
Meet the human-like robot on its first day of work
A humanoid machine called Apollo has just taken a tentative, slightly jerky, but significant step forward in the robot revolution.
The 5'8" tall robot performed the first public demonstration in a real-world setting of a real-world task - in this case assembling an engine part - entirely autonomously.
Clicking two parts together with a twist of its servo-controlled wrists, and handing it to a human colleague is a basic task. But it's also an important moment in the much-hyped world of human-like robot development.
"This is a really big day for us," says Jeff Cardenas, chief executive of Apptronik, the US company behind Apollo.
"We're excited to show this off, excited for the public to see the robot live and in person."
Mercedes-Benz has announced a multimillion-pound investment in Apptronik and is trialling a handful of the humanoid robots at its factory in Berlin and another in Hungary.
Investors and industrial firms - particularly car makers with long experience of using robots in manufacturing - have been closely following the development of human-like robots.
The costs of small, lightweight components have fallen as artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms and computer vision technology have led to rapid advances in the field of robots that can emulate human movement and tasks.
But despite a rising number of increasingly impressive-looking cyborgs being unveiled by tech companies in the US and Asia, few have taken their first steps out of the lab.
The Apollo robot looks small and underpowered surrounded by the huge robotic arms that weld, bolt and inspect Mercedes' latest cars at the Berlin-Marienfelde plant.
But hosting a robot with a human "form-factor" is more than just a photo opportunity, according to Mercedes-Benz.
"There's one big advantage," says Jorg Burzer, head of production and supply chain management at the German car maker.
"A humanoid robot is flexible, so you can basically introduce it to an assembly line or internal logistics or quality inspection... you can basically move it from one place to another."
Introducing a new assembly line, or upgrading an old one with traditional robotic arms is a major investment.
A robot that can be adapted to a range of tasks and work alongside humans would avoid that investment.
With hands and feet like ours, they can operate tools and work in the same workspaces as people.
Apollo can lift more than 25kg and potentially perform repetitive tasks that are, in the words of humanoid robot developers, too "dull, dirty or dangerous" for humans.
The purpose of the trial is to establish which tasks humanoid robots can usefully do and help improve the machine learning and dexterity required to do more.
"We want to try to find out what is really possible," says Mr Burzer.
"It's also very important to test how a humanoid robot can be integrated in running production together with our colleagues working here every day."
Texas-based Apptronik is reluctant to make claims as bold as some of their rivals.
"Everyone's ready for a robot to come into their home and do all of their laundry and all the things that they don't want to do. But it's very early on," says Mr Cardenas.
"Take the analogy of the shift to the personal computer. We're in the early '80s so at the very beginning."
Investors seem to believe in a robot-dominated future. One recent forecast sees the humanoid market growing 20-fold in the next eight years, with predictions of a population of tens of millions of the machines by 2050.
One major hurdle is the AI brains behind them.
Apptronik admits a truly "general purpose" robot capable of functioning outside a predictable and controlled environment like a factory won't be possible until computer intelligence can understand the real world like we do.
So-called "world models" are very much a work in progress for AI developers.
So the important questions, like when humanoid robots will steal our jobs, or whether they will go rogue and rise up against us can wait... for a little while at least.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
25 minutes ago
- Reuters
Focus: US importers turn to brokers to navigate Trump-era tariffs, at a cost
NEW YORK, June 11 (Reuters) - U.S. importers are increasingly relying on customs brokers to keep up with President Donald Trump's ever-changing trade policies. But booming demand for help in processing foreign goods has made these services more expensive, adding another cost to the tariff burden, industry players told Reuters. Customs brokerages, until recently an anonymous branch of the import ecosystem, handle the paperwork needed to process shipments and calculate tariff bills. Mom-and-pop brokers interviewed by Reuters say they are raising fees, while major logistics firms like Memphis, Tennessee-based FedEx (FDX.N), opens new tab and Germany-based DHL ( opens new tab are also adding staff to their customs compliance teams. Market research firms ballpark customs brokering as a roughly $5 billion industry in the United States. Hiring a broker is optional, but the increasing complexities of U.S. tariffs and customs regulations are leading more importers to shell out the cash. Independent brokers like Laredo, Texas-based JD Gonzalez are fielding dozens of questions daily from concerned clients struggling to understand what they may owe to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and whether to go ahead with shipments or hold off. Brokers are also spending more time and labor on customs forms than ever, and have in some cases implemented new IT systems. 'With all the new information we have to process, some of the automation we've used has been thrown out, so there's more work to do,' said JD Gonzalez, who is also president of custom brokerage trade group NCBFAA. The trend is part of a broader wave of corporate efforts to bolster trade compliance operations. Major companies, from Nike (NKE.N), opens new tab to Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab to Lowe's (LOW.N), opens new tab, had published job postings as of Wednesday for trade and customs professionals. Nike was seeking a 'lead' for trade and customs, who would 'play a pivotal role in shaping the future of our trade compliance framework,' according to the post on Nike's careers website. Amazon, meanwhile, had at least 10 U.S. customs brokerage jobs listed on its careers website. Lowe's had three. Nike, Amazon and Lowe's did not respond to requests for comment. Independent brokers often base their fees on the number of codes they must enter to classify the contents of a given shipment. Known as harmonized tariff schedule codes, these line items help border officials distinguish car parts from children's toys, and determine proper tariff rates. Prior to Trump's frenetic tariff policies, fees ranged from around $4 to $7 per code. But Gonzalez said the extra costs brokers have incurred as they ramp up systems to handle the tariff changes have led some to increase fees by $1 to $5 per code. Gonzalez said he has raised fees 'nominally,' while Steve Bozicevic, CEO of A&A Customs Brokers headquartered in Seattle and Vancouver, said his company added $3 per product type being imported into the U.S. because of merchandise facing "tariff stacking," a phrase used when an item faces multiple tariffs. "We raised the rates for the U.S. because of the new and added complexity," Bozicevic said. The company has not raised rates for imports into Canada because there's "no new complexity," he said. United Parcel Service (UPS.N), opens new tab raised brokerage rates in December between $3.75 and $50 per import entry, depending on the country of origin. The move was part of general rate increases and unrelated to changes in tariffs, a UPS spokesperson told Reuters. FedEx's logistics arm increased its base customs brokerage rates by 4% in January, according to a company spokesperson. These bigger logistics companies, which include brokerage services in their broader shipping offerings, are also beefing up staff. DHL has upped headcount on its U.S. customs entry team by 30% since February, according to a spokesperson for the company's DHL Express shipping unit. FedEx had more than 40 open job postings on its customs and trade teams as of Tuesday, mainly based in the U.S., according to its LinkedIn jobs page. UPS had 10 similar U.S. positions open, according to its jobs website. FedEx is "adjusting our network to meet demand" in an evolving tariff landscape, which "includes hiring additional customs brokerage roles," the spokesperson said. UPS declined to comment on the job postings. Historically, tariff changes have been less frequent, say brokers, trade lawyers and other trade professionals, and they have come with weeks of lead time, allowing brokers to prepare for the change and provide logistical feedback to CBP. Compare that to last week's doubling of steel and aluminum tariffs to 50%, which Trump announced abruptly, forcing the U.S. customs department to quickly publish official guidance just hours ahead of a midnight change. "Many brokers clear shipments ahead of time, so then you have to come back and retroactively redo it and fix it," said Miami-based customs broker Ralph De La Rosa, whose company, Imperial Freight Brokers, was founded by his father 54 years ago. Even brokers who have not raised fees said their services have become inherently more expensive as the number of HTS codes has spiked. Importers slowed shipments into the United States after Trump's massive tariff announcement on April 2, after having frontloaded purchases earlier in the year to get ahead of an expected rise in duties. Imports of consumer goods, which include cell phones and other household items, decreased $68.9 billion to $277.9 billion in April from a month before, according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Trump announced additional tariffs on steel and aluminum in June and in May threatened to impose 50% tariffs on the European Union. Adding to the uncertainty, a federal appellate court on Tuesday ruled that sweeping tariffs may remain in effect while appeals proceed, after a trade court ruled that the U.S. president overstepped his executive powers and blocked the duties. The appellate scheduled arguments for July 31.


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Campaigners welcome decision to call in Flamingo Land's controversial Loch Lomond plans after government U-turn
The Scottish Government has called in plans for a major development on the banks of Loch Lomond. Campaigners have welcomed a decision by the Scottish Government to call in Flamingo Land's controversial plans for a £43.5million resort on the banks of Loch Lomond. Yorkshire-based theme park operator Flamingo Land, through its subsidiary Lomond Banks, had proposed to construct two hotels, over 100 lodges, a waterpark and monorail at Balloch. After a long-running battle, initial proposals were shelved in 2019 due to significant local opposition and concerns from bodies such as the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA), the Woodland Trust and the National Trust for Scotland. Subsequent revised plans were unanimously turned down by the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park authority - however, an appeal by Lomond Banks was upheld by a Scottish Government reporter, who imposed 49 conditions on the developer and required them to reach an agreement with the authority before commencing construction. Despite pressure from MSPs, Public Finance Minister Ivan McKee had previously declined to step in regarding the decision to proceed with the plans. But in a statement released on Tuesday evening, he confirmed that the government would now recall the plans. "I have decided to recall the Lomond Banks appeal as the proposed development raises issues of national significance in view of its potential impact on Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park," the minister said. "This means that the appeal should be determined at a national level." Mr McKee had previously mentioned that "technical planning issues" were involved in the application, stating it was right for "objective planning judgment" to be used, hence the Government would not intervene. Following his remarks, a campaign spearheaded by the Scottish Greens saw over 50,000 individuals petitioning him to reconsider. Loch Lomond South Community Development Trust (LLSCDT) welcomed the decision and said it is actively working to shape and promote a "positive, community-ledalternative vision for the area—one that supports sustainable tourism, protects theenvironment, and truly benefits the people who live, work, and visit Loch Lomond". LLSCDT chairwoman, Lynne Somerville said: 'The people who live here must have a real say in the future of this place—not as an afterthought, but as equal partners. "The overwhelming response from the community shows not only opposition to inappropriate development, but also a clear appetite for something better—something rooted in fairness, sustainability, and local benefit. "Under the 2015 Community Empowerment Act, communities like ours are legally entitled to be heard and treated with respect in decisions that affect our land and future. It's time that legislation was meaningfully upheld.' The announcement arrived just a day before Scottish Labour planned to initiate a debate urging Government intervention, with Dumbarton MSP and the party's deputy leader Jackie Baillie suggesting ministers were apprehensive about a potential defeat. "The SNP face a motion tomorrow from Scottish Labour demanding that the application is recalled," she commented. "Thanks to cross party support for our motion, the SNP has U-turned before it was defeated in the chamber." In her statement, Ms Baillie remarked: "This is a welcome U-turn by the SNP, though it shouldn't have taken the fear of a defeat in Parliament to force them to reach this decision. "The SNP has ignored concerns time and time again – from politicians across the chamber and from local campaigners. "It is not right that a single reporter was allowed to overrule the National Park Authority's unanimous decision to reject the bid of the Flamingo Land resort. "This decision requires proper democratic oversight and I'm pleased ministers have finally accepted our calls and agreed to step in." Reacting to the announcement, Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer commended the decision, saying it was the "right move". "The evidence of the damage it would do to one of Scotland's most iconic locations is overwhelming," he added. "Once ministers consider the flood risk, loss of ancient woodland, hundreds of additional cars which would be brought onto notoriously congested roads and the litany of other devastating impacts it would have, I am sure they will reject the mega-resort application and finally end this decade-long saga. "People across Scotland expect their Government to protect our natural heritage. "Given previous mistakes, including the approval of Donald Trump's golf course despite local objections and serious environmental concerns, this is an opportunity for ministers to show that they have learned and will now put people and planet ahead of greedy developers."


Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Council decides on plans for flats in town near Glasgow
The application for a brownfield site at 82 to 84 Cross Arthurlie Street in Barrhead was submitted to East Renfrewshire Council by Glasgow-based developer AS Homes. The plans, which show a mixture of one and two-bedroom properties, have been given the green light subject to 17 conditions. READ NEXT: Greggs store closes temporarily - here's why One of the conditions is that all 12 flats must be for/occupied as social rented housing which is to be provided by a registered social landlord, in perpetuity. The vacant site, which is overgrown, extends from Cross Arthurlie Street on its east side to Henry Street on its west side. The buildings that were on site were approved to be demolished in 2007 and the site has been vacant/undeveloped since the buildings were demolished. As part of the decision, approval was also granted for a parking court containing ten spaces at the rear of the block, a bin store and cycle store as well as housing for a sprinkler storage tank and pump. Access to the parking court will be from Henry Street. Another condition of the approval is that parking courtyard shall not slope towards Henry Street unless drainage infrastructure is installed to prevent water issuing onto the public road. READ NEXT: Plans revealed for new takeaway near Glasgow One objection was received to the plans which raised concerns about neighbour notification not being carried out, overshadowing and the loss of light to a living room and a bathroom. The application's report of handling issued by East Renfrewshire Council stated: 'With regard to the objection that has been received the following comments are made. 'Notices to neighbours were not originally issued when the application was validated as a result of an administrative error. 'The notices to neighbours were subsequently issued dated April 22, 2025 and the requisite time period given for any representations to be submitted before determining the application.'