Elon Musk's Attack Of Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Triggers Internet Feeding Frenzy
Elon Musk seemed kinda mad Tuesday ― and the internet couldn't have been happier.
President Donald Trump's former adviser for the unofficial Department of Government Efficiency took to his X social media platform to gripe about the passage of the president's so-called Big Beautiful Bill, calling it 'outrageous' and 'a disgusting abomination.'
To be fair, it's not like the man-child mogul was previously hiding his feelings.
Back in May, he criticized the version that passed the House as a 'massive spending bill' that increases the federal deficit and 'undermines the work' done by DOGE.
On Monday, Republican politicians who worked on the bill pushed back against Musk's attack, saying he didn't understand how it worked.
Many social media users on X, formerly Twitter, reacted to Musk's latest attack with a lot of schadenfreude, that oh-so-apt German word that means finding happiness in another person's misery.
Elon Musk Is Leaving The Trump Administration After Criticizing 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Republicans Big Mad At Elon Musk For Telling The Truth About 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Elon Musk Unloads On Republicans' 'Disgusting Abomination' Big Beautiful Bill
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
9 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
California Lawmaker Leads Voter ID Ballot Initiative Signature Campaign
A California lawmaker is leading an attempt to place an initiative on the 2026 ballot to require voter ID as a statewide constitutional amendment. Republican Assemblyman Carl DeMaio of San Diego is seeking volunteers to help gather signatures and raise funds to let voters decide on two issues: whether citizenship should be verified at the time of voter registration and whether IDs should be required when casting a ballot. The
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The sequel to Trump's so-called travel ban is not an improvement on the original
Ahead of the Republican presidential nominating contests in Iowa and New Hampshire in 2016, Donald Trump was looking to solidify his position as the likely GOP nominee. To that end, the future president came up with a stunning proposal: As 2015 neared its end, Trump declared his support for 'a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States' until such time that he was satisfied that U.S. officials understood 'what the hell is going on.' As regular readers know, it was a bigoted applause line — which his base eagerly embraced. It also turned into a campaign promise the Republican was eager to keep. On only his seventh day in the White House, Trump signed a policy that became known as the 'travel ban,' sparking outrage, bureaucratic chaos, family hardships and a series of messy legal fights. On the first day of Joe Biden's term, the then-Democratic president undid his predecessor's policy, signing a proclamation titled 'Ending Discriminatory Bans on Entry to The United States.' More than four years later, Trump is not only restoring his old policy, he's also adding to it. NBC News reported: In a return of one of the most controversial policies of his first term, President Donald Trump signed a proclamation Wednesday banning nationals from a dozen countries. ... Nationals of 12 countries will be barred from entering the United States: Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It's difficult to summarize all of the granular details of the White House's latest move in a blog post — Team Trump published relatively detailed overviews online overnight, and NBC News' report is thorough — but in addition to the aforementioned 12 countries, seven other countries (Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela) will face partial travel restrictions. There will apparently be some exceptions for athletes competing in international events, as well as those who've qualified for Afghan special immigrant visas. The administration's policy is scheduled to take effect shortly after midnight on Monday, but whether the White House will change, overhaul or worsen the strategy between now and then remains to be seen. As the world begins assessing the practical, geopolitical and moral implications of Trump's new — but not improved — policy, let no one say this is surprising. On the campaign trail ahead of the 2024 election, the Republican boasted about blocking Muslims from entering the country during his first term, telling voters, 'We didn't want people coming into our country who really love the idea of blowing our country up.' Months later, Trump assured the electorate that he intended to restore and expand his original policy. (He vowed this would happen on the first day of his second term, though he missed his own deadline by 135 days.) But the fact that the incumbent president is following through on a misguided promise does not make a bad idea good. Indeed, Democratic Sen. Chris Coons described the White House's gambit as 'new Muslim ban' in a written statement. 'President Trump's own statement makes it clear exactly what this new executive order is: the latest attempt to institute his unpopular and immoral Muslim ban which was thrown out time and again by the courts in his first term,' the Delaware senator said. 'Improving our national security should be a bipartisan goal, but fear and bigotry do not keep Americans safe. What this will do instead is cause chaos, inflict pain, and break apart families, just as his prior attempts did. This order should be reversed, and Congress needs to reassert our role by passing laws that make our immigration system secure, effective and humane.' To be sure, some of the countries affected by the president's directive have Muslim populations, but some do not. That said, the White House's official 'fact sheet' on the policy specifically included this quote from Trump: 'We will restore the travel ban, some people call it the Trump travel ban, and keep the radical Islamic terrorists out of our country that was upheld by the Supreme Court.' There were already some indications that some Muslim-American voters were feeling buyers' remorse after having backed Trump last fall. The Republican's latest move probably won't help on this front. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
All eyes on Germany's Merz ahead of White House meeting with Trump
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is scheduled to meet US President Donald Trump at the White House on Thursday in his first visit to the US capital since becoming chancellor a month ago - in what is likely to be the toughest test of his young tenure yet. Trump is scheduled to receive the German leader at 11:30 am (1530 GMT), followed by a bilateral meeting in the Oval Office and a working lunch. Previous visits to the Oval Office by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa were marked by controversies, and the way Merz handles the situation is likely to set the tone for future German-US relations. The meeting is expected to focus on efforts to end the war in Ukraine, NATO's response to growing external threats, and the trade dispute between the United States and the European Union. Merz has already made it clear that he is not travelling to the US capital begging for support but as a confident representative of European positions. The chancellor has only briefly met Trump once before, many years ago in New York. However, since taking office four weeks ago, he has spoken with Trump several times about Russia's war against Ukraine - both individually and in larger groups with other European leaders. The two now address each other by first names and are in regular contact via text messages. Merz spent the night at Blair House - the president's guest house - after arriving in Washington. He is due to spend only about 17 hours in the US capital and also plans to visit the Capitol, the seat of the two chambers of Congress. In keeping with tradition, Merz left a book at Blair House - a collection of letters from German immigrants published by Walter Kamphoefner in 1988 titled "News from the Land of Freedom. German Immigrants write home." At the encounter in the Oval Office, which is open to the press, Trump's closest advisors are likely to be present as well. However, Vice President JD Vance is expected to be absent after playing a leading role in the dressing-down of Zelensky in front of rolling cameras in February Vance, as well as US Foreign Secretary Marco Rubio - whose participation has been confirmed - have attacked Germany and other European allies over what they say are restrictions on free speech and the marginalization of far-right parties including the Alternative for Germany (AfD). Merz, whose conservatives came out first in February's elections ahead of the AfD, has repeatedly made it clear that he rejects the US meddling in Germany's domestic politics. In June, Merz and Trump are scheduled to meet twice more: at the Group of Seven (G7) summit in Canada in mid-June and at the NATO summit later that month in The Hague.
