classic Four Lions. Akhtar played a bumbling Muslim extremist who accidentally blows himself up in a field of sheep.
Sign up to Inside Saturday
The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend.
after newsletter promotion
He calls Four Lions a 'groundbreaking' film. '[Islamic terrorism] was a real hot topic at the time. We were in a situation where we were terrified of the Muslim community, both here and in America. And the film was so irreverent, it just took the teeth out of it. It portrayed these young men as buffoons, clowns, not something to be feared. Because it doesn't matter if it's a bunch of young Muslim lads, or young white lads or whatever, you just get lads in a room and it's going to be a shitshow.'
Despite the success of the film – fans still shout its most famous line 'Rubber dinghy rapids bro!' at Akhtar – the offers failed to come in, and the actor found himself living in a van and desperately searching for work. About that time, he had his beard yanked by a stranger in the street and, on another occasion, a group of men started shouting racist slurs at him when he was with his wife, the director Alexis Burke.
But if Akhtar is holding on to any residual anger, he doesn't show it. 'Even as a teenager, I refused to let anybody tell me I was just one thing, because it's false,' he says. 'If I feel upset by those experiences it means they've won. Whatever they were trying to make me feel worked. The only option is to blankly refuse that. I'm lucky now I can look back on it, with the career that I've had, and interrogate it in different ways.' In fact, he adds, he often draws on his own life in his work. 'I'm always working that way. I ask: what do I have in my experience that is close or approximate to this character?'
Akhtar has the ability to make you root for his characters, no matter how shocking their actions. He won his first Bafta for his performance as the Muslim father who murders his daughter and then kills himself in the BBC Three drama Murdered By My Father, making him the first non-white man to win the lead actor gong (he was previously nominated for Utopia, and has since won a best supporting actor Bafta for Sherwood). It's an event the actor calls 'bittersweet … You can't not celebrate winning a massive award. I was happy and proud of making it happen, but there was also this overwhelming feeling of it being strange. We've been here for a really long time, so 2017 seemed pretty late in the day to start noticing British Asian actors.'
He has become so sought after that his nickname in the business is Ideal Actor, a play on his name. Does he feel vindicated in his decision to stick with acting, despite those years in the van? 'There was never an option of not doing so, because the alternative was returning to a life of law.' What kind of lawyer does he think he would have been? He laughs. 'Oh, a terrible one.'
Over time, the resentment Akhtar once felt towards his father for pushing him into that degree has evolved into understanding. 'I've got kids myself now, an eight- and six-year-old, and I totally get it. My dad came up against a lot of struggles, pain and discomfort. It's the job of a parent to make sure your children don't feel that. He was going to do everything in his power to mitigate against it.'
We discuss that common immigrant experience, of feeling you have to make sacrifices for your parents because of the huge sacrifice they made for you. In fact, he says, he has come to believe that cultural assimilation is the greatest act of creative expression. Even if they couldn't understand his career choices, he feels he can trace his talent for creativity straight back to his parents.
'I'm writing a film at the moment which is loosely based on my mum and her experience of coming over from east Africa,' he explains. 'I was working out why I was drawn to this story. I was thinking of her leaving Nairobi as a 16-year-old. How she got on a plane and flew over. The only thing she could hold on to was this faint idea of what her life could be, and the only thing at her disposal to meet that vision was her sheer will. It's like being in front of an open canvas, or the first page of a novel. There's nothing more terrifying than looking at a horizon and it being blank, with nothing to orient you.'
He dwells on this. 'Maybe that's why I stuck with the acting on some level, because I saw in my parents the tenacity and will to meet your objective,' he adds.
The Estate is Akhtar's second play in two years, after starring in Anton Chekhov's The Cherry Orchard at London's Donmar Warehouse last year, and he says he would love to do more. It reminds him why he wanted to act in the first place. 'It's just you and the audience. The thing that makes it terrifying is the thing that makes it so fulfilling.'
Is there anything specific he hopes audiences will take away from The Estate? 'We're so multiplicitous as individuals, I just hope people have an insight into an experience they otherwise wouldn't have been exposed to. In this instance, it's seeing someone who is British Asian in a way they wouldn't necessarily have seen them before. You want people to bypass the nonsense questions – like why is this person in this position? – and get to the proper questions, like am I feeling something true?'
The Estate is at the National Theatre: Dorfman, London, 9 July to 23 August.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK must push for diplomatic solution following US strikes on Iran, says Swinney
UK must push for diplomatic solution following US strikes on Iran, says Swinney

Powys County Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

UK must push for diplomatic solution following US strikes on Iran, says Swinney

John Swinney has said the UK must push for a diplomatic solution delivered by the international community, following the overnight US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme. The Scottish First Minister's response to the developments in the Middle East came after Sir Keir Starmer urged Iran to return to negotiations. UK minister Douglas Alexander said the Government 'has been putting contingencies in place' as the region braces for any potential retaliation from Iran. US President Donald Trump said three key nuclear sites in Iran were 'completely and fully obliterated' in the military strikes. The US is thought to have used B-2 stealth bombers to drop bunker-busting munitions on the sites – including the deeply-buried Fordo facility – as well as 30 Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from submarines. The US-UK base at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean is not thought to have been used in the operation. Posting on X, Mr Swinney said: 'The Middle East conflict has reached an alarmingly greater level of danger after the US attacks on Iran. 'The conflict must be stopped by a diplomatic solution delivered through the international community. And the UK Government must insist on that now.' The Prime Minister had earlier said Iran should 'return to the negotiating table', noting the region remains 'volatile'. The Middle East conflict has reached an alarmingly greater level of danger after the US attacks on Iran. The conflict must be stopped by a diplomatic solution delivered through the international community. And the U.K. Government must insist on that now. — John Swinney (@JohnSwinney) June 22, 2025 He said: 'Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. 'Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat.' Former Scottish first minister Humza Yousaf was critical of the Prime Minister's response. He posted on social media: 'An awful statement from the PM, which ignores our collective responsibility to uphold international law. 'Supporting illegal military action in Iran, and gas-lighting us about an imminent nuclear threat, is hauntingly reminiscent of the lies told in the run up to the Iraq war.' During a protest march in London, Mr Yousaf had earlier accused the UK Government of 'abusing' anti-terror laws against the Palestine Action group, which vandalised two aircraft at RAF Brize Norton. Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. The situation in the Middle East remains volatile and stability in the region is a priority. We call… — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 22, 2025 Trade policy minister Mr Alexander, who is the MP for Lothian East and a former international development minister, spoke to the BBC's Sunday Show. He said: 'I understand that people have woken up this morning to the news that was breaking overnight with a real sense of concern. 'I want to assure your viewers that the British Government has been putting contingencies in place. 'There have been a whole series of meetings, I and other have been attending Cobra meetings in the course of the week.'

If my father can't hand his title to a woman, boys will continue to dominate
If my father can't hand his title to a woman, boys will continue to dominate

Telegraph

time26 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

If my father can't hand his title to a woman, boys will continue to dominate

Is it not staggering that, in 2025, only a male can inherit a hereditary title along with the possible land, house and seat in Parliament that come with it? More than a decade ago, Parliament voted to remove male bias in the royal family's succession laws, yet it remains ingrained elsewhere in Britain. Concurrently, I see an endless stream of foreigners coming to my current home of California to take advantage of its liberal rules on assisted fertility. They harvest embryos with IVF and choose the gender of the embryo to be implanted into their, or a paid surrogate's, uterus. Among the people I know who do this, they so often choose a male. Some friends choose to do IVF in California because they cannot get pregnant naturally. But I also know some who are doing it solely to select the gender of their offspring. It's legal in the USA – they call it 'family balancing' and it's a very common request – whereas in the UK, it is illegal. I only learnt this recently. Now that I'm aware, I cannot help but see the link to our archaic primogeniture rights in Britain – and feel compelled to speak out. If daughters do not have inheritance rights in the UK, we are simply reinforcing, in law, the idea that boys are better. This makes it more likely that people will continue choosing boys at Californian IVF clinics. The boys will continue to dominate – and that's just wrong. In my opinion, this gender discrimination is not a problem that affects just the 0.001 per cent – it is an issue that affects the psyche of a nation, and perhaps, inadvertently, multiple nations. This archaic rule reinforces the idea that a daughter is a disappointment. Incapable. Obsolete. It's a global mindset, and as long as Great Britain continues to favour boys over girls, it only strengthens that mindset worldwide. I believe the hereditary title and the possible estate that accompanies it should go to the eldest born, irrespective of gender. In these gender-transitioning times, this statement is more important than ever. As my father, the Earl of Balfour – a man with four daughters, of whom I am the second, and no sons – has suggested previously, the bizarre status quo might mean that my elder sister, Lady Willa Franks, could be eligible to inherit his title if she chose to change her gender. If males who transition to females are allowed to compete as women in the Olympics, then a female who transitions to male can surely inherit a castle. As it stands, when my father dies, his title will go to his younger brother Charles, and then onto Charles's son (his second-born child, because of course it will bypass Charles's firstborn, a daughter). I am the second daughter of an Earl; I have nothing to gain personally by fighting this fight (unless I transition from female to male and 'usurp' my older sister – now there's a thought). Nor do I have anything to lose. 'If you see an injustice, speak out,' people say – and I cannot remain silent, even if the dinosaurs in the House of Lords take umbrage. Some 91 hereditary peers remain in the Lords, having inherited their titles because they have penises. Sir Keir Starmer plans to remove them altogether but seems less concerned about the fact it is still called the House of Lords. It should be renamed the House of Peers. The reverberations of a change to our primogeniture rules would, of course, extend beyond the IVF clinics of California. I am not motivated by the young girls missing out on British dukedoms, though I think about them often. I am thinking about those girls in Afghanistan or Sudan who are denied the chance to go to school by overbearing fathers who deem them more useful as servants at home. I am fighting for them just as much as for my kind, community-serving older sister, who would be a perfect candidate to inherit my father's title and the responsibilities that come with it. I want to make this change for them – because the world is one and equal opportunities matter. That's why I support the 'Land for Women' campaign by the Legacy of War Foundation, which promotes the economic empowerment of women through land ownership. Some argue that the system of hereditary titles should be abolished altogether – although it would seem daft to me to erase the unique and beautiful thing that is British history. But even then, there are still houses and estates – jewels of the nation that are unique and need able custodians. (Come and live in the USA and you'll start to understand the sheer magic of an Anglo-Saxon castle or a Baroque stately home.) These custodians can be just as well female as male – with whatever gendered partner, husband, wife, companion or team of supporters to help, of course. Both are qualified for such a role. The late Queen Elizabeth II – a most capable manager and matriarch – proved that for 70 years. I am not a feminist (a word too female-heavy for me); if I must call myself anything, it is 'gender equalist'. Ideally, I'd class myself simply as 'human' in a time when women have earned the right to vote and the right to equal education and employment opportunities. I do not mean that we excel at the same things – no; we may all overlap in certain tasks, but women excel in some areas that men do not, and vice versa, with myriad overlaps in between. The world would not function if it were not for both sexes. And if owning and running a stately home is akin to raising a child, as many suggest, then clearly a female is as capable as any man in the role. Award them to the firstborn, be they male, female, transgender or non-binary. It's a small change that will make a big impact. And please, let's do it soon, Sir Keir – before those American IVF clinics select even more boys for their customers and discard the girls forever.

Iron Maiden's ‘2 Minutes to Midnight' has never felt more timely
Iron Maiden's ‘2 Minutes to Midnight' has never felt more timely

Telegraph

time27 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Iron Maiden's ‘2 Minutes to Midnight' has never felt more timely

Iron Maiden are a band undimmed by age. In front of a capacity crowd at the Utilita Arena in Birmingham, the group of 60-somethings – propelled by drummer Simon Dawson, who replaced the now-retired Nicko McBrain last year – appeared adrenalized. Delivering 1980s hits such as The Trooper, Aces High, The Number of the Beast and Run to the Hills, bassist Steve Harris sprinted back and forth across the stage while guitarists Adrian Smith, Dave Murray and Janick Gers lacerated the air with solos that sounded like electricity looking for trouble and lead singer Bruce Dickinson became an air-raid siren in human form. Unlike AC/DC and Metallica, metal's other market leaders, Iron Maiden refuse simply to wheel out the same show for years on end. On their last arena tour, they stuck to a set list harvested, mostly, from their most recent album, Senjutsu (2021) and Somewhere Back in Time, from 1986. A year later, they are instead performing a series of evergreen bangers drawn from their first decade or so, and somehow making them sound brand new. Despite largely representing a period in which they wore younger men's clothes – Spandex, mostly – the set also featured a smattering of the kind of roomier material the band have increasingly embraced in more recent years. And, during the 13-odd minute Rime of the Ancient Mariner and the fussy Seventh Son of a Seventh Son, with their innumerable time-changes and scenic detours, I admit I found my mind wandering. At other times, though, they remained bang on the money. Indeed, given the events that would unfold in Iran overnight, the nuclear war-themed 2 Minutes to Midnight was a grimly prescient choice. At the time of its release, many people sneered at music like this. Now, 41 years later, you could argue that, with its fixation on death and apocalyptic anxiety, metal might just be the protest music of our times. Elsewhere, with lyrics about being pursued by Satan or chasing Native Americans across the plains, Maiden provided escapism in a thrillingly immediate form. Nothing wrong with that, of course. This normally unreflective band also allowed their audience a rare glimpse behind the bombast. The evening ended with the superb Wasted Years, a song about the sacrifices made by musicians who live on the road. 'Too much time on my hands, I got you on my mind / Can't ease this pain,' Dickinson sang. Perhaps not. But in the four decades that have elapsed since the track's release, Iron Maiden have embarked on dozens of tours, playing hundreds of concerts to people who, as was clearly the case in Birmingham, adore them. And, with great purpose, they're still at it. Never mind that the band's core members are all marching towards their 70th birthdays, evidently their journey continues to bring joys – both to them and us – that far outweigh the strain. Iron Maiden are on tour in the UK until June 30. For details, see:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store