
Kleinfontein is not an illegal township, maintains CEO
Mayor Moya has established a committee to prevent more townships from popping up.
While City of Tshwane Mayor Nasiphi Moya has declared Kleinfontein among 17 illegally established townships in city, the Afrikaner-only town's leadership says nothing could be further from the truth.
Earlier this week, Moya confirmed that the city has identified 17 illegally established townships within the metro's boundaries, some established on municipal land or private property. These include:
Leeuwfontein;
Kleinfontein;
Moshate Gardens;
Marula View;
Mooikloof (Tweefontein) Wallmannsthal;
Haakoringboom;
Onderstepoort;
Elandsfontein Plots;
and Moloto City.
Moya said the individuals responsible for these settlements did not follow the legal framework that governs township establishment.
'In most cases, no formal township application was lodged, environmental and planning approvals were bypassed, and no bulk infrastructure was planned or installed,' she said.
Moya said these illegal developments now face a host of serious challenges, including inadequate access to water, electricity, sanitation, and roads, poor spatial integration, and service delivery backlogs.
Moya has established a mayoral sub-committee to prevent more townships from popping up.
The High Court in Pretoria declared Kleinfontein illegal last year and ordered the city to enforce its laws and regulations in the area. The settlement's leaders said they planned to challenge this in court.
Town not illegal, says CEO
Kleinfontein CEO Stefan Wiese welcomed the establishment of this committee, but disputed that the town is an illegal township.
'Kleinfontein is a legally established cultural settlement in terms of section 235 of the constitution of the Republic of South Africa, which provides for the right to self-determination of cultural communities.
'This status was formally acknowledged by the Gauteng Legislature in 2013, following a visit to Kleinfontein by members of the provincial legislature, who recognised our community as a legitimate cultural expression under the constitution,' he said.
Wiese said Kleinfontein is built on private land, legally bought and fully paid for by its members, and developed using funds raised entirely by the community.
'We have received no government grants or assistance in this regard.
'Kleinfontein is also not a burden on the City of Tshwane. Since our establishment more than 30 years ago, we have provided all municipal-type services internally, including water, sanitation, electricity distribution, refuse removal, and internal security.
'We do not receive or require any municipal services from the City.
'Importantly, Kleinfontein has had an active rezoning application with the City of Tshwane since 2013,' he added.
Wiese said they were relieved that this matter may now finally receive the attention it deserves through the work of the committee.
'A resolution to this long-outstanding application will bring clarity and benefit all,' he said.
ALSO READ: WATCH: 'Apartheid and Kleinfontein can't be mentioned in the same sentence' says Afrikaner community after MK party visit
What the committee will do
The committee's focus will be on reviewing the findings and legal implications of the 17 identified illegal townships, consulting with affected communities and property owners, engaging relevant departments and enforcement agencies, and recommending a consolidated approach and draft policy for the Council's consideration.
The committee includes the MMC for Human Settlements Aaron Maluleka, the MMC for Economic Development and Spatial Planning Sarah Mabotsa, the MMC for Utilities Frans Boshielo, and the MMC for Community Safety Hannes Coetzee.
ALSO READ: EFF to march to exclusive Afrikaner township Kleinfontein
Are they paying tax?
Tshwane's Democratic Alliance (DA) caucus spokesperson, Jacqui Uys, said the party hopes the outcomes of the committee's investigations will be fair towards all the ratepayers and residents of Tshwane.
'The City of Tshwane has 19 illegally established developments, like Kleinfontein, Leeufontein, and Moshate Gardens, where approximately 19 500 individuals are not charged rates and taxes. The city chose to leave some untaxed, yet charge punitive taxes on others,' she added.
Uys said it is not fair to Tshwane taxpayers that these areas are exempt from paying tax.
'However, many of whom the homeowners in these developments were hoodwinked by developers when purchasing their properties and were unaware of the accompanied illegalities, thus a punitive tax is also unfair,' she concluded.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
9 hours ago
- The South African
What happens if Afrikaner 'refugees' want to come home?
A second batch of Afrikaner 'refugees' have settled into the US, and thousands more are expected to arrive. However, with South African-born Elon Musk's ongoing feud with President Donald Trump, concern is mounting among those who now call America home. More importantly, will they be allowed to return to South Africa? It's no secret that President Donald Trump's view of South Africa was influenced by his former right-hand man, Elon Musk. Born in Pretoria, and having left at just 17, the world's richest man has actively accused his country of birth of promoting 'white genocide', 'farm confiscation,' and 'racist laws'. With Trump now threatening to cut all government contracts to Musk, and possibly distance himself from him altogether, what does this mean for the Afrikaner 'refugees' already in the US? What does Elon Musk's rant mean for Afrikaner 'refugees'? Images via X The group of white South Africans was offered asylum based on proving their fear of persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. Under US and international immigration laws, refugees who have received asylum cannot simply be deported to their country of persecution. Legislation also vigorously protects their rights to stay in their new adoptive country. However, their status can be terminated should they be found guilty of serious crimes or if they fraudulently sought asylum. According to the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), there is a strict vetting process for those who seek refugee status in the country. Once resettled in the US, refugees are permitted to work immediately. They will be eligible for a green card a year later. However, there are also stringent travel restrictions in place. The USCIS states that all refugees must obtain permission via a travel document before they depart the US. Failure to do so could result in asylees being denied re-entry into the US. These actions could also strip asylees of their refugee status, resulting in removal proceedings before an immigration judge. In the case of Afrikaners, returning to South Africa – considered the country of 'persecution' – could come at a cost. Here is how… Refugees who visit SA without prior permission shall be presumed to have abandoned their asylum unless they can establish compelling reasons for their return. Refugees are expected to explain the reason for their return in the process of obtaining permission. Returning to one's country of claimed persecution could result in termination of asylum if there are fundamental changes in circumstances back home. Termination could also occur due to fraud in the asylum application. This happens if an applicant is not eligible for refugee status. Returning to SA for business or pleasure can be considered evidence that the refugee's alleged fear of persecution is not genuine. For Afrikaner 'refugees' hoping to return home willingly for good, voluntary repatriation is always an option. Organisations like the UNHCR help those who wish to travel back to their countries by providing financial assistance. According to the South African Department of International Relations, 'refugees' would be welcomed back as citizens. However, they would have to revoke their status in order for this to happen. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X , and Bluesky for the latest news.

IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Elon Musk's influence on Trump: A closer look at the Afrikaner genocide debate
US president Donald Trump shakes hands with billionaire businessman Elon Musk on May 30 before their public feud. Image: Allison Robbert / AFP The public fallout between US President Donald Trump and South African-born billionaire Elon Musk is not bothering one of the political parties in the Government of National Unity (GNU). Trump and Musk took to their social media platforms this week over differences in his administration's spending. Musk stated that Trump would not have won the 2024 presidential elections without his campaign spending hundreds of US dollars. Freedom Front Plus leader Dr Corné Mulder said he did not believe the approach by Trump or his administration would be changed due to the bitter feud and affect its response to allegations of 'genocide' against white Afrikaner farmers in South Africa. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Mulder was responding to questions about whether the fallout could see Trump dramatically changing his views on the white Afrikaner genocide in South Africa. Musk is widely regarded as a person who wielded immense influence on Trump. 'It is incorrect to assume that US foreign policy is based on the influence of specific individuals. Unhappiness with SA is not something new. Even during the (Joe) Biden administration, a bipartisan bill was introduced in the US Congress to relook the US-SA relationship,' he said. Political analyst Professor Dirk Kotzé said Musk has in the past been influential in these issues, but there are many other South Africans who are also influential and close to Trump. 'So it will not necessarily change this matter, I don't think Musk was the one who dealt with or promoted the issue of genocide necessarily, he was more there in terms of black economic empowerment and employment equity and those government policies that he criticised, so he will continue with that until there is an agreement about Starlink,' Kotzé explained. He added: 'When it comes to the Afrikaner issues and what is called genocide, I don't think he was ever a key person in that, I think that is more where the conservatives – AfriForum, Solidarity, (South African-born American conservative political commentator and radio host) Joe Pollak and others – came in to promote that idea.' Kotzé said his understanding is that there has been a smaller, second group that went to the US after the earlier AfriForum-Solidarity delegation, but without any public attention because it created much more disturbances within US politics in general. 'So I think it has become a controversial issue in the US, and Trump wants to avoid that. I can see that this is not going to be a public project in the future, it is not something they will announce in the media, welcome them, and have public events,' he predicted. Kotzé also anticipates that this initiative or project will, over time, actually slow down. 'I don't see it developing strong momentum that it will be something very prominent in the future. I think it is going to disappear over time,' he said.


The South African
14 hours ago
- The South African
Afrikaner 'refugees': What happens now after Elon Musk's rant?
Elon Musk's fallout with US President Donald Trump has sparked concern for Afrikaner 'refugees' who arrived in the US last month. To date, two groups of white South Africans have resettled in the country under a programme signed off by the president. Elon is cited as 'influencing' Trump on claims of 'white genocide', 'farm confiscation,' and 'racist laws' happening in his country of birth. However, all of these contentious issues have been disputed by South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. Could the feud between the world's richest man and the world's most powerful man halt the refugee plans, or possibly see the 'persecuted' South Africans deported back home? On Thursday, 5 June, Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's feud over a clash in the legislature reached a boiling point. On the X platform – owned by Elon – many wondered what would become of the Afrikaner refugees whose plea to be freed of 'persecution' was aided by the two men. For many, this was a running joke about the 'misinformation' that has been spread about South Africa. Comedian David Kau posted: 'I stand with the 49 Afrikaner Americans in these difficult times'. Comedic puppet Chester Missing added: 'Elon and Trump getting divorced? So tragic. Who keeps the Afrikaner refugees?' Here's what others had to say… With President Trump threatening to cut all government contracts to Elon Musk, and possibly distance himself from him altogether, what does this mean for the Afrikaner 'refugees' already in the US? The group of white South Africans was offered asylum based on proving their fear of persecution on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group. Elon Musk's ties to Trump have been irreparably severed. What happens to Afrikaner 'refugees' now? Images via X: @usembassysa Under US and international immigration laws, refugees who have received asylum cannot simply be deported to their country of persecution. Legislation also strongly protects their rights to stay in their new adoptive country. However, their status can be terminated should they be found guilty of serious crimes or if they fraudulently sought asylum. According to the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), there are stringent travel restrictions in place for asylum seekers. In the case of Afrikaners, returning to South Africa – their country of 'persecution' – could come at their peril: there is no guarantee of their readmission into the US. Returning to SA could also be considered evidence that the refugee's alleged fear of persecution is not genuine. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.