Is Ramaphosa in trouble? US Secretary of Marco Rubio calls out SA
Rubio claimed South Africa is undermining American security interests.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said President Donald Trump would not join a meeting of G20 leaders in South Africa in November, stressing that Pretoria has been 'consistently unaligned' with US policy.
Rubio's comments came a day before President Cyril Ramaphosa meets with Trump at the White House on Wednesday.
Agenda
Ramaphosa arrived in Washington on Monday afternoon with his delegation for a working visit to the US amid tensions between the two countries.
The highly anticipated meeting between Ramaphosa and Trump has been confirmed for 5:30 pm (Central African Time) on Wednesday at the White House.
While the Presidency did not share an agenda for the talks, Ramaphosa and Trump are expected to discuss several issues, including members of the US administration snubbing the G20 meetings, aid cuts, the ongoing wars in Ukraine and Gaza, South Africa's International Court of Justice (ICJ) case against Israel and 'strengthening ties with Iran, which supports terrorism globally'.
WATCH Marco Rubio speaking about South Africa
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said President Donald Trump would not join a meeting of G20 leaders in South Africa in November, stressing that Pretoria has been 'consistently unaligned' with US policy. Vid: @SenTedCruz #DonaldTrump #CyrilRamaphosa #MarcoRubio @TheCitizen_News pic.twitter.com/Hx2INSTC6C
May 21, 2025
ALSO READ: WATCH: 'Fear not' Ramaphosa says, as Johann Rupert and Ernie Els expected to join Trump meeting
American interests
Speaking at a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Rubio claimed South Africa is undermining American security interests.
'We chose not to participate in this year's G20 hosted by South Africa either at the foreign minister level or the president's level, and it had a lot to do with some of these issues, in addition to some of the issues they brought on their agenda, which we don't think reflect the priorities of this administration,' Rubio said.
'So the president of South Africa is here today because he says he endeavours to reset relations between our countries and President Trump. If someone says that it is always going to be open to resetting relations, but it will have to touch on some of the issues just pointed out now.
'Obviously, the position they've adopted towards Israel is not just off balance, but completely geared towards one side, and it makes one wonder about these allegations that are out there now of foreign influence, including with Iran. They are clearly on the global stage, and multiple multinational organisations have consistently been a vote against America's interests time and again,' Rubio said.
'Zelensky-style ambush'
There is speculation about how the meeting will go, with fears Ramaphosa is walking into a 'Zelensky-style ambush', referring to the viral clash that took place when Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky visited the White House in February.
Ramaphosa told journalists in Washington that he was hoping for 'really good' discussions with Trump and his administration.
'I'm looking forward to a really good and positive meeting, and we're looking forward to a very good outcome for our country, for our people, for the jobs in our country and good trade relations and [normalising] relations between our two countries.'
Foreign policy
Ramaphosa said he will also clarify South Africa's policy positions on a range of pressing geopolitical matters.
'We are going to have an opportunity to discuss geopolitical issues, not only Israel, but also Ukraine. So all these matters will be on the table for proper discussion, and we are very rational when it comes to discussing global and geopolitical matters.
'We will put South Africa's interests first, and our own foreign policy positions will be well clarified. So fear not,' Ramaphosa said.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa vs Trump: Here's what you need to know
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
‘Apartheid Did Not Die' by Mandla J Radebe
ABOUT THE BOOK More than three decades after the fall of apartheid, the spectre of its legacy continues to cast a long, divisive shadow over SA's democracy. Apartheid Did Not Die is a powerful indictment of the persistent structures of racial power and economic inequality that continue to shape the nation. Prof Mandla J Radebe confronts the unsettling truth that for many, the democratic era has not dismantled the architecture of apartheid, it has merely repainted it. He interrogates the role of the media in shaping public consciousness and maintaining elite hegemony. Through explorations of the endurance of racial capitalism, and sharp media and political analysis, Apartheid Did Not Die challenges us to reckon with the unfinished business of justice and true liberation. EXTRACT A Cathartic Moment Since the government's bold announcement that it would approach the ICJ under the Genocide Convention to address 'acts committed by Israel' in the ongoing Gaza siege, this principled move was met with widespread applause, especially within progressive circles. As survivors of apartheid, South Africans hold a unique perspective that enables us to recognise when similar systems of oppression and injustice are unfolding. Our lived experience instils a commitment to international solidarity, precisely because it was acts of generosity from people we did not even know who played a crucial role in contributing to our freedom. Therefore, this continues to drive us to stand against any form of injustice to ensure that others do not endure similar traumatic experiences. The government's case was rooted in deep concerns over the 'plight of civilians caught in the present Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip', highlighting the indiscriminate use of force and the forcible displacement of inhabitants. The government argued that these actions constituted international crimes, including crimes against humanity and war crimes. Moreover, the government presented evidence suggesting that acts meeting the threshold of genocide or related crimes, as defined under the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, were occurring in Gaza. Granted, South Africa is a country of people with diverse perspectives, including those who support Israel. In fact, most organisations representing sections of the white settler community not only opposed the decision but were appalled by it. The South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD) criticised the government's decision to take Israel to the ICJ, accusing it of failing 'to play a role in engaging with both sides' of the conflict. The SAJBD said it 'mourns the loss of innocent life on both sides of the current Israel–Hamas conflict'. The use of the words 'war' and 'conflict' in reference to Gaza obscure a number of historical facts, beyond the reality that this is a one-sided annihilation of the Palestinians by Israel. The number of dead Palestinians, predominantly women and children, speaks volumes. Nonetheless, the SAJBD holds the view that the government is biased in its approach, stating, 'We urged our government to play a role in talking to both sides, and in using their influence to ensure Hamas releases the hostages, following their deadly raid on Israel on 7 October'. Similarly, the official opposition, the DA, criticised the government's decision, contending that South Africa was 'taking sides' and had 'undermined its ability to serve as a neutral mediator'. Its spokesperson, Emma Powell, accused the ANC government of inconsistency, stating, 'It is, however, a great pity that the South African government has consistently ignored gross human rights violations on our own doorsteps, including in Sudan and Zimbabwe'. This retort, often echoed by those who covertly support the atrocities in Gaza, accuses SA of selectively addressing conflicts far removed and affecting non-Africans, while allegedly ignoring crises on the continent. Some 'black' organisations, such as the African Christian Democratic Party (ACDP), invoke biblical justifications for their support of Israel. ACDP leader Kenneth Meshoe argued that, instead of taking Israel to the UN's top court for genocide crimes, SA could have mediated to convince Hamas to release the hostages captured during the October 7 raid in Israel. Meshoe also questioned the validity of the government's case, claiming, 'We also do not believe that the South African government will be able to prove that Israel has the necessary genocidal intent against the Palestinian people as required by the genocide convention'. The opposition by the ACDP and other obscure black organisations to the government's decision to take Israel to the ICJ reflects a painful reality that, in every society and struggle, there are collaborators, those whose minds have been so deeply infiltrated by the enemy's propaganda that they often adopt positions more radical than the oppressor's. This phenomenon speaks to the psychological scars of colonialism, as Fanon articulated. South African poet Mzwakhe Mbuli captures this sentiment poignantly in one of his stanzas: 'ukulimala kwengqondo, ukulimala komuntu' (a psychological wound can be as devastating as physical harm). Of course, the likes of Meshoe were proven wrong by the court, which found Israel responsible for, inter alia, racial segregation and apartheid against the Palestinians. The ruling detailed a long list of abuses and violations of international law that Israeli authorities had committed. It declared Israel's occupation illegal and established clear standards for Israel to provide reparations to the Palestinian people. Indeed, the ICJ rulings align with extensive evidence of grave crimes committed by Israeli authorities, as presented by the UN and numerous experts. In a landmark case brought by SA, the ICJ issued three binding rulings mandating urgent measures that Israeli authorities must implement to prevent the risk of genocide in their military operations in Gaza. Let us now return to why I regard this as a cathartic moment for many ordinary South Africans such as myself. For those of us who experienced apartheid first-hand and continue to live with its physical and emotional scars and its permanent legacies, this case symbolises a reckoning with injustice on a global stage. It is a moment of collective validation for the oppressed, and an opportunity to demand accountability in the face of systemic violence. For many, it rekindles the hope that their own struggles and sacrifices have not been forgotten, and that the fight against oppression, wherever it exists, remains a universal imperative. The ICJ proceedings provided a platform for marginalised voices to articulate the profound impact of apartheid oppression, with the Gaza genocide serving as the focal point. The Israeli government and the apartheid regime were and are, two brutal forces, alike in indignity. Much like the TRC, which served as a vital space to confront the architects of apartheid, such as the ruthless operatives of the Vlakplaas unit, the ICJ hearings resonated deeply with those who suffered under apartheid. For those who once endured such horrors in silence, the ICJ proceedings were not solely about justice for Palestinians, but they also symbolised an opportunity for personal and collective healing, connecting past and present struggles against systemic oppression. The TRC, which was established to uncover the truth, and allow victims to recount their harrowing experiences, and confront those responsible for grave injustices. It served as a symbolic arena where the silenced could reclaim their narratives, shedding light on the depths of their suffering. The scars of apartheid, deeply etched in the national psyche, found recognition through the TRC's crucial role in fostering healing and reconciliation. The testimonies shared during the process transcended personal anguish, and in the process, they became testaments to resilience and the indomitable spirit of those who were oppressed. These stories brought to light both the pain of the past and the courage of individuals committed to justice and equality. The proceedings at the ICJ rekindled these memories, providing a rare and invaluable platform for the Palestinian voice to be heard on an international stage. The Palestinians' experiences of oppression and suffering were unveiled, laying bare, for the world to witness, the harsh realities they face every minute. t brought to bear the universal yearning for dignity and equality and how the Palestinians are resisting the shackles of oppression. Indeed, it is imperative to acknowledge that healing is an ongoing journey. While the TRC, for instance, marked a significant step towards reconciliation, it also revealed the complexities of forgiveness in the immediate aftermath of deep-seated trauma. Critical conversations about justice were ignited, just like the accountability and the collective responsibility to build a more equitable and inclusive future. While celebrating SA's principled stance, we must honour the strength and courage of those who spoke out, even as we confront the ongoing challenges in the pursuit of genuine justice. The ICJ case serves as a reminder that the journey towards truth and reconciliation demands commitment and vigilance; this is the basis upon which a nation liberated from the shadows of its painful past may be constructed. This cannot happen in isolation but requires dedication to international solidarity premised on a genuine commitment to global peace and justice. This is the only way to guarantee that such atrocities do not recur. However, if we fail to counter imperialism, the driving force behind racial capitalism and other injustices, our efforts are unlikely to succeed. It is this very commitment that underpins SA's unwavering support for the Palestinian struggle.
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
US arrests nihilist over fertility clinic bombing
An American man who believes human life should not exist has been arrested in connection with the bombing of a fertility clinic in California that killed the attacker, Image: Pexels An American man who believes human life should not exist has been arrested in connection with the bombing of a fertility clinic in California that killed the attacker, the FBI said Wednesday. Daniel Park, 32, was taken into custody at a New York area airport, where he arrived from Poland, on charges that he shipped explosives to the man who blew himself up in Palm Springs last month. The explosion ripped a hole in the clinic and blew out the windows and doors of nearby buildings. Bomber Guy Edward Bartkus, 25, of the town of Twentynine Palms in California, died in the blast, which also wounded four people. None of the embryos stored at the clinic were affected. US Attorney Bill Essayli said investigators probing the bombing had discovered Bartkus had "pro-mortalist, anti-natalist and anti-pro-life extremist ideology." Bartkus believed "that individuals should not be born without their consent and that non-existence is best," the US Justice Department said in a statement. Essayli said Park shared those beliefs, and is accused of "shipping approximately 180 pounds of ammonium nitrate, an explosive precursor commonly used to construct homemade bombs, to Bartkus." He said Park, who lives in Seattle, Washington, and Bartkus were together in Twentynine Palms in January and February, where they ran experiments. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Days after the attack, Park -- a US citizen -- fled to Poland, where he was ultimately detained by Polish law enforcement at the request of the FBI. Park was expected to appear in court in New York on Wednesday for a hearing to determine if he can be extradited to California. Akil Davis of the FBI said law enforcement was aware of a small nihilist movement in the United States, and had been tracking it for several years, although these two men were not on their radar. "They don't believe that people should exist," he told reporters. "There's tons of terminology out there, anti-natalism, pro-mortalism, nihilism. These all are intertwined to create their belief system." US Attorney General Pam Bondi said the bomb attack had been a "cruel, disgusting crime that strikes at the very heart of our shared humanity." "We are grateful to our partners in Poland who helped get this man back to America and we will prosecute him to the fullest extent of the law," she wrote on social media. AFP
eNCA
6 hours ago
- eNCA
Zelensky says Russian ceasefire memorandum is an 'ultimatum'
President Volodymyr Zelensky said Wednesday Russia had handed Ukraine a series of old ultimatums at peace talks in Istanbul this week, calling instead for a meeting with Vladimir Putin to break the impasse. More than three years into Russia's grinding invasion, which has cost tens of thousands of lives, the two sides have opened direct talks searching for a way to end what has become Europe's largest conflict since World War II. The fighting has pitted Kyiv and its Western allies against the Kremlin, whose demands have made clear it is seeking little short of capitulation from Ukraine. At a second round of negotiations on Monday, the two sides swapped documents with their terms for a ceasefire and agreed a large-scale prisoner exchange, which could go forward this weekend. But Zelensky blasted Russia's demands and cast doubt on whether the talks in their current format would achieve anything. "It is, after all, an ultimatum from the Russian side to us," Zelensky told reporters of the Russian demands. Moscow's demands included Ukraine fully pulling out of four regions -- Donetsk, Lugansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia -- that Russia claims to have annexed but does not have full control over. The Ukrainian leader said it was "pointless" to hold further talks with Russian delegates at their current rank -- who he previously dismissed as "empty heads" -- since they could not agree a ceasefire. He instead renewed his call for a sit-down with Russian counterpart Putin and US President Donald Trump. - 'Any day' - "We are ready for such a meeting any day," Zelensky said, adding he was proposing a ceasefire be put in place before any such summit, which would also include Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. The White House said earlier this week that Trump was "open" to meeting after the two sides failed to make headway towards a ceasefire. But speaking in Moscow shortly after Zelensky, Putin immediately dismissed the idea of direct talks and rejected the call for an unconditional ceasefire. "Why reward them by giving them a break from the combat, which will be used to pump the regime with Western arms, to continue their forced mobilisation and to prepare different terrorist acts," Putin said at a televised meeting. "Who negotiates with those who place their bets on terror?" he added. The only concrete agreement to come out of the talks has been a series of large-scale prisoner exchanges. AFP | Tetiana DZHAFAROVA Zelensky said the sides were planning to exchange 500 POWs this weekend. In Moscow, lead Russian negotiator Vladimir Medinsky confirmed in comments to Putin that the exchange would take place on Saturday, Sunday or Monday. Russia's invasion has left swathes of eastern and southern Ukraine destroyed, with millions forced to flee their homes in Europe's largest refugee crisis since World War II. Despite both Zelensky and Putin appearing to question whether progress was possible, Russia's foreign minister praised the Istanbul talks. "I think it is important and useful," Sergei Lavrov told Putin. "Both rounds, as we know, have yielded concrete results," he said, referring to the POW swaps. - Kyiv urges more sanctions - Ukrainian troops have been suffering months of setbacks on the battlefield as Russian forces steadily advance across key sectors of the sprawling front line. Russia's army said it had captured another village in Ukraine's Sumy border region, the latest in a string of gains as it seeks to establish what it calls a "buffer zone" inside Ukrainian territory. Zelensky urged Kyiv's military backers to ramp up support in a bid to pressure Russia towards peace. "We must not allow Russia to blur reality or mislead the world. Moscow must be forced into diplomacy," Zelensky said in a video message at a NATO meeting. The call comes as the United States has stepped back from its support under Trump, pushing instead for a quick end to the fighting and starting a rapprochement with Putin. Kyiv has however sought to gain assurances of continued support from the White House. On Wednesday, senior Zelensky aide Andriy Yermak met US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington. "We discussed the situation on the front line and the need to strengthen support for Ukraine in the field of air defence," Yermak said, adding he had urged more US sanctions on Russia.
