
Can't exclude women: Supreme Court on Judge Advocate General recruitments
The Supreme Court on Wednesday came down heavily on the government over the gender disparity in appointments to the Judge Advocate General (JAG) branch of the Army, questioning how the post could be termed gender-neutral when vacancies continue to be bifurcated into male and female categories.'Once women are allowed in JAG, why is a discrimination being made by being posted in A or B area, and why can't they be deployed everywhere,' the bench asked, underlining the need for equal opportunity across all postings.advertisementHearing a challenge to the JAG entry notification, the court pointed to the clear inequality in the vacancy distribution—six posts reserved for men and only three for women. It also raised strong objections to the restricted deployment of female JAG officers in combat or frontline zones.
The government, represented by the Additional Solicitor General (ASG), defended the policy by saying that women are not deployed in such zones because the government does not want them to become Prisoners of War. He argued that it was a policy decision, not discrimination.While acknowledging that female JAG members are combatants, the ASG cited the Balakot strike as an example of their vital contributions. 'Women are playing a very important role in the back...,' he said, stressing that while the face of warfare is changing, it doesn't negate the continued requirement for a male-dominated fighting force.advertisementThe court, however, questioned this reasoning and remarked, 'How in today's time can 50% of the population be asked to not enter one area?' Emphasising the need for inclusive mobilisation, the bench said, 'You cannot exclude them and then say only the men will fight.''In a country of such magnitude with a large population and so many hostile countries around, the entire nation is needed to be mobilised, especially in JAG where women are performing really well,' the court observed.Addressing concerns of merit, the bench clarified, 'We are not saying that a person who is less deserving should get in, but people on lower merit can't be taken only because of gender.''We don't think Army needs such sort of philosophy,' the court concluded.Tune InTrending Reel
IN THIS STORY#Supreme Court

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Chandigarh: No ramp, lift in office meant to aid individuals with disabilities
Meant to provide justice to disabled persons, the office of the State Commission for Persons with Disabilities in Sector 18, which is situated on the first floor, has no facility of lift or ramp. The commission, which has the responsibility to ensure the effective implementation of Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016, itself is ignoring the Sections 40 and 44 which mandate the accessibility of physical infrastructure to the disabled persons, say visitors. The RPWD Act, 2016, specifies 21 types of disabilities. The Section 44 of the RPwD Act goes on to state that no establishment shall be granted permission to build any structure if the building plan does not adhere to the rules under Section 40 and no establishment shall be issued a certificate of completion or allowed to take occupation of a building unless it has adhered to such rules. In the already built infrastructure, the Act calls for provisions for making it accessible to disabled persons. After the Supreme Court directions to states to appoint commissioners for persons with disabilities, the State Commission for Persons with Disabilities was set up in Chandigarh in September 2024. The commissioner was appointed and given office in Sector 18, the same building that houses Chandigarh Right to Service Commission and other offices. As many as 50 cases were listed in the past nine months in the commission that has quasi-judicial powers with about 60% being settled, said commissioner Madhvi Kataria. 'I have written to the social welfare department numerous times to either have the office on the ground floor or make accessibility provisions. The matter has been taken up with the administrator as well. We are hopeful to have a positive outcome,' she said. As a temporary arrangement, the cases related to people with locomotor disability are heard on the ground floor who are unable to walk upstairs. National Association for the Blind's executive member Shiv Kumar, who suffers from visual disability, said, 'Not just locomotor disability, the office structure is not friendly for those with visual, hearing and speech disabilities as there are no tactile tiles on floor, no sign language and braille boards in place. Many people are not even aware of the commission's office because there is no board, website or any awareness about the commission.' Navpreet Ganga, LLB student from Panjan University, who uses crutch to walk, said, 'Nothing feels more demeaning than entering a building with no ramp, no lift, walking on tactile-less floors and having washrooms not made for specially abled.' Social welfare secretary Anuradha Chagti refused to comment on the issue. As per the RPwD Rules, 2017, Harmonised Guidelines for Universal Accessibility have been framed on measures to make physical environment, transportation, information and communications accessible to disabled persons. Among the measures missing in the commission's office are braille/tactile features along with appropriate wayfinding signages, tactile guiding surface indicators and colour contrast at site entrance. There is no floor demarcation in the parking area for people with disability, and also the designated parking is above normal height and only for two wheelers. No beepers are installed at the main entrance point to enable people with visual impairments to locate them. No tactile layout plan along with braille and audio system is there. The guidelines also mention the need to have handrails with braille plates indicating specific location on both sides of the corridors.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Trump threatens broader troop deployment if ICE protests and riots spread
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel President Donald Trump is prepared to deploy National Guard troops in more US cities if protests over immigration raids spread beyond Los Angeles, officials said on Wednesday, June 11. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told senators that the Pentagon could surge Guard units 'if there are other riots where law enforcement officers are threatened'.White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt warned: 'Let this be an unequivocal message to left-wing radicals… You will not succeed,' she has threatened to use force not just against immigration activists, but also any protestors attempting to disrupt the military parade in Washington next Saturday, celebrating the Army's 250th anniversary, which is expected to feature tanks, helicopters, Army parachutists and observers view the parade as a symbolic culmination of a dramatic week in which the president prepared to deploy armed forces against domestic turbulence and embraced military gave a stirring address at Fort Bragg, saying US soldiers 'will chase you down, crush you and cast you into oblivion' if threats did not distinguish between violent protestors and those peacefully opposing his immigration policies. Leavitt insisted during a briefing that 'of course' the president supports peaceful protest, dismissing concerns as a 'stupid question'.Many critics compare the administration's message to authoritarian rhetoric, warning it may erode democratic norms. Harvard professor Steven Levitsky cautioned that deploying troops against protesting civilians without a clear cause resembles tactics used by autocratic sued to block the deployment, arguing it violates state sovereignty and civil rights. A federal court hearing is scheduled 2,000 California National Guard troops are stationed around Los Angeles federal facilities to protect buildings and personnel. Another 2,000 Guardsmen and 700 Marines received crowd-control training and stand rules now specify how active-duty Marines may use force, guided by standing defense protocols. They are armed and geared but not cleared for arrests unless under extreme began in Los Angeles after mass ICE raids. Over 100 people were arrested. Demonstrations have since spread to cities like Philadelphia, Chicago, San Francisco, New York, Atlanta, and Seattle. Some involved peaceful marches; others saw vandalism and arrests.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Assam will deport 'foreigners' even if their names feature in NRC: Himanta
Guwahati, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has said that the state government's current policy is to push back foreigners even if their names are found in the National Register of Citizens . The way the NRC was carried out in Assam leaves a lot of scope for doubt, and it cannot be the only document for determining a person's citizenship, Sarma said. The NRC, an official record of bonafide Indian citizens living in Assam, was updated under the supervision of the Supreme Court and released on August 31, 2019, leaving out more than 19 lakh applicants. However, it has not been notified by the Registrar General of India, leaving the controversial document without any official validity. ''Many people had entered their names in the NRC by using unfair means. So we have adopted the policy of pushing back if the authorities are absolutely convinced that the persons concerned are foreigners,'' the CM said on the sidelines of a programme in Darrang on Wednesday. A large number of people have been picked up from across Assam since last month on suspicion of being doubtful citizens, as part of a nationwide drive, and many of them were pushed back to Bangladesh. Some of them returned after the neighbouring nation refused to accept them as their citizens. ''Personally, I am not convinced that the presence of a name in the NRC alone is enough to determine that someone is not an illegal migrant,'' he said. Asked whether a section of officials did not carry out the NRC exercise with due diligence, Sarma said that is a possibility. Sarma alleged that social activist and author Harsh Mander had camped in Assam for two years, and sent some youths from the state to America and England for education and encouraged them to manipulate the NRC. "These matters came to my knowledge after I became the chief minister,'' he said. Sarma, speaking on detection and deportation of foreigners, during a special assembly session on June 9, had said the state government will implement the Immigrants Act, 1950, for the purpose, which allows the district commissioners to declare illegal immigrants and evict them.