logo
‘Drones are above our heads': Kurdish-led SDF fights for survival in Syria

‘Drones are above our heads': Kurdish-led SDF fights for survival in Syria

The Guardian21-02-2025

Thirty meters under the city of Kobani, north-east Syria, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) kept a watchful eye on the Turkish border. A plasma screen TV displayed 16 surveillance feeds to officers in a room in one of the Kurdish-led militia's tunnels, where Kalashnikovs and SDF flags adorned the walls.
The soldiers dare not emerge from the tunnels, fearful of being picked off by the Turkish drones buzzing overhead. They move between facilities in the subterranean network on foot, emerging from entrances hidden in nondescript buildings.
'Most of our forces are currently concentrated in the tunnels. When Turkey started threatening us, we started going underground,' Zinarin Kobane, the commander of the SDF's Euphrates region, said during a rare tour of the SDF's tunnel network.
When the Syrian Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) toppled the Assad regime and seized power on 8 December last year, Syria's conflict, frozen for years, suddenly came unstuck. The precarious balance between the US-backed SDF and Turkish-backed Syrian opposition forces was shattered, and frontlines which had been quiet since 2019 reignited.
The SDF was soon pushed out of the city of Manbij, northern Syria, and there have been daily clashes at the nearby Tishrin Dam. The dam, which acts as a natural buffer zone between the SDF and Turkish-backed factions in northern Syria, provides electricity for Kurdish-ruled areas.
The Kurdish forces, with US backing, carved out an autonomous region of north-east Syria in 2012 where they have ruled ever since. Now, with Syrian rebels in Damascus and Turkish-backed fighters on their doorstep, the Kurdish autonomous region is fighting for its survival.
'The dam is our first line of defence. If they break through, it opens the door to occupation of the entire region. We've already lost 14,000 people in the fight against Islamic State – we won't give this area up,' Kobane said.
At stake is a decade-long political project that has ended the oppression of Syrian Kurds. Now, parents can name their children Kurdish names and teach their language in schools – basic rights deprived to the ethnic minority under the Assad regime's 53-year rule.
The SDF's fight against Turkish-backed factions has been punishing. Kobane said the battle tactics of Syrian factions had shifted over the last two months to more closely mirror Turkish military doctrine. While Syrian groups fight on the ground, Turkish drones and warplanes provide cover from above, pounding targets far beyond the frontline.
Aware that they are no match for Turkey, which has the second-largest military in Nato, Kurdish fighters are dug in. A little more than five years after Turkey's invasion of northern Syria in 2019, the SDF began building a vast tunnel network across the region.
The underground facilities, large enough to accommodate thousands of fighters, are advanced. The floors are tiled, air vents bring in oxygen from above ground and wifi allows commanders to comfortably direct battle formations from control rooms located 10 storeys below ground while sipping Pepsi.
The tunnel network has allowed the SDF to shift its tactics to adapt to the threat from Turkish airpower. Its fighters move between underground facilities, emerge behind enemy lines to carry out an attack, then disappear again into one of the networks' many hidden entrances.
As fighting rages on the front, negotiations have begun between SDF leaders and the new Syrian government in Damascus. In early January, the head of the SDF, Gen Mazloum Abdi, met the former leader of HTS, Ahmed al-Sharaa, who is now Syria's president.
Describing the meeting as 'positive', Abdi said the two leaders agreed on general principles and set up two technical committees to coordinate between Damascus and the SDF on military and civil affairs.
'We agreed that we are a part of Syria and that we want to keep Syria unified. But, our view on the way they are dealing with the transitional phase – the practical details, the tools for us to work together, the timeline – our views differ on this,' Abdi said. He added that he believed 'Turkish intervention' was slowing negotiations and had a negative effect on them.
The Syrian government has requested that the SDF disband and integrate within the new Syrian defence ministry so that the north-east can return to Syrian government control. The SDF has said that while it is amenable to integrating within a new Syrian army, it wants to maintain some measure of autonomy under a new decentralised constitution.
The window for the SDF to make a deal with Damascus is closing. As negotiations stall, Damascus is moving ahead with the formation of the new Syrian state, with or without the Kurdish authority.
On Thursday, the Syrian government said any groups that did not lay down their arms would not take part in a national dialogue conference aimed at creating Syria's first permanent government.
Abdi said: 'There should be no pre-emptive conditions for participation in the dialogue conference … We want to work with the new Syrian administration for the sake of the future of Syria, we can build Syria together.'
The SDF is further squeezed by the possibility of a US troop withdrawal from north-east Syria under the Trump administration. The US maintains about 2,000 soldiers in eastern Syria, nominally to support the SDF in their fight against IS. The troop presence is seen as a key deterrent to any Turkish or Syrian invasion of Kurdish-held territory.
The Trump administration has made no announcement regarding its presence in Syria, but its goal of reducing US entanglements abroad and Trump's erratic decision-making has put Kurdish authorities on edge. In 2019, Trump suddenly decided to pull out US troops overnight after a phone call with Turkish president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, leaving the SDF to fend off a Turkish incursion by itself.
The US partnered with the SDF in 2014 to defeat IS, which held swathes of territory in Iraq and Syria as part of its 'caliphate'. Over the last decade, this partnership has become a cornerstone of the Kurdish authority's security.
US armoured personnel carriers patrol the streets of Hasakah, north-east Syria, as people walk by unfazed, used to their presence. A plaque from the former CIA director Gina Haspel that thanks Abdi for his leadership greets guests in the general's reception hall.
That relationship has been increasingly difficult for the US to explain to Turkey, which views the SDF as the Syrian arm of the Kurdistan Workers' party (PKK) – a group it classifies as a terrorist entity and with which it has fought a 45-year war. Turkey, which tolerated the presence of the SDF on its southern border during the fight against IS and Assad, has put increasing pressure on Washington to abandon its partner.
The US diplomat James Jeffrey, a former ambassador to Turkey, envoy to Syria and envoy to the international coalition to defeat IS, said: 'The problem is that much of the reason that we partnered with the SDF has gone away. Tell me how it ends? The Turks are wondering: 'What happened to what you said was a temporary transactional relationship?''
The Kurdish-led forces are not, however, without negotiating cards. The Kurdish-led authorities hold about 70,000 suspected IS fighters and their relatives – thousands of whom are foreigners. Foreign powers are wary of allowing the new authority in Damascus, which holds many foreign jihadists among its ranks, to assume control of the prisons and camps where suspected IS members are held.
Kurdish officials have further warned that a US withdrawal and a subsequent Turkish invasion of north-east Syria could harm their ability to keep IS in check.
'A US pullout would encourage Turkey to attack the area, and that would affect the war against IS in general,' Abdi said, because a security vacuum would hinder the SDF's ability to guard IS prisons and camps.
In Kobani, the prospect of a looming Turkish invasion has created an oppressive sense of unease.
In the countryside surrounding the city, Turkey carries out airstrikes regularly. The streets of the city's main commercial market are covered by corrugated metal sheeting to shield pedestrians from view of Turkish drones overhead. Attacks on the Tishrin Dam and other civilian infrastructure has left the city without water and electricity for days at a time.
'Every day, the drones are above our heads. It has been two months without water and electricity,' said Fidan Shamsi, an 18-year-old traffic officer who lost four teeth and suffered facial scarring in a Turkish drone strike while protesting at the Tishrin Dam on 15 January. Nine out of the 10 women in her police unit were injured in drone strikes – one was killed.
'If you lose your country, you lose your soul. If they attack Kobani, they won't spare anyone,' Shamsi said.
Baderkhan Ahmad contributed to this report from north-east Syria

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US urges UK to U-turn on Israeli sanctions
US urges UK to U-turn on Israeli sanctions

Spectator

time23 minutes ago

  • Spectator

US urges UK to U-turn on Israeli sanctions

As if the Labour government didn't have enough on its plate with Rachel Reeves's spending review to be announced at midday, it is also facing pressure from the US over sanctions imposed on two Israeli cabinet ministers. Late last night, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that the travel ban and asset freezes imposed on security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich 'Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, said that the asset freezes and travel bans on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich 'do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war'. Rubio hasn't just taken aim at the UK – President Donald Trump's man has also urged Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway to row back on their sanctions, while Israel has slammed yesterday's sanctions as 'outrageous'. The move by the UK and allied countries came after remarks made by Ben-Gvir and Smotrich were deemed to have 'incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights' by Foreign Secretary David Lammy.

Democratic governors seek to roll back state-funded health care for undocumented immigrants
Democratic governors seek to roll back state-funded health care for undocumented immigrants

NBC News

timean hour ago

  • NBC News

Democratic governors seek to roll back state-funded health care for undocumented immigrants

A trio of states with Democratic governors viewed as potential 2028 presidential candidates have taken steps in recent weeks to freeze or cut government-funded health care coverage for undocumented immigrants. Democratic Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Tim Walz of Minnesota have largely attributed the proposals to budget shortfalls stemming from original plans to expand health care to immigrants without legal status. But the moves also occur against the backdrop of broader debate within the Democratic Party over how to handle immigration, an issue that dragged it down in the last election and that President Donald Trump and the GOP have continued to try to capitalize on. The plans, which would scale back health care coverage for undocumented immigrants in the three Democratic-led states just years after it was expanded, have angered progressives and immigrant advocacy groups, who warn the party risks alienating its base — particularly as protests against Trump's deportation plans break out around the country. The latest development came in Minnesota on Tuesday, after both chambers of the Legislature passed a bill to end state-funded health care for undocumented adults. The bipartisan effort advanced through the Republican-controlled House and the Democratic-controlled Senate as part of attempts to balance the state budget. It now goes to Walz, who has said he'll sign it. The bill would end undocumented adults' eligibility for MinnesotaCare — the state-funded health insurance program for low-income residents — effectively reversing one of the signature policy wins Walz secured during a landmark legislative session in 2023, when Democrats were in full control of state government. Undocumented children would remain eligible to enroll in the program under the legislation. In California, Newsom unveiled a budget plan last month that would cut back on health care benefits for undocumented immigrants — a stark reversal from his promises of universal health care for all the state's residents, regardless of their immigration status. Newsom's plan in his 2025-26 budget has called for freezing enrollment for undocumented adults to receive the full scope of the state's Medicaid program, known as Medi-Cal. Newsom's office has said the changes would apply only to new applicants over age 19, that existing enrollees wouldn't be kicked off their plans and that the freeze, which would begin next year, wouldn't apply to people enrolled in limited plans. Newsom's proposed changes also included a new $100 monthly premium for adults 19 and older with 'unsatisfactory immigration status' beginning in 2027. His expansion of Medi-Cal has cost far more than his administration anticipated. Newsom has said the changes will help to balance the state's budget, which has run a multibillion-dollar shortfall that he has blamed on Trump's tariffs, as well as growing costs from higher enrollment in Medi-Cal. Meanwhile, Illinois remains on track by the end of the month to end a program — called Health Benefits for Immigrant Adults — that provides state-funded health care coverage for more than 30,000 low-income adults who are living in the state without documentation. Similarly, the program in Illinois was more expensive than expected when it was created in 2021. Pritzker's latest budget, which the Democratic-led Legislature passed last month, proposed eliminating it by July 1. While the moves would help those states recalibrate their budgets, a sweeping Trump-backed domestic policy bill moving through Congress proposes slashing Medicaid funding for states that provide health care coverage to undocumented immigrants. Trump also signed an executive order this year targeting undocumented immigrants' access to government assistance programs. In response to questions from NBC News, Newsom spokesperson Elana Ross reiterated his statement in his initial announcement of the changes last month that 'instead of rolling back the program — meaning cutting people off for basic care — we're capping it.' Pritzker's office said in an email that 'this year, passing a balanced budget required the difficult decision that reflects the reality of Trump and Republicans tanking our national economy and attempting to strip away healthcare.' A Walz spokesperson didn't respond to questions about Minnesota's plan, which was the result of a compromise after Republican lawmakers had pushed to end the entire MinnesotaCare program. 'No one got everything they wanted,' Walz said last month after he reached a tentative deal with Republicans on the budget, which was finalized in a special session this week. 'There were very difficult conversations about issues that were very dear to each of these caucuses. But at the end of the day, we were able to come to this agreement.' Blowback from the left Immigrant advocacy groups have panned the moves, saying they risk further imperiling the broader health care system, and blasted Democrats for succumbing to Trump's attacks. 'We urge state leaders to build on their progress, rather than placing the health of their residents at risk,' said Tanya Broder, the senior counsel for health and economic justice policy at the National Immigration Law Center. 'Particularly as extremist politicians scapegoat and target immigrants, we are counting on state officials to do the right thing and hold the line. 'As states increasingly have recognized, a community's health and well-being depend on ensuring that everyone has access to health care. Immigrants pay billions of dollars in federal, state and local taxes, yet many are excluded from critical health care programs,' she added. 'Terminating state coverage for immigrants will compromise our collective health, as well as the health care infrastructure that serves all of us.' Some progressives questioned whether the moves were part of a broader strategy by the three governors to move to the right on the broader issue of immigration, which polling has shown still remains one of Trump's strongest issues. They said they could face a backlash from their base by departing from positions on supporting immigrant communities and expanding health care. 'It really feeds into the conservative narrative that undocumented immigrants are a drain on our communities,' said Jennifer Driver, a senior director at the State Innovation Exchange, a progressive legislative policy group. 'This assumption that by moving more to the middle or to the right that you're going to recruit some people back — I think it's a miscalculation. 'The frustration that you're seeing in the Democratic base is due to this kind of this waffling, this kind of idea that 'OK, yes, we are progressive — but only in some moments,'' Driver added. Other strategists suggested it remained too early to gauge whether a broader shift was in play as governors and other lawmakers positioned themselves for potential 2028 White House bids, and they emphasized that the threats blue states face from Trump are serious. 'The Trump administration is squeezing the hell out of states,' said Jeff Blodgett, a Minnesota-based Democratic strategist who was a campaign manager for the late Sen. Paul Wellstone and the state director for both of Barack Obama's presidential campaigns. 'There's just a lot of concern about current and future budgets given what the federal government is doing to states.'

US criticises UK for sanctions on extremist Israeli ministers
US criticises UK for sanctions on extremist Israeli ministers

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

US criticises UK for sanctions on extremist Israeli ministers

Trump's secretary of state Marco Rubio said that the travel ban and asset freeze imposed on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich 'do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire' and called for the measures to be reversed. The UK is taking the action alongside Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway. Rubio said that the US 'stands shoulder-to-shoulder' with Israel. READ MORE: UK must do 'far more' than sanctions and stop all arms sales to Israel UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy said on Tuesday that the ministers had been 'inciting violence against Palestinian people for months and months and months, they have been encouraging egregious abuses of human rights'. In a post on Twitter/X, Rubio said that the 'United States condemns the sanctions imposed by the governments of United Kingdom, Canada, Norway, New Zealand, and Australia on two sitting members of the Israeli cabinet. These sanctions do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war.' He went on to say that America reminds 'our partners not to forget who the real enemy is'. 'The United States urges the reversal of the sanctions and stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Israel.' Itamar Ben-Gvir (left) and Bezalel Smotrich (Image: Getty Images) The sanctions against Israel's security and finance ministers were announced on Tuesday. Smotrich and Ben-Gvir are both considered far-right extremists, but are in government as they help to prop up Benjamin Netanyahu's fragile coalition government. Smotrich has campaigned against allowing aid into Gaza, and also supported the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which are considered illegal under international law. Meanwhile, Ben-Gvir has called for Gaza's people to be resettled from the territory. In a joint statement with the foreign ministers of the other nations who also imposed sanctions, Lammy said that the two sanctioned ministers had incited 'serious abuses of Palestinian human rights' and described their actions as 'not acceptable'. READ MORE: Independent Scotland under SNP would break ties with Israel, says Stephen Flynn The statement added: 'We will strive to achieve an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the immediate release of the remaining hostages by Hamas which can have no future role in the governance of Gaza, a surge in aid and a path to a two-state solution.' Downing Street said that the two men had been sanctioned in their 'personal capacities' and not 'their ministries and departments'. 'As the Israeli ambassador to the UK has said in recent interviews, their statements in their ministerial capacities do not even represent government policy,' a Number 10 spokesman said. The UK and other allies have upped pressure on Israel in recent weeks, amid aid shortages in Gaza and suggestions a large-scale offensive could be launched into the territory. It has been reported that only scarce amounts of aid is making it into the hands of people, and the slow flow of food and medicines has prompted warnings of famine and starvation. Netanyahu is wanted for arrest by the International Criminal Court for alleged crimes against humanity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store