
Gov. Braun signs partisan school boards into law
Gov. Mike Braun signed the partisan school board bill, which passed out of the Senate for the final time by one vote, into law Tuesday.
Senate bill 287, which will require school board candidates to declare a political party when running in a general election, passed 26-24 on April 24, which was the final day of session.
Bill author Sen. Gary Byrne, R-Byrneville, said in a statement Wednesday that he authored the bill because 'voters should know where candidates for office stand on the issues' of stewarding taxpayer dollars and setting educational policies.
'While the initial version of the bill included a provision for a primary process to ensure that vote-splitting did not lead to voters being effectively disenfranchised in a general election, I was thankful to see the governor sign the bill into law because it is an important step forward in increasing transparency for voters while ensuring running for local office remains accessible for Hoosiers,' Byrne said in the statement.
During the Senate's final discussion of the bill, Byrne said school boards should be partisan because school board races see lower voter turnout because voters don't know the political party of the candidates. Further, school boards are already partisan, Byrne said.
'Like it or not, this is something that voters want to know about the candidate,' Byrne said. 'Some people who are against this bill say school boards shouldn't be partisan. I don't think this bill makes them partisan, I think that they already are partisan.'
Senate Bill 287 was amended in the House Elections and Apportionment committee to reflect House Bill 1230, authored by Rep. J.D. Prescott, R-Union City, which removed the primary election requirement and states that in the general election a school board candidate can choose to be listed as a Republican, Democrat, independent or nonpartisan.
When the bill was heard by the House, it was amended further to state that if a candidate chooses to be nonpartisan, then a blank space will appear on the ballot where party affiliation would be listed.
If the board member who leaves the board was a Republican or Democrat, then a caucus should be held to replace that member, but independent or nonpartisan candidates can be replaced by the sitting school board members, according to the bill.
Under the bill, board members would see a pay increase from $2,000 to 10% of the lowest starting salary of a teacher working in the district.
Initially, the Senate filed a motion to dissent from the House amendments to the bill, but the dissent was rescinded two days before the end of session and a concurrence was filed. That allowed the bill, as amended by the House, to advance for final consideration by the Senate.
A concern with the bill, Byrne said, has been that it would trigger the Hatch Act, a federal law that prevents federal employees from running in a partisan election. But, Byrne said the Hatch Act already impacts school board candidates because once a candidate includes political language on campaign literature or is endorsed by a political party then the race becomes partisan.
Further, Byrne said the House amendment allows for nonpartisan candidates to be placed on the ballot. Byrne suggested that it could help federal employees running in a school board race.
According to the Hatch Act, even if a federal employee ran as a nonpartisan candidate, if other candidates declare a party then the race becomes partisan and the federal employee couldn't run.
Mark Sperling, Indiana University Northwest interim dean of the School of Education, said he was 'very disappointed' that the partisan school board bill has become law.
'I don't think school boards should be partisan. School boards represent an entire community not sections of a community,' Sperling said.
Sperling, who previously worked in the K-12 education systems in Indiana and Michigan, said education shouldn't be political, and it's 'unfortunate' that school boards will now become political.
Under the new law, Sperling said it's likely that qualified candidates won't run for school board because they won't want to enter a political race. It's his hope, Sperling said, that the majority of school board candidates run as independents to keep politics out of the school board.
'To have a political party attached to you, I think adds pressure, adds a different level of responsibility than it would if you were a nonpartisan school board member whose only concern is the welfare of the children in the school corporation,' Sperling said.
Rep. Vernon Smith, D-Gary, who has spent decades as an educator, said making school board races partisan will be 'detrimental to the public school system.'
The goal of the law is for public schools to become more like the Republican party, which includes banning books and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives as well as micromanaging educators, Smith said.
'They are trying to get their beliefs imposed on public schools,' Smith said. 'The focus ought to be on excellence in education.'
GlenEva Dunham, president of the Gary Teachers Union, Local 4 and president of American Federation of Teachers Indiana, said school boards should be focused on the students, not politics.
'Even though they declare what party they are for, we hope that they continue to listen to the community, to listen to the parents whose children are in those districts and do what is best for the children,' Dunham said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
15 minutes ago
- Newsweek
GOP Senator Accuses Trump Of 'Petty Vindictiveness' After White House Snub
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky excoriated the White House and President Donald Trump on Wednesday after saying he and his family had been disinvited from the annual White House picnic. Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment via email on Wednesday. The Context Paul suggested he was snubbed from the picnic because of his staunch opposition to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the Trump-backed reconciliation package that's under debate in the Senate. The proposal delivers on Trump's top priorities, including more funding for immigration and border security and cementing the tax cuts that were implemented as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. Paul is among a handful of congressional Republicans who have vehemently opposed the fiscal plan, with the Kentucky senator saying he will only consider supporting it if it does not raise the federal debt ceiling. What To Know The Kentucky Republican told reporters on Wednesday that his invitation to the White House picnic was rescinded, accusing the Trump administration of engaging in "petty vindictiveness" due to his opposition to Trump's "big, beautiful bill." "And so how do they choose to respond? They are afraid of what I'm saying so they think they're going to punish me, I can't go to the picnic, as if somehow that's going to make me more conciliatory," Paul told reporters. "So it's silly in a way, but it's also just really sad that this is what it's come to. But petty vindictiveness like this, I don't know, it makes you wonder about the quality of people you're dealing with." Paul said that his son, daughter-in-law and grandson were planning to attend the picnic with him. The GOP senator added that he believes every other lawmaker in Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, will be in attendance. Rand Paul: I've just been told that I've been uninvited from the White House picnic. Every Democrat and Republican will be invited. I just find this incredibly petty. It really makes me lose a lot of the respect I had for Donald Trump. — Acyn (@Acyn) June 11, 2025 Paul said that he wasn't sure if the decision to cancel his invitation came from the president himself or another White House staffer. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.


CNBC
31 minutes ago
- CNBC
Elon Musk's favorability among Republicans dropped 16 points since March, Quinnipiac says
Elon Musk's official role in the Trump administration recently came to an end. Many Republicans won't be sad to see less of him, according to the results of Quinnipiac University's latest public opinion survey. While a majority of Republicans still hold a favorable view of Musk, the number fell to 62% in the poll out Wednesday, down from 78% in March, Quinnipiac said. Overall, the Quinnipiac poll found that 30% of self-identified voters surveyed in the U.S. hold a favorable opinion of Musk, according to polling from June 5 to June 9. Republican and Democratic voters remain deeply divided in their views of the world's richest man, who contributed nearly $300 million to propel President Donald Trump back to the White House. Only 3% of Democrats surveyed said they held a favorable of view of the Tesla CEO, who was once seen as an environmental leader appealing to liberal values. Musk didn't respond to a request for comment. Musk and Trump had a very public falling out last week that started with Musk's disapproval of the president's spending bill and escalated into an all-out war of words that played out on social media. Musk said on Wednesday that he regretted some of the posts he made about Trump last week, adding that "they went too far." Even with a slide in his favorability, Musk is still popular among Republicans after his time running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an effort to dramatically slash the size of the federal government. Among the Republican respondents to the early June poll, 80% rated Musk and DOGE's work as either excellent or good, while 13% said it was either not so good or poor. In the March poll, 82% of Republicans surveyed said they thought Musk and DOGE were helping the country. Read the full survey results here.

Washington Post
35 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Rand Paul says White House excluded his family from picnic as punishment
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) said the Trump administration has excluded him and his family from a picnic at the White House in what he believes to be an act of retribution, politicizing an annual celebration of bipartisanship over Paul's refusal to support the president's signature legislation. 'We just tried to get our tickets today, and they said, 'You were not invited,' ' Paul told reporters outside the Capitol on Wednesday. While he said he did now know exactly who left him out, he added, 'I think that it's somebody acting in a very petty way.'